Correction to: Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.

Unfortunately, figures 1 and 2 have been incorrectly published in the original publication. The complete correct figures are given below with the captions.

Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated a new metric for assessing the quality of motion of the cervical segments over the arc of extension-to-flexion motion after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). We quantified: (1) the amount of motion contributed by individual spinal segments to the total cervical spine motion, termed segmental motion fraction, and its variation throughout the arc of extension-to-flexion motion and (2) how cervical disc arthroplasty using two distinct prosthesis designs may influence the segmental motion contributions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested 16 human C3-T1 spine specimens under physiologic loads; first intact, after CDA at C5-C6, and then at C5-C6 and C6-C7. The M6-C (Orthofix, USA) and Mobi-C (Zimmer, USA) disc prostheses were used in eight specimens each. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The designs of the cervical disc prostheses tested significantly influenced the variation in segmental motion fraction as the spine underwent motion between the endpoints of extension and flexion. While the mean segmental motion contribution to the total cervical motion was not influenced by prosthesis design, the way the motion took place between the extension and flexion endpoints was significantly influenced. The M6-C artificial disc restored physiologic motion quality such that implanted segments continued to function in harmony with other segments of the cervical spine as measured before arthroplasty. Conversely, the Mobi-C prosthesis, while maintaining average motion contributions similar to the pre-implantation values, demonstrated large deviations in motion contribution over the extension-to-flexion arc motion in ten of 16 implanted segments. Such non-physiologic implant kinematics could cause excessive prosthesis wear and motion and stress shielding at adjacent segments. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Biomechanical Properties of a Novel Mesh Suture in a Cadaveric Flexor Tendon Repair Model.

PURPOSE: Conventional suture repairs, when stressed, fail by suture rupture, knot slippage, or suture pull-through, when the suture cuts through the intervening tissue. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of flexor tendon repairs using a novel mesh suture with traditional suture repairs. METHODS: Sixty human cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested and assigned to 1 of 3 suture repair groups: 3-0 and 4-0 braided poly-blend suture or 1-mm diameter mesh suture. All tendons were repaired using a 4-strand core cruciate suture configuration. Each tendon repair underwent linear loading or cyclic loading until failure. Outcome measures included yield strength, ultimate strength, the number of cycles and load required to achieve 1-mm and 2-mm gap formation, and failure. RESULTS: Mesh suture repairs had significantly higher yield and ultimate force values when compared with 3-0 and 4-0 braided poly-blend suture repairs under linear testing. The average force required to produce repair gaps was significantly higher in mesh suture repairs than in conventional suture. Mesh suture repairs endured a significantly greater number of cycles and force applied before failure compared with both 3-0 and 4-0 conventional suture. CONCLUSIONS: This ex vivo biomechanical study of flexor tendon repairs using a novel mesh suture reveals significant increases in average yield strength, ultimate strength, and average force required for gap formation and repair failure with mesh suture repairs compared with conventional sutures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Mesh suture-based flexor tendon repairs could lead to improved healing at earlier time points. The findings could allow for earlier mobilization, decreased adhesion formation, and lower rupture rates after flexor tendon repairs.

Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

PURPOSE: In this article, we summarize our work on understanding the influence of cervical sagittal malalignment on the mechanics of the cervical spine. METHODS: Biomechanical studies were performed using an ex vivo laboratory model to study the kinematic and kinetic response of human cervical spine specimens in the setting of cervical sagittal imbalance. The model allowed controlled variations of C2-C7 Sagittal Vertical Alignment (C2-C7 SVA) and T1-Slope so that clinically relevant sagittally malaligned profiles could be prescribed, while maintaining horizontal gaze, and their biomechanical consequences studied. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that increasing C2-C7 SVA caused flexion of lower cervical (C2-C7) segments and hyperextension of suboccipital (C0-C1-C2) segments to maintain horizontal gaze. An increase in C2-C7 SVA increased the lower cervical neural foraminal areas. Conversely, increasing T1-slope predominantly influenced subaxial cervical lordosis and, as a result, decreased cervical neural foraminal areas. Therefore, we believe patients with increased upper thoracic kyphosis and radicular symptoms may respond with increased forward head posture (FHP) as a compensatory mechanism to increase their lower cervical neural foraminal area and alleviate nerve root compression as well as reduce the burden on posterior muscles and soft and bony structures of the cervical spine. Increasing FHP (i.e., increased C2-C7 SVA) was associated with shortening of the cervical flexors and occipital extensors and lengthening of the cervical extensors and occipital flexors, which corresponds to C2-C7 flexion and C0-C2 extension. The greatest shortening occurred in the suboccipital muscles, suggesting considerable load bearing of these muscles during chronic FHP. Regardless, there was no evidence of nerve compression within the suboccipital triangle. Finally, cervical sagittal imbalance may play a role in exacerbating adjacent segment pathomechanics after multilevel cervical fusion and should be considered during surgical planning. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our biomechanical studies have improved our understanding of the impact of cervical sagittal malalignment on pathomechanics of the cervical spine. We believe this improved understanding will assist in clinical decision-making.

Decoupling the Wrist: A Cadaveric Experiment Examining Wrist Kinematics Following Midcarpal Fusion and Scaphoid Excision.

At the wrist, kinematic coupling (the relationship between flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation) facilitates function. Although the midcarpal joint is critical for kinematic coupling, many surgeries, such as 4-corner fusion (4CF) and scaphoidexcision 4-corner fusion (SE4CF), modify the midcarpal joint. This study examines how 4CF and SE4CF influence kinematic coupling by quantifying wrist axes of rotation. Wrist axes of rotation were quantified in 8 cadaveric specimens using an optimization algorithm, which fit a 2-revolute joint model to experimental data. In each specimen, data measuring the motion of the third metacarpal relative to the radius was collected for 3 conditions (nonimpaired, 4CF, SE4CF). The calculated axes of rotation were compared using spherical statistics. The angle between the axes of rotation was used to assess coupling, as the nonimpaired wrist has skew axes (ie, angle between axes approximately 60°). Following 4CF and SE4CF, the axes are closer to orthogonal than those of the nonimpaired wrist. The mean angle (±95% confidence interval) between the axes was 92.6° ± 25.2° and 99.8° ± 22.0° for 4CF and SE4CF, respectively. The axes of rotation defined in this study can be used to define joint models, which will facilitate more accurate computational and experimental studies of these procedures.

Dimensions of the cervical neural foramen in conditions of spinal deformity: an ex vivo biomechanical investigation using specimen-specific CT imaging.

PURPOSE: Patients with cervical spondylosis commonly present with neck pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy. As degenerative changes progress, multiple factors including disc height loss, thoracic kyphosis, and facetogenic changes can increase the risk of neural structure compression. This study investigated the impact of cervical deformity including forward head posture (FHP) and upper thoracic kyphosis, on the anatomy of the cervical neural foramen. METHODS: Postural changes of 13 human cervical spine specimens (Occiput-T1, age 50.6 years; range 21-67) were assessed in response to prescribed cervical sagittal malalignments using a previously reported experimental model. Two characteristics of cervical sagittal deformities, C2-C7 sagittal vertical alignment (SVA) and sagittal angle of the T1 vertebra (T1 tilt), were varied to create various cervical malalignments. The postural changes were documented by measuring vertebral positions and orientations. The vertebral motion data were combined with specimen-specific CT-based anatomical models, which allowed assessments of foraminal areas of subaxial cervical segments as a function of increasing C2-C7 SVA and changing T1 tilt. RESULTS: Increasing C2-C7 SVA from neutral posture resulted in increased neural foraminal area in the lower cervical spine (largest increase at C4-C5: 13.8 ± 15.7 %, P < 0.01). Increasing SVA from a hyperkyphotic posture (greater T1 tilt) also increased the neural foraminal area in the lower cervical segments (C5-C6 demonstrated the largest increase: 13.4 ± 9.6 %, P < 0.01). The area of the cervical neural foramen decreased with increasing T1 tilt, with greater reduction occurring in the lower cervical spine, specifically at C5-C6 (-8.6 ± 7.0 %, P < 0.01) and C6-C7 (-9.6 ± 5.6 %, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An increase in thoracic kyphosis (T1 tilt) decreased cervical neural foraminal areas. In contrast, an increase in cervical SVA increased the lower cervical neural foraminal areas. Patients with increased upper thoracic kyphosis may respond with increased cervical SVA as a compensatory mechanism to increase their lower cervical neural foraminal area.

Coupled rotation patterns in cervical spine axial rotation can change when the head is kept level.

The biomechanical literature describes axial rotation occurring coupled with lateral bending and flexion in the cervical spine. Since the head is kept level during some activities of daily living, we set out to investigate the changes in total and segmental motion that occur when a level gaze constraint is applied to cadaveric cervical spine specimens during axial rotation. 1.5Nm of left and right axial rotation moment was applied to sixteen C2-T1 cadaveric specimens with C2 unconstrained and C2 constrained to simulate level gaze. Overall and segmental motions were determined using optoelectronic motion measurement and specimen-specific kinematic modeling. Without a kinematic constraint on C2, motions were as described in the literature; namely, flexion and lateral bending to the same side as axial rotation. Keeping C2 level reduced that total axial rotation range of motion of the specimens. Changes were also produced in segmental coupled rotation in all specimens. The observed changes included completely opposite coupled motion than in the uncoupled specimens, and traditional coupled behavior at one load extreme and the opposite at the other extreme. Constraining C2 during axial rotation to simulate level gaze can produce coupled motion that differs from the classically described flexion and lateral bending to the same side as axial rotation. Statement of Clinical Significance: Activities of daily living that require the head to be kept level during axial rotation of the cervical spine may produce segmental motions that are quite different from the classically described motions with implications for biomechanical experiments and implant designers.

Prosthesis design and likelihood of achieving physiological range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty: analysis of range of motion data from 1,173 patients from 7 IDE clinical trials.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The functional goals of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are to restore enough range of motion (ROM) to reduce the risk of accelerated adjacent segment degeneration but limit excessive motion to maintain a biomechanically stable index segment. This motion-range is termed the "Physiological mobility range." Clinical studies report postoperative ROM averaged over all study subjects but they do not report what proportion of reconstructed segments yield ROM in the Physiological mobility range following CDA surgery. PURPOSE: To calculate the proportion of reconstructed segments that yield flexion-extension ROM (FE-ROM) in the Physiological mobility range (defined as 5°-16°) by analyzing the 24-month postoperative data reported by clinical trials of various cervical disc prostheses. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Analysis of 24-month postoperative FE-ROM data from clinical trials. PATIENT SAMPLE: Data from 1,173 patients from single-level disc replacement clinical trials of 7 cervical disc prostheses. OUTCOME MEASURES: 24-month postoperative index-level FE-ROM. METHODS: The FE-ROM histograms reported in Food and Drug Administration-Investigational Device Exemption (FDA-IDE) submissions and available for this analysis were used to calculate the frequencies of implanted levels with postoperative FE-ROM in the following motion-ranges: Hypomobile (0°-4°), Physiological (5°-16°), and Hypermobile (≥17°). The ROM histograms also allowed calculation of the average ROM of implanted segments in each of the 3 motion-ranges. RESULTS: Only 762 of 1,173 patients (implanted levels) yielded 24-month postCDA FE-ROM in the physiological mobility range (5°-16°). The proportions ranged from 60% to 79% across the 7 disc-prostheses, with an average of 65.0%±6.2%. Three-hundred and two (302) of 1,173 implanted levels yielded ROM in the 0°-4° range. The proportions ranged from 15% to 38% with an average of 25.7%±8.9%. One-hundred and nine (109) of 1,173 implanted levels yielded ROM of ≥17° with a range of 2%-21% and an average proportion of 9.3%±7.9%. The prosthesis with built-in stiffness due to its nucleus-annulus design yielded the highest proportion (103/131, 79%) of implanted segments in the physiological mobility range, compared to the cohort average of 65% (p<.01). Sixty-five of the 350 (18.6%) discs implanted with the 2 mobile-core designs in this cohort yielded ROM≥17° as compared to the cohort average of 9.3% (109/1,173) (p<.05). At 2-year postCDA, the "hypomobile" segments moved on average 2.4±1.2°, those in the "physiological-mobility" group moved 9.4±3.2°, and the hypermobile segments moved 19.6±2.6°. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis design significantly influenced the likelihood of achieving FE-ROM in the physiological mobility range, while avoiding hypomobility or hypermobility (p<.01). Postoperative ROM averaged over all study subjects provides incomplete information about the prosthesis performance - it does not tell us how many implanted segments achieve physiological mobility and how many end up with hypomobility or hypermobility. We conclude that the proportion of index levels achieving postCDA motions in the physiological mobility range (5°-16°) is a more useful outcome measure for future clinical trials.

Parametric and cadaveric models of lumbar flexion instability and flexion restricting dynamic stabilization system.

PURPOSE: Development of a dynamic stabilization system often involves costly and time-consuming design iterations, testing and computational modeling. The aims of this study were (1) develop a simple parametric model of lumbar flexion instability and use this model to identify the appropriate stiffness of a flexion restricting stabilization system (FRSS), and (2) in a cadaveric experiment, validate the predictive value of the parametric model. METHODS: Literature was surveyed for typical parameters of intact and destabilized spines: stiffness in the high flexibility zone (HFZ) and high stiffness zone, and size of the HFZ. These values were used to construct a bilinear parametric model of flexion kinematics of intact and destabilized lumbar spines. FRSS implantation was modeled by iteratively superimposing constant flexion stiffnesses onto the parametric model. Five cadaveric lumbar spines were tested intact; after L4-L5 destabilization (nucleotomy, midline decompression); and after FRSS implantation. Specimens were loaded in flexion/extension (8 Nm/6 Nm) with 400 N follower load to characterize kinematics for comparison with the parametric model. RESULTS: To accomplish the goal of reducing ROM to intact levels and increasing stiffness to approximately 50 % greater than intact levels, flexion stiffness contributed by the FRSS was determined to be 0.5 Nm/deg using the parametric model. In biomechanical testing, the FRSS restored ROM of the destabilized segment from 146 ± 13 to 105 ± 21 % of intact, and stiffness in the HFZ from 41 ± 7 to 135 ± 38 % of intact. CONCLUSIONS: Testing demonstrated excellent predictive value of the parametric model, and that the FRSS attained the desired biomechanical performance developed with the model. A simple parametric model may allow efficient optimization of kinematic design parameters.

Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion is a well-established procedure for treatment of degenerative disc disease and cervical trauma including flexion-distraction injuries. Low-profile interbody devices incorporating fixation have been introduced to avoid potential issues associated with dissection and traditional instrumentation. While these devices have been assessed in traditional models, they have not been evaluated in the setting of traumatic spine injury. This study investigated the ability of these devices to stabilize the subaxial cervical spine in the presence of flexion-distraction injuries of increasing severity. METHODS: Thirteen human cadaveric subaxial cervical spines (C3-C7) were tested at C5-C6 in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the load-control mode under ±1.5 Nm moments. Six spines were tested with locked screw configuration and seven with variable angle screw configuration. After testing the range of motion (ROM) with implanted device, progressive posterior destabilization was performed in 3 stages at C5-C6. RESULTS: The anchored spacer device with locked screw configuration significantly reduced C5-C6 flexion-extension (FE) motion from 14.8 ± 4.2 to 3.9 ± 1.8°, lateral bending (LB) from 10.3 ± 2.0 to 1.6 ± 0.8, and axial rotation (AR) from 11.0 ± 2.4 to 2.5 ± 0.8 compared with intact under (p < 0.01). The anchored spacer device with variable angle screw configuration also significantly reduced C5-C6 FE motion from 10.7 ± 1.7 to 5.5 ± 2.5°, LB from 8.3 ± 1.4 to 2.7 ± 1.0, and AR from 8.8 ± 2.7 to 4.6 ± 1.3 compared with intact (p < 0.01). The ROM of the C5-C6 segment with locked screw configuration and grade-3 F-D injury was significantly reduced from intact, with residual motions of 5.1 ± 2.1 in FE, 2.0 ± 1.1 in LB, and 3.3 ± 1.4 in AR. Conversely, the ROM of the C5-C6 segment with variable-angle screw configuration and grade-3 F-D injury was not significantly reduced from intact, with residual motions of 8.7 ± 4.5 in FE, 5.0 ± 1.6 in LB, and 9.5 ± 4.6 in AR. CONCLUSIONS: The locked screw spacer showed significantly reduced motion compared with the intact spine even in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury. The variable angle screw spacer did not sufficiently stabilize flexion-distraction injuries. The resulting motion for both constructs was higher than that reported in previous studies using traditional plating. Locked screw spacers may be utilized with additional external immobilization while variable angle screw spacers should not be used in patients with flexion-distraction injuries.

Simulated Weightbearing and Articular Injury From Transarticular Screws in a Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury Model.

BACKGROUND: Transarticular screw fixation is a common surgical treatment for tarsometatarsal ligamentous (Lisfranc) injuries. Iatrogenic damage to articular cartilage from screw placement, however, has been thought to potentially lead to increased risk of tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint arthritis after initial injury. To date, no study has evaluated the effect of weightbearing on articular cartilage after screw fixation. The aim of this study was to create a Lisfranc injury and quantify and compare articular damage due to screw fixation before and after simulated weightbearing. METHODS: A ligamentous Lisfranc injury was created in 10 cadaveric specimens and treated with transarticular screws. Specimens were cycled for 1000 cycles at 250 N to simulate 2 weeks of physiologic weightbearing. Rotation and diastasis across the Lisfranc complex were measured. Articular injury as a percentage of total articular surface was measured using digital imaging of the first and second TMT joint before and after simulated weightbearing. Comparisons between articular damage were made and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Simulated partial weightbearing increased articular injury 1.44-fold (P < .001). The second metatarsal (M2) showed the greatest increase (1.54-fold, P = .0047), whereas the first (M1) showed the least (1.35-fold, P = .0083). Increases seen at the medial (1.43-fold, P = .0387) and middle cuneiform (1.44-fold, P = .0292) were intermediate between the values seen at M2 and M1. CONCLUSION: Articular damage from transarticular screw fixation significantly increased after simulated partial weightbearing. This may increase the risk of arthritis and future morbidity when using transarticular screws for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Iatrogenic damage to articular cartilage due to screw fixation of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries may be increased with weightbearing.

Effect of K-wire Reuse and Drill Mode on Heat Generation in Bone.

BACKGROUND: We examined the effect of Kirschner wire (K-wire) reuse and use of oscillating mode on heat generation within cortical bone. METHODS: Two trocar-tipped K-wires were drilled through the diaphysis of each of 30 human metacarpals and phalanges: one K-wire was inserted in rotary mode and another in oscillating mode. Each wire was reused once. Thermocouples placed within the dorsal and volar bone adjacent to the K-wire drill path measured temperatures throughout each test. RESULTS: Peak cortex temperatures were 25°C to 164°C. Rotary drilling achieves peak temperatures quicker (31 ± 78 seconds vs 44 ± 78 seconds, P = .19) than oscillating drilling, but insertion time is also less, resulting in lower overall heat exposure. This effect is also seen when the K-wire is reused (34 ± 70 seconds vs 41 ± 85 seconds, P = .4). The length of time that cortical bone was exposed to critical temperatures (47°C or more) was significantly higher when a wire was reused (36 ± 72 seconds vs 43 ± 82 seconds, P = .008). Peak temperatures greater than 70°C (a temperature associated with instantaneous cell death) were observed on many occasions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall heat exposure may be higher if a K-wire is reused or inserted in oscillating mode. In the absence of external cooling, K-wire insertion into cortical bone can easily expose bone to temperatures that exceed 70°C and may increase the risk of osteonecrosis.

Bone cutting efficiency and heat generation using a traditional fluted Burr and a novel fluteless resurfacing tool.

BACKGROUND: Powered instrumentation is often used for bone preparation and/or removal in many orthopaedic procedures but does risk thermogenesis. This study compares biomechanical properties of a fluted burr and a novel fluteless resurfacing tool. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric metatarsals were tested with four predetermined cutting forces to evaluate heat generation and cutting rate for the fluted burr and fluteless resurfacing tool over 40 s or until a depth of 4 mm was reached. Cutting rate was calculated from displacement transducer data. Heat generation was measured by thermocouples placed in the bone adjacent to the burring site. Assuming a body temperature of 37 °C, a 10 °C increase in heat was used as the threshold of inducing osteonecrosis. FINDINGS: At 1.0 N and 1.7 N, the thermal osteonecrosis threshold was reached at comparable times between burrs, while the bone removed by the resurfacing tool was on average five times greater than fluted burr at 1.0 N and over twice as great at 1.7 N. Statistical analysis of these common cutting forces showed the resurfacing tool had significantly higher cutting rates (P < 0.01). As a result, the fluted burr produced higher temperatures for the same amount of bone removal (P < 0.01). INTERPRETATION: In a cadaveric study, the fluteless resurfacing tool demonstrated higher bone cutting rates and lower heat generation for the same amount of bone removed than a traditional fluted burr.

Republication of "A Biomechanical Comparison of Limited Open Versus Krackow Repair for Achilles Tendon Rupture".

Background: Soft tissue complications after Achilles tendon repair has led to increased interest in less invasive techniques. Various limited open techniques have gained popularity as an alternative to open operative repair. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare an open Krackow and limited open repair for Achilles tendon rupture. We hypothesized that there would be no statistical difference in load to failure, work to failure, and initial linear stiffness. Methods: A simulated Achilles tendon rupture was created 4 cm proximal to its insertion in 18 fresh-frozen cadaveric below-knee lower limbs. Specimens were randomized to open or limited open PARS Achilles Jig System repair. Repairs were loaded to failure at a rate of 25.4 mm/s to reflect loading during normal ankle range of motion. Load to failure, work to failure, and initial linear stiffness were compared between the 2 repair types. Results: The average load to failure (353.8 ± 88.8 N vs 313.3 ± 99.9 N; P = .38) and work to failure (6.4 ± 2.3 J vs 6.3 ± 3.5 J; P = .904) were not statistically different for Krackow and PARS repair, respectively. Mean initial linear stiffness of the Krackow repair (17.8 ± 5.4 N/mm) was significantly greater than PARS repair (11.8 ± 2.5 N/mm) (P = .011). Conclusion: No significant difference in repair strength was seen, but higher initial linear stiffness for Krackow repair suggests superior resistance to gap formation, which may occur during postoperative rehabilitation. With equal repair strength, but less soft tissue devitalization, the PARS may be a favorable option for patients with risk factors for soft tissue complications.

Comparison of a Novel Modified All-Suture Construct versus Suspensory Suture-button Fixation in a Syndesmotic Injury Model.

OBJECTIVES: To biomechanically investigate a novel modified all-suture construct compared with commercially available suspensory button fixation for stabilization of the syndesmosis. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of cadaver lower limbs were obtained. We used a material testing machine and Optotrak optoelectronic 3D motion measurement system for testing. Syndesmotic injuries were simulated, and specimens were fixed with either a suspensory suture button or modified all-suture construct. Repaired specimens were then cyclically loaded for 500 cycles. Spatial relationship of the tibia and fibula were continuously monitored for the intact, destabilized, and repaired states. The results were analyzed using independent samples t test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in sagittal or coronal plane translation between intact and either repair. Compared with the intact state, both repair techniques demonstrated significantly more external rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia and decreased construct stiffness. Cycling of the specimens did not significantly increase coronal or sagittal plane translation; however, external rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia increased and stiffness decreased with cycling for both repair techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sagittal and coronal plane translation is no different from the intact state for both fixation techniques. However, rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia was increased, and construct stiffness was decreased compared with the intact state for both fixation techniques. These findings suggest that an all-suture construct could offer syndesmotic fixation comparable with proprietary suspensory button fixation in a cadaver model.

Effect of prosthesis endplate lordosis angles on L5-S1 kinematics after disc arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that L5-S1 kinematics will not be affected by the lordosis distribution between the prosthesis endplates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaveric lumbosacral spines (51.3 ± 9.8 years) were implanted with 6° or 11° prostheses (ProDisc-L) with four combinations of superior/inferior lordosis (6°/0°, 3°/3°, 11°/0°, 3°/8°). Specimens were tested intact and after prostheses implantation with different lordosis distributions. Center of rotation (COR) and range of motion (ROM) were quantified. RESULTS: Six-degree lordosis prostheses (n = 7) showed no difference in flexion-extension ROM, regardless of design (6°/0° or 3°/3°) (p > 0.05). In lateral bending (LB), both designs reduced ROM (p < 0.05). In axial rotation, only the 3°/3° design reduced ROM (p < 0.05). Eleven-degree lordosis prostheses (n = 5) showed no difference in flexion-extension ROM for either design (p > 0.05). LB ROM decreased with distributed lordosis prostheses (3°/8°) (p < 0.05). Overall, L5-S1 range of motion was not markedly influenced by lordosis distribution among the two prosthesis endplates. The ProDisc-L prosthesis design where all lordosis is concentrated in the superior endplate yielded COR locations that were anterior and caudal to intact controls. The prosthesis with lordosis distributed between the two endplates yielded a COR that tended to be closer to intact. CONCLUSIONS: Further clinical and biomechanical studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of lordosis angle distribution on the fate of the facet joints.

Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical cadaveric study of lumbar spine segments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate stability provided by parallel-shaped and anatomically shaped carbon fiber interbody fusion I/F cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) constructs with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few biomechanical data are available on the anatomically shaped cages in PLIF and TLIF constructs. METHODS: Twenty human lumbar segments were tested in flexion-extension (FE) (8 N m flexion, 6 N m extension), lateral bending (LB) (± 6 N m), and torsional loading (± 5 N m). Each segment was tested in the intact state and after insertion of interbody cages in one of 3 constructs: PLIF with 2 parallel-shaped or anatomically shaped cages and TLIF with 1 anatomically shaped cage. All cages received supplementary pedicle screw fixation. The range-of-motion (ROM) values after cage insertion and posterior fixation were compared with the intact specimen values using analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: All constructs significantly reduced segmental motion relative to intact (P < 0.001). The motion reductions in FE, LB, and axial rotation were 85 ± 15%, 83 ± 18%, and 67 ± 6.8% for the PLIF construct using parallel cages, 79 ± 5.5%, 87 ± 10%, and 66 ± 20% for PLIF using anatomically shaped cages, and 90 ± 6.8%, 87 ± 12%, and 77 ± 22% for TLIF with an anatomically shaped cage. In FE and LB, the reductions in the ROM caused between the 3 constructs were equivalent (P > 0.05). In axial rotation, the TLIF cage provided significantly greater limitation in the ROM compared with the parallel-shaped PLIF cage (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The parallel-shaped and anatomically shaped I/F cages provided similar stability in a PLIF construct. The greater stability of the TLIF construct was likely due to a more anterior placement of the TLIF cage and preservation of the contralateral facet joint.

Superficial Deltoid Ligament and Deep Deltoid Ligament Play Equally Important Roles in the Stability of Isolated Lateral Malleolus (OTA/AO 44-B1) Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the individual contributions to stability of the superficial and deep deltoid ligaments in the setting of SER IV ankle fractures. METHODS: Nineteen total cadaveric specimens were used. SER IV injuries were created with the rupture of either the superficial (SER IV-S) (n = 9) or deep deltoid (SER IV-D) (n = 10). These were tested by applying an external rotation force (1 Nm, 2 Nm, 3 Nm, and 4 Nm). Changes in the position of the talus were recorded with a 3D motion tracker. Injury conditions were compared with a 4-step general linear model with repeated measures. Injury condition was also compared with the intact state and to each other using 2-tailed t tests. RESULTS: The general linear model showed that increased loading had a significant effect with axial rotation (P = 0.02) and sagittal translation (P = 0.003). SER IV-S and SER IV-D showed significantly greater instability compared with the intact state in axial rotation (1 Nm, 2 Nm, and 3 Nm). SER IV-S and SER IV-D did not significantly differ from each other. CONCLUSIONS: SER IV fracture patterns can be unstable with isolated injury to either the superficial or deep deltoid. This challenges the notion that deep deltoid rupture is necessary. Further clinical studies would help quantify the consequences of this instability.

Kinematics of a cervical disc prosthesis implanted above or below one- and two-level fusions.

Background: The theoretical advantages of hybrid constructs over multi-level fusion have been illustrated in clinical and biomechanical studies. However, there is no biomechanical data on hybrid constructs using load control analyses. There is also no clear data on whether there is a biomechanical difference if the arthroplasty is below or above a 1- or 2-level fusion. This work investigated the effect on segmental motion of having a cervical total disc arthroplasty implanted above or below a 1- or 2-level fusion. Methods: Segmental motions of 16 C2-T1 cervical spine specimens were measured as the specimens were tested to 1.5Nm in axial rotation and in flexion-extension under compressive preload. Tests were conducted on intact specimens, and then after arthroplasty with a 1-level and 2-level fusion. 8 specimens were in test Group 1, where the hybrid configuration had a total disc arthroplasty above a 1- or 2-level fusion. The arthroplasty was below the 1- and 2-level fusion in Group 2. Load control and displacement control analyses were conducted to determine the effect of the hybrid configurations on segmental motion. Results: In load control, compensatory motion increases were found at all non-instrumented cervical spine segments in flexion-extension and axial rotation. Flexion-extension and axial rotation ranges of motion at the total disc arthroplasty level were less than 1° different than intact.In displacement control, there was no consistent pattern of compensatory motion. Range of motion at the arthroplasty level was within 3.5° of intact. Conclusions: The total disc arthroplasty segmental level in a hybrid construct has similar amounts of motion as intact. This may shield the arthroplasty level and adjacent levels from supra-physiological motion and loading. These results suggest that a hybrid construct may be protective of adjacent segments, whether the total disc arthroplasty is above or below the fusion.

Comparison of the biomechanical stability of transverse and oblique screw trajectories in retrograde intramedullary nailing of supracondylar femur fractures.

BACKGROUND: The goal was to determine the effect of addition of oblique trajectory distal interlock screws to a retrograde intramedullary femoral nail on implant stability (stiffness), cycles to failure and mode of failure. The hypothesis was that addition of oblique screws would increase implant stability and number of loading cycles to failure. METHODS: Eight matched pairs were tested; one femur implanted with a femoral nail with only transverse distal interlock screws and the other with transverse and oblique interlock screws. Axial compressive load was applied to the femoral head and the gluteal tendon was tensioned vertically to simulate standing or at 45° to the sagittal plane to simulate stair climbing. Loads were cycled to increasing amplitude until failure of fixation (10 mm displacement or 10° rotation). FINDINGS: In simulated standing, oblique screw specimen had greater sagittal bending (bowing) than transverse only specimen. Transverse (axial) plane motion was higher in simulated stair climbing in oblique screw specimen. Oblique screw specimen had higher sagittal plane translation at 600 N of load. At 300 N, oblique screw specimen had lower internal-external rotation than transverse only specimen. A larger number of cycles to failure were observed in four oblique screw of seven paired specimen. Failure (10 mm or 10 degrees of motion) was only achieved during simulated stair climbing. INTERPRETATION: Our hypothesis that adding oblique screws improves fixation was rejected. Activities of daily living other than standing may constitute a challenge to fracture fixation; fixation failure occurred at lower loads in simulated stair climbing than standing.