Effect of intraoperative treatment options on hip joint stability following total hip arthroplasty.

Dislocation remains the leading indication for revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study was to use a computational model to compare the overall resistance to both anterior and posterior dislocation for the available THA constructs commonly considered by surgeons attempting to produce a stable joint. Patient-specific musculoskeletal models of THA patients performing activities consistent with anterior and posterior dislocation were developed to calculate joint contact forces and joint positions used for simulations of dislocation in a finite element model of the implanted hip that included an experimentally calibrated hip capsule representation. Dislocations were then performed with consideration of offset using +5 and +9 offset, iteratively with three lipped liner variations in jump distance (10°, 15°, and 20° lips), a size 40 head, and a dual-mobility construct. Dislocation resistance was quantified as the moment required to dislocate the hip and the integral of the moment-flexion angle (dislocation energy). Increasing head diameter increased resistive moment on average for anterior and posterior dislocation by 22% relative to a neutral configuration. A lipped liner resulted in increases in the resistive moment to posterior dislocation of 9%, 19%, and 47% for 10°, 15°, and 20° lips, a sensitivity of approximately 2.8 Nm/mm of additional jump distance. A dual-mobility acetabular design resulted in an average 38% increase in resistive moment and 92% increase in dislocation energy for anterior and posterior dislocation. A quantitative understanding of tradeoffs in the dislocation risk inherent to THA construct options is valuable in supporting surgical decision making.

Impact of alignment and kinematic variation on resistive moment and dislocation propensity for THA with lipped and neutral liners.

Instability and dislocation remain leading indications for revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many studies have addressed the links between implant design and dislocation; however, an understanding of the impact of alignment and kinematic variability on constraint of modern THA constructs to provide joint stability is needed. The objective of this study is to provide objective data to be considered in the treatment algorithm to protect against joint instability. Joint contact and muscle forces were evaluated using musculoskeletal models of THA patients performing activities consistent with posterior and anterior dislocation. Position and joint loads were transferred to a finite element simulation with an experimentally calibrated hip capsule representation, where they were kinematically extrapolated until impingement and eventual dislocation. Cup anteversion and inclination were varied according to clinical measurements, and variation in imposed kinematics was included. The resistive moment provided by the contact force and joint capsule, and overall dislocation rate (dislocations/total simulations) were determined with neutral and lipped acetabular liners. Use of a lipped liner did increase the resistive moment in posterior dislocation, by an average of 5.2 Nm, and the flexion angle at dislocation by 1.4° compared to a neutral liner. There was a reduction in similar magnitude in resistance to anterior dislocation. Increased cup anteversion and inclination, hip abduction and internal rotation all reduced the occurrence of posterior dislocation but increased anterior dislocation. A quantitative understanding of tradeoffs in the dislocation risk inherent to THA construct options is valuable in supporting surgical decision making.

Development and calibration of a probabilistic finite element hip capsule representation.

The objective of this study was to develop a probabilistic representation of the hip capsule, which is calibrated to experimental capsular torque-rotation behavior and captures the observed variability for use in population-based studies. A finite element model of the hip capsule was developed with structures composed of a fiber-reinforced membrane, represented by 2D quadrilateral elements embedded with tension-only non-linear spring. An average capsule representation was developed by calibrating ligament properties (linear stiffness, reference strain) so that torque-rotation behavior matched mean cadaveric data. A probabilistic capsule was produced by determining the ligament property variability which represented ±2 SD measured in the experiment. Differences between experimental and model kinematics across all positions had RMS error of 4.7°. Output bounds from the optimized probabilistic capsule representation were consistent with ±2 SD of experimental data; the overall RMS error was 5.1°. This model can be employed in population-based finite element studies of THA to assess mechanics in realistic scenarios considering implant design, as well as surgical and patient factors.

The impact of hip implant alignment on muscle and joint loading during dynamic activities.

BACKGROUND: Component alignment is an important consideration in total hip arthroplasty. The impact of changes in alignment on muscle forces and joint contact forces during dynamic tasks are not well understood, and have the potential to influence surgical decision making. The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of femoral head/stem and cup component placement on hip muscle and joint contact forces during tasks of daily living and to identify which alignment parameters have the greatest impact on joint loading. METHODS: Using a series of strength-calibrated, subject-specific musculoskeletal models of patients performing gait, sit-to-stand and step down tasks, component alignments were perturbed and joint contact and muscle forces evaluated. FINDINGS: Based on the range of alignments reported clinically, variation in head/stem anteversion-retroversion had the largest impact of any degree of freedom throughout all three tasks; average contact forces 413.5 (319.1) N during gait, 262.7 (256.4) N during sit to stand, and 572.7 (228.1) N during the step down task. The sensitivity of contact force to anteversion-retroversion of the head/stem was 31.5 N/° for gait, which was similar in magnitude to anterior-posterior position of the cup (34.6 N/m for gait). Additionally, superior-inferior cup alignment resulted in 16.4 (4.9)° of variation in the direction of the hip joint contact force across the three tasks, with the most inferior cup placements moving the force vector towards the cup equator at the point of peak joint contact force. INTERPRETATION: A quantitative understanding of the impact and potential tradeoffs when altering component alignment is valuable in supporting surgical decision making.