Acute and subacute complications of pediatric and adolescent knee arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to determine the frequency of acute and subacute complications (within 6 months) of arthroscopic knee procedures in patients aged 17 years or younger and to determine associated risk factors. METHODS: We identified all patients aged 17 years or younger who underwent arthroscopic knee procedures at our institution from 1997 to 2009. Patient demographic and surgical data were collected from the medical and surgical records, with specific focus on intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,002 knee arthroscopies were reviewed. The overall complication rate was 14.7%. Major complications occurred in 21 surgeries (2.1%) and included the following: septic arthritis (n = 3, 0.3%), wound complication requiring operative revision (n = 9, 0.9%), arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation (n = 4, 0.4%), other unplanned subsequent surgery (n = 4, 0.4%), and death (n = 1, 0.1%). Surgeries with an anesthesia time of 265 minutes or greater (P = .026), operative time of 220 minutes or greater (P = .013), or tourniquet time of 114 minutes or greater (P < .001) and surgeries with 3 or more Current Procedural Terminology codes (P = .003) had a statistically significant increase in risk of major complications. The incidence of minor complications was 12.6%, which included persistent effusion/hemarthrosis requiring arthrocentesis (n = 59, 5.9%) and superficial wound infection (n = 18, 1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Major complications after knee arthroscopy in children and adolescents are rare, but minor complications are more common. If possible, surgeons should avoid prolonged anesthesia, surgery, and tourniquet times. The pediatric patient's medical and family history should be reviewed to identify important risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Comparing the Clinical Utility of the Infant Developmental Inventory With the Ages and Stages Questionnaire at 9-Month Well-Child Visits.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical utility of administering 2 recommended developmental screening instruments, the Infant Developmental Inventory (IDI) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), at 9-month well-child visits in paper format. METHODS: Outcomes of the 2 screens, including correct completion and interpretation by clinician, time of visit, and screen outcome were compared. RESULTS: Out of 33 children administered the ASQ and with documented scores, 12 (36.4%) did not receive passing scores, while 5 (12.2%) of the 41 children administered the IDI did not receive passing scores (P = .014). Out of 41 IDI screens, 12 (29.3%) were completed incorrectly, while there were no ASQ screens completed incorrectly (P < .001) by caregivers. CONCLUSION: In our pilot study, the ASQ is more often completed correctly by caregivers and identifies more children at risk for delay as compared with the IDI. Additional larger scale studies are needed to evaluate the usefulness of developmental screening tools when used within primary care practice.

Impact of implementing mental health screening by mail with a primary care management model.

BACKGROUND: Early recognition and treatment of social and emotional disorders in children is significant for school preparation. These disorders are frequently underdetected without the use of standardized screening instruments. The purpose of our study is to describe the implementation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) in primary care practice by mail when children are 30 months old. METHODS: In this 4-month study, parents of all 30-month-old children who receive primary care at our study site were mailed the ASQ:SE. In children who did not pass screening or received a call from a registered nurse for parental concerns documented on the questionnaire, short-term clinical outcomes were obtained from the electronic medical record. During the last month of the study, the demographics variables of race and insurance type were analyzed for an association with questionnaire completion by mail. RESULTS: Of the 870 families mailed 30-month ASQ:SE screens, 507 (58.3%) were returned by mail. Out of the children with returned screens, 38 (7.5%) of parents were contacted for either elevated scores or concerning comments and 6 (1.2%) were referred to Early Intervention. Parents of children with government insurance returned the ASQ:SE questionnaire 34.2% (13/38) of the time compared with 65.5% (76/116) of those with private insurance (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that mental health screening can be effectively managed in primary care practice by a registered nurse using a follow-up protocol. Mailing the ASQ:SE is likely not an effective way to comprehensively screen most primary care populations.