RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with high tumor burden and major portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains a great challenge. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC) versus lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE (Len+DEB-TACE) for HCC > 7.0 cm accompanied with major PVTT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive patients with HCC (> 7.0 cm) and major PVTT who received Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC (Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC group) or Len+DEB-TACE (Len+DEB-TACE group) between July 2019 and June 2021 from eight institutions in China. Objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 205 patients were included. After PSM, 85-paired patients remained in the study cohorts. Patients in the Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC group had higher ORR (61.2% vs. 34.1%, P < 0.001), longer TTP (median, 9.8 vs. 5.9 months, P < 0.001), and prolonged OS (median, 16.7 vs. 12.5 months, P < 0.001) than those in the Len+DEB-TACE group. The ORR and TTP of both intrahepatic tumor (ORR: 64.7% vs. 36.5%, P < 0.001; median TTP: 10.7 vs. 7.0 months, P < 0.001) and PVTT (ORR: 74.1% vs. 47.1%, P < 0.001; median TTP: 17.4 vs. 7.6 months, P < 0.001) were better in the Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC group than the Len+DEB-TACE group. The frequency of grade 3-4 TRAEs in the Len+DEB-TACE+HAIC group were comparable to those in the Len+DEB-TACE group (38.8% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.524). CONCLUSION: The addition of HAIC to Len+DEB-TACE significantly improved ORR, TTP, and OS over Len+DEB-TACE with an acceptable safety profile for large HCC with major PVTT.
RESUMO
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib combined with anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab (rego-sintilimab) as a second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received rego-sintilimab (rego-sintilimab group) or regorafenib alone (regorafenib group) as a second-line treatment from January 2019 to December 2020. Adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Uni- and multi-variable analyses of prognostic factors for OS and PFS were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: In total, 113 patients were included in the study: 58 received rego-sintilimab and 55 received regorafenib. The rego-sintilimab group had higher ORR (36.2% vs 16.4%, P = 0.017), longer PFS (median 5.6 vs 4.0 months; P = 0.045), and better OS (median 13.4 vs 9.9 months; P = 0.023) than the regorafenib group. Regorafenib alone, Child-Pugh B, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3.6 were independent prognostic factors for poor OS. Regorafenib alone, α-fetoprotein level, and NLR > 3.6 were independent prognostic factors for poor PFS. Subgroup analyses showed a survival benefit of rego-sintilimab in patients with NLR ≤ 3.6 (hazard ratio 0.518 [95% CI, 0.257-0.955]) but not in those with NLR > 3.6 (0.852 [0.461-1.572]); P = 0.002 for interaction. The difference in incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant (39.7% vs 30.9%; P = 0.331). Conclusion: Rego-sintilimab was tolerated and led to better OS than regorafenib as a second-line treatment for advanced HCC patients, especially in those with NLR ≤ 3.6.