Intraoperative Anesthetic Management of Lung Transplantation: Center-Specific Practices and Geographic and Centers Size Differences.

OBJECTIVE: Although increasing evidence in lung transplantation (LTx) suggests that intraoperative management could influence outcomes, there are no guidelines available regarding intraoperative management of LTx. The overall goal of the study was to assess geographic and center volume-specific clinical practices in perioperative management. DESIGN: Prospective data analysis. SETTING: Online survey from a single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: European and non-European LTx centers. INTERVENTIONS: An online survey was sent to 176 centers currently performing LTx procedures. It covered organizational data, general anesthesia considerations, fluid therapy and coagulation, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory therapies, and ventilation strategies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rates were 57.5% (n = 42) from European and 32% (n = 33) from non-European countries. Significant differences between European and non-European countries were use of volatile hypnotics (p = 0.016), use of sufentanil (p < 0.001), inotropic agents (p = 0.001) and colloid infusion (p < 0.001), use of calibrated pulse contour analysis (p = 0.004), use of intraoperative traditional laboratory-based coagulation tests (p = 0.001) and platelet function analysis (p = 0.005), and use of higher peak inspiratory pressure (p = 0.009). Center volume-specific differences were use of fentanyl (p = 0.03) and the use of higher peak inspiratory pressure (p = 0.005) for ventilation. Induction of anesthesia and use of advanced hemodynamic monitoring, therapy for pulmonary hypertension, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory therapies, and ventilation strategies were not different among the centers. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated for the first time statistically significant differences among European and non-European centers and among low- versus high-volume centers regarding intraoperative management during LTx. These observations will be of some guidance for the LTx community and may trigger more extensive studies.

Remote ECLS-Implantation and Transport for Retrieval of Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) emerges as a salvage option in therapy refractory cardiogenic shock but is limited to highly specialized tertiary care centers. Critically ill patients are often too unstable for conventional transport. Mobile ECLS programs for remote implantation and subsequent air or ground-based transport for patient retrieval could solve this dilemma and make full-spectrum advanced cardiac care available to patients in remote hospitals in whom shock otherwise might be fatal. METHODS: From December 2012 to March 2016, 40 patients underwent venoarterial ECLS implantation in remote hospitals with subsequent transport to our center and were retrospectively analyzed. The mobile ECLS team was available 24/7, implantation was performed percutaneously bedside, and compact support systems designed for transport were used. RESULTS: Twenty percent of the patients were female; the mean age was 55 ± 10 years, and the mean Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support score was 1.3 ± 0.5. Patient retrieval was accomplished via ground-based (n = 29, 72.5%, mean distance = 27.9 ± 29.7 km [range, 5.6-107.1 km]) or air (n = 11, mean distance = 62.4 ± 27.2 km [range, 38.9-116.4 km]) transport. No ECLS-related complications occurred during transport. The ECLS system could be explanted in 65.0% (n = 26) of patients, and the 30-day survival rate was 52.5% (n = 21). CONCLUSION: Remote ECLS implantation and interfacility transport on ECLS are feasible and effective. Interdisciplinary teams and full-spectrum cardiac care are essential to achieve optimal outcomes. Rapid-response ECLS networks have the potential to substantially increase the survival of cardiogenic shock patients.

Lung transplantation: from the procedure to managing patients with lung transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The perioperative management of lung transplantation patients remains a challenge. The most important goal is the prevention or attenuation of primary graft failure due to ischemia and reperfusion, operative trauma, and activation of systemic inflammation; it significantly influences short-long and long-term outcome. This review focuses on different aspects regarding the management of these high-risk patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The Lung Allocation Score was implemented to estimate the survival benefit from a lung transplant. As scarcity of lung grafts persists new techniques such as the ex-vivo lung perfusion might allow for expanding the criteria and distribution range of donor organs. Thoracic anesthesia for lung transplantation faces the challenge to manage impaired oxygenation, refractory hypercapnia, and severe pulmonary hypertension in order to attenuate the risk of primary graft failure. Further, lung protective ventilator strategies to prevent postoperative acute lung injury might have an impact on outcome. This includes extracorporeal circulation therapy as rapid advances in this field open up new possibilities. Recent findings suggest that particular attention should be paid to neurocognitive outcome. SUMMARY: There is evidence that important key strategies improve outcome after lung transplantation. An update on the substantial challenges in anesthesia comprises ventilator strategy and the use of extracorporeal circulation to minimize inflammation associated with primary graft failure.

A Randomized Study of a Single Dose of Intramuscular Cholecalciferol in Critically Ill Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of two doses of intramuscular cholecalciferol on serial serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D levels and on pharmacodynamics endpoints: calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and cathelicidin in critically ill adults. DESIGN: Prospective randomized interventional study. SETTING: Tertiary, academic adult ICU. PATIENTS: Fifty critically ill adults with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated to receive a single intramuscular dose of either 150,000 IU (0.15 mU) or 300,000 IU (0.3 mU) cholecalciferol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic parameters, and outcome measures were collected over a 14-day period or until ICU discharge, whichever was earlier. Prior to randomization, 28 of 50 patients (56%) were classified as vitamin D deficient. By day 7 after randomization, 15 of 23 (65%) and 14 of 21 patients (67%) normalized vitamin D levels with 0.15 and 0.3 mU, respectively (p=0.01) and by day 14, 8 of 10 (80%) and 10 of 12 patients (83%) (p=0.004), respectively. Secondary hyperparathyroidism was manifested in 28% of patients at baseline. Parathyroid hormone levels decreased over the study period with patients achieving vitamin D sufficiency at day 7 having significantly lower parathyroid hormone levels (p<0.01). Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and interleukin-6) fell significantly over the study period. Greater increments in 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D were significantly associated with greater increments in cathelicidin at days 1 and 3 (p=0.04 and 0.004, respectively). Although in-hospital mortality rate did not differ between the groups, patients who did not mount a parathyroid hormone response to vitamin D deficiency had a higher mortality (35% vs 12%; p=0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of either dose of intramuscular cholecalciferol corrected vitamin D deficiency in the majority of critically ill patients. Greater vitamin D increments were associated with early greater cathelicidin increases, suggesting a possible mechanism of vitamin D supplementation in inducing bactericidal pleiotropic effects.

The Munich Lung Transplant Group: Intraoperative Extracorporeal Circulation in Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective single-center study aimed to analyze transfusion requirements, coagulation parameters, and outcome parameters in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LuTx) with intraoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, comparing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 49 of a total of 188 LuTx recipients were identified being set intraoperatively on either conventional CPB (n = 22) or ECMO (n = 27). Intra- and postoperative transfusion and coagulation factor requirements as well as early outcome parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: LuTx patients on CPB had significantly higher intraoperative transfusion requirements when compared with ECMO patients, that is, packed red cells (9 units [5-18] vs. 6 units [4-8], p = 0.011), platelets (3.5 units [2-4] vs. 2 units [0-3], p = 0.034), fibrinogen (5 g [4-6] vs. 0 g [0-4], p = 0.013), prothrombin complex concentrate (3 iU [2-5] vs. 0 iU [0-2], p = 0.001), and tranexamic acid (2.5 mg [2-5] vs. 2.0 mg [1-3], p = 0.002). Also, ventilator support requirements (21 days [7-31] vs. 5 days [3-21], p = 0.013) and lengths of ICU stays (36 days [14-62] vs. 15 days [6-44], p = 0.030) were markedly longer in CPB patients. There were no differences in 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. CONCLUSION: These data indicate a perioperative advantage of ECMO usage with low-dose heparinization over conventional CPB for extracorporeal circulatory support during LuTx. Long-term outcome is not affected.

Impact of a ground intermediate transport from the helicopter landing site at a hospital on transport duration and patient safety.

BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical service provides timely care and rapid transport of severely injured or critically ill patients. Due to constructional or regulatory provisions at some hospitals, a remote helicopter landing site necessitates an intermediate ground transport to the emergency department by ambulance which might lengthen patient transport time and comprises the risk of disconnection or loss of vascular access lines, breathing tubes or impairment of other relevant equipment during the loading processes. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a ground intermediate transport at the hospital site prolonged patient transport times and operating times or increases complication rates. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all missions of a German air rescue service between 2012 and 2020 was conducted. Need of a ground transport at the accepting hospital, transfer time from the helipad to the hospital, overall patient transport time from the emergency location or the referring hospital to the accepting hospital and duration of the mission were analyzed. Several possible confounders such as type of mission, mechanical ventilation of the patient, use of syringe infusion pumps (SIPs), day- or nighttime were considered. RESULTS: Of a total of 179,003 missions (92,773 (51,8%) primary rescue missions, 10,001 (5,6%) polytrauma patients) 86,230 (48,2%) secondary transfers) an intermediate transport by ambulance occurred in 40,459 (22,6%) cases. While transfer times were prolonged from 6.3 to 8.8 min for primary rescue cases (p < 0.001) and from 9.2 to 13.5 min for interhospital retrieval missions (p < 0.001), the overall patient transport time was 14.8 versus 15.8 min (p < 0.001) in primary rescue and 23.5 versus 26.8 min (p < 0.001) in interhospital transfer. Linear regression analysis revealed a mean time difference of 3.91 min for mechanical ventilation of a patient (p < 0.001), 7.06 min for the use of SIPs (p < 0.001) and 2.73 min for an intermediate ambulance transfer (p < 0.001). There was no relevant difference of complication rates seen. CONCLUSIONS: An intermediate ground transport from a remote helicopter landing site to the emergency department by ambulance at the receiving hospital had a minor impact on transportation times and complication rates.

Predictive value of coagulation variables and glycocalyx shedding in hospitalized COVID-19 patients - a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Covid-19 disease causes an immense burden on the healthcare system. It has not yet been finally clarified which patients will suffer from a severe course and which will not. Coagulation disorders can be detected in many of these patients. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify variables of the coagulation system including standard and viscoelastometric tests as well as components of glycocalyx damage that predict admission to the intensive care unit. METHODS: Adult patients were included within 24 h of admission. Blood samples were analyzed at hospital admission and at ICU admission if applicable. We analyzed group differences and furthermore performed receiver operator characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: This study included 60 adult COVID-19 patients. During their hospital stay, 14 patients required ICU treatment. Comparing ICU and non-ICU patients at time of hospital admission, D-dimer (1450 µg/ml (675/2850) vs. 600 µg/ml (500/900); p = 0.0022; cut-off 1050 µg/ml, sensitivity 71%, specificity 89%) and IL-6 (47.6 pg/ml (24.9/85.4 l) vs. 16.1 pg/ml (5.5/34.4); p = 0.0003; cut-off 21.25 pg/ml, sensitivity 86%, specificity 65%) as well as c-reactive protein (92 mg/dl (66.8/131.5) vs. 43.5 mg/dl (26.8/83.3); p = 0.0029; cutoff 54.5 mg/dl, sensitivity 86%, specificity 65%) were higher in patients who required ICU admission. Thromboelastometric variables and markers of glycocalyx damage (heparan sulfate, hyaluronic acid, syndecan-1) at the time of hospital admission did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: General inflammatory variables continue to be the most robust predictors of a severe course of a COVID-19 infection. Viscoelastometric variables and markers of glycocalyx damage are significantly increased upon admission to the ICU without being predictors of ICU admission.

Anthropometric analysis of body habitus and outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

AIMS: This study aimed to determine whether anthropometric markers of thoracic skeletal muscle and abdominal visceral fat tissue correlate with outcome parameters in critically ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed thoracic CT-scans of 67 patients in four ICUs at a university hospital. Thoracic skeletal muscle (total cross-sectional area (CSA); pectoralis muscle area (PMA)) and abdominal visceral fat tissue (VAT) were quantified using a semi-automated method. Point-biserial-correlation-coefficient, Spearman-correlation-coefficient, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and logistic regression were used to assess the correlation and test for differences between anthropometric parameters and death, ventilator- and ICU-free days and initial inflammatory laboratory values. RESULTS: Deceased patients had lower CSA and PMA values, but higher VAT values (p < 0.001). Male patients with higher CSA values had more ventilator-free days (p = 0.047) and ICU-free days (p = 0.017). Higher VAT/CSA and VAT/PMA values were associated with higher mortality (p < 0.001), but were negatively correlated with ICU length of stay in female patients only (p < 0.016). There was no association between anthropometric parameters and initial inflammatory biomarker levels. Logistic regression revealed no significant independent predictor for death. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that pathologic body composition assessed by planimetric measurements using thoracic CT-scans is associated with worse outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Extracorporeal Circulation During Lung Transplantation Procedures: A Meta-Analysis.

Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is an invaluable tool in lung transplantation (lutx). More than the past years, an increasing number of centers changed their standard for intraoperative ECC from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) - with differing results. This meta-analysis reviews the existing evidence. An online literature research on Medline, Embase, and PubMed has been performed. Two persons independently judged the papers using the ACROBAT-NRSI tool of the Cochrane collaboration. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to determine whether veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) resulted in better outcomes compared with CPB. Six papers - all observational studies without randomization - were included in the analysis. All were considered to have serious bias caused by heparinization as co-intervention. Forest plots showed a beneficial trend of ECMO regarding blood transfusions (packed red blood cells (RBCs) with an average mean difference of -0.46 units [95% CI = -3.72, 2.80], fresh-frozen plasma with an average mean difference of -0.65 units [95% CI = -1.56, 0.25], platelets with an average mean difference of -1.72 units [95% CI = -3.67, 0.23]). Duration of ventilator support with an average mean difference of -2.86 days [95% CI = -11.43, 5.71] and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay with an average mean difference of -4.79 days [95% CI = -8.17, -1.41] were shorter in ECMO patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment tended to be superior regarding 3 month mortality (odds ratio = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.21-1.02) and 1 year mortality (odds ratio = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.37-1.13). However, only the ICU length of stay reached statistical significance. Meta-regression analyses showed that heterogeneity across studies (sex, year of ECMO implementation, and underlying disease) influenced differences. These data indicate a benefit of the intraoperative use of ECMO as compared with CPB during lung transplant procedures regarding short-term outcome (ICU stay). There was no statistically significant effect regarding blood transfusion needs or long-term outcome. The superiority of ECMO in lutx patients remains to be determined in larger multi-center randomized trials.