How shall we transfuse Hippolyta?

The US Department of Defense recently made the decision to open direct ground combat roles to women. Blood product transfusion is an essential component of the US Military guidelines for tactical combat casualty care and damage control resuscitation, but blood transfusion carries with it the specific side effect of alloimmunization-a uniquely significant side effect for young women who may desire subsequent pregnancies. Presently to be considered are the changes that may need to be made to blood transfusion in the setting of battlefield medicine to optimally care for combat-injured women, as a majority of the existing data regarding the risks of transfusion in the trauma setting involve predominantly men. This article delves into the possibility of a new cohort of women at risk for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, the need for women's health professionals to appropriately counsel women considering serving in direct ground combat roles about this specific risk, and the appropriate steps that should be considered to provide these women optimal medical care.

Future directions for monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer.

In the prior review, we outlined the current standard of care for monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer and discussed the many challenges associated with these strategies. We described the challenges faced in common clinical settings such as the adjuvant setting, neoadjuvant setting, and the metastatic setting. In this review, we will expand upon future directions meant to overcome several of these current challenges. We will also explore several new and promising methods under investigation to enhance how we monitor treatment responses in breast cancer. Furthermore, we will highlight several new technologies and techniques for monitoring breast cancer treatment in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic setting.

Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer.

Monitoring response to treatment is a key element in the management of breast cancer that involves several different viewpoints from surgery, radiology, and medical oncology. In the adjuvant setting, appropriate surgical and pathological evaluation guides adjuvant treatment and follow up care focuses on detecting recurrent disease with the intention of improving long term survival. In the neoadjuvant setting, assessing response to chemotherapy prior to surgery to include evaluation for pathologic response can provide prognostic information to help guide follow up care. In the metastatic setting, for those undergoing treatment, it is crucial to determine responders versus non-responders in order to help guide treatment decisions. In this review, we present the current guidelines for monitoring treatment response in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition, we also discuss challenges that are faced in each setting.

Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence.

Early detection of breast cancer recurrence is a key element of follow-up care and surveillance after completion of primary treatment. The goal is to improve survival by detecting and treating recurrent disease while potentially still curable assuming a more effective salvage surgery and treatment. In this review, we present the current guidelines for early detection of recurrent breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. Emphasis is placed on the multidisciplinary approach from surgery, medical oncology, and radiology with a discussion of the challenges faced within each setting.

Future directions for the early detection of recurrent breast cancer.

The main goal of follow-up care after breast cancer treatment is the early detection of disease recurrence. In this review, we emphasize the multidisciplinary approach to this continuity of care from surgery, medical oncology, and radiology. Challenges within each setting are briefly addressed as a means of discussion for the future directions of an effective and efficient surveillance plan of post-treatment breast cancer care.

Incidence, predictors, costs, and outcome of renal cell carcinoma after kidney transplantation: USRDS experience.

INTRODUCTION: We carried out an analysis of the United States Renal Data System to determine the incidence, risk factors, prognosis, and costs associated with the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after kidney transplantation. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort of 40,821 Medicare primary renal transplant recipients transplanted from January 1, 2000, to July 1, 2005, and followed up till December 31, 2005, excluding those with prior RCC or nephrectomy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the time of occurrence of RCC, and Cox regression was used to determine factors associated with RCC. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-eight patients were diagnosed with RCC within 3 years after transplant (incidence of 3.16 per 1000 person years). The 3-year incidence of RCC posttransplant was 9.29 per 1000 person years (2.3%) for those with pretransplant cysts and 3.08 per 1000 person years (0.7%) without pretransplant cysts. RCC was diagnosed disproportionately early posttransplant in patients with cysts. Cysts were independently associated with increased risk of RCC, as was male gender, older recipient, donor age, African American recipient, increased time on dialysis and acute rejection within first year posttransplant. RCC was associated with increased risk of mortality with a higher risk with pretransplant cysts. Patients who developed RCC had higher cumulative median costs ($55,456 at 2 years) than those who did not develop RCC ($40,369). There was no "clustering" of RCC in individual states or centers more than would be expected by chance. CONCLUSION: RCC was diagnosed disproportionately early in patients with pretransplant renal cysts and was associated with a worse prognosis and increased costs.