Biologic drug survival rates in the era of anti-interleukin-17 antibodies: a time-period-adjusted registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Drug survival rates reflect efficacy and safety and may be influenced by the availability of alternative treatment options. Little is known about time-dependent drug survival in psoriasis and the effect of increasing numbers of biologic treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether drug survival is influenced by the availability of treatment options and by factors such as gender, psoriatic arthritis or previous biologic treatment. METHODS: This observational, retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data from patients registered in the Austrian Psoriasis Registry (PsoRA) who were treated with biologics between 1 January 2015 and 30 November 2019. RESULTS: A total of 1572 patients who received 1848 treatment cycles were included in this analysis. The highest long-term Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement was observed after treatment with ixekizumab, followed by ustekinumab and secukinumab, adalimumab and etanercept. Overall, ustekinumab surpassed all other biologics in drug survival up to 48 months. However, when adjusted for biologic naïvety, its superiority vanished and drug survival rates were similar for ixekizumab (91·6%), secukinumab (90·2%) and ustekinumab (92·8%), all of them superior to adalimumab (76·5%) and etanercept (71·9%) at 12 months and beyond. Besides biologic non-naïvety (2·10, P < 0·001), the introduction of a new drug such as secukinumab or ixekizumab (relative hazard ratio 1·6, P = 0·001) and female gender (1·50, P = 0·019) increased the risk of treatment discontinuation overall, whereas psoriatic arthritis did not (1·12, P = 0·21). CONCLUSIONS: The time-dependent availability of drugs should be considered when analysing and comparing drug survival. Previous biologic exposure significantly influences drug survival. Women are more likely to stop treatment.

UV-induced alterations of the skin evaluated over time by reflectance confocal microscopy.

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) induces various alterations of the skin and plays a decisive part regarding the development of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer. For a closer examination of these phenomena in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is one of the most eligible options as it represents a diagnostic tool that allows a non-invasive examination of the skin, showing microanatomical structures and individual cells. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was using RCM to observe alterations of the skin induced by UVR and to describe the development of these changes. In addition, the findings were compared with histological examinations of the same area. METHODS: A small area in the gluteal region of 10 healthy subjects was exposed to a threefold individual minimal erythema dose of solar-simulated UVR. The following development of the sunburn reaction was evaluated with RCM 1, 24, 72 h and 1 week after UVR exposure. Furthermore, RCM images of unexposed skin were obtained, serving as a reference. To contrast histological examination with RCM, punch biopsies were performed at each point in time. The obtained data were interpreted regarding histological and RCM-based criteria on sunburn reaction. RESULTS: All important UVR-induced alterations of the skin could be shown in RCM beginning with an inflammatory reaction (inflammatory cells, vasodilatation, oedema), containing the formation of microvesicles, followed by the appearance of apoptotic keratinocytes (sunburn cells), activated melanocytes and at last, loss of the epidermal structure. There was an excellent correlation between RCM and histological features. CONCLUSIONS: Reflectance confocal microscopy is a highly valuable tool for non-invasive monitoring of UVR-induced changes of the skin over time. Furthermore, RCM provides a more detailed visualization of inflammatory cell formation and epidermal blood flow than histological examination can.

Methotrexate vs. fumaric acid esters in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: data registry report on the efficacy under daily life conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) vs. fumaric acid esters (FAE) in psoriasis treated under daily life conditions. METHODS: Data were extracted from a registry (http://www.psoriasisregistry.at) of 272 adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis treated primarily with MTX (n = 72) or FAE (n = 200) between 2004 and 2011. Data from all patients, including those who did not complete at least 3 months of monotherapy, were included in an intention-to-treat (ITT) worst-case analysis. RESULTS: Thirty of 72 (41.7%) patients treated with MTX and 85 of 200 (42.5%) patients treated with FAE discontinued early, mainly due to side-effects or lack of response. Among patients who completed at least 3 months of treatment, the response to primary treatment with MTX vs. FAE did not differ significantly at any time point. In the ITT worst-case analysis at month 3, complete remission rate, PASI90, PASI75 and PASI50 rates were 6%, 7%, 24% and 39% in MTX-treated patients vs. 1%, 5%, 27% and 44% in FAE-treated patients. Overall mean PASI reduction score improved significantly in response to primary MTX and FAE treatment (by 10.6% and 12.6%, respectively) between 3 and 6 months (P = 0.0005; exact Wilcoxon test), but not between 6 and 12 months (P = 0.16). A subset of 32 patients who did not respond satisfactorily to primary treatment with FAE responded better to subsequent MTX therapy (P < 0.0001; paired Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: As shown by retrospective analysis, the primary efficacy of FAE was similar to that of MTX under daily life conditions.

Treatment with 311-nm ultraviolet B enhanced response of psoriatic lesions in ustekinumab-treated patients: a randomized intraindividual trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with the interleukin-12/23 antibody ustekinumab produces a satisfactory response [i.e. 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) compared with baseline (PASI 75)] in the majority of patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether concomitant 311-nm ultraviolet (UV) B therapy can further enhance the response in patients with psoriasis treated with ustekinumab. METHODS: Ten patients (five women and five men; mean age 58years, range 48-66) with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis were treated with ustekinumab at a standard dosage of 45 or 90mg subcutaneously depending on body weight (below or above 100kg) at weeks 0 and 4. Within 2days after ustekinumab initiation, the minimal erythemal dose (MED) was determined and suberythemal MED 311-nm UVB-based phototherapy was thereafter administered to one randomly selected body half (left or right, excluding the head) three times weekly for 6weeks. Treatment response was monitored weekly in terms of half-body PASI. RESULTS: Nine patients completed the study. Analysis of their data showed that 311-nm UVB significantly accelerated the therapeutic response. At baseline (i.e. start of 311-nm UVB therapy), the mean PASI was similar in both irradiated and unirradiated body halves (13·6 vs. 13·3). At week 6, however, it was lower on irradiated body halves (2·5 vs. 6·1). This difference of 3·6 (95% confidence interval 1·3-5) was statistically significant and corresponded to an overall mean PASI reduction from baseline of 82% vs. 54%, respectively. At week 6, PASI 75 was achieved significantly more often on UV-irradiated body halves than on unirradiated body halves [7/9 patients (78%) vs. 1/9 (11%)] (McNemar test, P=0·007). At week 12, this synergistic effect of 311-nm UVB was still apparent although not significantly so. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 311-nm UVB accelerates the clearance of psoriatic lesions in ustekinumab-treated patients.

Efficacy of psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy vs. biologics in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: retrospective data analysis of a patient registry.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared the clinical efficacy of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) vs. biologics in the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical efficacy of PUVA and biologic therapies for psoriasis under daily life conditions. METHODS: Data from a psoriasis registry (http://www.psoriasis-therapieregister.at) of 172 adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis treated between 2003 and 2010 were analysed retrospectively. These patients had received oral PUVA [118 treatment courses including 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP; n = 32) and 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP; n = 86)] and/or biologic agents [130 treatment courses including adalimumab (n = 18), alefacept (n = 32), efalizumab (n = 17), etanercept (n = 38), infliximab (n = 7) and ustekinumab (n = 18)]. Treatment responses were analysed in terms of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvement, including complete remission (CR) and reduction of PASI by at least 90% (PASI 90) or 75% (PASI 75), at treatment completion for PUVA (median time 10·3 and 9·2 weeks, for 8-MOP and 5-MOP, respectively) and at week 12 for biologics. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat-as observed CR, PASI 90 and PASI 75 rate was 22%, 69% and 86% for PUVA compared with 6%, 22% and 56% for adalimumab (P = 0·0034 by adapted Wilcoxon test), 3%, 3% and 25% for alefacept (P = 0·000000002), 6%, 6% and 59% for efalizumab (P = 0·000053), 6%, 29% and 39% for etanercept (P = 0·0000086), 29%, 71% and 100% for infliximab (P = 0·36) and 6%, 39% and 67% for ustekinumab (P = 0·028). When applying a more conservative post-hoc modified worst-case scenario analysis, with CR of 15%, PASI 90 of 58% and PASI 75 of 69%, PUVA was superior only to alefacept (P = 0·000013), efalizumab (P = 0·015) and etanercept (P = 0·0037). There were no statistically significant differences in PASI reduction rates between PUVA and infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective analysis of registry data revealed that the primary efficacy of PUVA was superior to that of certain biologics. Prospective head-to-head studies of PUVA and biologics are warranted to confirm these observations.