Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid Prevents Postpartum Hemorrhage and Transfusions in Cesarean Deliveries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide and PPH resulting in transfusion is the most common maternal morbidity in the United States. Literature demonstrates that tranexamic acid (TXA) can reduce blood loss in cesarean deliveries; however, there is little consensus on the impact on major morbidities like PPH and transfusions. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate if administration of prophylactic intravenous (IV) TXA prevents PPH and/or transfusions following low-risk cesarean delivery. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines were followed. Five databases were searched: Cochrane, EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, and ClinicalKey. RCTs published in English between January 2000 and December 2021 were included. Studies compared PPH and transfusions in cesarean deliveries between prophylactic IV TXA and control (placebo or no placebo). The primary outcome was PPH, and the secondary outcome was transfusions. Random effects models were used to calculate effect size (ES) of exposure in Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RR). All analysis was done at a confidence level (CI) of α = 0.5. Modeling showed that TXA led to significantly less risk of PPH than control (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.28-0.67). The effect on transfusion was comparable (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.73). Heterogeneity was minimal (I 2 = 0%). Due to the large sample sizes needed, many RCTs are not powered to interpret TXA's effect on PPH and transfusions. Pooling these studies in a meta-analysis allows for more power and analysis but is limited by the heterogeneity of studies. Our results minimize heterogeneity while demonstrating that prophylactic TXA can lower PPH occurrence and reduce the need for blood transfusion. We suggest considering prophylactic IV TXA as the standard of care in low-risk cesarean deliveries. KEY POINTS: · Consider TXA prior to incision for singleton, term pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean.. · Prophylactic TXA is effective in preventing PPH and blood transfusions.. · Routine use of TXA has the potential to decrease transfusion-related complications and costs..

Patient-Reported Health Outcomes and Quality of Life after Peripartum Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum.

OBJECTIVE: Short-term morbidity of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is well described, but few data are available regarding long-term outcomes and quality of life. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes after hysterectomy for PAS. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study of women with risk factors for PAS who were enrolled antenatally. Exposed women were defined as those who underwent cesarean hysterectomy due to PAS. Unexposed women were those with three or more prior cesareans or placenta previa, but no PAS, who underwent cesarean delivery without hysterectomy. Two surveys were sent to patients at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postpartum: (1) a general health questionnaire and (2) the SF-36, a validated quality of life survey. Aggregate scores for each questionnaire were calculated and responses were analyzed. RESULTS: At 6 months postpartum, women with PAS were more likely to report rehospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 5.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-24.3), painful intercourse (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.04-6.02), and anxiety/worry (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.43-9.93), but were not statistically more likely to report additional surgeries (OR 3.39, 95% CI 0.99-11.7) or grief and depression (OR 2.45, 95% CI 0.87-6.95). At 12 months, women with PAS were more likely to report painful intercourse, grief/depression, and anxiety/worry. At 36 months, women with PAS were more likely to report grief/depression, anxiety/worry, and additional surgeries. Women with PAS reported significantly lower quality of life in physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, and pain at 6 months postpartum, but not in other quality of life domains. Decreased quality of life was also reported at 12 and 36 months in the PAS group. CONCLUSION: Women with PAS are more likely to report ongoing long-term health issues and decreased quality of life for up to 3 years following surgery than those undergoing cesarean for other indications. KEY POINTS: · Long-term placenta accreta spectrum data to guide peripartum patient education.. · This study addresses a critical knowledge gap.. · Women affected by PAS report long-term morbidity..

Association of Prostaglandin Use for Cervical Ripening with Mode of Delivery in Small for Gestational Age versus Non-Small for Gestational Age Neonates.

OBJECTIVE: Prostaglandins (PGs) use for cervical ripening with small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses is controversial since it remains uncertain if use increases the chance of cesarean delivery (CD). We aimed to assess the association between PG use for cervical ripening and mode of delivery between SGA and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b), a prospective observational cohort study of 10,038 nulliparas. We included women undergoing induction with nonanomalous fetuses in the cephalic presentation. Women with >2 cm cervical dilation or prior uterine scar were excluded. We assessed the association of PG use with CD among women with SGA and AGA neonates. SGA was defined as birth weight <10th percentile for gestational age and sex. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders and test for interaction. Secondary outcomes included adverse neonatal outcomes, indication for CD, maternal hemorrhage, and chorioamnionitis. RESULTS: Among 2,353 women eligible, PGs were used in 54.8%, SGA occurred in 15.1%, and 35.0% had CD. The association between PG use and CD differed significantly (interaction p = 0.018) for SGA versus AGA neonates; CD occurred more often in SGA neonates exposed to PGs than not (35 vs. 22%, p = 0.009). PG use was not associated with CD among AGA neonates (36 vs. 36%, p = 0.8). This effect remained significant when adjusting for body mass index, race/ethnicity, and cervical dilation. Among SGA neonates, CD for "nonreassuring fetal status" was similar between PG groups. Among SGA neonates, PG use was not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes or postpartum hemorrhage but had a higher rate of chorioamnionitis (7.0 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: PG use was associated with a higher rate of CD in SGA but not AGA neonates; however, further studies are needed before PG use is discouraged with SGA neonates. KEY POINTS: · PGs are commonly used for cervical ripening.. · PG use was associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery in SGA neonates.. · PG use was not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes..