Clinical Decision Support System Used in Spinal Disorders: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal disorders are highly prevalent worldwide with high socioeconomic costs. This cost is associated with the demand for treatment and productivity loss, prompting the exploration of technologies to improve patient outcomes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are computerized systems that are increasingly used to facilitate safe and efficient health care. Their applications range in depth and can be found across health care specialties. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to explore the use of CDSSs in patients with spinal disorders. METHODS: We used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for this scoping review and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) statement. Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and PsycINFO, were searched from inception until October 11, 2022. The included studies examined the use of digitalized CDSSs in patients with spinal disorders. RESULTS: A total of 4 major CDSS functions were identified from 31 studies: preventing unnecessary imaging (n=8, 26%), aiding diagnosis (n=6, 19%), aiding prognosis (n=11, 35%), and recommending treatment options (n=6, 20%). Most studies used the knowledge-based system. Logistic regression was the most commonly used method, followed by decision tree algorithms. The use of CDSSs to aid in the management of spinal disorders was generally accepted over the threat to physicians' clinical decision-making autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effectiveness was frequently evaluated by examining the agreement between the decisions made by the CDSSs and the health care providers, comparing the CDSS recommendations with actual clinical outcomes would be preferable. In addition, future studies on CDSS development should focus on system integration, considering end user's needs and preferences, and external validation and impact studies to assess effectiveness and generalizability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: OSF Registries osf.io/dyz3f; https://osf.io/dyz3f.

Early cement augmentation may be a good treatment option for pain relief for osteoporotic compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The incidence of osteoporotic compression fractures (VCFs) have been rising over the past decades. Presently, vertebral cement augmentation procedures such as balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are common treatments allowing pain relief and functional recovery. However, there is controversy on whether different timeframes for cement augmentation affects clinical outcomes. Hence, this study aimed to compare pain relief and complication rates between early versus late cement augmentation. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library was conducted, identifying studies that compared early versus late cement augmentation for VCFs. As the definitions of "early" and "late" phases across studies are heterogenous, we established the cut-off between early and late phase as intervals to accommodate as many studies as possible for analysis. We conducted two separate analyses with different cut-off intervals and included studies that reported interventions within these respective time intervals. In analysis 1, we included studies which grouped patients into "early" and "late" group based on a cut-off time frame of 2-4 weeks. On the other hand, in analysis 2, we included studies which grouped patients into "early" and "late" groups based on a cut-off time frame of 6-8 weeks. Meta-analysis was conducted via random-effect models, comparing outcomes of interest between early and late groups. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. The total cohort size was 712 and 775 patients in analysis 1 and 2 respectively. Mean follow-up was 12.9 ± 3.7 months and 11 ± 0.6 months respectively. VAS change at final follow-up was significantly greater in the early group for both analyses. (MD = - 0.66, p = 0.01; and MD = - 1.18, p < 0.005 respectively). There was no significant difference in post-operative absolute VAS score, number of cement leakage, number of adjacent compression fractures and local kyphotic angle, for both analyses. Patients in both groups experienced reductions in VAS score that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference. CONCLUSION: Both early and late timeframes for cement augmentation offered significant improvement in pain relief, with similar post-operative absolute pain score, kyphotic angle, cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures. Early surgery may offer substantial pain relief in patients presenting with pain as early as < 2-4 weeks of VCFs.

Pelvic thickness, sex, ethnicity, and age affect pelvic incidence in healthy volunteers of Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) database.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the affecting factors on pelvic incidence (PI) and to test the hypothesis that PI changes even after skeletal maturity probably due to hypermobility of the sacroiliac joint using a large international multi-center database. METHODS: A prospective and cross-sectional healthy adult volunteers, ages 18-80 years, across 5 countries were used. Radiographic measurements included standard whole body alignment parameters. Bivariate regression analyses between PI versus demographics and spino-pelvic anatomical parameters were performed. An effect of sex on pelvic anatomical parameters was also investigated. Multivariate logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure was performed to identify the contributing factors to PI, and an appropriate model was obtained. RESULTS: PI showed a significant positive correlation with age in pooled data. Divided by sex, however, there was no correlation in men, but women showed a significant higher correlation coefficient. Pelvic thickness (PTh) had a significant negative correlation with age in pooled data. Divided by sex, no correlation was found in men, but there was a significant correlation in women with higher correlation coefficient. The stepwise multivariate analysis for the factors on PI identified four significant factors: age, sex, ethnicity, and PTh. CONCLUSIONS: PTh, sex, ethnicity, and age affected PI. There was a positive correlation between PI and age. The tendency was more significant in woman than in man. The results support the hypothesis that PI increases with aging, but the change seems to be small and needs to be verified in a longitudinal evaluation.

Correlation analysis of the PI-LL mismatch according to the pelvic incidence from a database of 468 asymptomatic volunteers.

PURPOSE: Previous studies on adults with degenerative scoliosis (ADS) have been fixed the threshold of PI-LL mismatch less than 10° for achieving good clinical outcomes. Recent studies discussed that PI-LL mismatch should consider individual pelvic incidence (PI) and should be set first in a normal population. The purpose of this study is to assess the variability of PI-LL mismatch according to PI in an asymptomatic population. METHODS: Full-body low dose stereoradiographic evaluation was done in a multi-ethnic cohort of 468 asymptomatic adult volunteers. Patients were clustered in three groups depending on individual PI values: PI < 45°, 45° < PI < 60° and PI > 60°. 3D measurements were performed using a commercially available 2D/3D modeling software to establish a correlation of PI with other spinopelvic parameters. ANOVA and Tukey's HSD for post-hoc analysis were used to determine the differences between the three groups. RESULTS: In our asymptomatic population, the mean value of PI-LL mismatch is - 5.4° ± 10.7°. Clusterization of the population reveals significant differences in the distribution of L1S1 lordosis, pelvic tilt and PI-LL with positive linear correlation according to PI values. As an interestingly result, PI-LL mismatch is equal to 0° when PI is around 64°. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that PI-LL mismatch is negative in an asymptomatic population (- 5.4° ± 10.7°) and the value should be customized to each patient to be able to restore the appropriate lordosis in ADS. The PI-LL mismatch is given by the formula PI-LL = - 28.5 + 0.44 × PI.

Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.

AIM: Interbody cages are commonly used to augment interbody fusion. Commonly used materials include titanium (Ti) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), with their inherent differences. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare between the various clinical and radiological outcomes of Ti and PEEK interbody spinal cages. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between Ti and PEEK interbody cages in patients undergoing spinal fusion was performed. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database were searched. All studies that compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent Ti and PEEK cages were included. Subgroup analyses was performed to differentiate between patients who had cervical and lumbar interbody fusion. RESULTS: A total of 11 articles were identified, with a total of 743 patients. Spinal fusion rates at final follow-up did not differ between Ti and PEEK cages (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.57-3.94, P = 0.41), although in patients undergoing lumbar fusion, Ti cages demonstrated superior fusion (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.05-4.28, P = 0.04). In patients with non-infective etiologies, Ti cages had a higher rate of cage subsidence (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.13-4.16, P = 0.02). Both types of cages had similar operating time, postoperative hematoma formation, neuropathic pain, segmental angle correction and postoperative clinical outcome improvement. CONCLUSION: In non-infective lumbar spine conditions, Ti cage may be the superior option due to the higher fusion rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A novel hospital capacity versus clinical justification triage score (CCTS) for prioritization of spinal surgeries in the "new normal state" of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, while healthcare systems and hospitals are diverting their resources to combat the pandemic, patients who require spinal surgeries continue to accumulate. The aim of this study is to describe a novel hospital capacity versus clinical justification triage score (CCTS) to prioritize patients who require surgery during the "new normal state" of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGY: A consensus study using the Delphi technique was carried out among clinicians from the Orthopaedic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesia departments. Three rounds of consensus were carried out via survey and Webinar discussions. RESULTS: A 50-points score system consisting of 4 domains with 4 subdomains was formed. The CCTS were categorized into the hospital capacity, patient factors, disease severity, and surgery complexity domains. A score between 30 and 50 points indicated that the proposed operation should proceed without delay. A score of less than 20 indicates that the proposed operation should be postponed. A score between 20 and 29 indicates that the surgery falls within a grey area where further discussion should be undertaken to make a joint justification for approval of surgery. CONCLUSION: This study is a proof of concept for the novel CCTS scoring system to prioritize surgeries to meet the rapidly changing demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers a simple and objective method to stratify patients who require surgery and allows these complex and difficult decisions to be unbiased and made transparently among surgeons and hospital administrators.

The odontoid-CSVL distance in a global population of asymptomatic volunteers: normative values and implications for spinal coronal alignment.

PURPOSE: In a population of asymptomatic volunteers across 5 countries, we sought to: (a) establish normative values of the Odontoid-Central Sacral Vertical Line (OD-CSVL) across patient factors, and (b) assess correlations of OD-CSVL with other radiographic parameters. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic adult volunteers, ages 18-80 years, were enrolled across 5 countries (France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, United States) forming the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort. Included volunteers had no known spinal disorder(s), no significant neck/back pain (VAS ≤ 2; ODI ≤ 20), and no significant scoliosis (Cobb ≤ 20°). Radiographic measurements included commonly used coronal alignment parameters (mm) and angles (°). OD-CSVL was defined as the difference between the odontoid plumb line (line from the tip of the odontoid vertically down) and the CSVL (vertical line from the center of the sacrum). Chi-square, student's t tests, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, linear regression, and Pearson's correlation were used with significance at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 467 volunteers were included with normative OD-CSVL values by age decade, gender, BMI, and country. Mean ± SD OD-CSVL was 8.3 mm ± 6.5 mm and 31 (6.6%) volunteers were almost perfectly aligned (OD-CSVL < 1 mm). A linear relationship was seen between OD-CSVL with both age (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.015). Significant variation was seen between OD-CSVL and 5 different ethnicities (p = 0.004). OD-CSVL correlated best with other coronal radiographic parameters, C7-CSVL (r = 0.743, p < 0.001), OD-knee (r = 0.230, p < 0.001), CAM-knee (r = 0.612, p < 0.001), and regional TL cobb angle (r = 0.4214, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Among asymptomatic volunteers, increased OD-CSVL was significantly associated with increased age, increased BMI, and ethnicity, but not gender. OD-CSVL correlated strongest with C7-CSVL, TL cobb angle, OD-knee, and CAM-knee. OD-CSVL. These results support further study of OD-CSVL in symptomatic adult spine deformity patients.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic resident education: a nationwide survey study in South Korea.

PURPOSE: There have not been well-designed survey studies investigating the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on orthopaedic resident education. METHODS: A 58-question, web-based survey was administered to orthopaedic residents in South Korea. A total of 229 orthopaedic residents from 43 hospitals completed the survey questionnaire. RESULTS: The average working time of 72.7 hours/week before the pandemic was decreased to 65.6 hours/week during the pandemic (p < 0.001). The time working in the operating room was significantly decreased during the pandemic, but not in the emergency centre and outpatient clinic. The education times for lecture and clinical case discussion were decreased during the pandemic (both, p < 0.001), respectively. While the use of traditional teaching methods was decreased, the use of online-based teaching methods was increased (p < 0.001). However, satisfaction level with online-based teaching methods was significantly lower compared with that of traditional teaching methods. The average working time exposed to the patients with COVID-19 was 9.7 hours/week. About 47.6% of orthopaedic residents experienced isolation or quarantine. The average score for quality of life, which was 68.9 out of 100 scores before the pandemic, decreased to 61.7 during the pandemic (p < 0.001). The most stressful factor for orthopaedic residents during the pandemic was family/relative health, followed by their own health and residency program. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on orthopaedic resident education in South Korea. Therefore, flexible and sustainable strategies are necessary to prepare for the future as well as the current pandemic situation.

Normal variation in sagittal spinal alignment parameters in adult patients: an EOS study using serial imaging.

PURPOSE: To describe normal variations in sagittal spinal radiographic parameters over an interval period and establish physiological norms and guidelines for which these images should be interpreted. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from a continuous series of adult patients with first-episode mild low back pain presenting to a single institution. The sagittal parameters of two serial radiographic images taken 6-months apart were obtained with the EOS® slot scanner. Measured parameters include CL, TK, TL, LL, PI, PT, SS, and end and apical vertebrae. Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty patients with a total of 120 whole-body sagittal X-rays were analysed. Mean age was 52.1 years (SD 21.2). Mean interval between the first and second X-rays was 126.2 days (SD 47.2). Small variations (< 1°) occur for all except PT (1.2°), CL (1.2°), and SVA (2.9 cm). Pelvic tilt showed significant difference between two images (p = 0.035). Subgroup analysis based on the time interval between X-rays, and between the first and second X-rays, did not show significant differences. Consistent findings were found for end and apical vertebrae of the thoracic and lumbar spine between the first and second X-rays for sagittal curve shapes. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic sagittal parameters vary between serial images and reflect dynamism in spinal balancing. SVA and PT are predisposed to the widest variation. SVA has the largest variation between individuals of low pelvic tilt. Therefore, interpretation of these parameters should be patient specific and relies on trends rather than a one-time assessment.

The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in addition to computed tomography scans in the evaluation of cervical spine injuries: a study of obtunded blunt trauma patients.

PURPOSE: Evidence guiding the use of CT and MRI scans in blunt trauma patients who are obtunded remains controversial. This study aims to determine and predict if computed tomography (CT) scans alone can be performed without risking oversight of substantial injuries found on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 63 blunt trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale of < 8. Data were collated from electronic medical records and included patient demographics, premorbid mobility, mechanism of injury, suspected level of injury and neurological examination findings. Patients were urgently evaluated using CT scans, followed by non-contrast MRI scans within 48 h of admission. The accuracy of CT scan was evaluated using MRI as a reference. Adjusted multivariable analysis was also performed to identify predictors for findings detected on MRI but not on CT. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 42.3 years and 90.5% were males. CT scans had a high specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 87.2%. Predictors of MRI abnormalities include females, patients with relatively milder mechanisms of injury, patients with suspected thoracic spine injury, and CT scan findings of facet dislocation and intracranial haemorrhage. There was no predictor for spinal cord oedema. CONCLUSIONS: MRI should be performed in the presence of the aforementioned predictive factors and in the presence of neurological deficits. Otherwise, patients can be treated medically without the fear of missing a substantial cervical injury.

Delayed lymphocele formation following lateral lumbar interbody fusion of the spine.

PURPOSE: This paper aims to describe the rare post-operative complication of a lymphocele formation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: The patient in this case was a 76-year-old lady with a 10 year history of low back pain and neurogenic claudication. She had previously underwent multiple spine surgeries for her condition. She presented to our institution for a recurrence of her low back pain and right anterior thigh pain. She then underwent surgery in two stages; first, a mini-open lateral interbody fusion at L3/4 and L4/5; second, posterior instrumentation of T3 to S1 with sagittal spinal deformity correction. RESULTS: The patient recovered uneventfully in the initial post op period and was discharged within 8 days. However, she developed abdominal distension and discomfort 6 months after surgery. MRI and CT scan of her abdomen showed a retroperitoneal fluid collection compressing her left ureter, resulting in hydroureter and hydronephrosis. She was managed with a CT-guided drainage of the fluid collection. Fluid analysis was consistent with a lymphocele. Since the procedure, the patient has been asymptomatic for 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed lymphocele formation is a potential complication of lateral lumbar interbody fusion. When present, it can be managed conservatively with good results. This case suggests that surgeons should have a low threshold to investigate for a lymphocele development post-anterior or lateral lumbar spine surgery. The authors recommend the placement of a post surgical retroperitoneal drain, as it might assist in the early detection of a lymphocele formation.

The effectiveness of low-dose and high-dose tranexamic acid in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized study.

PURPOSE: Tranexamic acid is a proven drug used for reduction of intraoperative blood loss in spinal surgery. However, optimal dosing considering risk/benefits is not well established owing to the heterogeneity in patient selection and surgical procedures of previous studies. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various tranexamic acid regimens in reducing perioperative blood loss in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS: Patients were randomly grouped into three different interventions: low-dose tranexamic acid (LD), high-dose tranexamic acid (HD), and placebo-controlled (PC) groups. The HD and LD groups received 10 and 5 mg/kg of bolus loading dose and 2 and 1 mg/kg of continuous infusion until 5 h after surgery, respectively. Data on patient demographics and preoperative and 24-h postoperative laboratory values were collected. Outcome parameters include intraoperative blood loss, 24-h postoperative blood loss, and blood loss during removal of the last drain. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (mean age 63.3 ± 7.6 years) showed similar baseline characteristics. Intraoperatively, blood loss was reduced by the administration of tranexamic acid (P = 0.04), contributed predominantly by a difference between the LD and HD groups (123 mL; P < 0.01). The 24-h postoperative blood loss was reduced (P < 0.01), contributed predominantly by a difference between the PC and LD groups (144 mL; P = 0.02). During the removal of the last drain, statistical difference was found between the PC and HD groups (125 mL; P = 0.00). No complications or side effects from tranexamic acid use were noted. CONCLUSION: Tranexamic acid administration for single-level PLIF was effective and safe in reducing perioperative blood loss in a dose-dependent manner. An HD regimen comprising 10 mg/kg of bolus loading dose and 2 mg/kg/h of continuous infusion is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1 study according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence.

Interpretation of hip fracture patterns using areal bone mineral density in the proximal femur.

INTRODUCTION: Bone mineral density scans are currently interpreted based on an average score of the entire proximal femur. Improvements in technology now allow us to measure bone density in specific regions of the proximal femur. The study attempts to explain the pathophysiology of neck of femur (NOF) and intertrochanteric/basi-cervical (IT) fractures by correlating areal BMD (aBMD) scores with fracture patterns, and explore possible predictors for these fracture patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective study on all patients who underwent hip surgeries from June 2010 to August 2012. A total of 106 patients (44 IT/basi-cervical, 62 NOF fractures) were studied. The data retrieved include patient characteristics and aBMD scores measured at different regions of the contralateral hip within 1 month of the injury. Demographic and clinical characteristic differences between IT and NOF fractures were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test and two-sample t test. Relationship between aBMD scores and fracture patterns was assessed using multivariable regression modeling. RESULTS: After adjusted multivariable analysis, T-Troc and T-inter scores were significantly lower in intertrochanteric/basi-cervical fractures compared to neck of femur fractures (P = 0.022 and P = 0.026, respectively). Both intertrochanteric/basi-cervical fractures (mean T.Tot -1.99) and neck of femur fractures (mean T.Tot -1.64) were not found to be associated with a mean T.tot less than -2.5. However, the mean aBMD scores were consistently less than -2.5 for both intertrochanteric/basi-cervical fractures and neck of femur fractures. Gender and calcium intake at the time of injury were associated with specific hip fracture patterns (P = 0.002 and P = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture patterns following low energy trauma may be influenced by the pattern of reduced bone density in different areas of the hip. Intertrochanteric/basi-cervical fractures were associated with significantly lower T-Troc and T-Inter scores compared to neck of femur fractures, suggesting that the fracture traversed through the areas with the lowest bone density in the proximal femur. In the absence of reduced T.Troc and T.Inter, neck of femur fractures occurred more commonly. T-Total scores may underestimate the severity of osteoporosis/osteopenia and measuring T-score at the neck of femur may better reflect the severity of osteoporosis and likelihood of a fragility fracture.

Changes in Spinopelvic Parameters Between Standing and Sitting Postures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To report the ratio-of-differences between standing and sitting. To understand how sex and age influence these differences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Currently, spinal deformity surgery aims to realign the sagittal profile of the spine with-reference-to the standing posture resulting in overcorrection. New studies report significant disparities between standing and sitting spinal alignment. METHODS: A comprehensive search and review of the published literature was performed on 4 platforms in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 checklist by 2 authors independently. RESULTS: From 753 abstracts extracted from the databases, 38 papers involving 5423 patients were identified. sagittal vertical axis was more positive in sitting, with a pooled mean difference of 29.5 mm (95% CI: 17.9-41.0). Pelvic tilt (PT) was larger in sitting, with a pooled mean difference of 16.7 degrees (95% CI: 12.5-20.9), and a pooled odds ratio of 1.2(95% CI:1.1-1.3. P =0.001). Sacral Slope (SS) was smaller and lumbar lordosis (LL) was less lordotic in sitting, with a pooled mean difference of 15.0 degrees (95% CI: 11.918.1) and 21.1 degrees (95% CI:14.5-27.8), respectively, and a pooled odds ratio of 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6-0.8. P <0.001) and 0.7 (95% CI:0.6-0.7, P <0.001), respectively. Pelvic incidence and thoracic kyphosis was similar in sitting. Subgroup meta-analysis comparing odd ratio of standing to sitting showed: Among younger patients (age younger than 50), the PT and LL pooled odds-ratios were 1.4 and 0.7, respectively. Among older patients (age older than or equal to 50), the PT and LL pooled odds-ratios were 1.1 and 0.8, respectively. Among female patients, the SS pooled odds ratio was 0.6. Among male patients, the SS pooled odds ratio was 0.7. CONCLUSION: When comparing sitting to standing, it gives a more positive sagittal vertical axis, a smaller SS and LL, and a larger PT. pelvic incidence and thoracic kyphosis remained similar. Younger and female patients have pronounced differences in SS, PT, and LL, suggesting the existence of age and sex variations, and its role to be considered when planning for spinal realignment surgeries. Clinical outcome studies are required to ascertain the impact of these findings.

A Comparison between Structural Allografts and Polyetheretherketone Interbody Spacers Used in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Among interbody implants used during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), structural allografts and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are the most used spacers. Currently, no consensus has been established regarding the superiority of either implant, with US surgeons preferring structural allografts, whereas UK surgeons preferring PEEK. The purpose of this systematic review (level of evidence, 4) was to compare postoperative and patient-reported outcomes between the use of structural allografts PEEK interbody spacers during ACDF. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were searched for articles comparing the usage of structural allograft and PEEK interbody spacers during ACDF procedures from inception to April 10, 2023. The searches were conducted using the keywords "Spine," "Allograft," and "PEEK" and were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Subsequent quality and sensitivity analyses were performed on the included studies. Nine studies involving 1,074 patients were included. Compared with the PEEK group, the structural allograft group had comparable rates of postoperative pseudoarthrosis (p=0.58). However, when stratified according to the number of levels treated, the 3-level ACDF PEEK group was 3.45 times more likely to have postoperative pseudoarthrosis than the structural allograft group (p=0.01). Subsequent postoperative outcomes (rate of subsidence and change in the preoperative and postoperative segmental disc heights) were comparable between the PEEK and structural allograft groups. Patient-reported outcomes (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] of neck pain and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) were comparable. This study showed that for 3-level ACDFs, the use of structural allografts may confer higher fusion rates. However, VAS neck pain, NDI, and subsidence rates were comparable between structural allografts and PEEK cages. In addition, no significant difference in pseudoarthrosis rates was found between PEEK cages and structural allografts in patients undergoing 1- and 2-level ACDFs.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Enhance Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in a Rat Model.

Spinal fusion, a common surgery performed for degenerative lumbar conditions, often uses recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) that is associated with adverse effects. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) and their extracellular vesicles (EVs), particularly exosomes, have demonstrated efficacy in bone and cartilage repair. However, the efficacy of MSC exosomes in spinal fusion remains to be ascertained. This study investigates the fusion efficacy of MSC exosomes delivered via an absorbable collagen sponge packed in a poly Ɛ-caprolactone tricalcium phosphate (PCL-TCP) scaffold in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model. Herein, it is shown that a single implantation of exosome-supplemented collagen sponge packed in PCL-TCP scaffold enhanced spinal fusion and improved mechanical stability by inducing bone formation and bridging between the transverse processes, as evidenced by significant improvements in fusion score and rate, bone structural parameters, histology, stiffness, and range of motion. This study demonstrates for the first time that MSC exosomes promote bone formation to enhance spinal fusion and mechanical stability in a rat model, supporting its translational potential for application in spinal fusion.

Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review & meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is routinely treated with spinal decompression surgery, with an increasing trend towards minimally invasive techniques. Endoscopic decompression has emerged as a technique which minimizes approach-related morbidity while achieving similar clinical outcomes to conventional open or microscopic approaches. PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic decompression for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review on randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing endoscopic versus microscopic decompression was conducted, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Treatment effects were computed using pairwise random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials respectively. Quality of the overall body of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: A total of 19 primary references comprising 1,997 patients and 2,132 spinal levels were included. Endoscopic decompression was associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood-loss (weighted mean differences [WMD]=-33.29 mL, 95% CI:-51.80 to -14.78, p=.0032), shorter duration of hospital stay (WMD=-1.79 days, 95% CI: -2.63 to 0.95, p=.001), rates of incidental durotomy (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.91, p=.0184) and surgical site infections (RR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.10 to-0.51, p=.001), and a nonsignificant trend towards less back pain, leg pain, and better functional outcomes compared to its microscopic counterpart up to 2-year follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and microscopic decompression are safe and effective techniques for treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Prospective studies of larger power considering medium to long-term outcomes and rates of iatrogenic instability are warranted to compare potential alignment changes and destabilization from either techniques.

Increased matrix metalloproteinase-2 in ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and the regulation of MMP-2/TIMPs by elastin-derived peptides.

The study aimed to examine matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) expression in a rat ligamentum flavum (LF) hypertrophy model in vivo, and the effect of elastin-derived peptides (EDPs) on MMP-2 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in rat LF cells in vitro. Surgical destabilization was performed at the rat spinal L3/4 level to induce increased mechanical stress. Rats were killed at 6- and 12-weeks postsurgery for histological staining, immunohistochemical staining, RT-qPCR and western blot. 100 µg/mL EDPs were applied to isolated normal rat LF cells, with or without pretreatment of elastin receptor complex (ERC) inhibitors, to assess the expression of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2. Spinal destabilization led to LF hypertrophy, observed through increased LF thickness and area, along with histological changes of chondrometaplasia and elastic fiber degradation. LF was also stained positively for Col I and Col II, where elastic fiber has broken down. MMP-2 expression was notably elevated in the hypertrophied LF, accompanied by increased TIMP-2 and TIMP-3 levels. EDPs were found to suppress MMP-2 expression and reduce TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 levels in rat LF cells. Interestingly, exposure to EDPs led to a significant rise in MMP-2/TIMP-1 and MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratios, dependent on the ERC. Collectively, the study suggests that increased MMP-2 activity contributes to elastic fiber degradation in hypertrophied LF, generating EDPs that further enhance the MMP-2/TIMPs ratio in LF cells in an ERC-dependent manner. Further research is essential to delve into the mechanisms of EDPs in LF hypertrophy.

Is hybrid surgery of the cervical spine a good balance between fusion and arthroplasty? Pilot results from a single surgeon series.

PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the role of hybrid surgery (HS) that incorporates anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and artificial disc replacement (ADR) techniques. To our knowledge, this is the first study that provides a direct comparison of all three groups in terms of intra-operative parameters and outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. METHODS: Seven consecutive patients who underwent HS were matched with another seven patients who underwent ACDF and ADR based on levels of surgery. Prospective data on demographics, pre-operative and post-operative assessments, complications and functional scores (VAS, NDI, EQ-5D health score and index) were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test. Type I error was set at 5 %. RESULTS: Duration of surgery was significantly shorter for ACDF at 135 min (p = 0.025) compared with HS and ADR. ACDF also had greater blood loss when compared with ADR (p < 0.036). ADR has the shortest duration of hospitalization followed by HS and ACDF (p < 0.031). The HS group returned to work fastest (54 days) when compared with both ACDF (107 days) and ADR (73 days) with statistical significance seen between HS and ACDF (p = 0.035). Cervical range of motion (ROM) and functional scores did not show any significant differences. CONCLUSION: HS is comparable to ACDF and ADR in terms of safety and feasibility. Findings of shorter in-hospital stay and earlier return to work in HS group may be further explored in large, randomised controlled trials.