Cerebral ischemia initiates an immediate innate immune response in neonates during cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: A robust inflammatory response occurs in the hours and days following cerebral ischemia. However, little is known about the immediate innate immune response in the first minutes after an ischemic insult in humans. We utilized the use of circulatory arrest during cardiac surgery to assess this. METHODS: Twelve neonates diagnosed with an aortic arch obstruction underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and approximately 30 minutes of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA, representing cerebral ischemia). Blood samples were drawn from the vena cava superior immediately after DHCA and at various other time points from preoperatively to 24 hours after surgery. The innate immune response was assessed by neutrophil and monocyte count and phenotype using FACS, and concentrations of cytokines IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFα, sVCAM-1 and MCP-1 were assessed using multiplex immunoassay. Results were compared to a simultaneously drawn sample from the arterial cannula. Twelve other neonates were randomly allocated to undergo the same procedure but with continuous antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP). RESULTS: Immediately after cerebral ischemia (DHCA), neutrophil and monocyte counts were higher in venous blood than arterial (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02 respectively). The phenotypes of these cells showed an activated state (both P <0.01). Most striking was the increase in the 'non-classical' monocyte subpopulations (CD16(intermediate); arterial 6.6% vs. venous 14%; CD16+ 13% vs. 22%, both P <0.01). Also, higher IL-6 and lower sVCAM-1 concentrations were found in venous blood (both P = 0.03). In contrast, in the ACP group, all inflammatory parameters remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: In neonates, approximately 30 minutes of cerebral ischemia during deep hypothermia elicits an immediate innate immune response, especially of the monocyte compartment. This phenomenon may hold important clues for the understanding of the inflammatory response to stroke and its potentially detrimental consequences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01032876.

Immunotherapy after trauma: timing is essential.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To address and summarize some key issues and recent insights into the use of immunomodulating interventions to prevent and treat inflammatory complications in trauma patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Immunomodulatory therapies are aimed at altering the systemic inflammatory response after trauma to prevent and treat the inflammatory complications a patient can develop after sustaining injuries. This inflammatory response induced by injury is a complex and dynamic process with multiple humoral and cellular cascades involved, which leads to large heterogeneity in clinical outcome. Effective solutions are, therefore, expected to influence all involved facets. Over the years, a large body of evidence has accumulated testing over a hundred of monoclonal antibodies, antiendotoxins and antioxidants. However recently, intervention studies testing such agents in a clinical setting have become sparse. The majority of the promising experimental therapeutic approaches for inflammatory complications that target the inflammatory response did not lead to changes in clinical practice. SUMMARY: More insight is needed in the pathology of systemic inflammation after trauma for selection of patients, optimal timing and therapy to address the mechanism underlying inflammatory complications.

Early decreased neutrophil responsiveness is related to late onset sepsis in multitrauma patients: An international cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Severe trauma can lead to the development of infectious complications after several days, such as sepsis. Early identification of patients at risk will aid anticipating these complications. The aim of this study was to test the relation between the acute (<24 hours) inflammatory response after injury measured by neutrophil responsiveness and the late (>5 days) development of septic complications and validate this in different trauma populations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Two prospective, observational, cohort series in the Netherlands and South Africa, consisting of severely injured trauma patients. Neutrophil responsiveness by fMLF-induced active FcγRII was measured in whole blood flowcytometry, as read out for the systemic immune response within hours after trauma. Sepsis was scored daily. Ten of the 36 included Dutch patients developed septic shock. In patients with septic shock, neutrophils showed a lower expression of fMLF-induced active FcγRII immediately after trauma when compared to patients without septic shock (P = 0.001). In South Africa 11 of 73 included patients developed septic shock. Again neutrophils showed lower expression of fMLF induced active FcγRII (P = 0.001). In the combined cohort, all patients who developed septic shock demonstrated a decreased neutrophil responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Low responsiveness of neutrophils for the innate stimulus fMLF immediately after trauma preceded the development of septic shock during admission by almost a week and did not depend on a geographical/racial background, hospital protocols and health care facilities. Decreased neutrophil responsiveness appears to be a prerequisite for septic shock after trauma. This might enable anticipation of this severe complication in trauma patients.

Penetrating thorax injury leads to mild systemic activation of neutrophils without inflammatory complications.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality. Thoracic injuries are associated with inflammatory complications such as ARDS. The pathogenesis of this complication after pulmonary injury is incompletely understood, but neutrophils are thought to play a pivotal role. The aim of this project was to gain more insight in the role of thoracic injuries in the pathophysiological processes that link systemic neutrophil activation with inflammatory complications after trauma. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study fifty-five patients with isolated penetrating thoracic injury were included at a level one Trauma Unit. Blood samples were analysed for neutrophil phenotype with the use of flowcytometry within 3 h of trauma and repeated six and 24 h after injury. The presence of inflammatory complications (e.g. ARDS or sepsis/septic shock) was assessed during admission, and this was related to the neutrophil phenotpe. RESULTS: The clinical follow-up of fifty-three patients was uneventful. Only two patients developed an inflammatory complication. Within 3 h after trauma, neutrophils showed a decreased expression of FcγRII (p=0.007) and FcγRIII (p=0.001) compared to healthy individuals. After 6 h, expression of active FcγRII (p=0.017), C5aR (p=0.004) and CAECAM8 (p=0.043) increased, whereas L-selectin (p=0.002) decreased. After 24 h also CXCR-2 (CD182) expression increased compared to healthy individuals (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating thoracic trauma leads to a distinct primed activation status of circulating neutrophils within hours. In addition to activation of cells, both young and reverse migrated neutrophils are released into the circulation. This degree of systemic inflammation does not exceed a threshold of inflammation that is needed for the development of inflammatory complications like ARDS.