The core spindle pole body scaffold Ppc89 links the pericentrin orthologue Pcp1 to the fission yeast spindle pole body via an evolutionarily conserved interface.

Centrosomes and spindle pole bodies (SPBs) are important for mitotic spindle formation and serve as cellular signaling platforms. Although centrosomes and SPBs differ in morphology, many mechanistic insights into centrosome function have been gleaned from SPB studies. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the α-helical protein Ppc89, identified based on its interaction with the septation initiation network scaffold Sid4, comprises the SPB core. High-resolution imaging has suggested that SPB proteins assemble on the Ppc89 core during SPB duplication, but such interactions are undefined. Here, we define a connection between Ppc89 and the essential pericentrin Pcp1. Specifically, we found that a predicted third helix within Ppc89 binds the Pcp1 pericentrin-AKAP450 centrosomal targeting (PACT) domain complexed with calmodulin. Ppc89 helix 3 contains similarity to present in the N-terminus of Cep57 (PINC) motifs found in the centrosomal proteins fly SAS-6 and human Cep57 and also to the S. cerevisiae SPB protein Spc42. These motifs bind pericentrin-calmodulin complexes and AlphaFold2 models suggest a homologous complex assembles in all four organisms. Mutational analysis of the S. pombe complex supports the importance of Ppc89-Pcp1 binding interface in vivo. Our studies provide insight into the core architecture of the S. pombe SPB and suggest an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of scaffolding pericentrin-calmodulin complexes for mitotic spindle formation.

Femoral Magnetic Lengthening After Distal Femur Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.

CASE: A 10-year-old boy with osteosarcoma of the left distal femur underwent resection with compressive osseointegration endoprosthetic reconstruction, gradually resulting in a 4.5-cm leg-length difference with significant predicted progression. Two years after resection, he underwent right distal femur and proximal tibia epiphysiodesis and placement of a left femoral magnetic lengthening nail. At 2 years after lengthening and skeletal maturity, the patient has symmetric limb lengths, no pain, and returned to sports. CONCLUSION: A magnetic lengthening nail with contralateral epiphysiodesis is a viable option for correcting limb-length discrepancy after distal femur endoprosthetic reconstruction in a pediatric patient.

Utility of the Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Prophylactic Stabilization for Defining Metastatic Femur Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Cohorts from the electronic health record are often defined by the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The error prevalence of CPT codes for patients receiving surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the femur has not been investigated, and the predictive value of coding ontologies to identify patients with metastatic disease of the femur has not been adequately discussed. METHODS: All surgical cases at a single academic tertiary institution from 2010 through 2015 involving prophylactic stabilization of the femur or fixation of a pathologic fracture of the femur were identified using the CPT and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes. A detailed chart review was conducted to determine the procedure performed as documented in the surgical note and the patient diagnosis as documented in the pathology report, surgical note, and/or office visit notes. RESULTS: We identified 7 CPT code errors of 171 prophylactic operations (4.1%) and one error of 71 pathologic fracture fixation s(1.4%). Of the 164 prophylactic operations that were coded correctly, 87 (53.0%) had metastatic disease. Of the 70 pathologic operations that were coded correctly, 41 (58%) had metastatic disease. DISCUSSION: The error prevalence was low in both prophylactic stabilization and pathologic fixation groups (4.1% and 1%, respectively). The structured data (CPT and ICD-9 codes) had a positive predictive value for patients having metastatic disease of 53% for patients in the prophylactic stabilization group and 58% for patients in the pathologic fixation group. The CPT codes and ICD codes assessed in this analysis do provide a useful tool for defining a population in which a moderate proportion of individuals have metastatic disease in the femur at an academic medical center. However, verification is necessary.