In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.

Methods: 22 specimens prepared with Cention and RMGIC were embedded in primary teeth mounted in acrylic for analysing shear bond strength. Shear bond strength was analysed using a universal testing machine. The modes of failure in samples were observed under a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. 22 customised samples of Cention N and RMGIC were prepared and categorised as group A and group B, respectively. The flexural and compressive strengths of these samples were evaluated using a universal testing machine. Results: The shear bond strength of RMGIC was higher than that of Cention N, whereas the compressive and flexural strengths of Cention N were significantly higher than those of RMGIC. The modes of failure were predominantly adhesive followed by mixed failures. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that Cention N demonstrated superior mechanical properties compared with RMGIC and can therefore be recommended for restorations in primary posterior teeth. Cention N being a smart, esthetic, self-cured, or dual-cured material with better mechanical properties offers a wide range of applicability in primary teeth.

Biocompatibility of polymethyl methacrylate heat-polymerizing denture base resin copolymerized with antimicrobial monomers.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Quaternary ammonium (QA)-based monomers such as dimethyl-hexadecyl-methacryloxyethyl-ammonium iodide (DHMAI) and 2-dimethyl-2-dodecyl-1-methacryloxyethyl ammonium iodine (DDMAI) have been investigated as copolymerizable monomers to impart antimicrobial activity to dental restorative and prosthetic materials. However, the biocompatibility of these antimicrobial monomers needs to be investigated in vivo before their clinical use. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the in vivo biocompatibility of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) heat-polymerizing denture base resin copolymerized with varying concentrations of DHMAI and DDMAI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The toxicity and genotoxicity of the antimicrobial monomers (DHMAI 5 µg/mL and DDMAI 20 µg/mL) at 1 to 100 µg/mL concentrations were investigated against zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio, n=10) using a zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) or fish embryotoxicity test (FET) and comet assay, respectively. Further, DHMAI 5 µg/mL and DDMAI 20 µg/mL were incorporated into a conventional PMMA denture base system and a similar test was done on specimens of modified PMMA resin. For the evaluation of in vivo biocompatibility, modified PMMA specimens were subcutaneously implanted into Wistar rats (n=6) and biochemical, hematological, and histopathological parameters were investigated. Results were analyzed and compared using ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05). RESULTS: Toxicity and genotoxicity studies using zebrafish embryos revealed that the incorporation of monomer to PMMA did not increase the toxicity, as confirmed by post-hour fertilization. Modified PMMA did not affect the hematological parameters, such as red blood cell (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) except for the platelet count, which was significantly increased (P<.001), and the biochemical parameter, such as total protein (TP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), triglyceride (TG), creatinine (Crea), total cholesterol, and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), except for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, which was significantly decreased (P<.01). Histopathologically, no changes were observed in the sections of the liver, kidney, spleen, and subcutaneous tissues in the modified PMMA implanted rats. Additionally, no significant variation was found in the expression of immunohistochemical marker tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), confirming the noninflammatory response exerted by the modified PMMA on experimental rats. CONCLUSIONS: Zebrafish embryos treated with modified PMMA specimens demonstrated favorable biological properties and did not exhibit significant cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Subcutaneously implanted modified PMMA did not cause any major hematological, biochemical, and histopathological alterations in Wistar albino rats, thus confirming the biocompatibility of PMMA heat-polymerizing denture base resin incorporated with DHMAI and DDMAI for dental applications.

Effect of Bonding Agents on the Shear Bond Strength of Tooth-colored Restorative Materials to Dentin: An In Vitro Study.

AIM: The aim of the study is to determine the difference in the shear bond strengths to dentin among dental composite (Filtek Z350®, 3M), compomer (Dyract Flow®, Dentsply) and Giomer (Beautifil®, Shofu) with 3MTM Single BondTM Universal Adhesive (SBU) (7th generation, self-etch, single solution adhesive) and AdperTM Single Bond 2 Adhesive (ASB) (5th generation, total-etch, two solution adhesive). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human permanent teeth were collected, cleansed of debris, and placed in distilled water. The samples were segregated into two groups depicting the two bonding agents-AdperTM (ASB) and 3MTM Single Bond Universal (SBU) and sub-grouped into three groups depicting the three restorative materials (Composite, Giomer, and Compomer) used. Groups were respresented as follows: Group I-ASB + Composite; Group II-ASB + Giomer; Group III-ASB + Compomer; Group IV-SBU + Giomer; Group V-SBU + Compomer; Group VI-SBU + Composite. After applying the bonding agent as per the manufacturer's instructions, following which the restorative material was placed. A Universal Testing Machine (Instron 3366, UK) was employed to estimate the shear bond strength of the individual restorative material and shear bond strengths were calculated. RESULTS: Composite bonded with SBU (group VI) displayed the greatest shear strength (11.16 ± 4.22 MPa). Moreover, Giomers and flowable compomers displayed better bond strengths with ASB compared with their SBU-bonded counterparts. CONCLUSION: These results mark the importance of careful material selection in clinical practice and the bonding agent used to achieve optimal bond strength and enhance the clinical longevity and durability of dental restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: From a clinical perspective, to avoid a compressive or a shear failure, it would be preferrable to use a direct composite restorative material with SBU (Single bond universal adhesive, 7th generation) to achieve maximum bond strength. How to cite this article: Kuchibhotla N, Sathyamoorthy H, Balakrishnan S, et al. Effect of Bonding Agents on the Shear Bond Strength of Tooth-colored Restorative Materials to Dentin: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(3):245-249.

Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength between aged and new alkasite based restorative material.

Background: This study investigates various surface treatment methods to assess shear bond strength between set Cention N (alkasite-based restorative material) and new alkasite based restorative material. Assessing different surface treatments provide insights in optimizing repair procedure that enables durability of the restoration, thus potentially benefitting clinical outcomes. Methods: A total of 48 alkasite based restorative material blocks, measuring 4 mm in depth and 4 mm in diameter, were prepared. The samples were randomly divided into 8 groups (n = 6) according to the surface treatment done. Group I: Surface preparation by bur; Group II: Surface treatment by laser; Group III: Application of 2-step etch and rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive),Group IV: Application of single step self-etch adhesive (Scotchbond Universal adhesive); Group V: Bur preparation followed by application of 2-step etch and rinse adhesive; Group VI: Bur preparation followed by application of single step self-etch adhesive; Group VII: Laser preparation followed by application of 2-step etch and rinse adhesive; and Group VIII: Laser preparation followed by application of single step self-etch adhesive. Post-surface preparation, all the specimens were restored with newly mixed alkasite material. Repair bond strength measurements were assessed with universal testing machine. Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's tests were used to check normality and Homogeneity of variance. ANOVA with post-hoc Games-Howell test and two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test was performed to evaluate the influence of surface preparation on the repair bond strength. Results: Using a 2-step etch and rinse adhesive resulted in a higher repair bond strength (26.05±2.12) compared to other surface treatments. In contrast, roughening of the surface with burs led to lowest repair bond strength (17.06±3.29) (P=0.02). Conclusion: Application of 2-step etch and rinse adhesive to the existing alkasite based restorative material provides superior bonding with the newly added alkasite based restorative material.

Effect of Chelating Agents on Push-Out Bond Strength of NeoMTA Plus to Root Canal Dentin

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate and compare the effect of 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA), 9% Etidronic acid (HEDP), and 7% Maleic acid (MA) on the push-out bond strength of NeoMTA Plus sealer to the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canal dentin. Material and Methods Forty single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were selected and decoronated to 12 mm long root fragments. Working length was established and root canals were then enlarged up to rotary Protaper F3. After each instrumentation, the root canal was irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl. For the final irrigation regimen, the specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=10) and treated with EDTA, HEDP, MA or Saline. Root canals were coated with NeoMTA Plus sealer, and obturation was done with single cone obturation technique. Subsequently, three horizontal sections were taken from the coronal, middle and apical thirds of each specimen, and POBS was measured using a universal testing machine. The type of bond failures was assessed under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was done with One-way ANOVA with Tukey's Post hoc analysis. Results MA and EDTA showed the highest POBS. There was no significant difference in bond strength between MA and EDTA (p>0.05). HEDP and Saline showed lower POBS. Among all the four groups, the coronal third showed the highest values, followed by middle and apical thirds. Conclusion The type of chelating agent used during the root canal treatment significantly affects the bond strength of NeoMTA Plus to the root canal dentin.

Effect of Thermocycling on the Colour Stability of Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in-vitro Spectrophotometric Analysis

Abstract Objective: To compare the color stability of Cention N, Fuji IX GP Extra, and Fuji IX GP after thermocycling. Material and Methods: Ten discs of each material of dimension 10 x 1 mm were prepared using a split mold. The preparations of the specimens were done according to the powder/liquid ratio as recommended by the manufacturers [4.6:1, 3.4:1 and 3.6:1 for the groups I, II, and III, respectively]. After setting, the samples were retrieved, and the thickness of each specimen was measured using a micrometer at five different locations. The specimens with variations in thickness, porosity or cracks were discarded and thus not included in the study. The selected specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours prior to testing. The prepared specimens were thermocycled at 5°C and 55°C, with a dwell time of 15 seconds for 250 or 500 cycles. Subsequently, the color parameters of the discs were measured using a spectrophotometer. The data were analyzed using two way ANOVA test, and a p-value <0.001 was considered. Results: Thermocycling resulted in changes in the color of both Glass Ionomer cement and Cention N (p<0.001). Among the materials tested, Cention N showed superior color stability. Conclusion: Cention N exhibited better color stability compared to Glass ionomer cements.

Fracture resistance of teeth obturated with two different types of mineral trioxide aggregate cements / Resistência à fratura de dentes obturados com dois tipos diferentes de cimentos agregados de trióxido minera

Objective: Endodontically obturated teeth have lower fracture resistance depending on the obturating material and technique. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the influence of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa Division) and OrthoMTA III (BioMTA, Daejeon, Korea) as an obturating material on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Material and Methods: Thirty extracted human maxillary central incisors were decoronated and instrumented using Protaper instruments (size F5). Irrigation was performed with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite between each instrument change followed by 7% maleic acid for one minute. Finally, canals were flushed with 5 ml of PBS solution for one minute. Samples were then divided into three groups. Group I- positive control (no root canal filling); Group II- obturation with ProRoot MTA; Group III- obturation with OrthoMTA III. Ten teeth were randomly selected as a negative control in which no treatment was performed. All the specimens were then subjected to fracture strength testing using universal testing machine. For evaluation of biomineralization, six maxillary central incisors were divided into two groups. Group I obturated with ProRoot MTA and group II obturated with OrthoMTA III. These samples were subjected to SEM analysis. Results: Positive control group demonstrated the least fracture resistance, while OrthoMTA III group showed the highest fracture resistance. There was no significant difference between negative control group and ProRoot MTA groups (p=0.821). OrthoMTA III group showed better tubular biomineralization when compared to ProRoot MTA. Conclusions: Root canals obturated with OrthoMTA III had better fracture resistance and increased tubular biomineralization compared to ProRoot MTA. Since root canals obturated with OrthoMTA III had better fracture resistance, it can be used as a promising obturating material.(AU)

Objetivo: Dentes obturados endodonticamente apresentam menor resistência à fratura, dependendo do material e da técnica de obturação. Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência do ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa Division) e OrthoMTA III (BioMTA, Daejeon, Coréia) como material obturador na resistência à fratura de dentes tratados endodonticamente. Material e Métodos: Trinta incisivos centrais superiores humanos extraídos foram decoronados e instrumentados com instrumentos Protaper (tamanho F5). A irrigação foi realizada com hipoclorito de sódio a 2,5% entre cada troca de instrumento, seguida por ácido maleico a 7% por um minuto. Finalmente, os canais foram lavados com 5 ml de solução de PBS por um minuto. As amostras foram então divididas em três grupos. Grupo I - controle positivo(sem preenchimento do canal radicular); Grupo II - obturação com ProRoot MTA; Grupo III -obturação com OrthoMTA III. Dez dentes foram selecionados aleatoriamente como controle negativo, no qual nenhum tratamento foi realizado. Todas as amostras foram então submetidas atestes de resistência à fratura usando uma máquina de teste universal. Para avaliação da biomineralização, seis incisivos centrais superiores foram divididos em dois grupos: grupo Iobturado com ProRoot MTA e grupo II obturado com OrthoMTA III. Essas amostras foram submetidas à análise SEM. Resultados: O grupo controle positivo demonstrou a menor resistência à fratura, enquanto o grupo OrthoMTA III apresentou a maior resistência à fratura. Não houve diferença significativa entre o grupo controle negativo e os grupos ProRoot MTA (p= 0,821). O grupo OrthoMTA III apresentou melhor biomineralização tubular quando comparado ao ProRoot MTA. Conclusões: Os canais radiculares obturados com OrthoMTA III apresentaram melhor resistência à fratura e maior biomineralização tubular em comparação como ProRoot MTA. Como os canais radiculares obturados com OrthoMTA III apresentaram melhor resistência à fratura, podendo ser utilizado como um material obturador promissor.(AU)