Locating the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation surgery: analysis of a case series comparing CT and MR targeting.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery targeting the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (Vim) has proven efficacy in the treatment of tremor. AIMS: The primary aim is to investigate whether there is a statistically significant difference in patient outcomes when CT-guided targeting of the Vim is compared with MRI-guided targeting. METHODS: This is a retrospective study concerning patients undergoing Vim-targeted DBS at the Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle (9th August 2012 to 4th January 2019). Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Scale (FTM TS) and EQ-5D scores were collected from patient notes. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 24. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare means. RESULTS: Independent samples t-test did not reveal a statistically significant difference between CT (n = 10; FTM TS mean = 65.40, SD = 11.40; EQ-5D mean = 39.50, SD = 17.87) and MR (n = 7; FTM TS mean = 60.57, SD = 7.50; EQ-5D mean = 32.14, SD = 9.94) groups in pre-surgery FTM TS (t(15) = 0.977, p = 0.344) and EQ-5D (t(15) = 0.982, p = 0.342) scores. No statistically significant difference between the CT (FTM TS mean = 24.12, SD = 20.47; EQ-5D mean = 75.56, SD = 15.63) and MR (FTM TS mean = 22.86, SD = 6.72; EQ-5D mean = 70.43, SD = 15.48) groups was revealed at 1 year assessment of FTM TS (t(14) = 0.155, p = 0.879) and EQ-5D (t(14) = 0.654, p = 0.524). The median difference between pre- and post-surgery FTM TS and EQ-5D scores in the CT group at 1 year was 43.00 and 35.00, respectively. The MR patient group median difference in pre- and post-surgery at 1 year was 35.00 and 35.00 respectively. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference between CT and MR image-guided targeting patient groups was detected.

The Neurology and Neurosurgery Interest Group (NANSIG)-ten years of cultivating interest in clinical neurosciences.

Collaboration and successful teamworking are important components of clinical practise, and these skills should be cultivated early in medical school. The breadth of current medical school curricula means that students often have limited exposure to clinical neurosciences. Since its inception in 2009, the Neurology and Neurosurgery Interest Group (NANSIG) has become a national (UK and Republic of Ireland) example of student and junior doctor synergistic collaboration to deliver educational materials, research, conferences, seminars and workshops, as well as advocating for diversity in this field. Recently, it has expanded to incorporate an international audience and cater for a larger group of young medical professionals. The organisation has overcome numerous challenges and is constantly innovating new approaches to harness the necessary knowledge, skills and network to succeed in a career in neurosciences, neurology and neurosurgery. This article summarises the initiatives undertaken by the group over its first 10 years of existence and its organisational structure, as well as its future plans.

Survival outcomes following craniotomy for intracranial metastases from an unknown primary.

INTRODUCTION: Management of patients with intracranial metastases from an unknown primary tumor (CUP) varies compared to those with metastases of known primary tumor origin (CKP). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recognizes the current lack of research to support the management of CUP patients with brain metastases. The primary aim was to compare survival outcomes of CKP and CUP patients undergoing early resection of intracranial metastases to understand the efficacy of surgery for patients with CUP. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed, wherein patients were identified using a pathology database. Data was collected from patient notes and trust information services. Surgically managed patients during a 10-year period aged over 18 years, with a histological diagnosis of intracranial metastasis, were included. RESULTS: 298 patients were identified, including 243 (82.0%) CKP patients and 55 (18.0%) CUP patients. Median survival for CKP patients was 9 months (95%CI 7.475-10.525); and 6 months for CUP patients (95%CI 4.263-7.737, p = 0.113). Cox regression analyses suggest absence of other metastases (p = 0.016), age (p = 0.005), and performance status (p = 0.001) were positive prognostic factors for improved survival in cases of CUP. The eventual determination of the primary malignancy did not affect overall survival for CUP patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. Surgical management of patients with CUP brain metastases is an appropriate treatment option. Current diagnostic pathways specifying a thorough search for the primary tumor pre-operatively may not improve patient outcomes.

The evolution of an SBNS-accredited NANSIG simulated skills workshop for aspiring neurosurgical trainees: an analysis of qualitative and quantitative data.

BACKGROUND: The Neurology and Neurosurgery Interest Group (NANSIG) neurosurgical skills workshop is novel in teaching neurosurgical skills solely to medical students and foundation trainees in the UK. The aim is to offer an affordable option for a high-fidelity simulation course enabling students to learn and practise specific neurosurgical skills in a safe, supervised environment. METHODS: A 10-delegate cohort was quantitatively assessed at the NANSIG neurosurgical skills workshop. Two assessors used a novel modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (mOSATS) assessment tool, comprising 5 domains ranked according to a 5-point scale to rate delegates' ability to create a burr hole. Qualitative data from previous workshops were collected, consisting of open-ended, closed-ended and 5-point Likert scale responses to pre- and post-workshop questionnaires. Data were analysed using SPSS® software. RESULTS: Delegates scored a mean total of 62.1% (21.75/35) and 85.1% (29.8/35) in pre- and post-workshop assessments respectively revealing a statistically significant improvement. Regarding percentage of improvement, no significant difference was shown amongst candidates when comparing the number of neurosurgical cases observed and/or assisted in the past. There was no significant difference in the overall rating between the last two workshops (4.89 and 4.8 out of 5, respectively). One hundred percent of the attendees reported feeling more confident in assisting in theatre after the last two workshops. CONCLUSION: We show that a simulation workshop cannot only objectively quantify the improvement of surgical skill acquisition but can also be beneficial regardless of the extent of prior experience.

Use of an Online Referral Service for Acute Neurosurgical Referrals: An Institutional Experience.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to review the current scope of emergency neurosurgical referrals and examine the long-term use of a web-based referral system. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective observational study. Referral information was collected retrospectively over a 1-year period after the implementation of a web-based referral system (June 2019-June 2020). Information such as demographics, clinical information, referrer details, and neurosurgical response times and outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using R Version 6.3.1. RESULTS: Our unit received 5949 referrals with a median age of 63 years old (range: 0-107 years) (male = 50.3%). We observed an average of 16.3 referrals per day (range: 4-32), with Fridays having the highest average and the weekend days receiving statistically fewer referrals (P < 0.001). More than a third (35.9%) of referrals occurred within hours (8:00-17:00 Monday-Friday), with A + E making up approximately 50% of referrals. Common reasons for referral were traumatic brain injury, intracranial tumors, and degenerative spine. The median time from referral to first response was 32 minutes, occurring within an hour in 72.9% of cases. The median time to definite response was 83 minutes, occurring within 2 hours in 58.2% of cases. Factors found to impact the response time were referral emergency and time of day. Our acceptance rate over this period was 18.5%. CONCLUSIONS: With an increasing number of referrals, it is feasible to provide traceable advice in a timely manner through an electronic web-based referral system transferable to any specialty. Insights could be used to direct resources and workforce planning according to emergency referral patterns.

Utility of 5-ALA for resection of CNS tumours other than high-grade gliomas: a protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is a proagent developed for fluorescent-guided surgery for high-grade glioma patients associated with a significant increase in resection conferring survival. 5-ALA was shown to penetrate the blood-brain barrier accumulating in malignant glioma cells with high selectivity, sensitivity and positive predictive value. However, those have yet to be explored aiding diagnosis for tumours of the central nervous system (CNS) other than high-grade gliomas (HGG). No up-to-date systematic review exists reporting the major surgical outcomes and diagnostic accuracy. We sought to conduct a systematic review of the literature summarising surgical outcomes, evaluate the quality of diagnostic accuracy reported in the literature and qualitatively assess the evidence to inform future studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase) with subsequent interrogation of references lists of articles reporting the use of 5-ALA for brain tumours other than high-grade glioma adult patients, which also report the extent of resection and/or survival. Prospective and retrospective cohort and case-control studies with more than five patients will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen the abstracts and full articles, with a third reviewer resolving any conflicts. The data will be extracted in a standardised template and outcomes will be reported using descriptive statists. The quality of non-randomised studies will be appraised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will summarise the available evidence on the effect of the clinical utility of 5-ALA in achieving resection and improving survival and its diagnostic accuracy for tumours of the CNS other than HGG. The data will be presented nationally and internationally and the manuscript will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. No ethical approvals were needed. The aim is to inform prospective studies minimising reporting bias allowing for more reliable, reproducible and generalisable results. The study has been registered in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021260542.