Clinico-pathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of ovarian carcinoma with different histologic subtypes - A benchmark analysis of 482 cases.

PURPOSE: Ovarian carcinomas (OCX) have traditionally been thought to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium. However, recent (immuno-) histopathological and molecular analyses suggest that OCX consist of morphological subtypes with different epidemiologic features and a varying prognosis. METHODS: The data of 482 OCX from the Clinical Cancer Registry of Leipzig who were surgically treated between 2000 and 2019 and were evaluated regarding incidence, clinico-pathologic characteristics and prognostic factors. Cases were separated into high-grade and non-high-grade serous tumors. Both groups were analyzed regarding the tumor stage, lymph node involvement, site of origin and prognosis. RESULTS: The overall incidence for OCX was 17.9. The most common histological subtype was high-grade serous OCX (57.9%; 279/482). Patients with high-grade were significantly older than those with a non-high-grade serous OCX (63.9 versus 58.5 years; p < 0.001), more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage >pT3 (78.5% (219/279) versus 42.8% (87/203); p < 0.001) and showed a 2.4-fold higher frequency of lymph node metastases (53.4% vs. 21.2%; p < 0.02) with a 4.6-fold higher rate of > 1 cm metastatic deposits (pN1b) within the lymph nodes (14.8% vs. 4.6%; p < 0.02). Irrespective of tumor stage and morphological subtype, the 1- and 5-year overall survival (OAS) was 72.9% and 40.8%, respectively. Patients with high-grade serous OCX showed a shorter 5-year OAS compared to non-high-grade serous OCX (34.1% vs. 57.0%; p 0.001). This association was reproducible in patients with an advanced tumor stage irrespective of the histopathologic tumor type serous OCX (pT3: 32.4% vs. pT1: 75.1%; p 0.001) as well as within high-grade (pT3: 28.7% vs. pT1: 55.5%; p = 0.003) and non-high-grade serous OCX (pT3: 43.0% vs. 80.0%; p 0.001). There were no differences in OAS depending on the site of origin (fallopian tube, ovary, peritoneum) within the two histologic subgroups. CONCLUSION: OCX cases from a single institution with uniform surgical treatment and a standardized histopathological workup were evaluated. The poor prognostic outcome of patients with high-grade serous compared non-high-grade serous OCX as well as an advanced stage of the disease was confirmed. This study demonstrates for the first time that the histopathological distinction into high-grade serous and non-high-grade serous tumors may be much more prognostically relevant than the site of origin.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vulvar cancer with and without inguinal lymph node involvement.

PURPOSE: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is associated with increased metastatic spread and poor prognosis. Data on vulvar carcinoma are limited. METHODS: Thirty-two cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (16 with and 16 without inguinal lymph node metastases) and their lymph node deposits were evaluated for immunohistochemical expression of EMT markers (vimentin, cyclin D1, e-cadherin), p16, p53 and Ki-67. Results of EMT-immunostainings were compared to lymph node involvement and expression of p53 and p16. The micro-anatomical staining pattern for EMT markers comparing the tumor center with the front of invasion was analysed in each tumor. RESULTS: There was no difference in the expression of EMT markers between node negative and node positive tumors. Staining for vimentin and cyclin D1 was seen within tumor cells at the front of invasion in 100 and 84.4% of the tumors, respectively. The majority of cases (68.7%) showed negative or reduced staining for e-cadherin in this micro-anatomical localization. Tumor cells within the lymph node metastases showed positive staining for e-cadherin in 75% and for cyclin D1 in 49% of the cells but were negative for vimentin in 13 out of 16 cases (81.3%). Tumors with aberrant p53 staining represented a non-significant higher vimentin but significantly higher cyclin D1 expression at the front of invasion than those with p53 wild-type pattern. CONCLUSION: The present study shows no differences in the expression of EMT markers between node positive and node negative vulvar cancers. The evaluation of immunostaining within the micro-anatomical context indicates that an EMT-phenotype is restricted to the tumor cells at the front of invasion. Paired analyses of vulvar carcinomas and their lymph node deposits suggest mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) in the metastatic deposits. Immunohistochemical staining results may suggest that EMT is more prevalent in vulvar cancer with aberrant p53 staining.