The Effect of Iloprost in the Healing of Colonic Anastomosis in Rats under Chemotherapy with Irinotecan.

PURPOSE: We have investigated the possible positive effect of iloprost in the healing of colonic anastomosis, in rats under intraperitoneal chemotherapy with irinotecan. METHOD: Forty male Wistar rats have been divided into four groups. They underwent a partial colectomy and a termino-terminal anastomosis. They were administered, intraperitoneally, saline (group 1), irinotecan (group 2), iloprost (group 3), or irinotecan and iloprost (Group 4). After the sacrifice of the animals what followed was an autopsy, a macroscopic examination and the measurement of the anastomotic rupture pressure. A portion of the anastomosis was sent over for histological examination and determination of hydroxyproline levels. Results: The frequency of the leakage from the anastomosis was considered as significantly increased in group 2 compared with the other groups. In group 2, a significantly greater degree of adhesions, compared to all the remaining groups, was observed. The bursting pressure of the anastomosis was significantly lower in group 2, as compared with all the remaining groups, and significantly increased in the group 4 compared with group 2. Leukocytosis, fibroblasts, the neocollagen and the levels of hydroxyproline in group 4 showed significantly increased values, compared with group 2. The angiogenesis was significantly increased in groups 3 and 4 compared with group 2. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal administration of iloprost after colectomy, termino-terminal anastomosis and intraperitoneal administration of irinotecan promotes the healing process of the colon anastomoses as it competes the inhibitory effect of irinotecan.

Long-term risk, clinical management, and healthcare resource utilization of stable patients with coronary artery disease and post-myocardial infarction in Greece - TIGREECE study.

BACKGROUND: In light of the scarcity of evidence, TIGREECE evaluated the clinical management and long-term outcomes of patients at high risk for an atherothrombotic event who have suffered a myocardial infarction (MI), managed by cardiologists/internists in routine hospital and private office settings in Greece. METHODS: TIGREECE, a multicenter, 3-year prospective cohort study, enrolled patients ≥50 years old, with a history of MI 1-3 years before enrollment and with at least one of the following risk factors: age ≥65 years, diabetes mellitus requiring medication, second prior MI, multivessel coronary artery disease, and creatinine clearance 15-60 mL/min. The primary outcome was a composite of MI, unstable angina with urgent revascularization, stroke, or all-cause death. RESULTS: Between 5 June 2014 and 25 July 2015, 305 eligible consented patients (median age: 67.3 years; 81.3% males; 14.8% active smokers; 80.7% overweight/obese) were enrolled; 52.5% had ≥2 qualifying risk factors. The median time from the index MI [ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 51.1%, non-STEMI in 33.1%] to enrollment was 1.7 years. Of the patients, 65.9% had been discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy. At enrollment, 94.4% were receiving antiplatelets: 60.0% single [acetylsalicylic acid (ASA): 43.3%; clopidogrel: 15.7%] and 34.4% dual (ASA + clopidogrel: 31.8%) therapy. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 3-year primary composite event rate was 9.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-13.0), and the ischemic composite event rate was 6.7% (95% CI: 4.2-9.9). CONCLUSIONS: Study results indicate that in the routine care of Greece one in ten patients experience a recurring cardiovascular event or death, mainly of ischemic origin, 1-3 years post-MI.

Allergy Associated Myocardial Infarction: A Comprehensive Report of Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis and Management of Kounis Syndrome.

Kounis syndrome (KS) has been defined as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the context of a hypersensitivity reaction. Patients may present with normal coronary arteries (Type I), established coronary artery disease (Type II) or in-stent thrombosis and restenosis (Type III). We searched PubMed until 1 January 2020 for KS case reports. Patients with age <18 years, non-coronary vascular manifestations or without an established diagnosis were excluded. Information regarding patient demographics, medical history, presentation, allergic reaction trigger, angiography, laboratory values and management were extracted from every report. The data were pulled in a combined dataset. From 288 patients with KS, 57.6% had Type I, 24.7% Type II and 6.6% Type III, while 11.1% could not be classified. The mean age was 54.1 years and 70.6% were male. Most presented with a combination of cardiac and allergic symptoms, with medication being the most common trigger. Electrocardiographically, 75.1% had ST segment elevation with only 3.3% demonstrating no abnormalities. Coronary imaging was available in 84.8% of the patients, showing occlusive lesions (32.5%), vascular spasm (16.2%) or normal coronary arteries (51.3%). Revascularization was pursued in 29.4% of the cases. In conclusion, allergic reactions may be complicated by ACS. KS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.

Transradial access through the anatomical snuffbox: Results of a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Distal transradial access (dTRA), through the anatomical snuffbox (AS) of the hand, is a novel, potentially beneficial, vascular access for patients undergoing coronary procedures. METHOD: Consecutive patients with an indication for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in our tertiary center, from November 2018 to March 2019. The success rate of the procedure, the incidence of local complications, the time required for hemostasis, and the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO) were evaluated. RESULTS: Α total of 167 patients were catheterized through the dTRA (79.6% men, 20.4% women), with a median age of 64 years. The indication for catheterization was ACS in 80 (47.9%) patients, stable coronary artery disease in 51 (30.5%) patients, and other reasons in 36 (21.6%) patients. Fifty patients (32.9%) underwent PCI. Successful sheath insertion was recorded in 152 (91.0%) patients. The mean time to hemostasis after sheath removal was 52 ± 11 min. Vascular access site complications were evaluated with ultrasound in 62 (40.8%) of the enrolled patients, 40 ± 15 days after the procedure. Among them, 2 (3.2%) patients presented with arteriovenous fistula, and 2 (3.2%) patients with local occlusion at the puncture site within the AS and distal to the transverse ligament, with preservation of the patency of the radial artery proximal to the radial styloid process. CONCLUSION: The dTRA may be a feasible and safe access site for diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures, with decreased incidence of RAO and time required for hemostasis compared to classical radial artery access.

Manual Versus Mechanical Compression of the Radial Artery After Transradial Coronary Angiography: The MEMORY Multicenter Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare manual versus mechanical compression of the radial artery after coronary angiography via transradial access regarding radial artery occlusion (RAO), access-site bleeding complications, and duration of hemostasis. BACKGROUND: Hemostasis of the radial artery after sheath removal can be achieved either by manual compression at the puncture site or by using a mechanical hemostasis device. Because mechanical compression exerts a more stable, continuous pressure on the artery, it could be hypothesized that it is more effective compared with manual compression regarding hemostasis time, bleeding, and RAO risks. METHODS: A total of 589 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography by transradial access with a 5-F sheath were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either manual or mechanical patent hemostasis of the radial artery. Radial artery patency was evaluated by color duplex ultrasonography 24 h after the procedure. The primary endpoint was early RAO at 24 h. Secondary endpoints included access-site bleeding complications and duration of hemostasis. RESULTS: Thirty-six (12%) early RAOs occurred in the manual group, and 24 (8%) occurred in the mechanical group (p = 0.176). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding access-site bleeding complications (hematoma, 52 [17%] vs. 50 [18%]; p = 0.749; bleedings, 8 [3%] vs. 9 [3%]; p = 1.000). Duration of hemostasis was significantly shorter in the manual group (22 ± 34 min vs. 119 ± 72 min with mechanical compression; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Manual and mechanical compression resulted in similar rates of early RAO, although the total duration of hemostasis was significantly shorter in the manual group.

Moderate procedural sedation and opioid analgesia during transradial coronary interventions to prevent spasm: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that moderate procedural sedation can reduce the incidence of radial artery spasm. BACKGROUND: Transradial access for left heart catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention is increasingly used for emergent and elective procedures, in lieu of the femoral approach. However, increased rates of access site crossover have been reported, with radial artery spasm being a major contributor to this effect. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective transradial percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively randomized to receive fentanyl and midazolam during the procedure or no treatment (control subjects). The primary endpoint was angiographically confirmed radial artery spasm. Patient discomfort was quantified with a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Two thousand thirteen patients (age 64.5 ± 8.4 years) were randomized. Spasm occurred in 2.6% of the treatment group versus 8.3% of control subjects (p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 0.29). The number needed to treat to avoid 1 case of spasm was 18 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.9 to 26.6). The access site crossover rate was 34% lower in the treatment group: 9.9% versus 15.0% (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.82). Patient discomfort visual analogue scale score was 18.8 ± 12.5 in the treatment group versus 27.4 ± 17.4 in control subjects (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the 30-day rate of death or repeat hospital stay for any cause: 4.6% versus 4.5% (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.56). CONCLUSIONS: Routine administration of relatively low doses of an opioid/benzodiazepine combination during transradial interventional procedures is associated with a substantial reduction in the rate of spasm, the need for access site crossover, and the procedure-related level of patient discomfort.

Long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in grafts vs native vessels in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: The long-term clinical outcome of patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not clear. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study of post-CABG patients, who underwent PCI in either a graft or a native vessel. RESULTS: Out of 221 consecutive patients, those with PCI in both native vessel and graft (N=16) and missing follow-up data (N=15) were excluded. Out of the remaining 190 patients (age 67.9±9.6 years; 90.0% men), the graft-PCI group (N=88) had more occluded native vessels (2.1±0.8 vs 1.6±0.8; P<0.001), and fewer totally occluded grafts (0.55±0.6 vs 0.75±0.8; P=0.05) compared with the native vessel-PCI group (N=102). On follow-up (median duration 28 months), the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), cardiac death, and repeat revascularization was higher in graft-PCI group compared with native vessel-PCI group (43.2% vs 19.6%, log-rank P<0.001; 19.3% vs 6.9%, log-rank P=0.008; and 23.9% vs 12.7%, log-rank P=0.02, respectively). Graft-PCI was independently associated with higher risk for major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-5.57; P=0.002), cardiac death (HR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.16-10.22; P=0.03) and repeat revascularization (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.02-5.72; P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Post-CABG patients, undergoing graft compared with native vessel-PCI, have worse long-term clinical outcome. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the optimal revascularization strategy for such patients.