Image guided volumetric response during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as a predictor of disease outcomes.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to correlate volumetric image guided disease response to clinical outcomes in patients receiving chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty four patients completing definitive CRT for locally advanced HNSCC with megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) guided tomotherapy IMRT were retrospectively reviewed for volumetric response. Grossly identifiable primary tumor (PT) and nodal disease (ND) response was evaluated by weekly MVCT regression. Percent end-of-treatment (EOT) residual volumes and regression rates were correlated with risk of local failure (LF), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 7 LFs were identified in 6 patients at a median follow-up of 8months. The mean percent EOT residual volumes for PT and ND in patients with and without LF were 20% vs. 5% (p=0.005) and 47% vs. 6% (p=0.0001), respectively. The PT and ND volume regression rates for patients with and without LF were 12.7% per week vs. 15.9% per week (p=0.04) and 3.4% per week vs. 10.5% per week (p<0.001), respectively. Utilizing an EOT cut-off value of 25% residual volume, the relative risks of LF for PT and ND were 14.7 (p=0.03) and 25 (p=0.001), respectively. Patients found with PT and/or ND residual volumes <25% at EOT had longer 2year OS of 100% vs. 67% (p=0.0023) and PFS of 87% vs. 17% (p<0.001) compared with patients with residual volumes >/= 25% at EOT. CONCLUSION: Patients with locally advanced HNSCC who have significant MVCT volume reduction over the course of definitive CRT tend to have favorable clinical outcomes.

Reproducibility of vaginal immobilization balloons in situ overnight for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: The use of vaginal immobilization balloons placed into the vagina for immobilization of tandem and ovoid (T+O) applicator during high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy delivery has been used at our institution, and seems to have improved our patient comfort, decreased procedure time, and minimized applicator misplacement. We aimed to show that these balloons, while originally marketed for single-day use, are safe and maintain applicator positioning/dosimetry when left in situ overnight for treatment delivery on sequential days. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-two paired computed tomography (CT) scans from thirteen patients who underwent T+O HDR treatments on sequential days with vaginal immobilization balloons in situ overnight were retrospectively compared to calculate mean change of balloon volumes and balloon/T+O distance to bony landmarks. Dosimetric planning was retroactively performed on day 2 using CT scan of each pair, and the change in estimated radiation delivery to the bladder and rectum was compared. RESULTS: No statistically significant overnight changes were found in balloon volumes or anterior balloon positioning. The posterior balloon shifted -0.29 ±0.46 cm (p = 0.03) to the anterior public symphysis and 0.32 ±0.50 cm (p = 0.01) to the right femoral head. The tandem shifted 0.37 ±0.39 cm (p = 0.002) to the pubic symphysis. There was no significant difference found in radiation delivered to the bladder or rectum between the paired scans. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed minimal change in balloon volumes, balloons/T+O positioning, or in radiation dose to bladder and rectum when the applicator remained overnight. These findings support that inflatable vaginal immobilization balloons remaining in situ overnight for additional HDR T+O treatments on sequential days, is safe and provides stable dosimetry.

Prospective Study of Use of Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Versus Routine Symptom Management During Weekly Radiation Treatment Visits.

PURPOSE: During radiotherapy (RT), patient symptoms are evaluated and managed weekly during physician on-treatment visits (OTVs). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a 9-symptom validated self-assessment tool for reporting common symptoms in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that implementation and physician review of ESAS during weekly OTVs may result in betterment of symptom severity during RT for certain modifiable domains. METHODS: As an institutional quality improvement project, patients were partitioned into 2 groups: (1) 85 patients completing weekly ESAS (preintervention) but blinded to their providers who gave routine symptom management and (2) 170 completing weekly ESAS (postintervention group) reviewed by providers during weekly OTVs with possible intervention. To determine the independent association with symptom severity of the intervention, multivariate logistic regression was performed. At study conclusion, provider assessments of ESAS utility were also collected. RESULTS: Compared with the preintervention group, stable or improved symptom severity was seen in the postintervention group for pain (70.7% v 85.6%; P = .005) and anxiety (79.3% v 92.9%; P = .002). The postintervention group had decreased association (on multivariate analysis) with worsening severity of pain (OR, 0.13; P < .001), nausea (OR, 0.25; P = .023), loss of appetite (OR, 0.30; P = .024), and anxiety (OR, 0.19; P = .005). Most physicians (87.5%) and nurses (75%) found ESAS review useful in symptom management. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of ESAS for OTVs was associated with stable or improved symptom severity where therapeutic intervention is more readily available, such as counseling, pain medication, anti-emetics, appetite stimulants, and anti-anxiolytics. The incorporation of validated patient-reported symptom-scoring tools may improve provider management.