Efficacy and quality of life for FOLFOX/bevacizumab +/- irinotecan in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer-final results of the AIO CHARTA trial.

BACKGROUND: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab has demonstrated benefits for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, challenges arise in its clinical implementation due to expected side effects and a lack of stratification criteria. METHODS: The AIO "CHARTA" trial randomised mCRC patients into clinical Group 1 (potentially resectable), 2 (unresectable/risk of rapid progression), or 3 (asymptomatic). They received FOLFOX/bevacizumab +/- irinotecan. The primary endpoint was the 9-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR@9). Secondary endpoints included efficacy in stratified groups, QoL, PFS, OS, ORR, secondary resection rate, and toxicity. RESULTS: The addition of irinotecan to FOLFOX/bevacizumab increased PFSR@9 from 56 to 67%, meeting the primary endpoint. The objective response rate was 61% vs. 69% (P = 0.21) and median PFS was 10.3 vs. 12 months (HR 0.83; P = 0.17). The PFS was (11.4 vs. 12.9 months; HR 0.83; P = 0.46) in potentially resectable patients, with a secondary resection rate of 37% vs. 51%. Moreover, Group 3 (asymptomatic) patients had a PFS of 11.1 vs. 16.1 months (HR 0.6; P = 0.14). The addition of irinotecan did not diminish QoL. CONCLUSION: The CHARTA trial, along with other studies, confirms the efficacy and tolerability of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for mCRC. Importantly, clinical stratification may lead to its implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered as NCT01321957.

Four versus six cycles of CHOP chemotherapy in combination with six applications of rituximab in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma with favourable prognosis (FLYER): a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) are the standard treatment for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In the FLYER trial, we assessed whether four cycles of CHOP plus six applications of rituximab are non-inferior to six cycles of R-CHOP in a population of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with favourable prognosis. METHODS: This two-arm, open-label, international, multicentre, prospective, randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial was done at 138 clinical sites in Denmark, Israel, Italy, Norway, and Germany. We enrolled patients aged 18-60 years, with stage I-II disease, normal serum lactate dehydrogenase concentration, ECOG performance status 0-1, and without bulky disease (maximal tumour diameter <7·5 cm). Randomisation was computer-based and done centrally in a 1:1 ratio using the Pocock minimisation algorithm after stratification for centres, stage (I vs II), and extralymphatic sites (no vs yes). Patients were assigned to receive either six cycles of R-CHOP or four cycles of R-CHOP plus two doses of rituximab. CHOP comprised cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and vincristine (1·4 mg/m2, with a maximum total dose of 2 mg), all administered intravenously on day 1, plus oral prednisone or prednisolone at the discretion of the investigator (100 mg) administered on days 1-5. Rituximab was given at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. No radiotherapy was planned except for testicular lymphoma treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after 3 years. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. A non-inferiority margin of -5·5% was chosen. The trial, which is completed, was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00278421. FINDINGS: Between Dec 2, 2005, and Oct 7, 2016, 592 patients were enrolled, of whom 295 patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of R-CHOP and 297 were assigned to receive four cycles of R-CHOP plus two doses of rituximab. Four patients in the four-cycles group withdrew informed consent before the start of treatment, so 588 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. After a median follow-up of 66 months (IQR 42-100), 3-year progression-free survival of patients who had four cycles of R-CHOP plus two doses of rituximab was 96% (95% CI 94-99), which was 3% better (lower limit of the one-sided 95% CI for the difference was 0%) than six cycles of R-CHOP, demonstrating the non-inferiority of the four-cycles regimen. 294 haematological and 1036 non-haematological adverse events were documented in the four-cycles group compared with 426 haematological and 1280 non-haematological adverse events in the six-cycles group. Two patients, both in the six-cycles group, died during study therapy. INTERPRETATION: In young patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and favourable prognosis, four cycles of R-CHOP is non-inferior to six cycles of R-CHOP, with relevant reduction of toxic effects. Thus, chemotherapy can be reduced without compromising outcomes in this population. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Baseline and interim PET-based outcome prediction in peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A subgroup analysis of the PETAL trial.

The prospective randomized Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (PETAL) trial was designed to test the ability of interim PET (iPET) to direct therapy. As reported previously, outcome remained unaffected by iPET-based treatment changes. In this subgroup analysis, we studied the prognostic value of baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and iPET response in 76 patients with T-cell lymphoma. TMTV was measured using the 41% maximum standardized uptake value (SUV41max ) and SUV4 thresholding methods. Interim PET was performed after two treatment cycles and evaluated using the ΔSUVmax approach and the Deauville scale. Because of significant differences in outcome, patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lymphoma were analyzed separately from patients with ALK-negative lymphoma. In the latter, TMTV was statistically significantly correlated with progression-free survival, with thresholds best dichotomizing the population, of 232 cm3 using SUV41max and 460 cm3 using SUV4 . For iPET response, the respective thresholds were 46.9% SUVmax reduction and Deauville score 1-4 vs 5. The proportion of poor prognosis patients was 46% and 29% for TMTV by SUV41max and SUV4 , and 29% and 25% for iPET response by ΔSUVmax and Deauville, respectively. At diagnosis, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for poor prognosis vs good prognosis patients according to TMTV was 2.291 (1.135-4.624) for SUV41max and 3.206 (1.524-6.743) for SUV4 . At iPET, it was 3.910 (1.891-8.087) for ΔSUVmax and 4.371 (2.079-9.187) for Deauville. On multivariable analysis, only TMTV and iPET response independently predicted survival. Patients with high baseline TMTV and poor iPET response (22% of the population) invariably progressed or died within the first year (hazard ratio, 9.031 [3.651-22.336]). Due to small numbers and events, PET did not predict survival in ALK-positive lymphoma. Baseline TMTV and iPET response are promising tools to select patients with ALK-negative T-cell lymphoma for early allogeneic transplantation or innovative therapies.

[Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Results from a non-interventional trial]. / Erlotinib plus Gemcitabin als Therapie bei Patienten mit metastasiertem Pankreaskarzinom: Ergebnisse einer nicht-interventionellen Studie.

Metastatic pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all cancers. With nab-Paclitaxel/gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine/erlotinib, several treatment options are available which improve the patient's overall survival. Especially for patients who develop rash under erlotinib treatment can benefit from gemcitabine/erlotinib combination therapy. This non-interventional study (NIS ML21284) investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of gemcitabine/erlotinib therapy in the treatment routine of metastatic pancreatic cancer, in particular, in the context of the occurrence of a rash.Between 2007 and 2010, the treatment data of 433 patients in 98 centres were documented. All parameters recorded were assessed descriptively.Treatment with gemcitabine/erlotinib resulted in both a significant increased median overall survival of the patient subgroup with rash grade ≥ 1 (9.90; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 8.19 to 11.05 vs. 6.48 months; 95 % CI, 5.66 to 7.40, p = 0.0010) and median progression-free survival (5.43, 95 % CI, 4.90 to 6.12 vs. 3.98 months, 95 % CI, 3.52 to 5.03, p = 0.0131). The overall response rate of patients treated with gemcitabine/erlotinib, who had developed rash grade ≥ 1, was 5.9 % higher compared to patients without rash (31.7 % vs. 25.8 %).In conclusion, these results from the daily treatment routine of metastatic pancreatic cancer underline the importance of combined gemcitabine/erlotinib therapy for a subgroup of patients who develop a rash in the course of erlotinib treatment.

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large German community-based observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: After approval of bevacizumab in Germany in 2005 for the treatment of unresectable advanced or refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), this observational cohort study was initiated to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with various chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: To facilitate enrolment of a typical mCRC population, eligibility criteria were minimised. Choice of chemotherapy regimen was at the physicians' discretion, but influenced by current registration status. Predefined endpoints were treatment characteristics, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events assessed as potentially related to bevacizumab treatment. Patients were followed for up to four years. RESULTS: In total 1777 eligible patients were enrolled at 261 sites from January 2005 to June 2008. Median age: 64 years (range 19-100); male 62%; ECOG performance status 0-1/≥ 2 89%/11%. Chemotherapy choice was fluoropyrimidine (FU) 12%, FU/oxaliplatin 18%, FU/irinotecan 64%, no chemotherapy concurrent to bevacizumab 2% and other 4%. Best investigator-assessed response rate was 60% (complete response 10%, partial response 51%). Median PFS was 10.2 months and median OS was 24.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in this population of mCRC patients with different chemotherapy regimens is consistent with that observed in other patient registries/non-randomised trials and also corresponds well with data from similar treatment arms of phase III trials.

Bevacizumab in first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: German community-based observational cohort study results.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on age. METHODS: Eligibility criteria focused on M1 disease without prior palliative chemotherapy. Choice of chemotherapy regimen was at the physician's discretion. Predefined efficacy endpoints were response rate, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). Patients were analysed by age (<70 vs. ≥70 years, <75 vs. ≥75 years). RESULTS: Of 1777 patients, 27% and 12% were ≥70 and ≥75 years, respectively. PFS was shorter in elderly patients (<70 vs. ≥70 years: 10.5 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.074; <75 vs. ≥75 years: 10.5 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.00019), as was OS (<70 vs. ≥70 years: 25.8 vs. 22.7 months, p < 0.0008; <75 vs. ≥75 years: 25.8 vs. 20.8 months; p < 0.0001). In the groups <70 and <75 years, PFS was longer in those receiving oxaliplatin-/irinotecan-containing regimens vs. those receiving 5-FU/capecitabine (<70 years: 10.6 vs. 9.0 months; p = 0.0065; <75 years: 10.6 vs. 9.2 months; p = 0.028); no difference in PFS was observed between oxaliplatin-/irinotecan-containing regimens vs. 5-FU/capecitabine regimens in both elderly age-group comparisons (≥70 years: 9.7 vs. 9.2 months; ≥75 years: 8.3 and 9.0 months). CONCLUSION: First-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapies were effective in German mCRC patients ≥75 years of age, but PFS and OS were significantly shorter in this age group vs. younger patients.

Sorafenib Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FLT3-Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation (SORMAIN).

PURPOSE: Despite undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with internal tandem duplication mutation in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3-ITD) have a poor prognosis, frequently relapse, and die as a result of AML. It is currently unknown whether a maintenance therapy using FLT3 inhibitors, such as the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, improves outcome after HCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial (SORMAIN; German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00000591), 83 adult patients with FLT3-ITD-positive AML in complete hematologic remission after HCT were randomly assigned to receive for 24 months either the multitargeted and FLT3-kinase inhibitor sorafenib (n = 43) or placebo (n = 40 placebo). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint of this trial. Relapse was defined as relapse or death, whatever occurred first. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the hazard ratio (HR) for relapse or death in the sorafenib group versus placebo group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.85; log-rank P = .013). The 24-month RFS probability was 53.3% (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.68) with placebo versus 85.0% (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93) with sorafenib (HR, 0.256; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.65; log-rank P = .002). Exploratory data show that patients with undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) before HCT and those with detectable MRD after HCT derive the strongest benefit from sorafenib. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib maintenance therapy reduces the risk of relapse and death after HCT for FLT3-ITD-positive AML.

Outcome of non-mold effective anti-fungal prophylaxis in patients at high-risk for invasive fungal infections after allogenic stem cell transplantation.

Patients who develop severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) have a higher risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI). At our center, fluconazole prophylaxis is standard and upfront mold-effective prophylaxis performed only in patients with specific risk constellations. A total of 290 patients undergoing alloSCT between May 2002 and August 2011 were analyzed. Patients were regarded as high-risk if they suffered from acute GvHD II-IV° or extensive chronic GvHD. The 2-year incidence of an IFI after alloSCT was 8.97% (26/290) in the entire cohort and 7.78% (7/90) in the high-risk group. Mortality due to IFI was 3.85% (1/26) without including a high-risk patient. In the multivariate analysis a pre-transplant fungal infection was the only significant risk factor for developing an IFI after alloSCT (HR = 5.298; p = .001). A fluconazole prophylaxis in patients with GvHD after alloSCT is feasible in facilities with HEPA filtration and high awareness of clinical signs for IFI.

Renal cell cancer presented with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis effectively treated with sorafenib.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib has been approved in the U.S. and the European Union for patients with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC). There is evidence that treatment with sorafenib can achieve partial remissions in patients with brain metastases of RCC. CASE REPORT: We report of a patient with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis of RCC, who 10 days after initiation of sorafenib therapy showed a noticeable decrease in contrast enhancement of the tumor in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain. This partial response was verified by an MRI scan on day 74. DISCUSSION: Results of a sub-evalution of a randomized phase III trial show that sorafenib offers encouraging activity in the treatment of patients with RCC and brain metastases. CONCLUSION: This case shows that sorafenib can achieve rapid tumor response in a patient with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis of RCC. This partial remission can persist for at least 10 weeks.

Data pattern analysis for the individualised pretherapeutic identification of high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients by cytomics.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcome predictions in phase III studies are mostly derived for patient groups, but not for individual patients, although individualised predictions are an ultimate goal to permit a personalised fine tuning of therapy. This may permit earlier application of target therapies, minimise general damage to the organism, and result in improved complete remission rates in malignant diseases. METHODS: In this study, Lymphochip cDNA microarray gene expression results of DLBCL patients, from a published prospective meta-analysis study on the prediction of group prognosis, were analysed for individualised predictions using a nonstatistical data pattern classification approach. The training set was comprised of the same 160 DLBCL patients as in the prognosis study, with the validation set of 80 patients remaining unknown to the learning process. This permits the assessment of prospective classifier performance towards unknown patients. RESULTS: Pretherapeutic predictions for the training and validation set patients were correct in 98.1% and 78.3% of the cases for nonsurvival and in 67.3% and 45.3% for survival. The discriminatory data pattern consisted of 14 known and 10 unknown gene products. CONCLUSIONS: The better than 95% correct pretherapeutic prediction for about one-half of the ultimately nonsurviving high-risk patients of the training set is promising for clinical considerations about individualised therapy in such cases. Reliable individualised survival predictions are not possible with the information content of the present dataset. It seems necessary to investigate additional gene products, since survival may significantly depend on non-lymphocyte-associated genes that escape to the lymphocyte-oriented Lymphochip gene activation analysis.