Alterations in the Skin Microbiome in Dermatologic Diseases and with External Exposures: CME Part 2.

In Part I of our CME we reviewed the skin microbiome in healthy individuals. Part II reviews the evolving understanding of alterations in the skin microbiome in specific human diseases. We also discuss how the skin microbiome can change with environmental exposures and medications such as antibiotics as well as ongoing research on microbiome-based interventions.

Immune-Mediated and Psychiatric Comorbidities Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Alopecia Areata.

Importance: Alopecia areata (AA) has been associated with multiple comorbidities, yet information regarding the timing of comorbidity development after AA diagnosis is limited. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and new-onset incidence of psychiatric and autoimmune comorbidities in patients with AA in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis used data collected from January 1, 2007, to April 30, 2023, from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases, which contains medical and drug claims data from more than 46 million patients in the US. Data from adolescent and adult patients (aged 12-64 years) diagnosed with AA and patients without AA (ie, controls) were evaluated. For some analyses, patients with AA were matched (1:4) to controls based on sex, age, and geographic region. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence (at the time of AA diagnosis) and incidence (new onset after AA diagnosis) of psychiatric and autoimmune diseases were reported as percentage of patients. Risk of developing a new-onset psychiatric or autoimmune disease after AA diagnosis was calculated as adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) with 95% CIs. Results: At baseline, 63 384 patients with AA and 3 309 107 without AA were identified. After matching, there were 16 512 and 66 048 patients in the AA and control groups, respectively, with a mean (SD) age of 36.9 (13.4) years and 50.6% of whom were female. Compared with the unmatched controls, patients with AA had higher prevalence of psychiatric (30.9% vs 26.8%; P < .001) and autoimmune (16.1% vs 8.9%; P < .0001) comorbidities at AA diagnosis; incidence was also higher in patients with AA (without history of these comorbidities) vs the matched control group. Patients with AA vs controls had a significantly higher risk of developing a psychiatric (AHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3-1.4) or autoimmune (AHR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.5-2.8) comorbidity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients with AA had a higher prevalence of autoimmune and psychiatric comorbidities at AA diagnosis and demonstrated an elevated risk of new-onset autoimmune and psychiatric comorbidities after their diagnosis. These data highlight the most common comorbidities among patients with AA and may help physicians counsel and monitor patients newly diagnosed with AA.

Mechanistic basis for the translation inhibition of Cutibacterium acnes by Clindamycin.

Inflammation and the Gram-positive anaerobic bacterium Cutibacterium acnes, which is implicated in acne pathogenesis and pilosebaceous unit inflammation, are the main targets of antibiotic-based therapy against acne vulgaris (acne). The most widely used antibiotics in acne therapy are tetracyclines, macrolides, and lincosamides. Unfortunately, C. acnes bacteria over the past several decades have demonstrated increased resistance to these antibiotics, particularly to clindamycin. The precise knowledge of how antibiotics interact with their clinical target is needed to overcome this problem. Toward this goal, we determined the structure of clindamycin in complex with the ribosome of Cutibacterium acnes at 2.53 Å resolution using cryogenic electron microscopy. The galactose sugar moiety of clindamycin interacts with nucleotides of the 23S rRNA directly or through a conserved network of water-mediated interactions. Its propyl pyrrolidinyl group interacts with the 23S rRNA through van der Waals forces. Clindamycin binding to the Cutibacterium acnes ribosome interferes with both: proper orientation of the aminoacyl group of the A-site bound tRNA that is needed for peptide bond formation and with the extension of the nascent peptide. Our data are important for advancing understanding of antibiotic resistance and development of narrow- spectrum antibacterial drugs, which is an urgent need for contemporary antibiotic stewardship.

Scientific Rationale and Clinical Basis for Clindamycin Use in the Treatment of Dermatologic Disease.

Clindamycin is a highly effective antibiotic of the lincosamide class. It has been widely used for decades to treat a range of skin and soft tissue infections in dermatology and medicine. Clindamycin is commonly prescribed for acne vulgaris, with current practice standards utilizing fixed-combination topicals containing clindamycin that prevent Cutibacterium acnes growth and reduce inflammation associated with acne lesion formation. Certain clinical presentations of folliculitis, rosacea, staphylococcal infections, and hidradenitis suppurativa are also responsive to clindamycin, demonstrating its suitability and versatility as a treatment option. This review describes the use of clindamycin in dermatological practice, the mechanism of protein synthesis inhibition by clindamycin at the level of the bacterial ribosome, and clindamycin's anti-inflammatory properties with a focus on its ability to ameliorate inflammation in acne. A comparison of the dermatologic indications for similarly utilized antibiotics, like the tetracycline class antibiotics, is also presented. Finally, this review addresses both the trends and mechanisms for clindamycin and antibiotic resistance, as well as the current clinical evidence in support of the continued, targeted use of clindamycin in dermatology.

Clindamycin: A Comprehensive Status Report with Emphasis on Use in Dermatology.

Clindamycin is a lincosamide antibiotic that has been used as a topical, oral, or injectable formulation for over five decades. It exhibits a narrow spectrum of microbiologic activity, primarily against gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria. In dermatology, clindamycin has been used primarily as a topical agent, usually for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Despite questions surrounding antibiotic resistance and/or its relative contribution to antibiotic treatment efficacy, a large body of data support the therapeutic value of topical clindamycin for acne vulgaris. As a systemic agent, clindamycin is used orally to treat a variety of cutaneous bacterial infections, and sometimes for acne vulgaris, with oral treatment for the latter less common in more recent years. The modes of action of clindamycin are supported by data showing both its anti-inflammatory and antibiotic mechanisms, which are discussed here along with pharmacokinetic profiles and structure-activity relationships. The diverse applications of clindamycin for multiple disease states, its efficacy, and safety considerations are also reviewed here, including for both topical and systemic formulations. Emphasis is placed on uses in dermatology, but other information on clindamycin relevant to clinicians is also discussed.

Developing a questionnaire for assessing clinician- and patient-reported outcomes in actinic keratosis: Results from an expert panel.

Background: Current assessments on topical treatment attributes in actinic keratosis (AK) do not evaluate safety, effectiveness, and satisfaction from both clinician and patient perspectives, creating an unmet need for more comprehensive AK-specific measures that fully capture the patient experience. Objective: To develop an actinic keratosis-specific expert panel questionnaire (AK-EPQ) of patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes for use in research studies. Methods: Using interviews of patients with AK and targeted literature reviews, a 9-person consensus panel of dermatologists with expertise in AK treatment was convened to develop the AK-EPQ to assess AK-specific patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes. Results: Nine expert advisers achieved consensus on 11 AK-EPQ items that encompass patient and clinician perspectives of treatment-related local skin reactions, clinical and cosmetic outcomes associated with AK, and satisfaction with treatment; the AK-EPQ will be first implemented in the Patient-Reported Outcomes for Actinic Keratosis study (NCT05260073). Limitations: The AK-EPQ does not directly measure quality of life, although it can be used with validated quality of life instruments. Conclusion: The newly developed AK-EPQ elicits insights into the patient and clinician experience with AK treatments. Comparative probing of these perspectives may help optimize precision medicine in AK treatment.

Early and Sustained Improvements in Symptoms and Quality of Life with Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Results from Two Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2).

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by increased itch, skin pain, poor sleep quality, and other symptoms that negatively affect patient quality of life. Upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 than JAK2, JAK3, or tyrosine kinase 2, is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of upadacitinib on patient-reported outcomes over 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Data from two phase III monotherapy trials of upadacitinib (Measure Up 1, NCT03569293; Measure Up 2, NCT03607422) were integrated. Changes in pruritus, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, mental health, and patient impression were evaluated. Patient-reported outcome assessments included the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale, Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index, Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment. Minimal clinically important differences, achievement of scores representing minimal disease burden, and the change from baseline were evaluated in patients who received upadacitinib through week 52 and in patients who received placebo through week 16. RESULTS: This analysis included 1609 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, N = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, N = 567; placebo, N = 485). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar across all arms. The proportion of patients treated with upadacitinib reporting improvements in itch increased rapidly by week 1, increased steadily through week 8, and was sustained through week 52. Patients receiving upadacitinib also experienced improvements in pain and other skin symptoms by week 1, which continued through week 16; improvements were maintained through week 52. Patient reports of improved sleep increased rapidly from baseline to week 1, increased steadily through week 32, and were sustained through week 52. Patients experienced quality-of-life improvements through week 8, which were maintained through week 52. By week 1, patients in both upadacitinib groups experienced rapid improvements in emotional state, and by week 12, patients also achieved meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression. Improvements in mental health continued steadily through week 32 and were maintained through week 52. Patients treated with upadacitinib 30 mg generally experienced improvements in patient-reported outcomes earlier than those treated with upadacitinib 15 mg. Through week 16, patients receiving upadacitinib experienced greater improvements versus those receiving placebo in all assessed patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with once-daily upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg experienced early improvements in itch, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, and mental health that were sustained through week 52. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03569293 (13 August 2018) and NCT03607422 (27 July 2018).

Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is a condition that causes painful itchy dry skin, which is burdensome for patients and has a negative impact on quality of life. These symptoms frequently lead to disruption of daily activities such as school and work, decreased self-confidence, social isolation, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance. Symptoms of atopic dermatitis, such as itch and sleep disturbance, can only be assessed by patients. Therefore, it is important to consider patients' perceptions of their symptoms and the related impact on their quality of life, especially when evaluating treatment benefits. Upadacitinib is an orally administered drug approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In two clinical trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2), we investigated how treatment with upadacitinib (15-mg or 30-mg dose) given once daily to adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis would impact their symptoms and quality of life over a 1-year period. We measured changes over time in patients' assessments of itch, pain, other skin-related symptoms, sleep, daily activities, emotional state, mental health, and overall quality of life. Patients treated with upadacitinib experienced improvements in symptoms of atopic dermatitis and quality of life within the first 1­2 weeks of treatment. These improvements continued to steadily increase in the following weeks and lasted through 1 year of treatment. In conclusion, once-daily treatment with upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg led to early and lasting improvements in the well-being of patients with atopic dermatitis.

Upadacitinib Rapidly Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atopic Dermatitis: 16-Week Results from Phase 3 Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and 2).

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by intense itch and other symptoms that negatively impact quality of life (QoL). This study evaluates the effect of upadacitinib (an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor) monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD over 16 weeks. METHODS: This integrated analysis of the double-blind, placebo-controlled periods of phase 3 monotherapy clinical trials Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293) and Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422) assessed itch (Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [WP-NRS] and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]), skin pain and symptom severity (AD Symptom Scale), symptom frequency (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure), sleep (AD Impact Scale [ADerm-IS] and SCORAD), daily activities and emotional state (ADerm-IS), QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] and Children's DLQI), mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and patient impressions (Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment). RESULTS: Data from 1683 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, n = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, n = 567; placebo, n = 559) were analyzed. A greater proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo experienced improvements in itch (≥ 4-point improvement on WP-NRS) by week 1 (upadacitinib 15 mg, 11.2%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 17.7%; placebo, 0.5%; P < 0.001), with response rates sustained through week 16 (upadacitinib 15 mg, 47.1%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 59.8%; placebo, 10.4%; P < 0.001). Improvements were similar for PROs assessing skin pain/symptoms, sleep, daily activities, QoL, emotional state, mental health, and patient impressions of disease severity and treatment. Responses generally improved rapidly (within 1-2 weeks), increased through weeks 4-6, and were maintained through week 16. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily oral upadacitinib monotherapy improved response rates across PROs compared with placebo. Upadacitinib therapy resulted in rapid, sustained improvements in PROs measuring symptom burden and QoL in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03569293 and NCT03607422.

Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is characterized by itchy, dry, inflamed skin. These symptoms often make it difficult for patients to get adequate sleep. Patients with atopic dermatitis may also experience anxiety, depression, reduced self-confidence, social isolation, disruption to daily activities like school and work, and decreased quality of life. Many atopic dermatitis symptoms, including itch and psychological impact, are difficult for doctors to assess. Thus, it is important to consider patients' descriptions of their symptoms and quality of life, particularly when assessing treatment benefit. Upadacitinib is an orally administered drug approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We investigated how upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) given once daily to adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in the Measure Up 1 and 2 clinical trials impacts their symptoms and quality of life over a 16-week period. We compared changes in patient-reported itch, pain, sleep, daily activities, emotional state, mental health, and overall quality of life among patients in the clinical trials who received upadacitinib with those in the same studies who received a dummy (placebo) treatment. Upadacitinib improved patient-reported symptoms and quality of life early in the clinical trials, often within the first 1­2 weeks. The extent of the improvements increased through weeks 4­6 of treatment and lasted through week 16. Patients who received upadacitinib reported greater improvements in symptoms and quality of life than did patients who received placebo. Upadacitinib treatment resulted in rapid and lasting improvements in the well-being of patients with atopic dermatitis.