Rethinking the Rule of 10s: Early Cleft Lip Repair Improves Weight Gain.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares patients undergoing early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (<3-months) and traditional lip repair (TLR) (3-6 months) with/without nasoalveolar molding (NAM) to evaluate the effects of surgical timing on weight gain in hopes of guiding future treatment paradigms. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, California. PATIENT, PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent ECLR or TLR ± NAM from November 2009 through January 2020. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patient demographics, birth and medical history, perioperative variables, and complications were collected. Infant weights and age-based percentiles were recorded at birth, surgery, 8-weeks, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postoperatively. The main outcomes were weight change and weight percentile amongst ECLR and TLR ± NAM groups. RESULTS: 107 patients met inclusion criteria: ECLR, n = 51 (47.6%); TLR + NAM, n = 35 (32.7%); and TLR-NAM, n = 21 (19.6%). ECLR patients had significantly greater changes in weight from surgery to 8-weeks and from surgery to 24-months postoperatively compared with both TLR ± NAM (P < .05). Age-matched weights in the ECLR group were significantly greater than TLR ± NAM at multiple time points postoperatively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ECLR significantly increased patient weights 24-months postoperatively when compared to TLR ± NAM. Specifically compared to TLR-NAM, ECLR weights were significantly greater at all time points past 6-months postoperatively. The results of this study demonstrate that ECLR can mitigate feeding difficulties and malnutrition traditionally seen in patients with cleft lip.

Tympanostomy Tubes: Are They Necessary? A Systematic Review on Implementation in Cleft Care.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the indication for and the effects of early ventilation tube insertion (VTI) on hearing and speech for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP). DESIGN: We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-guided systematic review of relevant literature. SETTING: Setting varied by geographical location and level of clinical care across studies. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients with CLP who underwent VTI were included. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures were hearing and speech following VTI. Secondary outcome measures were tube-related and middle ear complications. Early VTI occurred before or at time of palatoplasty while late VTI occurred after palatoplasty. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles met inclusion criteria. Articles varied among study design, outcome measures, sample size, follow-up, and quality. Few studies demonstrated support for early VTI. Many studies reported no difference in hearing or speech between early and late VTI. Others reported worse outcomes, greater likelihood of complications, or needing repeat VTI following early tympanostomy placement. Several studies had significant limitations, including confounding variables, small sample size, or not reporting on our primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: No consistency was found regarding which patients would benefit most from early VTI. Given the aforementioned variability and sub-optimal methodologies, additional studies are warranted to provide stronger evidence regarding VTI timing in cleft care.

Orthognathic Surgery Rate in Cleft Care.

PURPOSE: To determine the true need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) at a high-volume craniofacial center. METHODS: An institutional retrospective review of patients with CL/P born between 1975 and 2008 was performed. Patients with adequate documentation reflecting cleft care who were ≥ 18 years at the time of last craniofacial/dentistry follow-up were included. Patients with non-paramedian clefts or a comorbid craniofacial syndrome were excluded. Primary outcome variable was the total proportion of patients with CL/P who either underwent or were referred for orthognathic surgery Le Fort I (LF1) to correct midface hypoplasia. Secondary outcome variables were associations between cleft phenotype, midface hypoplasia severity, and number of cleft related surgeries with the eventual LF1 referral/recipiency. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients with CL/P met inclusion criteria. A total of 90/177 (51%) patients underwent corrective LF1; however, 110/177 (62%) of patients were referred for surgery. Patients with secondary cleft palate involvement were referred for and underwent LF1 at significantly greater rates than those without secondary palate involvement (referred: 65% versus 13%, P = 0.001; underwent: 55% versus 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with bilateral cleft lip/palate were referred for and underwent LF1 at significantly higher rates than those with unilateral cleft lip/palate (referred: 71.0% versus 50.4%, P= 0.04; underwent: 84% versus 71%, P = 0.02). Number of secondary palate surgeries was positively correlated with increased LF1 referral (P = 0.02) but not LF1 recipiency (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of orthognathic surgery redundant in patients with repaired CL/P was 51% at our institution, marginally above the higher end of previously reported rates. However, this number is an underrepresentation of the true requirement for LF1 as 62% of patients were referred for surgical intervention of midface hypoplasia. This distinction should be considered when counseling families.

Pediatric Odontogenic and Maxillofacial Bone Pathology: A Global Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although pathology in the maxillary and mandibular bones is rare in young patients, the differential diagnosis is broad. The World Health Organization (WHO) updated its classification of maxillofacial bone pathology in 2017. Using these updated guidelines, a systematic review of common maxillofacial bone lesions in the pediatric population was performed. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted capturing English language articles from inception to July 2020. Thirty-one articles were identified that described the frequency of maxillofacial bone pathology. Data were extracted and organized using the WHO 2017 classification of odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors. Prevalence data were analyzed among diagnostic categories and geographical regions. The SAS version 9.4 was used to complete statistical analyses. RESULTS: The articles included patients from birth to a maximum age of 14 to 19 years. The most common odontogenic cysts included radicular cyst (42.7%) and dentigerous cyst (39.0%) followed by odontogenic keratocyst (15.0%). Among odontogenic bone tumors, odontoma (49.3%) was most common followed by ameloblastoma (29.1%). The most common nonodontogenic bone tumor was fibrous dysplasia (42.4%), and the most common malignant bone tumor was osteosarcoma (75.0%). Significant variations were found by geographic region, with dentigerous cyst more common than radicular cyst, and ameloblastoma more common than odontoma in African and Asian countries (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review uses the WHO 2017 guidelines to classify common odontogenic and nonodontogenic maxillofacial bone lesions around the world. Pathogenesis, presentation, and available treatment options for the most common maxillofacial bone lesions are reviewed.

Craniofacial Dysmorphology in Infants With Non-Syndromic Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is a congenital disorder resulting from the premature suture fusion, leading to complex primary and compensatory morphologic changes in the shape of not only the calvarium and but also into the skull base. This deformity typically requires surgery to correct the shape of the skull and prevent neurologic sequelae, including increased intracranial pressure, sensory deficits, and cognitive impairment. METHODS: The present multicenter study sought to reverse-engineer the bone dysmorphogenesis seen in non-syndromic UCS using a geometric morphometric approach. Computed tomography scans for 26 non-syndromic UCS patients were converted to three-dimensional mesh models. Two hundred thirty-six unique anatomical landmarks and semi-landmarked curves were then plotted on each model, creating wireframe representations of the Patients' skulls. RESULTS: Generalized Procrustes superimposition, Principal Component Analysis, and heatmaps identified significant superior displacement of the ipsilateral orbit ("harlequin" eye deformity), anterior displacement of the ear ipsilateral to the fused coronal suture, acute deviation of midline skull base structures ipsilateral to the fused coronal suture and flattening of the parietal bone and associated failure to expand superiorly. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique illustrates the impact of premature coronal suture fusion on the development of the entire skull and proposes how bone dysmorphology contributes to the Patients' neurologic sequelae. By bridging novel basic science methodologies with clinical research, the present study quantitatively describes craniofacial development and bone dysmorphogenesis.

Postoperative helmet therapy following fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis.

Out of all the synostotic corrective surgeries, fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling for patients with unilateral coronal synostosis is one of the hardest to maintain symmetric and proportional correction without some amount of relapse. Over the course of 20 years operating on these patients, the senior author has made multiple adjustments to compensate for relapse asymmetry, including overcorrection on the affected side, increased points of fixation, periosteal release, and scalp expansion with galeal scoring to minimize tension of the closure. As a result of these interventions, we have seen improved immediate results following surgery. However, we have continued to note clinically significant relapse postoperatively. As such, we have started to implement postoperative helmet therapy (PHT) to help maintain the surgical correction, improve secondary brachycephaly, and increase overall symmetry. PHT is a reasonable low-risk complement to fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remolding. Clinically, PHT appears to help minimize relapse and improve overall head symmetry. Further investigation and increased patient enrollment are required to determine the true benefits of PHT in this patient population.

The role of neurotization in autologous breast reconstruction: Can reconstruction restore breast sensation?

As the sophistication of microsurgical breast reconstruction continues to evolve, plastic surgeons are focusing on techniques to improve functional and psychosocial outcomes for patients, including breast sensation. Interest in neurotization of breast flaps, among both patients and surgeons, has grown significantly in recent years. This study aimed to review the outcomes of neurotization across autologous flap reconstructions, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of this technique in improving postoperative sensory recovery.

Is Le Fort I Distraction Enough to Treat Severe Midface Hypoplasia?

BACKGROUND: In severe cases of maxillary hypoplasia, Le Fort I distraction may be required for treatment. This study describes our experience with internal distraction devices and assesses our outcomes in patients with a negative overjet on average >15 mm. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with a history of cleft lip and/or palate who underwent Le Fort I distraction at our institution from 11/2007-11/2017 was performed. Data regarding demographics, procedural details and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty patients, 13 (65.0%) male and 7 (30.0%) female, were included. All (100%) patients had a history of cleft lip and/or palate and 2 (10.0%) of them had associated syndromes. All 20 patients underwent internal distraction. The average age at surgery was 17.8 years (range 15.2-20.7, SD 1.6 years). The average preoperative negative overjet was 19.27 mm (range 10-30, SD 5.63 mm). The mean total distraction length was 15.3 mm (range 0-30, SD 6.72 mm). There were no intraoperative complications, however, there were a total of 4 (20.0%) postoperative complications, 2 of which required reoperation due to device malfunction or displacement. 14 (70.0%) patients had repeat procedures to complete occlusal correction or correct relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary distraction alone was insufficient for correction of maxillary discrepancies averaging >15 mm. Instead, it's utility may be in positioning the maxilla for a more viable final advancement and fixation procedure, rather than being solely responsible for achieving normal occlusion during distraction.

The Evolution of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

ABSTRACT: The understanding of cleft lip etiology and approaches for surgical repair have evolved over time, allowing for improved ability to restore form and function. The variability of cleft lip presentations has necessitated a nuanced surgical approach with multidisciplinary cleft care. The earliest documentation of unilateral cleft lip repair predates the 19th century, with crude outcomes observed before the advent of curved incisions and advancement flaps. In the 20th century, straight line, quadrilateral flap, and triangular flap repairs were introduced to mitigate post-repair surgical scarring, increase lip length, and restore the symmetry of the Cupid's bow. Towards the latter part of the century, the development of rotation-advancement principles allowed for improved functional and aesthetic outcomes. Future technical improvements will continue to address the goals of lip and nasal symmetry, muscular continuity, precise scar concealment, and improved patient satisfaction in an increasing range of cleft phenotypes and during subsequent years of growth.

Surgical Complexity and Physician Compensation: An Analysis of Relative Under-Valuation for Pediatric Brachial Plexus Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus reconstruction (BPR) is a rapidly advancing field within hand surgery. BPR procedures are complex, time-intensive, and require microsurgical expertise. As physician reimbursement rates for BPR are poorly defined, relative to more common hand procedures, we sought to analyze compensation for BPR across different payor groups and understand the factors contributing to their reimbursement. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of surgeries by a single senior staff member in a 4-year period to evaluate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes from BPR cases. For comparison, all finger fracture fixations and skin graft reconstructions performed by the same surgeon over the same time period were analyzed as well. RESULTS: A total of 57 BPR cases, 94 finger fracture fixation cases, and 69 skin grafting cases met inclusion criteria. Among the top 5 insurance providers, average work relative value unit (wRVU)/hour was 6.55, 3.49, and 12.67 for BPR, fracture fixation, and skin grafts, respectively. Reimbursements were an average $685.76/hour for BPR, compared to $590.10/hour for fracture fixation and $1,197.94/hour for skin grafts. CONCLUSIONS: BPR demonstrates a relative undervaluation, in terms of reimbursement per hour, given the time and surgical skill required for such cases, particularly compared to shorter, less complex cases such as skin grafting and fracture fixation. We find that this discrepancy is amplified across multiple levels of coding, billing, and reimbursement. We suggest specific strategies for physician leadership to more directly participate in the financial decisions that affect themselves, their patients, and their specialty.