The prevalence of burnout in oncology professionals: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses including more than 90 distinct studies.

PURPOSE: This overview of reviews aimed to summarize the prevalence of burnout and the dimensions of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment) in oncology professionals around the world. METHODS: The CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases were searched from inception to September 13, 2023. AMSTAR 2 was used to assess the quality of reviews. The overlap between reviews was calculated. RESULTS: Twelve reviews were included. Overall, reviews showed that burnout was prevalent in oncologists and oncology nurses. On the other hand, no reviews meta-analyzed the prevalence of burnout in oncology radiation therapists. In addition, the dimensions of burnout, high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment were highly prevalent across reviews in oncologists, oncology nurses, and oncology radiation therapists. In oncologists, the Americas (specifically Canada) showed the highest prevalence rates for high emotional exhaustion, whereas high depersonalization and low personal accomplishment were mainly prevalent in Europe and Asia, respectively. In oncology nurses, high emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization were mainly prevalent in Asia, whereas low personal accomplishment was more prevalent in the Americas (specifically Canada). The prevalence of overall levels of burnout was not meta-analyzed by continents. CONCLUSION: Some methodological improvements may help to make more robust the findings of this overview (e.g., specific subgroup meta-analyses by oncology specialties), which may help readers reach more precise, direct, and consistent findings. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QPWG5 .

Psoriatic arthritis with psychological comorbidities: an overview of systematic reviews on incidence, prevalence, and geographic disparities.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis evaluating the prevalence, incidence, and psychological comorbidities of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are increasing, so it's time to perform an overview of systematic reviews. To summarize the pooled prevalence, incidence, and psychological comorbidities rates of PsA, and to explore possible continent disparities. In this overview of systematic reviews the CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched to October 25, 2023. This overview included systematic reviews with meta-analysis of people with PsA, providing the pooled prevalence or incidence rates of PsA in general, or clinical populations and/or psychological comorbidities. The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement was followed. AMSTAR-2 assessed the quality of reviews. The degree of overlap was calculated using the corrected covered area (CCA). Maps were developed using the location of where primary studies were conducted using DataWrapper App. The protocol was prospectively registered with Open Science Framework registry. Pooled prevalence and incidence rates of PsA or its associated psychological comorbidities in general or specific populations. We also collected locations from the primary studies of the included meta-analyses. Only the assessment of prevalence rates of PsA in people with psoriasis showed slight overlap (CCA = 3.3%). Items 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12, and 13 were poorly reported in AMSTAR-2. The pooled prevalence of PsA ranged from 0.13 to 0.15% in the general population, and 15.5% to 19.7% in people with psoriasis. The pooled incidence of PsA ranged from 8.26 to 9.27 cases per 100,000 inhabitants to 0.87 cases in individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa. The pooled prevalence of psychological comorbidities was 11.9-20% for depression, 19-33% anxiety, 38% alexithymia, and 72.9% in poor sleep quality. Only the pooled incidence of depression was assessed with 21.3 per 1000-person year. PsA seems to be prevalent and incident not only in people with psoriasis, but also in general population. Depression and anxiety symptoms may be present in some patients with PsA. Finally, continent disparities exist, and methodological and clinical issues were found, which could be helpful in the future agenda of the epidemiology of PsA.

How can clinicians enhance self-efficacy beliefs in osteoarthritis? An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis.

This overview of reviews aimed to synthesize the effectiveness of non-pharmacological approaches to enhance self-efficacy in people with osteoarthritis. The CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 2023. We considered systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials evaluating any non-pharmacological intervention. We used AMSTAR 2 to assess the methodological quality of reviews. The overlap between reviews was calculated. We included eight systematic reviews with meta-analysis evaluating 30 different clinical trials. Overall, mind-body exercises, psychological interventions, and self-management strategies may improve arthritis self-efficacy. Specifically, the meta-analyses showed tai chi exercises, coping skills training, and the arthritis self-management program are more effective than controls to enhance arthritis self-efficacy in people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. In addition, inconsistent results were detected across meta-analyses regarding the effectiveness of multidisciplinary interventions. Finally, the degree of overlap between all reviews was moderate (CCA = 6%) and many included reviews reported most of the items of AMSTAR 2. Tai chi exercises, coping skills training, and the arthritis self-management program may be beneficial for enhancing arthritis self-efficacy. Open Science Framework Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VX2T6 .