Increased risk of renal dysfunction with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy compared with catheter-directed thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) is regularly used in the treatment of both venous and arterial thrombosis. Although there has been no formal report, PMT has been linked to cases of reversible postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk of renal dysfunction in patients undergoing PMT vs catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treatment of an acute thrombus. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of all patients in a single institution with a Current Procedural Terminology code for PMT or CDT from January 2009 through December 2014. Each patient was grouped into one of the four following procedural categories: PMT only, PMT with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) pulse-spray, PMT with CDT, or CDT only. Preoperative and postoperative creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values were obtained for each patient. The RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease) criteria were used to categorize the extent of renal dysfunction. χ2 analysis, one-way analysis of variance, and unpaired t-test were used to assess significance. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were reviewed, of which 82 were excluded due to either existence of preoperative AKI, history of end-stage renal disease, or lack of clinical data. Of the remaining 145 patients, 53 (37%) presented with arterial thrombosis (mean age, 62 years; 43% male) and 92 (63%) presented with venous thrombosis (mean age, 48 years; 45% male). The incidence of renal dysfunction was highest in the PMT/tPA pulse group (21%), followed by the PMT group (20%) and the PMT/CDT group (14%). CDT was not associated with renal dysfunction. PMT (P = .046), and PMT/tPA pulse (P = .033) were associated with higher rates of renal dysfunction than the CDT controls. The average preoperative GFR for the 22 patients who developed AKI was 53.7 ± 9.4 mL/min/1.73 m2. The minimum postoperative GFR within 48 hours was an average of 35 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2. Stratified by the RIFLE criteria, 13 (9%) patients progressed to the risk category, 6 (4%) progressed to the injury category, and 3 (2%) progressed to the failure category. None of the patients who developed renal dysfunction from PMT progressed to dialysis within the same admission period. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PMT as a treatment for vascular thrombosis is associated with renal dysfunction. Patients treated with PMT require postoperative vigilance and renal protective measures.

Principal considerations for the contemporary high-fidelity endovascular simulator design used in training and evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The simulation and rehearsal of virtual endovascular procedures are anticipated to improve the outcomes of actual procedures. Contemporary, high-fidelity simulation is based on feedback systems that combine concepts of mechanical, electrical, computer, and control systems engineering to reproduce an interactive endovascular case. These sophisticated devices also include psychometric instruments for objective surgical skill assessment. The goal of this report is to identify the design characteristics of commercially available simulators for endovascular procedures and to provide a cross-section comparison across all devices to aid in the simulator selection process. METHODS: Data were obtained (1) by a standard questionnaire issued to four simulator companies prompting for relevant design details of each model for the expressed purpose of publication, (2) from each manufacturer's respective website including appended sales brochures and specification sheets, and (3) by an evaluation of peer-reviewed literature. Focus topics include haptic technology, vessel segmentation, physiologic feedback, performance feedback, and physical logistics (ie, weight, dimensions, and portability). All data sources were surveyed between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2013. RESULTS: All of the commercially available, high-fidelity endovascular simulators use interactive virtual environments with preprogrammed physics and physiology models for accurate reproduction of surgical reality. The principal differences between devices are the number of access sites and haptic devices, the ability to reconstruct patient-specific anatomy for preprocedural rehearsal, and the available peripheral training modalities. Hardware and software options can also vary within the same device in comparing patient-specific with generic cases. CONCLUSIONS: Despite our limited knowledge about the potential of high-fidelity simulation within the endovascular world, today's currently available simulators successfully provide high-fidelity reproductions of the endovascular environment. We have found that all of the commercially available devices incorporate the necessary features for a high-fidelity experience: (1) haptic technology, (2) vessel reconstruction, (3) physiology feedback, and (4) performance feedback. Significant variations in design do exist and may influence differences in skill development, evaluation, or cost. However, further validation of these differences is still needed and would benefit program directors interested in expanding these platforms for vascular training and certification as this technology matures.

New training paradigms and program requirements.

Specialized training in vascular surgery evolved over the second half of the 20th century and continues to do so in 2006. Apprenticeship-style training in the 1960s and 1970s gave way to formal curriculum- and case-based programs created in the 1980s to improve the quality and consistency of vascular care. Recent developments have resulted in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's approval of additional training pathways leading to certification by the American Board of Surgery. This article summarizes the history of vascular surgery training in the United States and describes the four types of currently approved programs--Standard, Early Specialization, Independent, and Integrated--for specialty training in vascular surgery. These are the only programs that can lead to American Board of Surgery certification in vascular surgery.

Presentation, diagnosis, and management of arterial mycotic pseudoaneurysms in injection drug users.

Injection drug users frequently present with abscess, cellulitis, and endocarditis. The development of arterial mycotic pseudoaneurysm (AMP) as a sequela of injection drug use, however, is much less frequently reported. We undertook a study to determine the prevalence and presenting clinical characteristics of AMP, utilizing a retrospective review of all emergency department cases seen at one city public hospital for the 5-year period 1994-1999. Initial evaluation included physical examination, CT scan, ultrasound, and/or angiography. There were 7,795 patient visits for complications of injection drug use; 11 patients had AMP (0.14%). AMP involved the brachial (n = 5), subclavian (n = 2), radial (n = 2), femoral (n = 1) and popliteal arteries (n = 1). Fever was absent in the majority of patients (7/11). Either pulsatility or a mass was noted in three cases, and both were seen in 6/11 (54%). AMP was not initially suspected in three cases, which were treated as abscesses and surgically incised, resulting in arterial rupture. The annual prevalence of AMP in the presenting population was estimated to be 0.03%. However, a high index of suspicion for AMP should be maintained with injection drug users presenting with a mass or pulsatility over an artery, as there is risk of rupture, rapid exsanguination, and distal embolization.

Successful management of life-threatening hemorrhage in a patient with synchronous lupus anticoagulant and factor VIII inhibitor.

Acquired factor VIII inhibitor is increasingly recognized as a cause of major soft tissue hemorrhage. The laboratory diagnosis can be obscured by the synchronous presence of the lupus anticoagulant, an extremely rare occurrence that has been reported outside the vascular surgery literature. Vascular surgeons should be knowledgeable of factor VIII inhibitor and aware that it can present with other blood disorders, making the diagnosis more difficult and management more complex. This case report describes such a patient and reviews the current literature on this topic.

Abdominal aortic reconstruction in infected fields: early results of the United States cryopreserved aortic allograft registry.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic reconstructions for primary graft infection (PGI), mycotic aneurysm (MA), and aortic graft-enteric erosion (AEE) bear high morbidity and mortality rates, and current treatment options are not ideal. Cryopreserved grafts have been implanted successfully in infected fields and may be suitable for abdominal aortic reconstructions. Registry data from several institutions were compiled to examine results of cryopreserved aortic allograft (CAA) placement. METHODS: The experience of 31 institutions was reviewed for CAAs inserted from March 4, 1999, to August 23, 2001. Indications for CAA, organisms, mortality, and complications were identified. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, 43 men and 13 women, with a mean age of 66 years (range, 44 to 90 years) had in situ aortic replacement with CAA. Indications for CAA placement were PGI in 43 patients (77%), MA in seven (14%), AEE in four (7%), and aortic reconstruction with concomitant bowel resection in two (4%). Infectious organisms were identified in 33 patients (59%); the most frequent organism was Staphylococcus aureus in 17 (52%). Thirty-one patients (55%) needed an additional cryopreserved segment for reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 5.3 months (range, 1 to 22 months). One patient died in the operating room, and the 30-day surgical mortality rate was 13% (7/56). Seven additional patients died during the follow-up period, yielding an overall mortality rate of 25% (14 patients). Two patients (4%) had graft-related mortality as the result of hemorrhage from the CAA and persistent infection. Graft-related complications included persistent infection with perianastomotic hemorrhage in five patients (9%), graft limb occlusion in five (9%), and pseudoaneurysm in one (2%). Three patients (5%) needed amputation. CONCLUSION: In situ aortic reconstruction with CAA in infected fields carries a high mortality rate, but most deaths are not the result of allograft failure. However, CAA infection and lethal hemorrhage caused by graft rupture occurs and is concerning. Early reinfection was not reported. Late graft-related complications, such as reinfection, thrombosis, or aneurysmal changes, are unknown. Preliminary data from this registry fail to justify the preferential use of CAA for PGI, MA, or AEE. A multicenter, randomized study is needed to compare results with established techniques.