Comparison of effectiveness of methotrexate in patients with late-onset versus younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis: Real-world data from an inception cohort in Japan (NICER-J).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of methotrexate (MTX) as initial therapy in patients with late-onset and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA and YORA). METHODS: Of 114 patients with YORA and 96 patients with LORA, defined as RA occurring at ≥65 years of age, enrolled in a multicentre RA inception cohort study, 71 and 66 patients who had been followed up to 6 months after starting MTX treatment were included in this study. RESULTS: Proportions of patients on MTX treatment at 6 months were 96% and 92% in the YORA and LORA groups, respectively. Despite lower doses of MTX in the LORA group compared with the YORA group, no significant difference was observed in clinical disease activity index scores between the two groups throughout the follow-up period. The proportion of patients in clinical disease activity index remission at 6 months was 35% in both groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that knee joint involvement and high Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index were significant negative predictors of achieving clinical disease activity index remission at 6 months in the LORA group. CONCLUSION: Observations up to 6 months revealed that the effectiveness of MTX administered based on rheumatologist discretion in patients with LORA is comparable to that in patients with YORA in clinical settings.

Preliminary gait analysis of frail versus older adults.

[Purpose] This study aimed to verify the usefulness of an inertial measurement unit and compare the gait of frail and robust older adults. [Participants and Methods] Six participants (three males and three females) in their 80s were diagnosed as frail or robust according to Japanese Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. Using an inertial measurement unit, we measured parameters associated with the sole clearance and center of gravity shift. We then calculated the margin of stability in two directions. [Results] The gait analysis of both groups was reliable, as intraclass correlation coefficient values were comparable to the measurement accuracy of the inertial measurement unit achieved in a previous study of young participants. The results revealed that the sole clearance during the swing phase tended to be lower in frail than robust participants; moreover, the center of mass shift tended to be small and step width wide in frail participants, whereas the center of mass shift tended to be large in robust participants. [Conclusion] Our findings are expected to contribute to gait training in rehabilitation programs for older frail adults, the development of welfare equipment such as walking aids for frail elderly individuals, and the establishment of the reliability of inertial measurement unit use.

Management of chronic rheumatic diseases in women 18-45 years of age in Asia Pacific: insights from patient and clinician surveys.

OBJECTIVE: Perspectives of women aged 18-45 years with chronic rheumatic diseases (CRD), and clinicians, in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region are reported. METHODS: Online surveys were completed by women, pregnant in the past 2-5 years, with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and rheumatologists, obstetricians, orthopaedic surgeons who medically manage CRDs. RESULTS: Among 210 (RA 122, PsA 48, axSpA 40) patients, 52% (n = 109/210) delayed their decision to have children, most commonly due to concerns of passing on disease to offspring. 33% (n = 70/210) discussed family planning with a healthcare professional at diagnosis. Patients most often initiated discussions. 94% (n = 193/205) stopped treatment around pregnancy due to fear of fetal harm. 66% (n = 139/210) of patients felt they did not receive all relevant information on the impact of CRDs and treatment on pregnancy. Among 335 clinicians who participated, 82% (n = 143/174) of rheumatologists, 86% (n = 72/84) of obstetricians and 43% (n = 33/77) of orthopaedic surgeons agreed good disease control during pregnancy was their primary goal. 69% (n = 120/174) of rheumatologists were 'very comfortable' with prescribing tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for women aged 18-45 years. Comfort levels generally decreased with the onset of family planning. More obstetricians and orthopaedic surgeons supported avoiding TNFi during pregnancy than rheumatologists (40% [n = 34/84]/38% [n = 29/77] versus 16% [n = 28/174]). Access to more TNFi safety data during pregnancy was considered paramount for increasing clinician comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and physicians need current information and multidisciplinary discussions for improved management of CRD in women in APAC.

Choice of and response to treatment in patients with early-diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: Real-world data from an inception cohort in Japan (NICER-J).

OBJECTIVE: Various guidelines recommend that patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) try to achieve clinical remission within 6 months, and early therapeutic intervention is important to this end. This study aimed to investigate short-term treatment outcomes of patients with early-diagnosed RA in clinical practice and to examine predictive factors for achieving remission. METHODS: Of the 210 patients enrolled in the multicenter RA inception cohort, 172 patients who were followed up to 6 months after treatment initiation (baseline) were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the impact of baseline characteristics on achievement of Boolean remission at 6 months. RESULTS: Participants (mean age, 62 years) initiated treatment after a mean of 19 days from RA diagnosis. At baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation, proportions of patients using methotrexate (MTX) were 87.8%, 89.0%, and 88.3%, respectively, and rates of Boolean remission were 1.8%, 27.8%, and 34.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that physician global assessment (PhGA) (Odds ratio (OR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.99) and glucocorticoid use (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.65) at baseline were independent factors that predicted Boolean remission at 6 months. CONCLUSION: After a diagnosis of RA, satisfactory therapeutic effects were achieved at 6 months after the initiation of treatment centered on MTX according to the treat to target strategy. PhGA and glucocorticoid use at treatment initiation are useful for predicting the achievement of treatment goals.

Comparable efficacy of denosumab and romosozumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoid administration.

OBJECTIVES: Romosozumab is a newly released and widely known molecular-targeted drug for severe osteoporosis treatment with comparable effectiveness to denosumab. However, there have been no reports discussing the efficacy of those treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, especially those receiving glucocorticoids. This retrospective observational registry study compared the efficacy of 12-month treatment of denosumab and romosozumab in RA patients under the influence of glucocorticoid intake. METHODS: Following propensity score matching, 36 patients each in the denosumab and romosozumab groups were analysed in this study. Drug effectiveness was evaluated by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at baseline, 6 and 12 months as well as alterations in P1NP, TRACP-5b, and simplified disease activity index (SDAI). The occurrence of adverse events and new fractures was also assessed. RESULTS: At 12 months of treatment, BMD at the lumbar spine was increased by 7.5% in the denosumab group and 8.7% in the romosozumab group, which were both significantly and comparably elevated over baseline. At the total hip and femoral neck, romosozumab tended to exhibit favourable efficacy to increase BMD versus denosumab. Both P1NP and TRACP-5b were significantly lower in the denosumab group as compared with the baseline. Conversely in the romosozumab group, P1NP was increased over baseline, while TRACP-5b was decreased. Regarding SDAI alterations, both the romosozumab and denosumab groups exhibited comparable improvements in RA disease activity over time during treatment. Recorded adverse events and new fractures during treatment were few and minor in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Romosozumab exhibited comparable efficacy to denosumab for increasing BMD even under the influence of glucocorticoids for treating RA. Both drugs may be therefore suitable for managing osteoporosis in patients with RA and glucocorticoid intake.

Effectiveness of tacrolimus concomitant with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and tolerance of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) therapy administered concomitantly with tacrolimus (TAC) treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 2792 patients who underwent therapy with five bDMARDs (etanercept: ETN, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, and abatacept: ABT) were enrolled. Among the study subjects, 1582 were concomitant methotrexate (MTX group), 147 were concomitant TAC (TAC group), and 1063 were non-concomitant MTX and TAC (non-MTX/TAC group). The primary outcome was the incident rate of discontinuation of bDMARDs by adverse events (AEs) or loss of efficacy. RESULTS: Concerning the analysis for each reasons of discontinuation, including AEs and loss of efficacy, the hazards ratio (HR) was significantly lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups (AEs: HR = 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.68, loss of efficacy: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.78). The loss of efficacy with the use of ETN and ABT was lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups. Concomitant TAC did not induce elevated risk for discontinuation of AEs in all bDMARD analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant TAC with ABT or ETN showed higher retention rates than bDMARDs therapy without TAC or MTX. AEs did not increase over long-term observation.

Reasons and risk factors for discontinuation of treatment with any biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A long-term observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) usually switch to a second biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when the first has proven to be ineffective, although some may discontinue bDMARDs treatment altogether. We investigated the total rate of bDMARDs retention and the risk of bDMARDs discontinuation in patients with RA. METHODS: The study included 564 patients with RA who started bDMARDs treatment before 2008 (<65 years old, n = 413; ≥65, n = 151). The primary outcome was the incidence of bDMARDs discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Risk factors were examined using Fine and Gray regression models. RESULTS: Among 564 patients, 74 had discontinued bDMARDs treatment due to AEs. Male sex and Steinbrocker class 3-4 were more frequent, while rheumatoid factor and concomitant methotrexate treatment were less frequent, in those aged ≥65 years than in those aged <65 years, respectively. The subdistribution hazard ratio for discontinuation was significantly higher in the ≥65 group than in the <65 years group (hazard ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval = 2.07-6.03). Lack of concomitant treatment with MTX was risk factor for discontinuation in patients ≥65 years. Advanced Steinbrocker class was a risk factor in patients <65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients are at higher risk of discontinuing bDMARDs treatment due to AEs than younger patients.

Efficacy of add-on iguratimod in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who inadequately respond to either tocilizumab or tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of add-on iguratimod (IGU) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA patients) who inadequately respond to either tocilizumab (TCZ) or tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS: Twenty-three RA patients treated with TCZ (the TCZ group) and 23 RA patients treated with TNFi (the TNFi group) were enrolled in this 24-week retrospective study from our multicenter registry. All inadequate responders to either TCZ or TNFi received add-on IGU. Baseline demographics and disease activity at 24 weeks after initiating add-on IGU were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline clinical disease activity index (CDAI) values in the TCZ group and TNFi group were 14.1 and 11.8 (p = .24 between the two groups). At 24 weeks, CDAI values in the TCZ group and TNFi group were 5.1 and 7.5 (p = .002 and .002 compared to baseline, respectively) and ΔCDAI values were -9.0 and -4.3 (p = .007 between the two groups). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that add-on IGU in the TCZ group was associated with greater improvement in CDAI relative to the TNFi group. CONCLUSION: Add-on IGU was more effective in inadequate responders to TCZ than in inadequate responders to TNFi.

Higher doses of methotrexate associated with discontinuation of oral glucocorticoids after initiation of biological DMARDs: A retrospective observational study based on data from a Japanese multicenter registry study.

OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoids are important drugs used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. We recommend glucocorticoid discontinuation as soon as possible given the associated side-effects, but many patients continue to take oral glucocorticoids long-term. The present study aimed to explore factors associated with glucocorticoid discontinuation at 52 weeks after initiating biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: Subjects were 564 patients from a Japanese multicenter registry who were administered glucocorticoids and methotrexate (MTX) followed by initiation of the first bDMARD. We examined the status of oral glucocorticoid use at 52 weeks after initiating the first bDMARD. RESULTS: By 52 weeks after bDMARD initiation, 164 patients (29.1%) discontinued glucocorticoids. Multivariable analysis identified age, MTX dose, and glucocorticoid dose as factors independently associated with glucocorticoid discontinuation. After adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score matching, among patient groups administered MTX ≤ 8 mg/week and MTX > 8 mg/week, 105 pairs remained. A significantly higher rate of glucocorticoid discontinuation (41.0%) was noted for patients administered MTX > 8 mg/week. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that glucocorticoids may be discontinued after initiating bDMARDs. Moreover, higher MTX doses (>8 mg/week) at the time of bDMARD initiation were associated with glucocorticoid discontinuation among patients treated with bDMARDs.

Improvement in matrix metalloproteinase-3 independently predicts low disease activity at 52 weeks in bio-switch rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept.

OBJECTIVES: To explore predictive factors including MMP-3 for achievement of low disease activity (LDA) at 52 weeks in bio-switch rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept, for whom obtaining a good clinical response can be difficult. METHODS: Participants were 423 consecutive patients with RA treated with abatacept who were observed for longer than 52 weeks and registered in the TBCR, a Japanese multicentre registry system. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study factors that predict the achievement of LDA at 52 weeks in bio-naïve (n=234) and bio-switch (n=189) groups. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed that MMP-3 improvement rates at 12 weeks in bio-switch patients had the highest AUC with a cut-off value of 20.0% for predicting LDA achievement at 52 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, in addition to DAS28-CRP at baseline, achieving 20% improvement in MMP-3 levels at 12 weeks was an independent predictive factor (adjusted OR: 4.277, p=0.003) in the bio-switch group, whereas DAS28 was the only predictor in the bio-naïve group. Patients who achieved 20% improvement in MMP-3 levels at 12 weeks had significantly higher achievement rates of LDA at 52 weeks compared to those who did not achieve 20% improvement in the bio-switch group (60.0 vs. 33.3%, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that improvement in MMP-3 levels is key to predicting the clinical efficacy of abatacept. Closer attention paid not only to major clinical indices, but also changes in MMP-3 levels, could improve our ability to optimise clinical results when treating bio-switch patients.

Discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab: An interventional study.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) discontinuation in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with sustained low disease activity undergoing combination therapy with tocilizumab (TCZ) plus MTX.Methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective study included RA patients maintaining low disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10) for ≥12 weeks with TCZ plus MTX. Methotrexate was discontinued following 12 weeks of biweekly administration while continuing TCZ therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity with no flare at week 36.Results: A total of 49 patients completed 36 weeks of therapy. The proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity at week 36 was 75.5%. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeded the assumed threshold response rate of 60%, demonstrating the clinical feasibility of MTX discontinuation. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, defined as a Frequency Scale for Symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux disease score ≥8, significantly decreased from week 0 to 12 (27.1-18.4%; p= .025).Conclusion: Discontinuation of concomitant MTX is clinically feasible for maintaining low disease activity, and may be beneficial from the perspective of reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in Japanese RA patients treated with TCZ. Trial registration number: UMIN000021247.

Clinical effectiveness and long-term retention of abatacept in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients: Results from a multicenter registry system.

Objective: To study the clinical effectiveness and long-term retention rate of abatacept (ABA) in elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a multicenter registry. Our study population comprised 500 consecutive RA patients treated with ABA. We compared clinical effectiveness and ABA retention rates between the Young (≤62 years), Middle (62 to 72 years), and Elderly (≥72 years) groups. We also performed separate examinations to identify predictive factors for ABA discontinuation in those with versus those without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment.Results: Mean age was 52.7 years in the Young group, 67.7 years in the Middle group, and 78.1 years in the Elderly group. No significant group-dependent differences were found in mean DAS28 score, categorical distribution of DAS28, and EULAR response rate across the 52 weeks. The ABA retention rates at three years as determined by the Kaplan-Meier method were similar in all three groups. Patient age was not a significant predictor of ABA discontinuation due to adverse events in patients with concomitant MTX; however, it was found to be a significant predictor for those who did not use MTX (Cox hazard model).Conclusion: ABA would be a reasonable treatment option for elderly RA patients from the viewpoints of both clinical effectiveness and long-term retention. However, physicians should watch carefully for any serious adverse reactions in elderly RA patients with intolerance to MTX.

High rate of improvement in serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 levels at 4 weeks predicts remission at 52 weeks in RA patients treated with adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) levels can predict remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with adalimumab (ADA). METHODS: Subjects were 114 RA patients continuously treated with ADA for 52 weeks. Predictive factors at baseline and 4 weeks after initiation of ADA therapy for the achievement of remission (28-point count Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) < 2.3) at 52 weeks were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: DAS28-CRP at 4 weeks (odds ratio (OR) 0.614, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.382-0.988) and improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks (OR 1.057, 95% CI 1.002-1.032) were independent predictors of remission at 52 weeks. The best cut-off level of DAS28-CRP and improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks for predicting remission at 52 weeks was 3.73 (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 50%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 62%) and 39.93% (sensitivity: 47%, specificity: 83%, AUC: 64%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a high rate of improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks after initiation of ADA therapy can predict remission at 52 weeks in RA patients.

Predictors of biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieved clinical remission with biologic treatment: A multicenter observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate predictors of biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response as a surrogate for relapse in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved clinical remission with biologic treatment. METHODS: This study was performed based on data from a multicenter registry, and included 404 patients who achieved clinical remission within the first year of treatment with their first biologic. Cumulative retention rate of the first biologic was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the impact of patient characteristics on biologic discontinuation was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During follow-up, 50 patients discontinued their first biologic due to insufficient response. Overall discontinuation rates due to insufficient response after achieving remission were 6%, 11%, and 19% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant glucocorticoids at achieving remission [hazard ratio (HR): 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-7.64)] and a higher level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at achieving remission (HR: 1.47 per 1 mg/dL, 95% CI: 1.09-1.99) independently predict discontinuation due to insufficient response after achieving remission. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA who achieved remission with concomitant glucocorticoid treatment and a higher level of CRP are at high risk of subsequent biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response.

Disease activity early in treatment as a predictor of future low disease activity in RA patients treated with iguratimod.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective observational study aimed to examine the efficacy of iguratimod with and without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) and to estimate the adequate observational period for predicting low disease activity (LDA) achievement at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: All patients treated with iguratimod were registered in a Japanese multicenter registry. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for LDA achievement at 24 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to estimate the association of 28-joint disease activity score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at each time point with achievement of LDA at 24 weeks and determine a cut-off for DAS28-ESR. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were treated with iguratimod with (n = 65) or without (n = 58) MTX. Iguratimod therapy resulted in significant clinical improvement in both groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that DAS28-ESR at each time point was an independent significant predictor of LDA achievement at 24 weeks. Cut-off values of DAS28-ESR at 12 weeks based on ROC curves were 3.2 and 3.6 in patients with and without MTX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Iguratimod was effective in RA patients in clinical practice. Our results suggest that 12 weeks may be a sufficient period to judge the medium-term efficacy of iguratimod in patients treated with and without MTX.

Importance of methotrexate therapy concomitant with tocilizumab treatment in achieving better clinical outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity: an observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of concomitant use of MTX and baseline characteristics for remission in the treatment of RA with tocilizumab (TCZ) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 240 RA patients who received TCZ were selected from the multicentre Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry. Predictive baseline factors for remission [28-item DAS (DAS28) < 2.6] at 52 weeks were determined by logistic regression analysis. To confirm whether the associations varied by the level of baseline disease activity, we also assessed the model including the interaction term (each baseline variable × DAS28). RESULTS: In total, 49.3% of the study participants used MTX with TCZ. Even after controlling for the baseline DAS28, shorter disease duration (≤3 year) [odds ratio (OR) 3.58 (95% CI 1.81, 7.07)], less structural damage [Steinbroker stage ≤II, OR 2.33 (95% CI 1.32, 4.12)] and concomitant prednisolone use [OR 0.38 (95% CI 0.21, 0.68)] showed significant predictive values for remission. Concomitant MTX use failed to show a significant association with remission, whereas a significant interaction was observed among concomitant MTX use × DAS28 (P = 0.006). In patients with high baseline disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1), concomitant MTX use was associated with increased odds for remission [adjusted OR for all baseline variables 2.54 (95% CI 1.11, 5.83)], while no association was indicated between them in patients with low to moderate baseline disease activity (DAS28 ≤ 5.1). CONCLUSION: Concomitant MTX use is an important component of TCZ treatment for RA patients with high disease activity.

Use of a 12-week observational period for predicting low disease activity at 52 weeks in RA patients treated with abatacept: a retrospective observational study based on data from a Japanese multicentre registry study.

OBJECTIVE: Only a few studies have assessed predictive factors for the long-term efficacy of abatacept. This study aimed to provide clinical evidence of an adequate observational period for predicting low disease activity (LDA) achievement at 52 weeks in RA patients treated with abatacept. METHODS: Participants were all patients registered in a Japanese multicentre registry who were treated with abatacept and had at least 52 weeks of follow-up (n = 254). RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the 28-joint count with CRP (DAS28-CRP) at each time point for LDA achievement at 52 weeks were: 0.686 (cut-off score: 4.6) at baseline, 0.780 (3.8) at 4 weeks, 0.875 (3.3) at 12 weeks, and 0.900 (3.0) at 24 weeks. Although patients with a DAS28-CRP score < 3.0 at 24 weeks had the highest proportion of LDA achievement at 52 weeks (79.3%), the proportion for those with a score < 3.3 at 12 weeks was comparable (77.2%, P = 0.697). Proportions were significantly lower in patients with a score < 3.8 at 4 weeks or < 4.6 at baseline. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that a DAS28 score of < 3.3 at 12 weeks was an independent strong predictor for LDA at 52 weeks (adjusted odds ratio: 15.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks is an adequate observational period to judge the long-term clinical efficacy of abatacept, and is about as early as the period for assessing TNF blockade therapy.

Concomitant methotrexate and tacrolimus augment the clinical response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a prior history of biological DMARD use.

This observational retrospective study examined whether abatacept efficacy could be augmented with concomitant methotrexate (MTX) or tacrolimus (TAC) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experienced failure with prior biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and in whom favorable therapeutic efficacy is difficult to achieve. All patients with a prior biological DMARD history who were treated with abatacept for 52 weeks and registered in a Japanese multicentre registry were included. Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept according to the concomitant drug used, i.e., none (ABT-mono), MTX (ABT-MTX), and TAC (ABT-TAC), were compared. A greater mean percent change of DAS28-ESR was observed in the ABT-TAC group compared with the ABT-mono group at weeks 12 (-20.5 vs. -5.4 %, p = 0.035) and 24 (-25.0 vs. -11.0 %, p = 0.036). ABT-MTX and ABT-TAC groups had a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) within 52 weeks compared with the respective baselines, while no significant change was observed in the ABT-mono group. A higher proportion of patients in the ABT-TAC group achieved EULAR moderate response compared with the ABT-mono group at week 52 (66.7 vs. 35.0 %, p = 0.025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that concomitant TAC use was independently associated with the achievement of LDA and EULAR response at 52 weeks, while concomitant MTX use was not. Concomitant TAC use may offer a suitable option for RA patients treated with abatacept after prior biological DMARD failure, likely because both abatacept and TAC affect T cell activation.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and methotrexate in combination with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; a retrospective observational study in the TBC Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Tacrolimus (TAC) and abatacept (ABT) inhibit T-cells via different mechanisms and, in combination, may be effective against rheumatoid arthritis. However, they may also disrupt normal immune functions. We compared the efficacy and safety of ABT administered to patients in combination with TAC, methotrexate (MTX), or other drugs. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ABT in 211 patients: the drug was administered together with TAC (ABT+ TAC group; 22 patients), MTX (ABT+ MTX group; 102 patients), or patients treated without concomitant MTX or TAC (ABT mono group; 87 patients). The disease activity, treatment continuation rate, and reason for discontinuation of treatment were investigated. RESULTS: The retention rate at Week 24 was similar in the three groups. There were no cases of discontinuation related to the appearance of adverse events in the ABT+ TAC group. At Week 24, according to the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, the "good" response rates were 33.3%, 13.4%, and 13.4% in the ABT+ TAC, ABT+ MTX, and ABT mono groups, respectively. Statistically significant decreases in various disease activity scores/indices were observed in all the groups as early as Week 4. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size was small, the results of this retrospective study suggest that the ABT+ TAC combination therapy has at least comparable safety and efficacy to those of the ABT+ MTX combination, and that it can thus be a useful option for patients who cannot take MTX.

Drug retention rates of second biologic agents after switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese patients on low-dose methotrexate or without methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore drug retention rates of second biologic agents after switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in clinical practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on low-dose methotrexate (MTX) or without MTX. METHODS: A total of 169 RA patients who had been withdrawn from first-course TNFi therapy and received a different TNFi or tocilizumab (TCZ) as a second biologic agent were selected from the Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry, an observational cohort database. Retention rates of second biologic treatment were compared by the type of first TNFi and second biologic agents. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients received first-course infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) therapy, and 83 patients received first-course etanercept (ETN) therapy. The former group had a significantly higher retention rate (IFX, 81.1%; ADA, 83.3%) of the second biologic therapy compared to the latter (56.6%, p < 0.001, log-rank test). Drug retention rates of the second biologic agent after switching from IFX/ADA were significantly higher with ETN (90.0%) and TCZ (94.7%) than with ADA/IFX (59.3%). Drug retention rates of the second biologic agent after switching from ETN were significantly higher with TCZ (75.9%) than with ADA/IFX (46.3%). The differences were significant even after adjusting for baseline clinical variables using the Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: Drug retention rates of IFX and ADA after switching from the first TNFi were significantly lower compared to those of ETN and TCZ in patients on low-dose MTX or without MTX.