Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 146
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care ; 25(1): 301, 2021 08 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-term outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli related to hospital-building water systems have been described. However, successful mitigation strategies have rarely been reported. In particular, environmental disinfection or replacement of contaminated equipment usually failed to eradicate environmental sources of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: We report the investigation and termination of an outbreak of P. aeruginosa producing VIM carbapenemase (PA-VIM) in the adult intensive care unit (ICU) of a Swiss tertiary care hospital with active case finding, environmental sampling and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of patient and environmental strains. We also describe the implemented control strategies and their effectiveness on eradication of the environmental reservoir. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and September 2020, 21 patients became either infected or colonized with a PA-VIM strain. For 16 of them, an acquisition in the ICU was suspected. Among 131 environmental samples collected in the ICU, 13 grew PA-VIM in sink traps and drains. WGS confirmed the epidemiological link between clinical and environmental strains and the monoclonal pattern of the outbreak. After removing sinks from patient rooms and implementation of waterless patient care, no new acquisition was detected in the ICU within 8 months after the intervention. DISCUSSION: Implementation of waterless patient care with removal of the sinks in patient rooms was successful for termination of a PA-VIM ICU outbreak linked to multiple environmental water sources. WGS provides highly discriminatory accuracy to investigate environment-related outbreaks.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , beta-Lactamases/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Proteínas de Bactérias/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Epidemiologia , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Suíça/epidemiologia , beta-Lactamases/farmacologia
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28784678

RESUMO

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) resistant to decolonization agents such as mupirocin and chlorhexidine increases the need for development of alternative decolonization molecules. The absence of reported severe adverse reactions and bacterial resistance to polyhexanide makes it an excellent choice as a topical antiseptic. In the present study, we evaluated the in vitro and in vivo capacity to generate strains with reduced polyhexanide susceptibility and cross-resistance with chlorhexidine and/or antibiotics currently used in clinic. Here we report the in vitro emergence of reduced susceptibility to polyhexanide by prolonged stepwise exposure to low concentrations in broth culture. Reduced susceptibility to polyhexanide was associated with genomic changes in the mprF and purR genes and with concomitant decreased susceptibility to daptomycin and other cell wall-active antibiotics. However, the in vitro emergence of reduced susceptibility to polyhexanide did not result in cross-resistance to chlorhexidine. During in vivo polyhexanide clinical decolonization treatment, neither reduced polyhexanide susceptibility nor chlorhexidine cross-resistance was observed. Together, these observations suggest that polyhexanide could be used safely for decolonization of carriers of chlorhexidine-resistant S. aureus strains; they also highlight the need for careful use of polyhexanide at low antiseptic concentrations.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , Biguanidas/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Aminoaciltransferases/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Parede Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Daptomicina/farmacologia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Proteínas Repressoras/genética , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(2): 343-350, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27744604

RESUMO

Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. Ceftaroline susceptibility of an MRSA set archived between 1994 and 2003 in the Geneva University Hospitals detected a high percentage (66 %) of ceftaroline resistance in clonotypes ST228 and ST247 and correlated with mutations in PBP2a. The ceftaroline mechanism of action is based on the inhibition of PBP2a; thus, the identification of PBP2a mutations of recently circulating clonotypes in our institution was investigated. We analyzed ceftaroline susceptibility in MRSA isolates (2013 and 2014) and established that resistant strains correlated with PBP2a mutations and specific clonotypes. Ninety-six MRSA strains were analyzed from independent patients and were isolated from blood cultures (23 %), deep infections (38.5 %), and superficial (skin or wound) infections (38.5 %). This sample showed a ceftaroline minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range between 0.25 and 2 µg/ml and disk diameters ranging from 10 to 30 mm, with a majority of strains showing diameters ≥20 mm. Based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints, 76 % (73/96) of isolates showed susceptibility to ceftaroline. Nevertheless, we still observed 24 % (23/96) of resistant isolates (MIC = 2 µg/ml). All resistant isolates were assigned to clonotype ST228 and carried the N146K mutation in PBP2a. Only two ST228 isolates showed ceftaroline susceptibility. The decreasing percentage of ceftaroline-resistant isolates in our hospital can be explained by the decline of ST228 clonotype circulating in our hospital since 2008. We present evidence that ceftaroline is active against recent MRSA strains from our hospital; however, the presence of PBP2a variants in particular clonotypes may affect ceftaroline efficacy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Genótipo , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Tipagem Molecular , Mutação , Proteínas de Ligação às Penicilinas/genética , Prevalência , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Ceftarolina
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(2): 531-8, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26507428

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of polyhexanide (Prontoderm(®)) in eliminating MRSA carriage. METHODS: In a 1900 bed teaching hospital, MRSA-colonized patients were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority trial between January 2011 and July 2014. Patients were treated with either polyhexanide or placebo applied to the anterior nares (thrice daily) and skin (once daily) for 10 days. The primary outcome was MRSA decolonization at day 28 (D28) after the end of treatment assessed by ITT responder and PP analyses (microbiological follow-up ± 7 days and topical treatment ≥ 5 days). Secondary outcomes included safety, emergence of resistance and MRSA genotype changes. Registered trial number ISRCTN02288276. RESULTS: Of 2590 patients screened, 146 (polyhexanide group, 71; placebo group, 75) were included. ITT analysis showed that 24/71 (33.8%) patients in the polyhexanide group versus 22/75 (29.3%) in the placebo group were MRSA-free at D28 (risk difference, 4.5%; 95% CI, -10.6% to 19.5%; P = 0.56). PP analysis confirmed the results with 19/53 (35.8%) decolonized polyhexanide-treated patients versus 17/56 (30.4%) in the placebo arm (risk difference, 5.5%; 95% CI, -12.2% to 23%; P = 0.54). Nine serious adverse events occurred in the polyhexanide group versus 12 in the placebo group; none was attributable to study medication. Emergence of polyhexanide resistance or cross-resistance between polyhexanide and chlorhexidine was not observed. No case of exogenous recolonization by a genotypically different MRSA strain was documented. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that under real-life conditions, a single polyhexanide decolonization course is not effective in eradicating MRSA carriage.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Biguanidas/administração & dosagem , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Biguanidas/efeitos adversos , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(2): 290-5, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26568581

RESUMO

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is a global public health threat. Despite the emergence of highly resistant organisms and the huge medical need for new drugs, the development of antibacterials has slowed to an unacceptable level worldwide. Numerous government and non-government agencies have called for public-private partnerships and innovative funding mechanisms to address this problem. To respond to this public health crisis, the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking programme has invested more than €660 million, with a goal of matched contributions from the European Commission and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, in the development of new antibacterial strategies. The New Drugs for Bad Bugs (ND4BB) programme, an Innovative Medicines Initiative, has the ultimate goal to boost the fight against ABR at every level from basic science and drug discovery, through clinical development to new business models and responsible use of antibiotics. Seven projects have been launched within the ND4BB programme to achieve this goal. Four of them will include clinical trials of new anti-infective compounds, as well as epidemiological studies on an unprecedented scale, which will increase our knowledge of ABR and specific pathogens, and improve the designs of the clinical trials with new investigational drugs. The need for rapid concerted action has driven the funding of seven topics, each of which should add significantly to progress in the fight against ABR. ND4BB unites expertise and provides a platform where the commitment and resources required by all parties are streamlined into a joint public-private partnership initiative of unprecedented scale.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/isolamento & purificação , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Financiamento de Capital , Descoberta de Drogas/organização & administração , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Parcerias Público-Privadas , Descoberta de Drogas/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos
6.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 70(6): 1604-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25673635

RESUMO

The global burden of antibiotic resistance is tremendous and, without new anti-infective strategies, will continue to increase in the coming decades. Despite the growing need for new antibiotics, few pharmaceutical companies today retain active antibacterial drug discovery programmes. One reason is that it is scientifically challenging to discover new antibiotics that are active against the antibiotic-resistant bacteria of current clinical concern. However, the main hurdle is diminishing economic incentives. Increased global calls to minimize the overuse of antibiotics, the cost of meeting regulatory requirements and the low prices of currently marketed antibiotics are strong deterrents to antibacterial drug development programmes. New economic models that create incentives for the discovery of new antibiotics and yet reconcile these incentives with responsible antibiotic use are long overdue. DRIVE-AB is a €9.4 million public-private consortium, funded by the EU Innovative Medicines Initiative, that aims to define a standard for the responsible use of antibiotics and to develop, test and recommend new economic models to incentivize investment in producing new anti-infective agents.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/isolamento & purificação , Descoberta de Drogas/economia , Descoberta de Drogas/métodos , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/métodos , Pesquisa/economia , Descoberta de Drogas/organização & administração , Descoberta de Drogas/tendências , Humanos , Motivação
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 70(1): 264-72, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25209610

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The therapeutic arsenal for MRSA infections is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the non-inferiority of a combination of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole plus rifampicin versus linezolid alone for the treatment of MRSA infection. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, single-centre, non-inferiority trial comparing trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (160 mg/800 mg three times daily) plus rifampicin (600 mg once a day) versus linezolid (600 mg twice a day) alone in adult patients with various types of MRSA infection. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either regimen. The primary outcome was clinical cure at 6 weeks after the end of treatment (non-inferiority margin 20%) assessed by both ITT and PP analyses. Secondary outcomes included the microbiologically documented persistence of MRSA in clinical cultures, mortality and adverse events. The study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00711854). RESULTS: Overall, 150 patients were randomized to one of the two treatment arms between January 2009 and December 2013 and were included in the ITT analysis. Of these 56/75 (74.7%) in the linezolid group and 59/75 (78.7%) in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group experienced clinical success (risk difference 4%, 95% CI -9.7% to 17.6%). The results were confirmed by the PP analysis, with 54/66 (81.8%) cured patients in the linezolid group versus 52/59 (88.1%) in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group (risk difference 6.3%, 95% CI -6.8% to 19.2%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the secondary outcomes, including microbiologically documented failure. Four adverse drug reactions attributed to the study medication occurred in the linezolid group versus nine in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with linezolid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin seems to be non-inferior in the treatment of MRSA infection.


Assuntos
Acetamidas/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapêutico , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Acetamidas/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Linezolida , Masculino , Oxazolidinonas/efeitos adversos , Rifampina/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 70(4): 1245-55, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25527272

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To report the extent and components of global efforts in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in hospitals. METHODS: An Internet-based survey comprising 43 questions was disseminated worldwide in 2012. RESULTS: Responses were received from 660 hospitals in 67 countries: Africa, 44; Asia, 50; Europe, 361; North America, 72; Oceania, 30; and South and Central America, 103. National AMS standards existed in 52% of countries, 4% were planning them and 58% had an AMS programme. The main barriers to implementing AMS programmes were perceived to be a lack of funding or personnel, a lack of information technology and prescriber opposition. In hospitals with an existing AMS programme, AMS rounds existed in 64%; 81% restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, 74.3%; quinolones, 64%; and cephalosporins, 58%); and 85% reported antimicrobial usage, with 55% linking data to resistance rates and 49% linking data to infection rates. Only 20% had electronic prescribing for all patients. A total of 89% of programmes educated their medical, nursing and pharmacy staff on AMS. Of the hospitals, 38% had formally reviewed their AMS programme: reductions were reported by 96% of hospitals for inappropriate prescribing, 86% for broad-spectrum antibiotic use, 80% for expenditure, 71% for healthcare-acquired infections, 65% for length of stay or mortality and 58% for bacterial resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The worldwide development and implementation of AMS programmes varies considerably. Our results should inform and encourage the further evaluation of this with a view to promoting a worldwide stewardship framework. The prospective measurement of well-defined outcomes of the impact of these programmes remains a significant challenge.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Hospitais , Estudos Transversais , Saúde Global , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Política Organizacional
9.
Euro Surveill ; 19(29)2014 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25080142

RESUMO

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections in Europe. Many examples have demonstrated that the spread of MRSA within healthcare settings can be reduced by targeted infection control measures. The aim of this systematic literature analysis and review was to summarise the evidence for the use of bacterial cultures for active surveillance the benefit of rapid screening tests, as well as the use of decolonisation therapies and different types of isolation measures. We included 83 studies published between 2000 and 2012. Although the studies reported good evidence supporting the role of active surveillance followed by decolonisation therapy, the effectiveness of single-room isolation was mostly shown in non-controlled studies, which should inspire further research regarding this issue. Overall, this review highlighted that when planning the implementation of preventive interventions, there is a need to consider the prevalence of MRSA, the incidence of infections, the competing effect of standard control measures (e.g. hand hygiene) and the likelihood of transmission in the respective settings of implementation.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Meticilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Desinfecção das Mãos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Resistência a Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão
10.
Rev Med Suisse ; 10(446): 1918, 1920-3, 2014 Oct 15.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25438375

RESUMO

Enterococci are microorganisms with a remar- kable ability to adapt to their environment. Two species have a significant clinical implication, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. The risk factors for colonization and infection must be recognized, including prior treatment with antibiotics such as cephalosporins or quinolones. Because of their native resistance to several classes of antibiotics and the increase of acquired resistance to penicillins, the initial empiric treatment of a severe infection in a patient at risk of enterococcal infection often includes a glycopeptide. A restriction in the empirical use of cephalosporins or quinolones and a targeted antibiotic therapy following receipt of the antibiogram are essential to prevent the emergence of enterococcal strains and especially vancomycin-resistant enterococci.


Assuntos
Enterococcus , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/classificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/microbiologia , Cetoacidose Diabética/complicações , Cetoacidose Diabética/microbiologia , Enterococcus/isolamento & purificação , Enterococcus/patogenicidade , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/terapia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
11.
J Hosp Infect ; 147: 47-55, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467250

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Infection control measures are effective for nosocomial COVID-19 prevention but bear substantial health-economic costs, motivating their "de-escalation" in settings at low risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Yet consequences of de-escalation are difficult to predict, particularly in light of novel variants and heterogeneous population immunity. AIM: To estimate how infection control measure de-escalation influences nosocomial COVID-19 risk. METHODS: An individual-based transmission model was used to simulate SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks and control measure de-escalation in a French long-term care hospital with multi-modal control measures in place (testing and isolation, universal masking, single-occupant rooms). Estimates of COVID-19 case fatality rates (CFRs) from reported outbreaks were used to quantify excess COVID-19 mortality due to de-escalation. RESULTS: In a population fully susceptible to infection, de-escalating both universal masking and single rooms resulted in hospital-wide outbreaks of 114 (95% CI: 103-125) excess infections, compared with five (three to seven) excess infections when de-escalating only universal masking or 15 (11-18) when de-escalating only single rooms. When de-escalating both measures and applying CFRs from the first wave of COVID-19, excess patient mortality ranged from 1.57 (1.41-1.71) to 9.66 (8.73-10.57) excess deaths/1000 patient-days. By contrast, when applying CFRs from subsequent pandemic waves and assuming susceptibility to infection among 40-60% of individuals, excess mortality ranged from 0 (0-0) to 0.92 (0.77-1.07) excess deaths/1000 patient-days. CONCLUSIONS: The de-escalation of bundled COVID-19 control measures may facilitate widespread nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission. However, excess mortality is probably limited in populations at least moderately immune to infection and given CFRs resembling those estimated during the 'post-vaccine' era.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Controle de Infecções , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , França/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Idoso , Masculino , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
12.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; : 107259, 2024 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936492

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the main reasons for antibiotic prescriptions in primary care. Recent studies demonstrate similar clinical outcomes with shorter antibiotics courses. Here, we investigated the differential collateral effect of ciprofloxacin treatment duration on the gastrointestinal and oropharyngeal microbiome in patients presenting with uncomplicated UTI to primary care practices in Switzerland, Belgium and Poland. METHODS: Stool and oropharyngeal samples were obtained from 36 treated patients and 14 controls at the beginning of antibiotic therapy, end of therapy and one month after end of therapy. Samples underwent shotgun metagenomics. RESULTS: At the end of therapy, patients treated with both shorter (≤7 days) and longer (>7 days) ciprofloxacin courses showed similar changes in the gastrointestinal microbiome compared to non-treated controls. After one month, most changes in patients receiving shorter courses were reversed; however, longer courses led to increased abundance of the genera Roseburia, Faecalicatena and Escherichia. Changes in the oropharynx were minor and reversed to baseline levels within one month. Ciprofloxacin resistance encoding mutations in gyrA/B and parC/E reads were observed in both treatment groups, which decreased to baseline levels after one month. An increased abundance of resistance genes was observed in the gastrointestinal microbiome after longer treatment, and correlated to increased prevalence of aminoglycoside, beta-lactam, sulphonamide, and tetracycline resistance genes. CONCLUSION: Collateral effects on the gastrointestinal community, including an increased prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes, persists at least up to one month following longer ciprofloxacin therapy. Our data, therefore, support the use of shorter treatment duration.

13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 56(6): 798-805, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23223600

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether rising incidence rates of nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) replace antibiotic-susceptible bacteria (ASB), leaving the total BSI rate unaffected. METHODS: We investigated temporal trends in annual incidence densities (events per 100 000 patient-days) of nosocomial BSIs caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), ARB other than MRSA, and ASB in 7 ARB-endemic and 7 ARB-nonendemic hospitals between 1998 and 2007. RESULTS: 33 130 nosocomial BSIs (14% caused by ARB) yielded 36 679 microorganisms. From 1998 to 2007, the MRSA incidence density increased from 0.2 to 0.7 (annual increase, 22%) in ARB-nonendemic hospitals, and from 3.1 to 11.7 (annual increase, 10%) in ARB-endemic hospitals (P = .2), increasing the incidence density difference between ARB-endemic and ARB-nonendemic hospitals from 2.9 to 11.0. The non-MRSA ARB incidence density increased from 2.8 to 4.1 (annual increase, 5%) in ARB-nonendemic hospitals, and from 1.5 to 17.4 (annual increase, 22%) in ARB-endemic hospitals (P < .001), changing the incidence density difference from -1.3 to 13.3. Trends in ASB incidence densities were similar in both groups (P = .7). With annual increases of 3.8% and 5.4% of all nosocomial BSIs in ARB-nonendemic and ARB-endemic hospitals, respectively (P < .001), the overall incidence density difference of 3.8 increased to 24.4. CONCLUSIONS: Increased nosocomial BSI rates due to ARB occur in addition to infections caused by ASB, increasing the total burden of disease. Hospitals with high ARB infection rates in 2005 had an excess burden of BSI of 20.6 per 100 000 patient-days in a 10-year period, mainly caused by infections with ARB.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Adulto , Idoso , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
15.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 32(1): 33-42, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22898726

RESUMO

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains from different geographic areas have different genetic backgrounds, suggesting independent clonal evolutions. To better understand the virulence of MRSA strains and the relationship to their clonal and geographic origins, we undertook an analysis of epidemiologic, molecular, and virulence characteristics of a large number of MRSA isolates from geographically diverse origins, in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. A total of 99 MRSA isolates collected between 1993 and 2010 at the Geneva University Hospitals from diverse global origins were characterized with Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST), accessory gene regulator (agr) group, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), S. aureus protein A (spa), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing. Epidemiologic data were provided from clinical records. The bacterial virulence was tested in a C. elegans host model. The inter-relationships of epidemiological/molecular characteristics in association with nematocidal activities were analyzed with univariate and two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains were more virulent than hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), with higher nematocidal activities in CA-MRSA strains (0.776 vs. 0.506, p = 0.0005). All molecular characteristics (PVL, TSST, spa, SCCmec, MLST, and PFGE types) showed a significant association with nematocidal activities on univariate analysis (p < 0.005). PVL was not a significant predictor after adjusting for genomic backgrounds using spa, MLST, or PFGE typing. The dominant CA-MRSA strains in North America showed higher nematocidal activities than strains from other regions (p < 0.0001). Strains with global origins containing distinct genetic backgrounds have different virulence in the C. elegans model. Nematocidal activities were most highly correlated with SCCmec, spa, MLST, and PFGE typing, suggesting that genomic background rather than a single exotoxin characteristic was the most discriminating predictor of virulence.


Assuntos
Caenorhabditis elegans/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Saúde Global , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Tipagem Molecular , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Análise de Sobrevida , Virulência , Fatores de Virulência/genética
16.
J Hosp Infect ; 135: 55-58, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36805086

RESUMO

Mupirocin-based decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus carriers undergoing haemodialysis is not widely implemented due to concerns of mupirocin resistance. In our haemodialysis unit, a strategy combining universal S. aureus screening with targeted mupirocin-based decolonization was introduced two decades ago. In this study of haemodialysis patients, mupirocin resistance was assessed in blood and colonizing S. aureus isolates during two periods. Mupirocin resistance in S. aureus was infrequent in both blood and colonizing isolates. Furthermore, in the years 2003-2021, a decreasing trend in the annual rate of S. aureus bloodstream infections was observed. Targeted mupirocin-based decolonization of S. aureus carriers undergoing haemodialysis is a sustainable measure for preventing healthcare-associated infections.


Assuntos
Mupirocina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus , Estudos Longitudinais , Clorexidina , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
17.
J Hosp Infect ; 139: 6-10, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37343772

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI) among different catheter types using a large prospective database in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a tertiary care centre in Switzerland. METHODS: We included all neonates admitted to the NICU with at least one central intravascular catheter inserted between January 2017 and December 2020. We used marginal Cox model to determine the risk of CABSI among different catheter types. RESULTS: A total of 574 neonates and 1103 intravascular catheters were included in the study: 581 venous umbilical catheters, 198 arterial umbilical catheters and 324 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). We identified 17, four and four CABSIs in neonates with venous umbilical catheters, arterial umbilical catheters and PICCs, respectively. The risk of CABSI increased after two days of umbilical catheter maintenance. Using univariable Cox models, and adjusting for sex and gestational age, we observed a similar CABSI risk between venous and arterial umbilical catheters (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.16e2.08). Birth weight was associated with CABSI, with higher weight being protective (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16e0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies aimed at reducing umbilical catheter dwell time, particularly in low and very low birth weight neonates, may be effective in decreasing the incidence of CABSI in this population.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Sepse , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/epidemiologia , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Br J Surg ; 99(4): 589-95, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22231649

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no dedicated scoring system for predicting the risk of surgical-site infection (SSI) after resection of the colon or rectum. Generic scores, such as the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance index, are not used by colorectal surgeons. METHODS: Multivariable analysis of risk factors for SSI was performed in patients who underwent resection of the colon or rectum, and were followed during the first month after operation. A logistic regression model was used to identify determinant variables and construct a predictive score. RESULTS: There were 534 patients of whom 114 (21·3 per cent) developed SSI. In multivariable analysis, four parameters correlated with an increased risk of SSI: obesity (odds ratio (OR) 2·93, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·71 to 5·03), contamination class 3-4 (OR 3·33, 2·08 to 5·32), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III-IV (OR 1·82, 1·14 to 2·90) and open surgery (OR 2·22, 1·01 to 4·88). Each of these contributed 1 point to the risk score. The observed risk of SSI was 5 per cent for a score of 0, 12·0 per cent for a score of 1 point, 18·7 per cent for 2 points, 44 per cent for 3 points and 68 per cent for 4 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the score was 0·729. CONCLUSION: A simple clinical score based on four preoperative variables was clinically useful in predicting the risk of SSI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.


Assuntos
Colo/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Suíça
19.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 31(12): 3367-74, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22833247

RESUMO

We evaluated, by an improved susceptibility testing method, the prevalence and significance of low-level glycopeptide resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, which belonged to a previously described, retrospective cohort of patients treated for orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI) at the Geneva University Hospital between 2000 and 2008. Fifty-seven individual or multiple isolates were retrieved from 41 ODRI patients for glycopeptide susceptibility and clonality studies, including 20 patients with prosthetic joint (PJ) and 21 with osteosynthesis (OS) MRSA infections. Low-level glycopeptide resistance was detected by elevated teicoplanin or/and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs ≥ 4 mg/L), as determined by a previously validated combination of macrodilution and agar dilution assays of improved sensitivity. MRSA isolates with elevated teicoplanin MICs were detected in 20/41 (49 %) ODRI patients at the onset or during the course of glycopeptide therapy, namely, in 10 of 20 patients with PJ and 10 of 21 patients with OS infections. Only one isolate developed a concomitant increase in vancomycin MIC during therapy. 13/20 (65 %) glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA)-infected patients, including 7/10 (70 %) with PJ and 6/10 (60 %) with OS, experienced treatment failure. In contrast, therapy failed in only 5/21 (24 %) ODRI patients with non-GISA isolates (p = 0.012), including 2/10 (20 %) with PJ and 3/11 (27 %) with OS infections. The emergence of low-level teicoplanin resistance could not be explained by teicoplanin administration, since only four patients received teicoplanin. The evaluation of low-level teicoplanin resistance may improve the detection of GISA isolates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of low-level teicoplanin resistance on the outcome of glycopeptide therapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Glicopeptídeos/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Glicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Teicoplanina/farmacologia , Teicoplanina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
20.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 31(8): 1765-70, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22160823

RESUMO

Twenty-three hospital laboratories from Europe and Israel participated in an external quality assessment (EQA) of the culture-based detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Participants also reported the MRSA prevalence in clinical cultures and patient screening specimens, as well as the MRSA screening practices employed at their hospitals. An EQA panel of 18 samples consisting of two MRSA harbouring SCCmec IV and I, and one strain each of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative S. epidermidis, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus and Escherichia coli as pure strains or in mixtures at 10(7)-1 cfu absolute loads was analysed by the 23 participants. Seventeen (74%) participants identified 17 or more samples correctly. Of these, 15 (88%) utilised a chromogenic medium alone (ChromID, bioMérieux; BBL CHROMagar, BD Diagnostics; MRSA Select, Bio-Rad Laboratories) or combined with a conventional medium and up to three confirmatory tests. Proportions of MRSA among S. aureus isolated from clinical cultures varied widely, even among hospitals within countries, ranging from 11-20% to 61-70%. MRSA carriage rates were less variable (0-20%) between countries. Almost all participants (n=22, 96%) screened patients for MRSA carriage during 2009-2010, of which 15 (68%) screened intensive care unit (ICU) patients alone or combined with other targeted high-risk groups, and 10 (45%) combined nasal screening with another body site.


Assuntos
Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Compostos Cromogênicos , Meios de Cultura/química , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Israel , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa