Long-term results and quality of life after vibrant soundbridge implantation (VSBs) in children and adults with aural atresia.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and acceptance of the active middle ear implant system Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB®, MED-EL, Austria) in patients with aural atresia or aplasia (children and adults). METHODS: Data from 51 patients (mean age 13.9 ± 11.3 years), 42 (79.2%) children and adolescents, and 11 (20.8%) adults) who received a VSB implant between 2009 and 2019 at the Department of Otolaryngology at LMU Clinic Großhadern, Munich were included in the study. Pure-tone audiometry, speech recognition in a quiet environment and in a noisy environment were performed preoperatively, during the first fitting of the audio processor, after 1-3 years, after 3-5 years, and after 5 years (if possible). The follow-up period ranged from 11 to 157 months with a mean of 58.6 months (4.8 years). Furthermore, the benefit of the VSB was evaluated by self-assessment questionnaires (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale, respectively, for parents). RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in hearing and speech comprehension immediately after the initial fitting of the VSB system (mean hearing gain 38.4 ± 9.4 dB HL) and at follow-up intervals (1-3, 3-5 and after 5 years) for children and adults (p < 0.01). The values remained stable over the long-term, indicating a sustained functional gain from the VSB (mean hearing gain 38.9 ± 9.2 dB HL). The results of the self-assessments affirm the positive influence on hearing and speech comprehension with the VSB. With the VSB, there was an improvement of 41.3 ± 13.7% in the Freiburg monosyllable test. CONCLUSION: These results (a stable hearing gain over the long term, a good tolerance of the implant and an improvement in quality of life) affirm the recommendation for using the active middle ear implant VSB as early as permitted for aural atresia and aplasia patients. This study represents the audiometric results with the (to date) largest collective of aural atresia patients and with a long follow-up period.

ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the results of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measurements using automatic auditory response telemetry (AutoART) with those obtained by ART in adults. The study also aimed to evaluate the predictive value of intraoperative ART and AutoART ECAPs for speech intelligibility (SI) and hearing success (HS), and to determine if cochlear nerve (CN) cross-sectional area (CSA) obtained preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans could predict ART and AutoART ECAPs and SI and HS outcome. METHODS: The study analyzed and correlated ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds at electrodes E2, E6, and E10, as well as averaged ECAP thresholds over electrodes E1-E12, using data from 32 implants. Correlations were also examined for ART and AutoART ECAP slopes. In addition, averaged ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes for each participant were correlated with CN CSA measured from MRI sequences. SI of the monosyllabic Freiburg Speech Test at 65 dB sound pressure level was examined along with averaged ART and AutoART thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes. A parallel analysis was performed for HS, derived from the difference between baseline and 6-month SI. Finally, correlations between CN CSA and SI, as well as CN CSA and HS were examined. RESULTS: The results of the study showed a significant positive correlation between ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and as well as slopes for E2, E6, E10 and averaged thresholds and slopes of E1-E12. However, no significant correlation was observed between ART and AutoART averaged ECAP thresholds and slopes and either SI and HS or CN CSA. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between CN CSA and SI and HS. CONCLUSION: While AutoART is a reliable and safe program for measuring ECAPs in adults, the study found no preoperative prognostic information on intraoperative ECAP results using parameters extracted from current MRI sequences or pre-/intraoperative information on subsequent hearing outcome using ECAP and CN CSA.

Significance of endolymphatic sac surgery with and/or without simultaneous cochlea implant surgery in respect of vertigo control and speech perception in patients with Menière's disease.

PURPOSE: The focus on treating patients with Menière's Disease (MD) lies on the reduction of vertigo attacks and the preservation of sensory function. Endolympathic hydrops is considered as an epiphenomenon in MD, which can potentially be altered by endolymphatic sac surgery (ESS). Purpose of the study was to investigate the influences on vertigo control through manipulation of the perilymphatic system with or without ESS. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of 86 consecutive patients with MD according to current diagnostic criteria after endolymphatic sac surgery alone (ESSalone; n = 45), cochlear implantation (CI) alone (CIalone; n = 12), and ESS with CI (ESS + CI; n = 29), treated at a tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: vertigo control, speech perception pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Gender, side, and preoperative treatment were similar in all groups. Age was younger in the ESSalone-group with 56.2 ± 13.0 years (CIalone = 64.2 ± 11.4 years; ESS + CI = 63.1 ± 9.7 years). Definitive MD was present in all the CIalone, in 79.3% of the ESS + CI and in 59.6% of the ESSalone-patients. Likewise, vertigo control rate was 100% in the CIalone, 89.7% in the ESS + CI and 66.0% in the ESSalone-group. CONCLUSIONS: Vertigo control was improved in all three groups, however, superior in groups treated with CI, potentially contributed by the manipulation of both the endo- and perilymphatic systems. A more systematic characterization of the patients with larger case numbers and documentation of follow up data would be needed to evaluate a clinical effect more properly.

Comparison of speech perception in bimodal cochlear implant patients with respect to the cochlear coverage.

BACKGROUND: The hearing success of patients with bimodal fitting, utilizing both a cochlear implant (CI) and a hearing aid (HA), varies considerably: While some patients benefit from bimodal CI and HA, others do not. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to investigate speech perception in bimodally fitted patients and compare it with the cochlear coverage (CC). METHODS: The CC was calculated with the OTOPLAN software, measuring the cochlear duct length on temporal bone CT scans of 39 patients retrospectively. The patients were categorized into two groups: CC ≤ 65% (CC500) and CC > 65% (CC600). Monaural speech intelligibility for monosyllables at a sound pressure level (SPL) of 65 dB in a free-field setting was assessed before and after CI at various time points. The two groups, one with preoperative HA and one with postoperative CI, were compared. Additionally, speech intelligibility was correlated with CC in the entire cohort before CI and at the last available follow-up (last observation time, LOT). RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in speech intelligibility between CC500 and CC600 patients, with both groups demonstrating a consistent improvement after implantation. While CC600 patients tended to exhibit earlier improvement in speech intelligibility, CC500 patients showed a slower initial improvement within the first 3 months but demonstrated a steeper learning curve thereafter. At LOT, the two patient groups converged, with no significant differences in expected speech intelligibility. There was no significant relationship between unimodal/unilateral free-field speech intelligibility and CC. Interestingly, patients with a CC of 70-75% achieved the highest speech intelligibility. CONCLUSION: Despite of the lack of a significant correlation between CC and speech perception, patients appeared to reach their maximum in unimodal/unilateral speech perception primarily at a coverage level of 70-75%. Nevertheless, further investigation is warranted, as CC500 was associated with shorter cochlear duct length, and different types of electrodes were used in both groups.

The RonchAP® palatinal device: A conservative approach in treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome-a randomized, controlled study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the Ronch®AP palatal device in treating patients with moderate and severe forms of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial 22 patients were examined with the Ronch®AP palatal device after 4 weeks of usage. Their results were compared to a control group of 30 patients who did not receive any treatment during this time. All patients included did not tolerate CPAP therapy. Among other parameters the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was measured using nocturnal cardiorespiratory polysomnography. Daytime sleepiness was assessed using Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was used to analyze sleep quality. RESULTS: Using the Ronch®AP palatal device AHI was reduced from an average of 35.34 ± 14.9/h to 19.18 ± 14.93/h, whereas the control group only showed a minimal mean reduction from 31.32 ± 12.76/h to 29.37 ± 17.11/h. The difference in reduction between the two randomized groups was highly significant (d = - 14.2, 95% CI 5.9-22.6, t = 3.4, df = 49.9, p = 0.001). Epworth Sleepiness Scale score was lowered from 9.18 ± 4.73 to 7.82 ± 4.14 on average and sleep quality improved by - 1.91 ± 2.31. Both changes were also statistically relevant (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The Ronch®AP device is an effective alternative treatment option for patients suffering from moderate and severe forms of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and not tolerating CPAP therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 407-16 with approval from the local ethical committee (Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der LMU München).

[Speech perception as a function of cochlear coverage-comparison in bimodally hearing cochlear implant patients. German version]. / Sprachverstehen in Abhängigkeit von der cochleären Abdeckung ­ Vergleich bei bimodal versorgten Cochleaimplantatpatienten.

BACKGROUND: Hearing success in bimodally hearing patients with a cochlear implant (CI) and a hearing aid (HA) exhibits different results: while some benefit from bimodal CI and HA, others do not. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate hearing success in terms of speech perception in bimodally fitted patients in relation to the cochlear coverage (CC) of the CI electrodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the OTOPLAN software (CAScination AG, Bern, Switzerland), CC was retrospectively measured from CT scans of the temporal bone of 39 patients, who were then categorized into two groups: CC ≤ 65% (CC500) and CC > 65% (CC600). Monaural speech intelligibility for monosyllables at a sound pressure level (SPL) of 65 dB in open field was assessed at various timepoints, preoperatively with HA and postoperatively with CI, and compared between the groups. In addition, speech intelligibility was correlated with CC in the entire cohort before surgery and during follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Overall, no significant differences in speech intelligibility were found between CC500 and CC600 patients at any of the FU timepoints. However, both CC500 and CC600 patients showed a steady improvement in speech intelligibility after implantation. While CC600 patients tended to show an earlier improvement in speech intelligibility, CC500 patients tended to show a slower improvement during the first 3 months and a steeper learning curve thereafter. The two patient groups converged during FU, with no significant differences in speech intelligibility. There was no significant relationship between unimodal/unilateral free-field speech intelligibility and CC. However, patients with a CC of 70-75% achieved maximum speech intelligibility. CONCLUSION: Despite a nonsignificant correlation between CC and speech discrimination, patients seem to reach their maximum in unimodal/unilateral speech understanding mainly at 70-75% coverage. However, there is room for further investigation, as CC500 was associated with a shorter cochlear duct length (CDL), and long and very long electrodes were used in both groups.

Audiological results and subjective benefit of an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device in patients with congenital aural atresia.

PURPOSE: To review functional and subjective benefit after implantation of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device (BCD) in patients with congenital microtia with atresia or stenosis of the external auditory canal. METHODS: Retrospective chart analysis and questionnaire on the subjective impression of hearing ( Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-B) of patients treated between 2012 and 2015. RESULTSRESULTS: 18 patients (24 ears) with conductive or mixed hearing loss in unilateral (n = 10) or bilateral (n = 8) atresia were implanted with a BCD. No major complications occurred after implantation. Preoperative unaided air conduction pure tone average at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz (PTA 4 ) was 69.2 ± 11.7 dB, while postoperative aided PTA 4 was 33.4 ± 6.3 dB, resulting in a mean functional hearing gain of 35.9 +/- 15.6 dB. Preoperatively, the mean monosyllabic word recognition score was 22.9 % ± 22.3 %, which increased to 87.1 % +/- 15.1 % in the aided condition. The Oldenburger Sentence Test at S0N0 revealed a decrease in signal-to-noise-ratio from - 0.58 ± 4.40 dB in the unaided to - 5.67 ± 3.21 dB in the postoperative aided condition for all patients investigated. 15 of 18 patients had a subjective benefit showing a positive SSQ-B score (mean 1.7). CONCLUSION: The implantation of an active bone conduction device brings along subjective and functional benefit for patients with conductive or combined hearing loss.

Variation of the cochlear anatomy and cochlea duct length: analysis with a new tablet-based software.

PURPOSE: In cochlear implantation, thorough preoperative planning together with measurement of the cochlear duct length (CDL) assists in choosing the correct electrode length. For measuring the CDL, different techniques have been introduced in the past century along with the then available technology. A tablet-based software offers an easy and intuitive way to visualize and analyze the anatomy of the temporal bone, its proportions and measure the CDL. Therefore, we investigated the calculation technique of the CDL via a tablet-based software on our own cohort retrospectively. METHODS: One hundred and eight preoperative computed tomography scans of the temporal bone (slice thickness < 0.7 mm) of already implanted FLEX28™ and FLEXSOFT™ patients were found eligible for analysis with the OTOPLAN software. Measurements were performed by two trained investigators independently. CDL, angular insertion depth (AID), and cochlear coverage were calculated and compared between groups of electrode types, sex, sides, and age. RESULTS: Mean CDL was 36.2 ± 1.8 mm with significant differences between sex (female: 35.8 ± 0.3 mm; male: 36.5 ± 0.2 mm; p = 0.037), but none concerning side or age. Differences in mean AID (FLEX28: 525.4 ± 46.4°; FLEXSOFT: 615.4 ± 47.6°), and cochlear coverage (FLEX28: 63.9 ± 5.6%; FLEXSOFT: 75.8 ± 4.3%) were significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A broad range of CDL was observed with significant larger values in male, but no significant differences concerning side or age. Almost every cochlea was measured longer than 31.0 mm. Preoperative assessment aids in prevention of complications (incomplete insertion, kinking, tipfoldover), attempt of atraumatic insertion, and addressing individual necessities (hearing preservation, cochlear malformation). The preferred AID of 720° (two turns of the cochlea) was never reached, opening the discussion for the requirement of longer CI-electrodes versus a debatable audiological benefit for the patient in his/her everyday life.

Outcome of Auricular Reconstruction with Porous Polyethylene Frameworks: Our 10 Years of Experience with 113 Children and Adults.

This study evaluates the surgical outcome and patient benefit after auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks and temporoparietal fascia flaps in both children and adults. A total of 161 patients who had undergone auricular reconstruction between 2003 and 2014 by doctors in our department were asked to answer both a validated health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (Glasgow Benefit Inventory or Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory) and a questionnaire reporting satisfaction, complaints, and complications with the reconstructed pinna. Furthermore, postoperative surgical complications were recorded. A total of 113 patients (89 individuals older than 14 and 24 children under the age of 14) returned the questionnaires. About 80% of the patients were satisfied with the results of their auricular reconstruction. The main complaints concerned scars and the shape. Patients' quality of life was correlated with their postoperative aesthetic satisfaction. Thus, framework extrusion was the principal factor affecting patients' satisfaction, whereas treatable postoperative complications did not interfere with the overall quality of life. Interestingly, children indicated greater benefit from auricular reconstruction than older patients. With regard to the patient's feeling of being physically healthy after auricular reconstruction, partial pinna reconstruction and reconstruction without simultaneous hearing restoration should be very carefully considered. Auricular reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework significantly increases the patients' health-related quality of life and leads to significant patient satisfaction, especially in the case of younger patients.

The vibrating ossicular prosthesis in children and adolescents: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of the retrospective study was to collect speech intelligibility data on children and adolescents implanted with the vibrating ossicular prosthesis (VORP) 503. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentre study on 55 children and adolescents from 6 German clinics aged between 5 and 17 years suffering from mixed or conductive hearing loss implanted with a VORP 503. Pre- and postoperative bone-conduction pure tone thresholds were measured at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz, and word recognition scores in the unaided and VORP 503-aided conditions using monosyllabic speech intelligibility tests measured at 65-dB sound pressure level (SPL) were determined. RESULTS: Mean pre- and postoperative bone-conduction thresholds remained unchanged, showing the preservation of inner ear hearing. Speech intelligibility assessed in quiet at 65-dB SPL improved on average from 24.5% (SD ± 25.4) unaided to 86.4% (SD ± 13.4) aided. The average improvement of 61.9% (SD ± 25.3) was clinically and statistically significant. A total of three complications were found in the medical records of 55 subjects. The responsible investigators judged these events as procedure related. CONCLUSION: The treatment of children suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss with the VORP 503 implant demonstrates excellent aided benefit in terms of speech understanding and only minor complications.

Patient benefit from Cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a 1-year follow-up.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of life and benefit in patients with single-side deafness before and 1 year after cochlear implantation. In a prospective observational study design, ten adult patients with single-sided deafness undergoing cochlear implantation were included. All patients had on the implantation side no speech discrimination with normal hearing aids. The contralateral side was normal or marginal hearing loss. For determining the subject benefit from cochlear implantation, each patient answered standardized questionnaires directly before implantation and 1 year after. Regarding the questionnaire Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ), the tests yielded a significant difference in the subdomains "speech intelligibility" and "spatial hearing". The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) showed a significant difference in the subdomain "basic sound perception", but not in the total score. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP) showed on average moderate satisfaction in the subdomains "hearing aid benefit" and "residual disability". In general quality of life, no significant difference was found measured by the questionnaire EQ-5D-3L. One year after cochlear implantation, most patients with single-sided deafness showed benefits in hearing as measured by validated questionnaires However, not all patients reported a significant improvement in general quality of life. Therefore, it is important to inform patients adequately and offer alternative treatments before implantation.

Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors.

The RONDO is a single-unit cochlear implant audio processor, which omits the need for a behind-the-ear (BTE) audio processor. The primary aim was to compare speech perception results in quiet and in noise with the RONDO and the OPUS 2, a BTE audio processor. Secondary aims were to determine subjects' self-assessed levels of sound quality and gather subjective feedback on RONDO use. All speech perception tests were performed with the RONDO and the OPUS 2 behind-the-ear audio processor at 3 test intervals. Subjects were required to use the RONDO between test intervals. Subjects were tested at upgrade from the OPUS 2 to the RONDO and at 1 and 6 months after upgrade. Speech perception was determined using the Freiburg Monosyllables in quiet test and the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) in noise. Subjective perception was determined using the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19), and a RONDO device-specific questionnaire. 50 subjects participated in the study. Neither speech perception scores nor self-perceived sound quality scores were significantly different at any interval between the RONDO and the OPUS 2. Subjects reported high levels of satisfaction with the RONDO. The RONDO provides comparable speech perception to the OPUS 2 while providing users with high levels of satisfaction and comfort without increasing health risk. The RONDO is a suitable and safe alternative to traditional BTE audio processors.

Towards a Unified Testing Framework for Single-Sided Deafness Studies: A Consensus Paper.

BACKGROUND: While hearing aids for a contralateral routing of signals (CROS-HA) and bone conduction devices have been the traditional treatment for single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), in recent years, cochlear implants (CIs) have increasingly become a viable treatment choice, particularly in countries where regulatory approval and reimbursement schemes are in place. Part of the reason for this shift is that the CI is the only device capable of restoring bilateral input to the auditory system and hence of possibly reinstating binaural hearing. Although several studies have independently shown that the CI is a safe and effective treatment for SSD and AHL, clinical outcome measures in those studies and across CI centers vary greatly. Only with a consistent use of defined and agreed-upon outcome measures across centers can high-level evidence be generated to assess the safety and efficacy of CIs and alternative treatments in recipients with SSD and AHL. METHODS: This paper presents a comparative study design and minimum outcome measures for the assessment of current treatment options in patients with SSD/AHL. The protocol was developed, discussed, and eventually agreed upon by expert panels that convened at the 2015 APSCI conference in Beijing, China, and at the CI 2016 conference in Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: A longitudinal study design comparing CROS-HA, BCD, and CI treatments is proposed. The recommended outcome measures include (1) speech in noise testing, using the same set of 3 spatial configurations to compare binaural benefits such as summation, squelch, and head shadow across devices; (2) localization testing, using stimuli that rove in both level and spectral content; (3) questionnaires to collect quality of life measures and the frequency of device use; and (4) questionnaires for assessing the impact of tinnitus before and after treatment, if applicable. CONCLUSION: A protocol for the assessment of treatment options and outcomes in recipients with SSD and AHL is presented. The proposed set of minimum outcome measures aims at harmonizing assessment methods across centers and thus at generating a growing body of high-level evidence for those treatment options.

Single-Stage Ear Reconstruction and Hearing Restoration Using Polyethylene Implant and Implantable Hearing Devices.

The use of porous polyethylene in reconstructive surgery of the auricle is becoming increasingly accepted. This is a single-stage procedure providing pleasing cosmetic rehabilitation. Further advantages are the possibility of early implantation and the lack of complications caused by harvesting costal cartilage. Additional hearing restoration using middle ear implants allows functional rehabilitation at an early stage.

Partial auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks and superficial temporoparietal fascia flap.

Untreated acquired auricular damage can be a psychological burden, especially for younger patients. The significance of auricular reconstruction in patients with microtia in terms of quality of life has already been demonstrated. In these patients the use of porous polyethylene combined with a temporoparietal fascia flap has proven to be a suitable method for achieving good cosmetic results. Here, we describe how to use porous polyethylene combined with an endoscopically harvested temporoparietal fascia flap and autologous skin grafts for the reconstruction of acquired partial auricle defects and present outcomes and patient benefit. Ten consecutive patients were asked to answer validated questionnaires [modified Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI)] determining the effects of partial ear reconstruction on their health-related quality of life. These patients were seen regularly in our outpatient clinic for documentation and postoperative counseling. All patients returned a valid questionnaire; 80% were satisfied with the esthetic result. In retrospect, all patients would again decide to undergo surgery. The mean total GBI score was 27.8 (median 29.2, p < 0.05) reflecting an improvement of the health-related quality of life due to the operation. Odd feeling, numbness and the formation of scar tissue were the main complaints. Partial auricular reconstruction using porous polyethylene combined with an endoscopically harvested temporoparietal fascia flap and autologous skin grafts yields good esthetic results and can significantly increase patient's health-related quality of life.

Tenfold Increase: Acute Pediatric Mastoiditis Before, During, and After COVID-19 Restrictions.

INTRODUCTION: Acute mastoiditis (AM) is a relatively rare complication arising from acute otitis media, a common condition among children. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted AM cases. We noted a surge in pediatric AM cases in Germany after COVID-19 restrictions were lifted in 2022. This study assesses AM incidence and the clinical course in children before, during, and after the pandemic. The study also explores complication rates and microbial changes. METHODS: Participants: We included children (0-18 yr) diagnosed with AM who underwent mastoidectomy at a tertiary-care university hospital from January 2012 to June 2023.Objectives: We aimed to evaluate AM incidence during pre-COVID, COVID, and post-COVID periods; assess complications; and analyze the microbial spectrum.Data Analysis: Incidence and complication rates were compared between periods, along with the microbial spectrum. RESULTS: Population: 75 children were included (median age, 3.3 yr).Incidence: Significant increases in AM cases occurred in the post-COVID period compared to pre-COVID and COVID periods. No significant difference was observed between pre-COVID and COVID periods.Complications: Complication rates increased notably in the post-COVID period compared to pre-COVID and COVID periods with respect to more sensitive imaging methods being used in the post-COVID period. No significant difference was observed between pre-COVID and COVID periods.Spectrum of Pathogens: No significant differences were found in pathogen distribution between periods. Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae were common throughout. DISCUSSION: The study highlights a substantial rise in AM cases and complications after COVID-19 restrictions were lifted in Germany. This underscores the importance of monitoring infectious diseases and their complications during health crises. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of contrast-enhanced imaging. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms behind this trend. CONCLUSION: The study reveals a significant increase in pediatric AM cases and complications following the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Adequate computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging, including contrast enhancement, is shown to be a very important parameter beside clinical symptoms in deciding for the right therapy. Thus, surgical treatment became more important. Continuous monitoring and adaptive healthcare strategies during health crises are vital for optimal patient care. Further research is warranted to understand the reasons behind these trends and to inform future pandemic preparedness efforts.

Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.

INTRODUCTION: Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) are used for intra-/postoperative monitoring with intracochlear stimulation of cochlear implants. ECAPs are recorded in MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria) implants using auditory response telemetry (ART), which has been further developed with automatic threshold determination as AutoART. The success of an ECAP measurement also depends on the number of available spiral ganglion cells and the bipolar neurons of the cochlear nerve (CN). It is assumed that a higher population of spiral ganglion cell implies a larger CN cross-sectional area (CSA), which consequently affects ECAP measurements. METHODS: Intraoperative ECAP measurements from 19 implanted ears of children aged 8 to 18 months were retrospectively evaluated. A comparison and correlation of ART/AutoART ECAP thresholds/slopes at electrodes E2 (apical), E6 (medial), E10 (basal), and averaged E1 to E12 with CN CSA on magnetic resonance imaging was performed. RESULTS: A Pearson correlation of the ART/AutoART ECAP thresholds/slopes for E2/E6/E10 and the averaged electrodes E1 to E12 showed a significant correlation. The CN CSA did not correlate significantly with the averaged ART/AutoART ECAP thresholds/slopes across all 12 electrodes. SUMMARY: AutoART provides reliable measurements and is therefore a suitable alternative to ART. No significant influence of CN CSA on ECAP thresholds/slopes was observed. A predictive evaluation of the success of ECAP measurements based on CN CSA for a clinical setting cannot be made according to the present data.

Biomechanics and injury risk of a headbutt.

Headbutt is a relevant type of a criminal assault that can result in injuries. The aim of this study was to collect basic biomechanical data and assess the injury risk associated with a headbutt. Series of measurements were carried out with volunteers with and without relevant soccer heading experience, and the impact velocity of the striking head was measured. A soccer ball was used as a surrogate of the stationary victim's head. Two scenarios were considered: one corresponding to the typical headbutt situation, i.e. short movement of the assailant's head without backswing, and one representing the worst case, i.e. the most severe head impact without time or space constraints for the assailant. The results as well as epidemiological data from court cases and a large Munich's university clinic show that a typical headbutt is not likely to lead to life-threatening injuries, but bony injuries of the face can easily occur. Under certain circumstances (support of the victim's head, secondary impact on the ground etc.), severe injuries with potentially lethal outcomes are possible. A thorough analysis of each case is thus an imperative. The (soccer) heading experience does not influence the velocity of the headbutt.

Prevalence of labyrinthine ossification in CT and MR imaging of patients with acute deafness to severe sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of labyrinthine ossification, and especially cochlear ossification, in a cohort of patients with unilateral sudden deafness or severe sensorineural hearing loss. DESIGN: Retrospective data collection. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-four consecutive patients with unilateral sudden deafness or severe sensorineural hearing loss and either high-resolution CT (HRCT) of the temporal bone (isotropic spatial resolution ≤ 0.8 mm; n = 18) or high resolution CISS MRI (isotropic spatial resolution ≤ 1 mm; n = 55) were included. Nine patients underwent both imaging modalities. A standardized reading regarding labyrinthine ossifications was performed by an experienced head and neck radiologist blinded to clinical symptoms. RESULTS: Radiologic signs of cochlear ossification were present in 14 patients (12 CT and 2 MRI). Eight patients showed unilateral and six patients bilateral signs of cochlear ossification. In all except one of the unilateral cases, the deafened ear was affected. CONCLUSIONS: Signs of cochlear ossification were found in an unexpectedly high rate (14/64, 22%) of patients with acute deafness. The data suggest HRCT of the temporal bone to be more sensitive to detect labyrinthine ossification than MRI. HRCT of the temporal bone should therefore be considered in patients with impaired recovery of acute deafness to exclude cochlear ossification; if present, and, in cases of early signs, the patient should be evaluated further to facilitate early cochlear implantation before progression impedes electrode insertion, reflecting latest developments considering cochlea implants for single-sided deafness to be effective.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Tip Fold-Over: Our Experience With Long and Flexible Electrode.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate if there is any incidence of electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long and flexible lateral wall electrodes implanted in two high-volume Cochlear Implant (CI) centers in Germany. In addition, a detailed literature review was performed to capture all the peer-reviewed publications reporting on tip fold-over with CI electrodes from different CI brands for comparison. METHODS: Post-operative X-ray images of FLEX SOFT electrode from MED-EL in Stenver's view were retrospectively investigated for the presence of electrode tip fold-over from 378 consecutive cases in two high-volume CI centers in Germany. All patients were implanted between 2010 and 2018 by three individual experienced CI surgeons using round window and extended round window approach for CI electrode insertion. A literature review was performed following a thorough PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) search using the keywords "cochlear implant electrode tip fold-over" or "cochlear implant electrode tip roll-over" to capture articles that were published until December 2020 in English language only. Articles selection was based on electrode-related issues investigated only in-patient cases applying imaging modality. Those studies investigated tip fold-over in cadaveric temporal bones and cases with inner-ear malformation excluded. RESULTS: No single case of tip fold-over was clinically detected from the retrospective investigation of post-operative X-ray images from 378 consecutive cases. The electrode angular insertion depth as measured applying the cochlear coordinate system, varied from a minimum of 560° to a maximum of 720°. The literature review on the tip fold-over issue resulted in 24 peer-reviewed published articles in total. Tip fold-over with pre-curved modiolar-hugging electrodes was reported in 85 cases out of 1,606 implantations making an incidence rate of 5.3%. With the straight lateral wall electrodes, the tip fold-over was reported in four cases out of 398 implantations making an incidence rate of 1%, not including the number of implantations reported in the current study. Otherwise it would be 0.5%. CONCLUSION: Electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long flexible lateral wall electrodes is highly exceptional and this can be generalized to any of the straight lateral wall electrodes from any CI brand. The literature review on tip fold-over revealed an incidence rate of 5.3% with pre-curved or modiolar-hugging electrodes and 1% with straight lateral wall electrodes from CI brands. Including this series of 0% tip fold-over, the incidence rate of electrode tip fold-over with LW electrode type would be 0.5%.