The efficacy of irinotecan, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin (IPO) in relapsed germ cell tumours with high-dose chemotherapy as consolidation: a non-cisplatin-based induction approach.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the outcome of an expanded cohort of patients with relapsed germ cell tumours (GCTs) treated with a salvage chemotherapy regimen consisting of irinotecan, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin (IPO) and assess the role of IPO as an alternative to standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results of 72 consecutive patients were reviewed retrospectively. IPO was used either as a second-line treatment (29 patients), of which 20 patients subsequently received high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT), or third-line (43), of which 32 patients proceeded to HDCT. RESULTS: The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for the whole cohort were 30.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.3-40.5%) and 33.4% (95% CI 20.1-43.8%), respectively. Complete remission was achieved in 3%, marker-negative partial response (PR) in 41%, marker-positive PR in 18%, stable disease in 17% and progressive disease in 20%. In the second-line setting, the 2-year PFS rate was 43.5% (95% CI 21.7-60.8%) and 3-year OS 49.1% (95% CI 24.2-65.1%). In the third-line setting, the 2-year PFS rate was 21.0% (95% CI 9.5-35.4%) and the 3-year OS rate was 23.9% (95% CI 11.7-38.2). According to the current international prognostic factor study group criteria for first relapse for the high- and very high-risk group the 2-year PFS rates were 50% and 30%, respectively. There were two treatment-related deaths from IPO, and four from HDCT. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia (35%), thrombocytopaenia (18%), infection (15%), diarrhoea (11%) and lethargy (8%). CONCLUSIONS: IPO offers an effective, well-tolerated, non-nephrotoxic alternative to cisplatin-based salvage regimens for patients with relapsed GCTs. It appears particularly useful in high-risk patients and for those in whom cisplatin is ineffective or contra-indicated.

Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Biosynthesis of extragonadal androgen may contribute to the progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer. We evaluated whether abiraterone acetate, an inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis, prolongs overall survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have received chemotherapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 1195 patients who had previously received docetaxel to receive 5 mg of prednisone twice daily with either 1000 mg of abiraterone acetate (797 patients) or placebo (398 patients). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (elevation in the PSA level according to prespecified criteria), progression-free survival according to radiologic findings based on prespecified criteria, and the PSA response rate. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12.8 months, overall survival was longer in the abiraterone acetate-prednisone group than in the placebo-prednisone group (14.8 months vs. 10.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.77; P<0.001). Data were unblinded at the interim analysis, since these results exceeded the preplanned criteria for study termination. All secondary end points, including time to PSA progression (10.2 vs. 6.6 months; P<0.001), progression-free survival (5.6 months vs. 3.6 months; P<0.001), and PSA response rate (29% vs. 6%, P<0.001), favored the treatment group. Mineralocorticoid-related adverse events, including fluid retention, hypertension, and hypokalemia, were more frequently reported in the abiraterone acetate-prednisone group than in the placebo-prednisone group. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibition of androgen biosynthesis by abiraterone acetate prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who previously received chemotherapy. (Funded by Cougar Biotechnology; COU-AA-301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00638690.).

Carboplatin AUC 10 for IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma.

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic seminoma is a highly curable disease. Standard treatment comprises of combination chemotherapy. The short- and long-term toxicities of this treatment are increasingly recognised and the possibility of over treatment in such a curable disease should be considered. We have therefore assessed the use of single agent carboplatin at a dose of AUC 10 in patients with good prognosis metastatic seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with good prognosis metastatic seminoma treated with carboplatin (AUC 10) were identified at our institution and affiliated institutions. Treatment was three weekly for a total of three or four cycles. Outcome and toxicities were analysed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 36 months, 61 patients in total were treated with carboplatin AUC 10, all good prognosis by the IGCCCG criteria. Forty-eight percent had stage IIA/IIB disease and 52% had greater than stage IIB disease. Thirty-one patients (51%) had a complete response following treatment. Three-year survival was 96.3% with a three-year progression free survival of 93.2%. The main treatment toxicity was haematological with 46% having grade 3, 24% having grade 4 neutropenia and 54% experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: Single agent carboplatin at a dose of AUC 10 is an effective treatment for good prognosis metastatic seminoma. The outcome compares favourably to previously published outcomes of combination chemotherapy. Although haematological toxicity is a concern, single agent carboplatin treatment for good prognosis metastatic seminoma could be considered a treatment option and is associated with less toxicity than combination regimens currently used.

Abiraterone acetate for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: final overall survival analysis of the COU-AA-301 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate improved overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer at a preplanned interim analysis of the COU-AA-301 double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Here, we present the final analysis of the study before crossover from placebo to abiraterone acetate (after 775 of the prespecified 797 death events). METHODS: Between May 8, 2008, and July 28, 2009, this study enrolled 1195 patients at 147 sites in 13 countries. Patients were eligible if they had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. Patients were stratified according to baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, worst pain over the past 24 h on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, number of previous chemotherapy regimens, and type of progression. Patients were randomly assigned (ratio 2:1) to receive either abiraterone acetate (1000 mg, once daily and orally) plus prednisone (5 mg, orally twice daily) or placebo plus prednisone with a permuted block method via an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00091442. FINDINGS: Of the 1195 eligible patients, 797 were randomly assigned to receive abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (abiraterone group) and 398 to receive placebo plus prednisone (placebo group). At median follow-up of 20·2 months (IQR 18·4-22·1), median overall survival for the abiraterone group was longer than in the placebo group (15·8 months [95% CI 14·8-17·0] vs 11·2 months [10·4-13·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·64-0·86; p<0·0001). Median time to PSA progression (8·5 months, 95% CI 8·3-11·1, in the abiraterone group vs 6·6 months, 5·6-8·3, in the placebo group; HR 0·63, 0·52-0·78; p<0·0001), median radiologic progression-free survival (5·6 months, 5·6-6·5, vs 3·6 months, 2·9-5·5; HR 0·66, 0·58-0·76; p<0·0001), and proportion of patients who had a PSA response (235 [29·5%] of 797 patients vs 22 [5·5%] of 398; p<0·0001) were all improved in the abiraterone group compared with the placebo group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were fatigue (72 [9%] of 791 patients in the abiraterone group vs 41 [10%] of 394 in the placebo group), anaemia (62 [8%] vs 32 [8%]), back pain (56 [7%] vs 40 [10%]), and bone pain (51 [6%] vs 31 [8%]). INTERPRETATION: This final analysis confirms that abiraterone acetate significantly prolongs overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after docetaxel treatment. No new safety signals were identified with increased follow-up.

Single-agent carboplatin AUC10 in metastatic seminoma: A multi-centre UK study of 216 patients.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy and cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy are accepted standard-of-care treatments for metastatic seminoma with excellent survival outcomes but with established short- and long-term morbidity. Carboplatin monotherapy may be a less toxic alternative; however early historic studies at AUC7 showed inferior outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate multi-institutional data on and toxicity and longer-term survival for metastatic seminoma patients treated with the single-agent carboplatin AUC10. METHODS: We undertook a multi-institutional analysis incorporating all men with the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good-prognosis metastatic seminoma treated until 2018. Carboplatin AUC10 was given every 21 days. Toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival were noted. Variables predictive of progression were identified. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: 216 patients were treated. The three-year PFS rate was 96.5%, and five-year DSS was 98.3%. There were seven relapses, of which 5 were successfully salvaged with further chemotherapy ± surgery, and three non-seminoma-related deaths. There were no treatment-related deaths. Of 148/216 evaluable patients for toxicity, 37% and 27% suffered >/ = grade III neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Twelve percent of patients needed a platelet or blood transfusion (or both). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 5%. CONCLUSION: For metastatic seminoma, carboplatin AUC10 harbours a similar oncological efficacy to established therapies, with a low failure risk. The major acute toxicity was myelosuppression. Our study establishes carboplatin AUC10 as another standard-of-care treatment option for good-prognosis metastatic seminoma, with a potentially lower toxicity profile than other therapies.

TGFbeta induces apoptosis and EMT in primary mouse hepatocytes independently of p53, p21Cip1 or Rb status.

BACKGROUND: TGFbeta has pleiotropic effects that range from regulation of proliferation and apoptosis to morphological changes and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Some evidence suggests that these effects may be interconnected. We have recently reported that P53, P21Cip1 and pRB, three critical regulators of the G1/S transition are variably involved in TGFbeta-induced cell cycle arrest in hepatocytes. As these proteins are also involved in the regulation of apoptosis in many circumstances, we investigated their contribution to other relevant TGFbeta-induced effects, namely apoptosis and EMT, and examined how the various processes were interrelated. METHODS: Primary mouse hepatocytes deficient in p53, p21 and/or Rb, singly or in combination were treated with TGFbeta for 24 to 96 hours. Apoptosis was quantified according to morphology and by immunostaining for cleaved-capsase 3. Epithelial and mesenchymal marker expression was studied using immunocytochemistry and real time PCR. RESULTS: We found that TGFbeta similarly induced morphological changes regardless of genotype and independently of proliferation index or sensitivity to inhibition of proliferation by TGFbeta. Morphological changes were accompanied by decrease in E-cadherin and increased Snail expression but the mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin, SMAalpha and Vimentin) studied remained unchanged. TGFbeta induced high levels of apoptosis in p53-/-, Rb-/-, p21cip1-/- and control hepatocytes although with slight differences in kinetics. This was unrelated to proliferation or changes in morphology and loss of cell-cell adhesion. However, hepatocytes deficient in both p53 and p21cip1were less sensitive to TGFbeta-induced apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Although p53, p21Cip1 and pRb are well known regulators of both proliferation and apoptosis in response to a multitude of stresses, we conclude that they are critical for TGFbeta-driven inhibition of hepatocytes proliferation, but only slightly modulate TGFbeta-induced apoptosis. This effect may depend on other parameters such as proliferation and the presence of other regulatory proteins as suggested by the consequences of p53, p21Cip1 double deficiency. Similarly, p53, p21Cip1 and pRB deficiency had no effect on the morphological changes and loss of cell adhesion which is thought to be critical for metastasis. This indicates that possible association of these genes with metastasis potential would be unlikely to involve TGFbeta-induced EMT.

Paraneoplastic Cushing's syndrome in prostate cancer: a difficult management problem.

Cushing's syndrome associated with small-cell de-differentiation of prostate cancer is rare, but well described. The detection of Cushing's syndrome in a patient with prostate cancer can be problematical, and when occurring in prostate cancer nearly always implies the development of small-cell transformation. Testosterone levels in these patients are likely to be in the normal range, despite previous castration. The features of Cushing's syndrome contribute considerably to patients' morbidity and probably to their mortality. The syndrome is unlikely to be controlled with inhibitors of steroid synthesis, and chemotherapy is likely to be poorly tolerated, resolving the syndrome in only a few patients. We suggest that bilateral adrenalectomy at an early stage should be considered, possibly as a preliminary to anticancer treatments.

Electromotive drug administration with mitomycin C for intravesical treatment of non-muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma.

This article reviews the use and application of electromotive drug administration for the intravesical treatment of bladder cancer. Strong evidence supports the use of passive intravesical chemotherapy in the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. More recently, two published randomised trials have shown therapeutic advantage with protocols that use electromotive drug administration to enhance urothelial penetration of intravesical mitomycin C. The results suggest that the passive intravesical administration of chemotherapeutic drugs may be suboptimal. Further studies are required to demonstrate the feasibility and advantage of electromotive intravesical mitomycin C in the wider uro-oncological community.

Contralateral intratubular germ cell neoplasia in a patient with testicular cancer.

BACKGROUND: A 27-year-old man was referred to an oncology department following right orchiectomy for a stage I testicular seminoma at high risk for recurrence. He presented 6 weeks after the orchiectomy with an atrophic left testis, fatigue and a history of infertility. INVESTIGATIONS: Measurement of serum levels of urea, electrolytes, liver enzymes, bilirubin, human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha-fetoprotein, lactate dehydrogenase, testosterone and luteinizing hormone, full blood count, and left testicular biopsy. DIAGNOSIS: Tubular atrophy of the left testis with islands of intratubular germ cell neoplasia (ITGCN), and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. MANAGEMENT: The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy as a single dose of carboplatin for the seminoma at high risk for recurrence, and testosterone replacement for the hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. Radiotherapy to the ITGCN-bearing solitary testis or a second orchiectomy was offered to prevent the progression of ITGCN into an invasive germ cell tumor. After exploring his options with regards to fertility treatment, the patient chose to undergo second orchiectomy with a subsequent, unsuccessful, attempt at sperm retrieval. At 20 months after diagnosis of his initial seminoma the patient showed no sign of recurrence.

Chemotherapy for hormone-resistant prostate cancer: Where are we today?

Significant progress has been achieved in chemotherapy for hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) in the last five years. Although the disease was long considered to be chemoresistant, docetaxel-based regimens in particular have been shown to both palliate symptoms and prolong survival in HRPC patients. Docetaxel is now considered the best available chemotherapy for prostate cancer progressing on first-line hormonal treatment. Other cytotoxics including mitoxantrone, anthracyclines, vinorelbin and vinblastine can alleviate symptoms and improve progression-free survival in HRPC without affecting overall survival. The survival benefit from chemotherapy seen in randomized studies has been small or nonexistent. Results of a recent trial suggest that the survival benefit may have been underestimated as a result of crossover from the less active to the active arm.

Broad clinical activity of zoledronic acid in osteolytic to osteoblastic bone lesions in patients with a broad range of solid tumors.

Bone metastases are a common feature of a variety of solid tumors and are associated with substantial skeletal morbidity, including severe bone pain and pathologic fractures. Treatment with bisphosphonates, primarily pamidronate, is the current standard of care for patients with breast cancer and multiple myeloma who have predominantly osteolytic lesions. However, until recently no bisphosphonate had demonstrated efficacy in patients with osteoblastic lesions, which are common during the progression of prostate cancer and other solid tumors. Zoledronic acid, a potent, new-generation, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, has demonstrated significant benefits for patients with bone metastases resulting from a broad range of primary tumors, including multiple myeloma and breast, lung, kidney, and prostate cancers, and other solid tumors. Benefits include a decreased incidence of pathologic fractures and longer time to the first skeletal complication. Zoledronic acid is the first and only bisphosphonate to be proved effective in patients with all types of bone lesions, from osteolytic to osteoblastic, and therefore represents an important therapeutic advancement in the treatment of bone metastases.

Myocardial uptake of 99mTc-HDP and reduced perfusion on CT in subacute myocardial infarction.

A 65-year-old man with known bone metastases from prostate cancer and no cardiac history attended for a restaging bone scan (BS). Diffuse increased Tc-HDP activity in the heart was noted, new since a BS 3 months earlier. A restaging contrast-enhanced CT scan on the same day showed reduced myocardial perfusion in the anterior, apical, and septal walls. On direct questioning, he described an episode of severe exertional chest pain the day before. Myocardial infarction was confirmed and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. New cardiac uptake on BS, raising the possibility of myocardial infarction, is a red alert for clinicians.

Effect of abiraterone acetate treatment on the quality of life of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after failure of docetaxel chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In a recent randomised, double-blind, phase III clinical trial among 1195 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had failed docetaxel chemotherapy, abiraterone acetate was shown to significantly prolong overall survival compared with prednisone alone. Here we report on the impact of abiraterone therapy on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) observed during this trial, assessed using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire. METHODS: All analyses were conducted using prespecified criteria for clinically meaningful improvement and deterioration in FACT-P total score as well as subscale scores; all respective thresholds were defined using an accepted methodology. Improvement was assessed only in patients with clinically significant functional status impairment at baseline. RESULTS: Significant improvements in the FACT-P total score were observed in 48% of patients receiving abiraterone versus 32% of patients receiving prednisone (p < 0.0001). Also, the median time to deterioration in FACT-P total score was longer (p < 0.0001) in patients receiving abiraterone (59.9 weeks versus 36.1 weeks). Similar differences were observed in all FACT-P subscales, with the exception of the social/family well-being domain. Median time to improvement in the physical well-being domain and the trial outcome index was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) with abiraterone when compared with the prednisone arm. CONCLUSIONS: The previously demonstrated survival benefit for abiraterone is accompanied by improvements in patient-reported HRQoL and a significant delay in HRQoL deterioration when compared with prednisone.

Transdermal oestrogen therapy as a second-line hormonal intervention in prostate cancer: a bad experience.

OBJECTIVE: To compare transdermal oestrogen with oral diethylstilbestrol (DES) as a second- or third-line hormonal therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 32 assessable patients who, having already had a relapse on at least one line of hormonal therapy, received transdermal oestrogen therapy as an alternative to oral DES, when DES became unavailable. RESULTS: Whereas DES had controlled the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level for a median of 29 weeks in a group of 15 patients in remission, all but one had an increase in PSA level (median 86% increase above the starting PSA level) within a median of 8 weeks after introducing transdermal therapy. This increase was reversed in seven of the 12 patients who recommenced DES therapy. CONCLUSION: Although the use of transdermal oestrogen is currently attracting enthusiasm as a first-line treatment for prostate cancer, these results show that for second- or third-line therapy further cautious research with careful monitoring is necessary.

Randomized trial of two or five computed tomography scans in the surveillance of patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: Medical Research Council Trial TE08, ISRCTN56475197--the National Cancer Research Institute Testis Cancer Clinical Studies Group.

PURPOSE: Surveillance is a standard management approach for stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). A randomized trial of two versus five computed tomography (CT) scans was performed to determine whether the number of scans influenced the proportion of patients relapsing with intermediate- or poor-prognosis disease at relapse. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage I NSGCT opting for surveillance were randomly assigned to chest and abdominal CT scans at either 3 and 12 or 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months, with all other investigations identical in the two arms. Three of five patients were allocated to the two-scan schedule. Four hundred patients were required. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-seven patients were allocated to a two-scan and 167 to five-scan policy. With a median follow-up of 40 months, 37 relapses (15%) have occurred in the two-scan arm and 33 (20%) in the five-scan arm. No patients had poor prognosis at relapse, but two (0.8%) of those relapsing in the two-scan arm had intermediate prognosis compared with 1 (0.6%) in the five-scan arm, a difference of 0.2% (90% CI, -1.2% to 1.6%). No deaths have been reported. CONCLUSION: This study can rule out with 95% probability an increase in the proportion of patients relapsing with intermediate- or poor-prognosis disease of more than 1.6% if they have two rather than five CT scans as part of their surveillance protocol. CT scans at 3 and 12 months after orchidectomy should be considered a reasonable option in low-risk patients.

18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the prediction of relapse in patients with high-risk, clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: preliminary report of MRC Trial TE22--the NCRI Testis Tumour Clinical Study Group.

PURPOSE: There are several management options for patients with clinical stage I (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT); this study examined whether an 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) scan could identify patients without occult metastatic disease for whom surveillance is an attractive option. METHODS: High-risk (lymphovascular invasion positive) patients with CS1 NSGCT underwent 18FDG PET scanning within 8 weeks of orchidectomy or marker normalization. PET-positive patients went off study; PET-negative patients were observed on a surveillance program. The primary outcome measure was the 2-year relapse-free rate (RFR) in patients with a negative PET scan (the negative predictive value). Assuming an RFR of 90% to exclude an RFR less than 80% with approximately 90% power, 100 PET-negative patients were required; 135 scanned patients were anticipated. RESULTS: Patients were registered between May 2002 and January 2005, when the trial was stopped by the independent data monitoring committee due to an unacceptably high relapse rate in the PET-negative patients. Of 116 registered patients, 111 underwent PET scans, and 88 (79%) were PET-negative (61% of preorchidectomy marker-negative patients v 88% of marker-positive patients; P = .002); 87 proceeded to surveillance, and one requested adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 12 months, 33 of 87 patients on surveillance relapsed (1-year RFR, 63%; 90% CI, 54% to 72%). CONCLUSION: Though PET identified some patients with disease not detected by computed tomography scan, the relapse rate among PET negative patients remains high. The results show that 18FDG PET scanning is not sufficiently sensitive to identify patients at low risk of relapse in this setting.

Tumour markers for managing men who present with metastatic prostate cancer and serum prostate-specific antigen levels of <10 ng/mL.

OBJECTIVE: To define immunohistochemical features of the primary cancers that might help in the differential diagnosis and monitoring of treatment in men presenting with metastatic prostate cancer and low serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), who can be difficult to diagnose and manage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paraffin blocks of prostate biopsies were obtained for 33 patients presenting with untreated metastatic prostate cancer and serum PSA levels of <10 ng/mL. Sections were immunostained for PSA, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), androgen receptor (AR), chromogranin A and CD 56. RESULTS: The combined Gleason scores were 8-10 in 25 men (76%) and 6 or 7 in the other eight (24%). Morphologically, there were no neuroendocrine features. PSA immunostaining was equivocal in 12 (36%) cases and in a further 19 (58%) was strong but focal and could be missed on biopsy sampling. PSMA was expressed in 90% of cases, and staining was widely distributed in nine of the 12 in which PSA staining was equivocal. There was strong AR expression in 30 (91%) cases and it was present in areas where PSA was absent. CONCLUSION: In this patient group, immunohistochemical assessments of PSMA and AR are potentially useful as diagnostic markers.

Clinical features of patients who present with metastatic prostate carcinoma and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels < 10 ng/mL: the "PSA negative" patients.

BACKGROUND: Although < 1% of men present with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-negative prostate carcinoma, in that they have serum PSA levels much lower than the tumor burden would suggest, such patients represent a management dilemma. To the authors' knowledge, little information exists in the literature regarding patterns of disease and response to treatment. The authors wished to define the clinical features of this patient group. METHODS: The British Association of Urological Surgeons Cancer Registry 2000 and 2001 data bases were used to identify the clinical features and outcome of 33 men with metastatic prostate carcinoma who presented with serum PSA levels < 10 ng/mL. Clinical notes and histopathology were reviewed for each patient. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (51%) presented with urinary symptoms and/or pelvic pain, 6% with cachexia and 21% with bone pain. Characteristic bone metastases were present in 81% of patients, similar to the presentation of men with high serum PSA levels. Hypercalcemia was a feature in 9% of patients. Visceral metastases were present in two patients. The median response duration to first-line hormone manipulation was 7 months. No responses were seen in 11 of 13 patients who received second-line hormones or to any third-line treatment. Three of 5 patients who received chemotherapy responded but developed recurrent disease within 8 weeks of treatment cessation. The median overall survival was 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The presentation of patients with treatment-naïve PSA-negative metastatic prostate carcinoma is similar to that of patients with high serum PSA levels, but their median survival and response duration to first-line hormone therapy are of much shorter duration. Second-line hormone therapy is ineffective, but early chemotherapy may be beneficial. Hypercalcemia is a particular feature in this group of patients.