Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Br J Sports Med ; 46(4): 296-8, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21677317

RESUMO

Ice is commonly used after acute muscle strains but there are no clinical studies of its effectiveness. By comparison, there are a number of basic scientific studies on animals which show that applying ice after muscle injury has a consistent effect on a number of important cellular and physiological events relating to recovery. Some of these effects may be temperature dependant; most animal studies induce significant reductions in muscle temperature at the injury site. The aim of this short report was to consider the cooling magnitudes likely in human models of muscle injury and to discuss its relevance to the clinical setting. Current best evidence shows that muscle temperature reductions in humans are moderate in comparison to most animal models, limiting direct translation to the clinical setting. Further important clinical questions arise when we consider the heterogenous nature of muscle injury in terms of injury type, depth and insulating adipose thickness. Contrary to current practice, it is unlikely that a 'panacea' cooling dose or duration exists in the clinical setting. Clinicians should consider that in extreme circumstances of muscle strain (eg, deep injury with high levels of adipose thickness around the injury site), the clinical effectiveness of cooling may be significantly reduced.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/terapia , Crioterapia/métodos , Músculo Esquelético/lesões , Entorses e Distensões/terapia , Tecido Adiposo/diagnóstico por imagem , Animais , Humanos , Gelo , Modelos Animais , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagem , Entorses e Distensões/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia
2.
J Sci Med Sport ; 23(3): 252-257, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31862338

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between subjective health complaints, sleep quantity and new injury within an endurance sport population. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Ninety-five endurance sporting participants were recruited from running, triathlon, swimming, cycling and rowing disciplines. Over 52-week period participants submitted weekly data regarding subjective health complaints (SHCs) (cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal and psychological/lifestyle), sleep quantity, training load and new injury episodes. Applying a 7- and 14-day lag period, a shared frailty model was used to explore new injury risk associations with total SHCs and sleep quantity. RESULTS: 92.6% of 95 participants completed all 52 weeks of data submission and the remainder of the participants completed ≥30 weeks. Seven-day lag psychological/lifestyle SHCs were significantly associated with new injury risk (Hazard ratio (HR)=1.32; CI 95%=1.01-1.72, p<0.04). In contrast, cardiorespiratory (HR=1.15; CI 95%=0.99-1.36, p=0.07) and gastrointestinal (HR=0.77; CI 95%=0.56-1.05, p=0.09) SHCs were not significantly associated with new injury risk. New injury risk had a significant increased association with 14-day lag <7h/day sleep quantity (HR=1.51; CI 95%=2.02-1.13, p<0.01) and a significant decreased association with >7h/day sleep quantity (HR=0.63, CI 95%=0.45-0.87, p<0.01. A secondary regression analysis demonstrated no significant association with total SHCs and training load factors (Relative Risk (RR)=0.08, CI 95%=0.04-0.21, p=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: To minimise an increased risk of new injuries within an endurance sporting population, this study demonstrates that psychological/lifestyle subjective health complaints and sleep quantity should be considered. The study also highlights a lag period between low sleep quantity and its subsequent impact on new injury risk. No association was demonstrated between subjective health complaints, sleep quantity and training load factors.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/fisiopatologia , Resistência Física , Sono , Adulto , Atletas , Ciclismo , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Corrida , Natação , Esportes Aquáticos , Carga de Trabalho
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 9: 31, 2008 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18325114

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports the use of exercise for chronic low back pain (CLBP); however, adherence is often poor due to ongoing pain. Auricular acupuncture is a form of pain relief involving the stimulation of points on the outer ear corresponding with specific body parts. It may be a useful adjunct to exercise in managing CLBP; however, there is only limited evidence to support its use with this patient group. METHODS/DESIGN: This study was designed to test the feasibility of an assessor-blind randomised controlled trial which assess the effects on clinical outcomes and exercise adherence of adding manual auricular acupuncture to a personalised and supervised exercise programme (PEP) for CLBP. No sample size calculation has been carried out as this study aims to identify CLBP referral rates within the catchment area of the study site. The researchers aim to recruit four cohorts of n = 20 participants to facilitate a power analysis for a future randomised controlled trial. A computer generated random allocation sequence will be prepared centrally and used to allocate participants by cohort to one of the following interventions: 1) six weeks of PEP plus manual auricular acupuncture; 2) six weeks of PEP alone. Both groups will also complete a further six weeks of self-paced exercise with telephone follow-up support. In addition to a baseline and exit questionnaire at the beginning and end of the study, the following outcomes will be collected at baseline, and after 7, 13 and 25 weeks: pain frequency and bothersomeness, back-specific function, objective assessment and recall of physical activity, use of analgesia, perceived self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs, and beliefs about the consequences of back pain. Since this is a feasibility study, significance tests will not be presented, and treatment effects will be represented by point estimates and confidence intervals. For each outcome variable, analysis of covariance will be performed on the data, conditioning on the baseline value. DISCUSSION: The results of this study investigating the adjuvant effects of auricular acupuncture to exercise in managing CLBP will be used to inform the design of a future multi-centre randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94142364.


Assuntos
Acupuntura Auricular , Terapia por Exercício , Dor Lombar/terapia , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Terapia Combinada , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Medo , Estudos de Viabilidade , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Medição da Dor , Projetos Piloto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Projetos de Pesquisa , Tamanho da Amostra , Autoeficácia , Método Simples-Cego , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Lasers Surg Med ; 28(1): 33-9, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11430440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The current study (for which ethical approval was obtained) sought to assess the effect of low intensity monochromatic infrared therapy (LIMIRT) on experimentally induced delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy volunteers were recruited (n = 24, 12M:12F) and randomly allocated under strict double blind conditions to one of three experimental groups (n = 8, 4M:4F): Control, Placebo, or Treatment (840 nm; 3.0 J cm(-2), pulse frequency 1 kHz). DOMS was induced in a standardised manner in the biceps brachii of the nondominant arm. Subjects attended on 5 consecutive days during which the degree of pain and functional impairment was assessed. RESULTS: Analysis of results by using nonparametric Freidman and Kruskal-Wallis H tests (with relevant post hoc tests) revealed significant differences (P < 0.05) between Control and LIMIRT treatment groups for pain and tenderness scores. Despite trends in favour of the Treatment group, analysis failed to show any significant differences between the LIMIRT treatment and Placebo groups for all variables except mechanical pain threshold points 3-6 on day 2. CONCLUSION: The results of the current study suggest that LIMIRT is ineffective in the management of DOMS at the parameters investigated.


Assuntos
Raios Infravermelhos/uso terapêutico , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatologia , Doenças Musculares/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Musculares/etiologia , Doenças Musculares/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa