RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic surgery is complex with the potential for costly hospitalization. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing a pancreatic resection was performed. RESULTS: The median age of the study population was 64 years. Half of the cohort was female (51%), and the majority were white (62%). Most patients underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (69%). The pre-operative age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was zero for 36% (n = 50), 1 for 31% (n = 43) and ≥2 for 33% (n = 45). The Clavien-Dindo grading system for post-operative complication was grade I in 17% (n = 24), whereas 45% (n = 62) were higher grades. The medians direct fixed, direct variable, fixed indirect and total costs were $2476, $15,397, $13,207 and $31,631, respectively. There was a positive contribution margin of $7108, whereas the net margin was a loss of $6790. On univariate analyses, age, type of operation and complication grade were associated with total cost (P ≤ 0.05), whereas operation type and complication grade were associated with a net margin (P = 0.01). These findings remained significant on multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Increased cost, reimbursement and revenue were associated with type of operation and post-operative complications.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Pancreatectomia/economia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/economia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Obese patients are difficult to transport between emergency departments, imaging facilities, operating rooms, intensive care units, acute care units, and rehabilitation facilities. Each move, along with turning, bathing, and access to bathrooms, poses risks of injury to patients and personnel. Similarly, inadequate mobilization raises the risk of pressure ulcers. The costs can be prohibitive. METHODS: On 6 pilot units, mobilization of patients was delegated to trained lift team technicians who covered the units in pairs, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, to assist with moving and lifting of patients weighing 200 pounds or more, with a Braden Scale score of 18 or less and/or the presence of pressure ulcers. RESULTS: In fiscal year 2012, hospital-acquired pressure ulcers on pilot units decreased by 43% (from 61 to 35). Patient handling-related employee injuries on pilot units decreased by 38.5% (from 13 to 8). Employee satisfaction related to organizational commitment to employee safety and impact on job satisfaction was positively impacted by implementation of the lift team. With the reduction in employee injuries and the fall in the prevalence of pressure ulcers, the adoption of the lift team program decreased costs by $493,293.00. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of lift teams on pilot nursing units decreased patient handling-related employee injuries, resulting in sharp improvements in quality patient care and reduced costs.