Body Mass Index, Sarcopenia, and Their Variations in Predicting Outcomes for Patients Treated with Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as nivolumab has enabled outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) to be improved. However, only around 25% of patients respond to these therapies without being able to formally identify them. Data on relevant predictive markers are still lacking. The obesity paradox has been shown as a relevant prognostic marker in mRCC with better outcomes for obese patients. Nevertheless, the impact of weight variation and the presence of sarcopenia during ICI treatment is not known for now. METHODS: In a retrospective study, weight and its variations were collected at first day of ICI and at 6 weeks of treatment. Scanographic imagery was used to define the skeletal muscle index (SMI) as a reflect of sarcopenia. The impact of these parameters as predictive and prognostic factors for mRCC with nivolumab was evaluated. RESULTS: A higher body mass index (BMI) at baseline was significantly associated with response at the first scan (p = 0.036). Longer overall survival (OS) was observed for patients with a weight gain compared to the group with weight loss (p = 0.00028). Median OS for sarcopenic patients was 17.2 months and 31.6 months for the non-sarcopenic group of patients, but there was no statistical difference. CONCLUSION: This trial showed that a higher BMI and weight gain during nivolumab treatment were good predictive markers for outcomes in mRCC with nivolumab. Sarcopenia and variations in SMI could thus be of interest, but further studies are required.

Targeted Treatment of Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Focus on Pembrolizumab.

Endometrial cancer (EC) accounts for 2% of all new cancers. Advanced forms have a poor prognosis with barely 17% 5-year survival. The last few years improved our knowledge of EC with a new molecular classification derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). They are now divided between POLE mutant, Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) or deficient in Mismatch Repair System (dMMR), TP53 mutant and no specific molecular profile. Until now, treatments for advanced EC have included conventional platinum-based chemotherapy or hormonotherapy. The revolution in oncology represented by the advent of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) has also led to a major advance in the management of recurrent and metastatic EC. Pembrolizumab, a well-known anti PD-1, has firstly been approved as monotherapy in the second-line setting for dMMR/MSI-H advanced EC. More recently, a combination of lenvatinib with pembrolizumab offered a new effective option in the second line setting irrespectively of the MMR status, giving a new opportunity for these patients who had no actual standard of care before. This combination is currently being evaluated as frontline therapy. Despite exciting results, the main problem in identifying solid biomarkers remains unresolved and further investigations are required. New original combinations of pembrolizumab with other drugs including chemotherapy, poly ADPribose polymerase inhibitors (PARP-i) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors are being tested and promise exciting new therapeutic evolutions in a close future.

Eosinophil counts as a relevant prognostic marker for response to nivolumab in the management of renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in the management of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) with the advent of immunotherapy, only a few patients respond to these treatments. Predictors of response to nivolumab are currently being investigated but are still lacking. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate eosinophil levels and their variations during treatment as an accurate biomarker for outcome in metastatic RCC treated with nivolumab. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out for patients with metastatic RCC treated with nivolumab. Absolute eosinophil counts, their variation, and relative change were evaluated at six weeks. Relative eosinophil change was categorized in three groups (≥10%-decrease, no change, ≥10%-increase). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether eosinophils and their variations were prognostic markers for response at the first scan evaluation, progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients aged on average 66 years, 68% men, and 77% with good or intermediate International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group were included. The median follow-up was 16.6 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for good prognosis and was 22.5 and 6.5 months for intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. An increase in eosinophils and relative eosinophil change at six weeks of nivolumab was associated with a good response to immunotherapy (p = 0.012 and p = 0.024 respectively). In the group of patients with a 10%-decrease in relative change, PFS reduced significantly compared to the other groups (p = 0.0044 with the 10%-increase group and p = 0.03 with the no-change group). This relative increase was independent of IMDC risks factors for better OS (HR = 3.3 [1.45-7.4]; p = 0.004). The eosinophil baseline level was not associated with response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Eosinophil levels and relative eosinophil change at 6 weeks might be good prognostic markers for response to nivolumab for metastatic RCC, and were associated with better PFS and OS.