Simultaneous pharmacokinetic modeling of unbound and total darunavir with ritonavir in adolescents: a substudy of the SMILE trial.

Darunavir (DRV) is an HIV protease inhibitor commonly used as part of antiretroviral treatment regimens globally for children and adolescents. It requires a pharmacological booster, such as ritonavir (RTV) or cobicistat. To better understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DRV in this younger population and the importance of the RTV boosting effect, a population PK substudy was conducted within SMILE trial, where the maintenance of HIV suppression with once daily integrate inhibitor + darunavir/ritonavir in children and adolescents is evaluated. A joint population PK model that simultaneously used total DRV, unbound DRV, and total RTV concentrations was developed. Competitive and non-competitive models were examined to define RTV's influence on DRV pharmacokinetics. Linear and non-linear equations were tested to assess DRV protein binding. A total of 443 plasma samples from 152 adolescents were included in this analysis. Darunavir PK was best described by a one-compartment model first-order absorption and elimination. The influence of RTV on DRV pharmacokinetics was best characterized by ritonavir area under the curve on DRV clearance using a power function. The association of non-linear and linear equations was used to describe DRV protein binding to alpha-1 glycoprotein and albumin, respectively. In our population, simulations indicate that 86.8% of total and unbound DRV trough concentrations were above 0.55 mg/L [10 times protein binding-adjusted EC50 for wild-type (WT) HIV-1] and 0.0243 mg/L (10 times EC90 for WT HIV-1) targets, respectively. Predictions were also in agreement with observed outcomes from adults receiving 800/100 mg DRV/r once a day. Administration of 800/100 mg of DRV/r once daily provides satisfactory concentrations and exposures for adolescents aged 12 years and older.

Optimization of vigabatrin dosage in children with epileptic spasms: A population pharmacokinetic approach.

AIMS: Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug used to treat some forms of severe epilepsy in children. The main adverse effect is ocular toxicity, which is related to the cumulative dose. The aim of the study is to identify an acceptable exposure range, both through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model of vigabatrin in children enabling us to calculate patient exposure and through the study of therapeutic response. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including children with epilepsy followed at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital who had a vigabatrin assay between January 2019 and January 2022. The population pharmacokinetic study was performed on Monolix2021 using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Children treated for epileptic spasms were classified into responder and nonresponder groups according to whether the spasms resolved, in order to identify an effective plasma exposure range. RESULTS: We included 79 patients and analysed 159 samples. The median age was 4.2 years (range 0.3-18). A 2-compartment model with allometry and creatinine clearance on clearance best fit our data. Exposure analysis was performed on 61 patients with epileptic spasms. Of the 22 patients who responded (36%), 95% had an AUC0-24 between 264 and 549 mg.h.L-1. CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic model allowed us to identify bodyweight and creatinine clearance as the 2 main factors explaining the observed interindividual variability of vigabatrin. An acceptable exposure range was defined in this study. A target concentration intervention approach using this pharmacokinetic model could be used to avoid overexposure in responder patients.

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations in children aged 12†years and older: a PK substudy of the SMILE trial.

BACKGROUND: SMILE, a multicentre randomized trial, compared the efficacy and safety of switching virologically suppressed children and adolescents with HIV to a once-daily dual regimen of dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir versus continuing standard ART. Within a nested pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy, we performed a population PK analysis to describe total and unbound dolutegravir plasma concentrations in children and adolescents receiving this dual therapy. METHODS: Sparse blood samples were obtained during follow-up for dolutegravir quantification. A population PK model was developed to simultaneously describe total and unbound dolutegravir concentrations. Simulations were performed and were compared with the protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) and the in vitro IC50, respectively. Dolutegravir exposures in children aged ≥12 years were also compared with values in treatment-experienced adults. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-five samples from 153 participants aged between 12 and 18 years were collected for this PK analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described unbound dolutegravir concentrations. The relationship between unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations was best characterized by a non-linear model. Unbound dolutegravir apparent clearance was significantly influenced by total bilirubin concentrations and by Asian ethnicity. All children and adolescents had trough concentrations well above the protein-adjusted IC90 and the in vitro IC50 values. Dolutegravir concentrations and exposures were also similar to those obtained in adults receiving dolutegravir 50 mg once daily. CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily 50 mg dolutegravir dose for children and adolescents produces adequate total and unbound concentrations when used as part of dual therapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir.

Pharmacokinetic profile of acyclovir in a child receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy for acute liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is one of the treatments of critically ill children presenting severe acute liver failure. This affliction might be induced by HSV infection requiring a treatment by acyclovir. Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) can alter its pharmacokinetics, according to its physicochemical properties and CVVHDF settings. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: The patient was a 21-month-old female presenting liver failure with hyperammonemia treated by acyclovir with presumed HSV infection. CKRT was initiated on day 1 with substantial replacement and dialysate flow rates (respectively 75 and 220 mL/kg/h). Acyclovir was intravenously administered every 8 h with a 1-h infusion of 500 mg/m2. Plasma and effluent concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay to estimate the area under a curve (AUC) and CKRT clearance by 2 methods (one based on pre- and post-filter concentrations and the other one on dialysate flow rates). Clearance was estimated between 19.2 and 26.3 mL/min with the first method and between 27.6 and 44.3 mL/min with the second one. Concentrations were highly above the therapeutic index (peak concentration was measured at 28 mg/L), but AUC was appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: This case describes acyclovir pharmacokinetics during CKRT in a pediatric patient treated by acyclovir. The patient was treated with adapted exposure with the usual dosing, but lower dosing should be investigated with complementary studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02539407.

Beta-lactam exposure and safety in intermittent or continuous infusion in critically ill children: an observational monocenter study.

The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and clinical toxicity for three beta-lactams: cefotaxime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem, depending on two lengths of infusion: continuous and intermittent, in critically ill children. This single center observational prospective study was conducted in a pediatric intensive care unit. All hospitalized children who had one measured plasma concentration of the investigated antibiotics were included. Plasma antibiotic concentrations were interpreted by a pharmacologist, using a Bayesian approach based on previously published population pharmacokinetic models in critically ill children. Exposure was considered optimal, low, or high according to the PK target 100% fT> 4 × MIC and a trough concentration below the toxic concentration (50 mg.L-1 for cefotaxime, 150 mg.L-1 for piperacillin, and 44 mg.L-1 for meropenem). Between May 2019 and January 2020, 80 patients were included and received 106 antibiotic courses: 74 (70%) were administered in intermittent infusion (II) and 32 (30%) in continuous infusion (CI). Compared to II, CI provided more optimal PK exposure (n = 22/32, 69% for CI versus n = 35/74, 47% for II, OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.01-1.5, p = 0.04), less underexposure (n = 4/32, 13% for CI versus n = 36/74, 49% for II, OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.6-0.84, p < 0.001), and more overexposure (n = 6/32, 19% for CI versus n = 3/74, 4% for II, OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.03-1.3, p = 0.01). Five adverse events have been reported during the study period, although none has been attributed to beta-lactam treatment. CONCLUSION: CI provided a higher probability to attain an optimal PK target compared to II, but also a higher risk for overexposure. Regular therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in critically ill children receiving beta-lactams, regardless of the length of infusion. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Since beta-lactams are time-dependent antibiotics, the probability to attain the pharmacokinetic target is higher with continuous infusion compared to that with intermittent infusion. • In daily practice, continuous or extended infusions are rarely used despite recent guidelines, and toxicity is hardly reported. WHAT IS NEW: • Continuous infusion provided a higher probability to attain an optimal pharmacokinetic target compared to intermittent infusion, but also a higher risk of overexposure. • Regular therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in critically ill children receiving beta-lactams, regardless of the length of infusion.

Oral levofloxacin: population pharmacokinetics model and pharmacodynamics study in bone and joint infections.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at characterizing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral levofloxacin in adult patients in order to optimize dosing scheme and explore the PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) of levofloxacin in bone and joint infections (BJIs). METHODS: From November 2015 to December 2019, all patients hospitalized in Cochin Hospital, treated with levofloxacin and who had at least one dosage for therapeutic drug monitoring were included. PK was described using non-linear mixed-effect modelling. In a subgroup of patients with BJIs, the association between PK, MIC for the isolated pathogen and clinical outcome was investigated. Monte Carlo simulations investigated dosing regimens to achieve the PK/PD target (AUC/MIC ratio >100). RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were included (199 measurements), including 32 treated for BJI. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the data. Effects of estimated creatinine clearance (eCLCR) and age were significant on levofloxacin clearance. In BJI patients, no significant association was found between levofloxacin PK/microbiological parameters and either clinical outcome or adverse events. Based on our model, we proposed optimized oral levofloxacin dosing regimens according to renal function, to reach the PK/PD target AUC/MIC ratio >100 for three frequent causative pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). CONCLUSIONS: Our results reinforce the need of determining the MIC and using therapeutic drug monitoring in complex infections caused by P. aeruginosa.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Children: An Observational Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Septic critically ill children are at a high risk of inadequate antibiotic exposure, requiring them to undergo therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The aim of this study was to describe the use of TDM for antibiotics in critically ill children. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-center observational study between June and December 2019, with all children treated with antibiotics in a pediatric intensive care unit located in a French university hospital. Standard clinical and laboratory data were recorded. Blood samples were collected for routine laboratory tests, and plasma antibiotic levels were assayed using validated analytical methods. RESULTS: A total of 209 children received antibiotics. TDM was performed in 58 patients (27.8%) who had a greater mean organ dysfunction (according to the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference) (3 versus 1 in the non-TDM group; P < 0.05) and were treated with antibiotics for longer. A total of 208 samples were analyzed. The median [interquartile range] assay turnaround time was 3 (1-5) days, and 48 (46.2%) of the 104 initial antibiotic concentration values were below the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. A total of 34 (46%) of the 74 off-target TDM measurements available before the end of the antibiotic treatment prompted dose adjustment. This dose adjustment increased the proportion of on-target TDM measurements (70% versus 20% without adjustment). Subsequent measurements of the minimum inhibitory concentration showed that the use of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing's epidemiological cutoff values led to underestimation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment in 10 cases (20%). CONCLUSIONS: TDM seems to be an effective means of optimizing antibiotic exposure in critically ill children. This requires timely plasma antibiotic assays and minimum inhibitory concentration measurements. It is important to define which patients should undergo TDM and how this monitoring should be managed.

Estimation of piperacillin clearance with different glomerular filtration rate formulas in critically ill children.

AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is difficult to assess in critically ill children using gold standard method and alternatives are needed. This study aimed to determine the most accurate GFR estimation formula for assessing piperacillin clearance in critically ill children, using a published piperacillin pharmacokinetics (PK) population model. METHODS: All children hospitalized in the paediatric intensive care unit of a single institution who were receiving piperacillin were included. PK were described using the nonlinear mixed effect modelling software MONOLIX. In the initial PK model, GFR was estimated according to the Schwartz 1976 formula. We evaluated a set of 12 additional validated formulas, developed using plasma creatinine and/or cystatin C concentrations, in the building model to assess the lowest between-subject variability for piperacillin clearance. RESULTS: We included 20 children with a median (range) postnatal age of 1.9 (0.1-19) years, body weight of 12.5 (3.5-69) kg. Estimated GFR according to the Schwartz 1976 formula was 160.5 (38-315) mL min-1 1.73 m-2 . Piperacillin clearance was best predicted by the Bouvet combined formula. CONCLUSION: The combined Bouvet formula was the most accurate GFR estimation formula for assessing piperacillin clearance in critically ill children.

Lopinavir-Ritonavir Impairs Adrenal Function in Infants.

BACKGROUND: Perinatal treatment with lopinavir boosted by ritonavir (LPV/r) is associated with steroidogenic abnormalities. Long-term effects in infants have not been studied. METHODS: Adrenal-hormone profiles were compared at weeks 6 and 26 between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-exposed but uninfected infants randomly assigned at 7 days of life to prophylaxis with LPV/r or lamivudine (3TC) to prevent transmission during breastfeeding. LPV/r in vitro effect on steroidogenesis was assessed in H295R cells. RESULTS: At week 6, 159 frozen plasma samples from Burkina Faso and South Africa were assessed (LPV/r group: n = 92; 3TC group: n = 67) and at week 26, 95 samples from Burkina Faso (LPV/r group: n = 47; 3TC group: n = 48). At week 6, LPV/r-treated infants had a higher median dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) level than infants from the 3TC arm: 3.91 versus 1.48 ng/mL (P < .001). Higher DHEA levels (>5 ng/mL) at week 6 were associated with higher 17-OH-pregnenolone (7.78 vs 3.71 ng/mL, P = .0004) and lower testosterone (0.05 vs 1.34 ng/mL, P = .009) levels in LPV/r-exposed children. There was a significant correlation between the DHEA and LPV/r AUC levels (ρ = 0.40, P = .019) and Ctrough (ρ = 0.40, P = .017). At week 26, DHEA levels remained higher in the LPV/r arm: 0.45 versus 0.13 ng/mL (P = .002). Lopinavir, but not ritonavir, inhibited CYP17A1 and CYP21A2 activity in H295R cells. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir was associated with dose-dependent adrenal dysfunction in infants. The impact of long-term exposure and potential clinical consequences require evaluation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00640263.

Effect of Pregnancy on Unbound Raltegravir Concentrations in the ANRS 160 RalFe Trial.

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to explore the pharmacokinetics modification of unbound raltegravir during pregnancy. The RalFe ANRS160 study was a nonrandomized, open-label, multicenter trial enrolling HIV-infected pregnant women receiving a combined antiretroviral regimen containing 400 mg raltegravir twice daily. Biological samples were collected during the third trimester of pregnancy (between 30 and 37 weeks of gestational age) and at postpartum (4 to 6 weeks after delivery). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with Monolix software. A total of 360 plasma samples were collected from 43 women during pregnancy and postpartum. The unbound raltegravir was described by a one-compartment model with a transit compartment with first-order absorption, evolving to bound raltegravir (by a linear binding to albumin) or metabolism to RAL-glucuronide or to a first-order elimination, with a circadian rhythm. During pregnancy, the absorption was decreased and delayed and the raltegravir elimination clearance and glucuronidation increased by 37%. Median total and unbound area under the curve from 0 to 12 h significantly decreased by 36% and 27% during pregnancy. Median total trough concentration (Ctrough) decreased significantly in the evening (28%); however, the median total Ctrough in the morning, unbound Ctrough in the morning, and unbound Ctrough in the evening showed a nonsignificant decrease of 16%, 1%, and 15%, respectively, during pregnancy compared to the postpartum period. This is the first study reporting the pharmacokinetics of unbound raltegravir during pregnancy. As unbound Ctrough did not significantly decrease during the third trimester, the pregnancy effect on raltegravir unbound concentrations was not considered clinically relevant. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02099474.).

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill children with different renal functions.

PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in critically ill children and simulate dosing regimens in order to optimize patient exposure. METHODS: Meropenem plasma concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Meropenem PK was investigated using a non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach. RESULTS: Forty patients with an age of 16.8 (1.4-187.2) months, weight of 9.1 (3.8-59) kg, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 151 (19-440) mL/min/1.73 m2 were included. Eleven patients received continuous replacement renal therapy (CRRT). Concentration-time courses were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Body weight (BW), eGFR, and CRRT were covariates explaining the between-subject variabilities on central/peripheral volume of distribution (V1/V2), inter-compartment clearance (Q), and clearance (CL): V1i = V1pop × (BW/70)1, Qi = Qpop × (BW/70)0.75, V2i = V2pop × (BW/70)1, CLi = (CLpop × (BW/70)0.75) × (eGFR/100)0.378) for patients without CRRT and CLi = (CLpop × (BW/70)0.75) × 0.9 for patients with CRRT, where CLpop, V1pop, Qpop, and V2pop are 6.82 L/h, 40.6 L, 1 L/h, and 9.2 L respectively normalized to a 70-kg subject. Continuous infusion, 60 and 120 mg/kg per day, is the most adequate dosing regimen to attain the target of 50% fT > MIC and 100% fT > MIC for patients infected by bacteria with high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value (> 4 mg/L) without risk of accumulation except in children with severe renal failure. CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion allows reaching the fT > MIC targets safely in children with normal or increased renal clearance.

Early Bayesian Dose Adjustment of Vancomycin Continuous Infusion in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections are a global burden. Area under the serum concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio is the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter that best predicts vancomycin efficacy. Its therapeutic range is narrow, difficult to achieve because of a wide intersubject variability, especially in children, and is not routinely targeted since the AUC is rarely available. We investigated if an early Bayesian dose adjustment would increase the rate of vancomycin target attainment, in the first 24 hours of treatment (H24), in children.We conducted a single-centre randomized controlled trial in 4 pediatric departments of Necker-Enfants Malades hospital (Paris, France). Patients aged 3 months to 17 years for whom intravenous vancomycin was started were eligible and randomized in a 1:1 ratio: routine care were compared with an early vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (3h after treatment initiation) followed by an early Bayesian dose adjustment using a previously published population-based PK model that included age, bodyweight and serum creatinine as covariates. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients of each group achieving vancomycin therapeutic range at H24, defined by AUC0-24/MIC≥400 and AUC0-24 ≤800mg-h/L.Ninety-nine patients were enrolled: 49 were randomized to the Bayesian group and 50 to the control group. Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 82 patients: 85% of Bayesian group patients achieved H24 vancomycin target versus 57% of control group patients (p=0.007) with no difference regarding iatrogenic events. Early Bayesian dose adjustment increased the proportion of children achieving vancomycin target at H24, which may improve clinical outcomes of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections.

Simultaneous quantification of levofloxacin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin in microvolumes of human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

Levofloxacin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin are four fluoroquinolones used in the treatment of serious bacterial infections. The antibacterial activity of fluoroquinolones is concentration dependent. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring in daily clinical practice is warranted to ensure the therapy's efficacy and prevent bacterial resistance. The purpose of the present study was to develop a method using high-pressure liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet detector for simultaneous quantification of these four fluoroquinolones in human plasma. A 50 µL aliquot of plasma was precipitated by 200 µL of methanol using gatifloxacin as internal standard. The chromatographic separation was performed on a Kinetex XB-C18 column using a mobile phase composed of a mixture of orthophosphoric acid 0.4% (v/v), acetonitrile and methanol at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. Dual UV wavelength mode was used, with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin monitored at 293 nm, and pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin monitored at 280 nm. The calibration was linear over the ranges of 0.125-25 mg/L for levofloxacin, 0.1-20mg/L for moxifloxacin and 0.05-10 mg/L for both pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Inter- and intra-day trueness and precision were <13% for all the compounds under study. The proposed method was simple, reliable, cost-effective and suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring or pharmacokinetics studies.

Decreased darunavir concentrations during once-daily co-administration with maraviroc and raltegravir: OPTIPRIM-ANRS 147 trial.

Background: The OPTIPRIM-ANRS 147 trial compared intensive combination ART (darunavir/ritonavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine, raltegravir and maraviroc) started early during primary HIV-1 infection with standard tritherapy with darunavir/ritonavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. From month 6 to 18, the percentage of viral load values <50 copies/mL was lower in the pentatherapy arm than in the tritherapy arm. Here we compared antiretroviral drug concentrations between the two arms. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 50 patients at various times after drug administration. A Bayesian approach based on published population pharmacokinetic models was used to estimate residual drug concentrations (Ctrough) and exposures (AUC) in each patient. A mixed linear regression model was then used to compare the AUC and Ctrough values of each drug used in both groups. Results: Published models adequately described our data and could be used to predict Ctrough and AUC. No significant difference in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine and ritonavir parameters was found between the two arms. However, darunavir Ctrough and AUC were significantly lower in the pentatherapy arm than in the tritherapy arm (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: Adding maraviroc and raltegravir to darunavir-based tritherapy decreased darunavir concentrations. Compliance issues, maraviroc-darunavir interaction and raltegravir-darunavir interaction were suspected and may affect the kinetics of viral decay during pentatherapy. A specific pharmacokinetic interaction study is needed to explore the interactions between darunavir and maraviroc and raltegravir.

Model of population pharmacokinetics of cidofovir in immunocompromised children with cytomegalovirus and adenovirus infection.

Objectives: To describe cidofovir pharmacokinetics and assess the link between concentration and safety/efficacy in children. Patients and methods: An observational study was conducted in 13 immunocompromised children receiving cidofovir for adenovirus and/or cytomegalovirus infection. A population pharmacokinetic model was built and AUC0-24 was derived for each patient. Virological success was defined as a decrease of the viraemia by ≥1 log10 copies/mL within 15 days of cidofovir initiation. The association between AUC0-24 and virological success was assessed using a Wilcoxon test. An AUC0-24 cut-off value was determined using a Fisher's exact test. Results: Overall, 86 blood samples were analysed. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the cidofovir data. Virological success (VS) was reached in 6/8 children with adenovirus viraemia and in 1/4 children with cytomegalovirus viraemia. Patients with VS displayed a non-significant higher median AUC0-24 compared with patients with virological failure: 48.6 (range 8.9-72.6) versus 19.1 (6.9-22.7) mg·h/L. Adenovirus-viraemic patients with an AUC0-24 value below 19.1 mg·h/L had a higher probability of treatment failure (P = 0.03). Aviraemic children with stool and/or nasopharyngeal adenovirus carriage cleared the viral carriage within a month of cidofovir initiation. During treatment, 1/13 children developed a tubulopathy but none of them had an increase in creatininaemia. Conclusions: Cidofovir appears safe and reasonably well tolerated and seemed to have efficacy in a subset of patients with adenovirus/cytomegalovirus infection. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful in children receiving cidofovir and, in the case of adenovirus infection, targeting an AUC0-24 above 19.1 mg·h/L could be associated with higher probability of virological success.

Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz at a High Dose of 25 Milligrams per Kilogram per Day in Children 2 to 3 Years Old.

The MONOD ANRS 12206 trial was designated to assess simplification of a successful lopinavir (LPV)-based antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected children younger than 3 years of age using efavirenz (EFV; 25 mg/kg of body weight/day) to preserve the class of protease inhibitors for children in that age group. In this substudy, EFV concentrations were measured to check the consistency of an EFV dose of 25 mg/kg and to compare it with the 2016 FDA recommended dose. Fifty-two children underwent blood sampling for pharmacokinetic study at 6 months and 12 months after switching to EFV. We applied a Bayesian approach to derive EFV pharmacokinetic parameters using the nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM) program. The proportion of midinterval concentrations 12 h after drug intake (C12 h) corresponding to the EFV therapeutic pharmacokinetic thresholds (1 to 4 mg/liter) was assessed according to different dose regimens (25 mg/kg in the MONOD study versus the 2016 FDA recommended dose). With both the 25 mg/kg/day dose and the 2016 FDA recommended EFV dose, simulations showed that the majority of C12 h values were within the therapeutic range (62.6% versus 62.8%). However, there were more children underexposed with the 2016 FDA recommended dose (11.6% versus 1.2%). Conversely, there were more concentrations above the threshold of toxicity with the 25 mg/kg dose (36.2% versus 25.6%), with C12 h values of up to 15 mg/liter. Only 1 of 52 children was switched back to LPV because of persistent sleeping disorders, but his C12 h value was within therapeutic ranges. A high EFV dose of 25 mg/kg per day in children under 3 years old achieved satisfactory therapeutic effective levels. However, the 2016 FDA recommended EFV dose appeared to provide more acceptable safe therapeutic profiles. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01127204.).

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Tenofovir in the Genital Tract of Male HIV-Infected Patients.

The aims of this study were to describe the blood plasma (BP) and seminal plasma (SP) pharmacokinetics of tenofovir (TFV) in HIV-1-infected men, to assess the role of genetic polymorphism in the variability of TFV transfer into the male genital tract, and to evaluate the impact of TFV SP exposure on seminal plasma HIV load (spVL). Men from the Evarist-ANRS EP 49 study treated with TFV as part of their antiretroviral therapy were included in the study. A total of 248 and 217 TFV BP and SP concentrations from 129 men were available for the analysis. For pharmacogenetic assessment, a total of 121 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were genotyped. Data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. TFV pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model for BP and by an effect compartment with different input and output constants for SP. TFV exposures (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0-24]) were higher in SP than in BP (median AUC0-24, 7.01 versus 2.97 mg · liter-1 · h, respectively). The median (range) SP-to-BP AUC0-24 ratio was 2.24 (0.53 to 34.13). After correction for multiple testing, none of the SNPs were significantly associated with the TFV transfer rate constant. The impact of the TFV SP AUC0-24 or TFV SP-to-BP AUC0-24 ratio on spVL was not significant (P = 0.808 and 0.768, respectively). This is the first population model describing TFV pharmacokinetics in the male genital tract. TFV SP concentrations were higher than BP concentrations. Despite TFV SP exposures being higher than BP exposures, an spVL was detectable for 12.2% of the men.

Are Prophylactic and Therapeutic Target Concentrations Different?: the Case of Lopinavir-Ritonavir or Lamivudine Administered to Infants for Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV-1 Transmission during Breastfeeding.

The ANRS 12174 trial assessed the efficacy and tolerance of lopinavir (LPV)-ritonavir (LPV/r) prophylaxis versus those of lamivudine (3TC) prophylaxis administered to breastfed infants whose HIV-infected mothers were not on antiretroviral therapy. In this substudy, we assessed LPV/r and 3TC pharmacokinetics to evaluate the percentage of infants with therapeutic plasma concentrations and to discuss these data in the context of a prophylactic treatment. Infants from the South African trial site underwent blood sampling for pharmacokinetic study at weeks 6, 26, and 38 of life. We applied a Bayesian approach to derive the 3TC and LPV pharmacokinetic parameters on the basis of previously published pharmacokinetic models for HIV-infected children. We analyzed 114 LPV and 180 3TC plasma concentrations from 69 infants and 92 infants, respectively. A total of 30 LPV and 20 3TC observations were considered missing doses and discarded from the Bayesian analysis. The overall population analysis showed that 30 to 40% of the infants did not reach therapeutic targets, regardless of treatment group. The median LPV trough concentrations at weeks 6, 26, and 38 were 2.8 mg/liter (interquartile range [IQR], 1.7 to 4.4 mg/liter), 5.6 mg/liter (IQR, 3.2 to 7.7 mg/liter), and 3.4 mg/liter (IQR, 2.3 to 7.3 mg/liter), respectively. The median 3TC area under the curve from 0 to 12 h after the last drug intake were 5.6 mg · h/liter (IQR, 4.1 to 7.8 mg · h/liter), 5.9 mg · h/liter (IQR, 5.1 to 7.5 mg · h/liter), and 7.3 mg · h/liter (IQR, 4.9 to 8.5 mg · h/liter) at weeks 6, 26, and 38, respectively. Use of the therapeutic doses recommended by the WHO would have resulted in a higher proportion of infants achieving the targets. However, no HIV-1 infection was reported among these infants. These results suggest that the prophylactic targets for both 3TC and LPV may be lower than the therapeutic ones. For treatment, the WHO dosing guidelines should be suitable to maintain values above the therapeutic pharmacokinetic targets in most infants. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00640263.).

Suboptimal cotrimoxazole prophylactic concentrations in HIV-infected children according to the WHO guidelines.

AIMS: A clinical study was conduct in HIV-infected children to evaluate the prophylactic doses of cotrimoxazole [sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and trimethoprim (TMP)] advised by the WHO. METHODS: Children received lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (200 mg of SMX/40 mg of TMP once daily). A nonlinear mixed effects modelling approach was used to analyse plasma concentrations. Factors that could impact the pharmacokinetic profile were investigated. The model was subsequently used to simulate individual exposure and evaluate different administration schemes. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 136 children [average age: 1.9 years (range: [0.7-4]), average weight: 9.5 kg (range: [6-16.3])]. A dose per kg was justified by the significant influence of implementing an allometrically scaled body size covariate on SMX and TMP pharmacokinetics. SMX and TPM clearance were estimated at 0.49 l h-1 /9.5 kg and 3.06 l h-1 /9.5 kg, respectively. The simulated exposures obtained after administration of oral dosing recommended by the WHO for children from 10 to 15 kg were significantly lower than in adults for SMX and TMP. This could induce a reduction of effectiveness of cotrimoxazole. Simulations show that regimens of 30 mg kg-1 of SMX and 6 mg kg-1 of TMP in the 5-10 kg group and 25 mg kg-1 of SMX and 5 mg kg-1 of TMP in the 10-15 kg group are more suitable doses. CONCLUSIONS: In this context of high prevalence of opportunistic infections, a lower exposure to cotrimoxazole in children than adults was noted. To achieve comparable exposure to adults, a dosing scheme per kg was proposed.