Target Site Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem: Measurement in Human Explanted Lung Tissue by Bronchoalveolar Lavage, Microdialysis, and Homogenized Lung Tissue.

Pneumonia is one of the most common infections in intensive care patients, and it is often treated with beta-lactam antibiotics. Even if therapeutic drug monitoring in blood is available, it is unclear whether sufficient concentrations are reached at the target site: the lung. The present study was initiated to fill this knowledge gap. Various compartments from 10 patients' explanted lungs were subjected to laboratory analysis. Meropenem was quantified in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, microdialysate, and homogenized lung tissue with isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS). BAL fluid represents diluted epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and microdialysate represents interstitial fluid (IF). Differences between target site and blood concentrations were investigated. The median meropenem concentration in blood, ELF, IF, and tissue were 26.8, 18.0, 12.1, and 9.1 mg/liter, respectively. A total of 37.5% of the target site ELF and IF meropenem concentrations were below the clinical EUCAST breakpoint of 8 mg/liter. The median ELF/serum quotient was 61.8% (interquartile range [IQR], 24.8% to 87.6%), the median IF/serum quotient was 35.4% (IQR, 23.8% to 54.3%), and the median tissue/serum quotient was 34.2% (IQR, 28.3% to 38.2%). We observed a substantial interindividual variability between the blood and the compartments (ELF and IF), whereas the intraindividual variability was relatively low. Target site measurement in different lung compartments was feasible and successfully applied in a clinical setting. A relevant amount of 37.5% of the target site concentrations were below the clinical EUCAST breakpoint, indicating subtherapeutic dosing in high-risk patients receiving perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in lung transplantation. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03970265.).

Which Analysis Approach Is Adequate to Leverage Clinical Microdialysis Data? A Quantitative Comparison to Investigate Exposure and Reponse Exemplified by Levofloxacin.

PURPOSE: Systematic comparison of analysis methods of clinical microdialysis data for impact on target-site drug exposure and response. METHODS: 39 individuals received a 500 mg levofloxacin short-term infusion followed by 24-h dense sampling in plasma and microdialysate collection in interstitial space fluid (ISF). ISF concentrations were leveraged using non-compartmental (NCA) and compartmental analysis (CA) via (ii) relative recovery correction at midpoint of the collection interval (midpoint-NCA, midpoint-CA) and (ii) dialysate-based integrals of time (integral-CA). Exposure and adequacy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) therapy via pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target-attainment (PTA) analysis were compared between approaches. RESULTS: Individual AUCISF estimates strongly varied for midpoint-NCA and midpoint-CA (≥52.3%CV) versus integral-CA (≤32.9%CV) owing to separation of variability in PK parameters (midpoint-CA = 46.5%-143%CVPK, integral-CA = 26.4%-72.6%CVPK) from recovery-related variability only in integral-CA (41.0%-50.3%CVrecovery). This also led to increased variability of AUCplasma for midpoint-CA (56.0%CV) versus midpoint-NCA and integral-CA (≤33.0%CV), and inaccuracy of predictive model performance of midpoint-CA in plasma (visual predictive check). PTA analysis translated into 33% of evaluated patient cases being at risk of incorrectly rejecting recommended dosing regimens at CAP-related epidemiological cut-off values. CONCLUSIONS: Integral-CA proved most appropriate to characterise clinical pharmacokinetics- and microdialysis-related variability. Employing this knowledge will improve the understanding of drug target-site PK for therapeutic decision-making.