Reliability and safety of transnasal compared to conventional endoscopy for detecting oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Unsedated transnasal endoscopy may be used for detecting oesophageal varices. However, few studies evaluated feasibility and accuracy of this technique. We aimed to evaluate accuracy, interobserver agreement and safety of the transnasal ultrathin compared to conventional endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients referred for screening or surveillance of oesophageal varices. Patients underwent unsedated transnasal and sedated conventional endoscopies at the same day, which were recorded in a digital video file and randomly analysed by two double-blinded endoscopists. High-risk varices were defined by the presence of large calibre or red wale marks. Accuracy, interobserver agreement and safety of transnasal were compared to conventional endoscopy. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three cirrhotic patients (48% male, aged of 60 ± 5, 34% Child-Pugh B/C and 71% of cases for variceal screening) were included in the study. The prevalence of oesophageal varices and high-risk oesophageal varices were 59% (n = 79) and 29% (n = 39) respectively. For the presence of oesophageal varices, transnasal GIE yielded sensitivity of 94% [95% Confidence Interval, CI 88-99], specificity of 89% [81-97] as well as positive and negative predictive value of 93% and 91% respectively. A satisfactory interobserver agreement was observed for the presence of oesophageal varices (κ = 0.89) and high-risk varices (κ = 0.65). No serious adverse events were recorded; transnasal GIE was safe and significantly associated with lower rates of hypoxaemia (P < .0001) and hypotension (P < .0001) compared to conventional endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated transnasal endoscopy was safe and had an excellent accuracy and high interobserver agreement for detecting oesophageal varices and for identifying high-risk varices in cirrhotic patients.

Prevalence, variability, and outcomes in portal hypertensive colopathy: a study in patients with cirrhosis and paired controls.

BACKGROUND: Management of portal hypertensive colopathy (PHC) has been challenged by controversial results in its prevalence and clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: To describe the PHC prevalence and to evaluate the variability in diagnosis, the relation to severity of liver disease, and the incidence of severe outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Endoscopic unit of a tertiary-care academic center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PATIENTS: Patients with cirrhosis with portal hypertension and controls paired for age and sex. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were submitted to standard and image-enhanced colonoscopies, which were recorded in a coded video file and analyzed twice by a blinded endoscopist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The prevalence of PHC. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients with cirrhosis (55% male, mean age 59 years) and 51 healthy controls (43% male, mean age 61 years) were included. The top ranking colonoscopic findings were angiodysplasia-like lesions, nonspecific vascular pattern, red spots, and colorectal varices, all significantly more frequent in patients with cirrhosis compared with controls. PHC prevalence was 71% in patients with cirrhosis. For PHC, interobserver and intraobserver agreement (k values [standard error]) were 0.68 (0.09) and 0.63 (0.10), respectively. Intraobserver agreement for colonoscopic findings was satisfactory. PHC was not related to more severe liver disease or liver stiffness. Only 5 patients developed severe outcomes during follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The exclusion of patients with cirrhosis without esophageal varices and the absence of an interobserver agreement analysis by double-blinded endoscopists. CONCLUSION: PHC was highly prevalent in patients with cirrhosis, and its diagnostic agreement was satisfactory. PHC is not associated with relevant severe outcomes in a 12-month follow-up.