Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(10): 1793-1801, 2023 05 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36594172

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists about testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) among Medicaid enrollees after starting medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), despite guidelines recommending such testing. Our objectives were to estimate testing prevalence and trends for HIV, HBV, and HCV among Medicaid enrollees initiating MOUD and examine enrollee characteristics associated with testing. METHODS: We conducted a serial cross-sectional study of 505 440 initiations of MOUD from 2016 to 2019 among 361 537 Medicaid enrollees in 11 states. Measures of MOUD initiation; HIV, HBV, and HCV testing; comorbidities; and demographics were based on enrollment and claims data. Each state used Poisson regression to estimate associations between enrollee characteristics and testing prevalence within 90 days of MOUD initiation. We pooled state-level estimates to generate global estimates using random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, testing increased from 20% to 25% for HIV, from 22% to 25% for HBV, from 24% to 27% for HCV, and from 15% to 19% for all 3 conditions. Adjusted rates of testing for all 3 conditions were lower among enrollees who were male (vs nonpregnant females), living in a rural area (vs urban area), and initiating methadone or naltrexone (vs buprenorphine). Associations between enrollee characteristics and testing varied across states. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicaid enrollees in 11 US states who initiated medications for opioid use disorder, testing for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and all 3 conditions increased between 2016 and 2019 but the majority were not tested.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Hepatite C , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Vírus da Hepatite B , Medicaid , Hepacivirus , HIV , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia
2.
Am J Epidemiol ; 191(1): 126-136, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343230

RESUMO

Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) affects 50,000 women annually in the United States, but its consequences are not well understood. We aimed to estimate the association between SMM and risk of adverse cardiovascular events during the 2 years postpartum. We analyzed 137,140 deliveries covered by the Pennsylvania Medicaid program (2016-2018), weighted with inverse probability of censoring weights to account for nonrandom loss to follow-up. SMM was defined as any diagnosis on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention list of SMM diagnoses and procedures and/or intensive care unit admission occurring at any point from conception through 42 days postdelivery. Outcomes included heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke/transient ischemic attack up to 2 years postpartum. We used marginal standardization to estimate average treatment effects. We found that SMM was associated with increased risk of each adverse cardiovascular event across the follow-up period. Per 1,000 deliveries, relative to no SMM, SMM was associated with 12.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.2, 18.0) excess cases of heart failure, 6.4 (95% CI: 1.7, 11.2) excess cases of ischemic heart disease, and 8.2 (95% CI: 3.2, 13.1) excess cases of stroke/transient ischemic attack at 26 months of follow-up. These results suggest that SMM identifies a group of women who are at high risk of adverse cardiovascular events after delivery. Women who survive SMM may benefit from more comprehensive postpartum care linked to well-woman care.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pennsylvania , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 78(1): 57-67, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840510

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: More than 17 million people have gained health insurance coverage through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. Few studies have examined heterogeneity within the Medicaid expansion population. We do so based on time-varying patterns of emergency department (ED) and ambulatory care use, and characterize diagnoses associated with ED and ambulatory care visits to evaluate whether certain diagnoses predominate in individual trajectories. METHOD: We used group-based multitrajectory modeling to jointly estimate trajectories of ambulatory care and ED utilization in the first 12 months of enrollment among Pennsylvania Medicaid expansion enrollees from 2015 to 2017. RESULTS: Among 601,877 expansion enrollees, we identified 6 distinct groups based on joint trajectories of ED and ambulatory care use. Mean ED use varied across groups from 3.4 to 48.7 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and between 2.8 and 44.0 visits per 100 enrollees in month 12. Mean ambulatory visit rates varied from 0.0 to 179 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and from 0.0 to 274 visits in month 12. Rates of ED visits did not change over time, but rates of ambulatory care visits increased by at least 50% among 4 groups during the study period. Groups varied on chronic condition diagnoses, including mental health and substance use disorders, as well as diagnoses associated with ambulatory care visits. CONCLUSION: We found substantial variation in rates of ED and ambulatory care use across empirically defined subgroups of Medicaid expansion enrollees. We also identified heterogeneity among the diagnoses associated with these visits. This data-driven approach may be used to target resources to encourage efficient use of ED services and support engagement with ambulatory care clinicians.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pennsylvania , Estados Unidos
4.
JAMA ; 326(2): 154-164, 2021 07 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255008

RESUMO

Importance: There is limited information about trends in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) among Medicaid enrollees. Objective: To examine the use of medications for OUD and potential indicators of quality of care in multiple states. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory serial cross-sectional study of 1 024 301 Medicaid enrollees in 11 states aged 12 through 64 years (not eligible for Medicare) with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9 or ICD-10) codes for OUD from 2014 through 2018. Each state used generalized estimating equations to estimate associations between enrollee characteristics and outcome measure prevalence, subsequently pooled to generate global estimates using random effects meta-analyses. Exposures: Calendar year, demographic characteristics, eligibility groups, and comorbidities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of medications for OUD (buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone); potential indicators of good quality (OUD medication continuity for 180 days, behavioral health counseling, urine drug tests); potential indicators of poor quality (prescribing of opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines). Results: In 2018, 41.7% of Medicaid enrollees with OUD were aged 21 through 34 years, 51.2% were female, 76.1% were non-Hispanic White, 50.7% were eligible through Medicaid expansion, and 50.6% had other substance use disorders. Prevalence of OUD increased in these 11 states from 3.3% (290 628 of 8 737 082) in 2014 to 5.0% (527 983 of 10 585 790) in 2018. The pooled prevalence of enrollees with OUD receiving medication treatment increased from 47.8% in 2014 (range across states, 35.3% to 74.5%) to 57.1% in 2018 (range, 45.7% to 71.7%). The overall prevalence of enrollees receiving 180 days of continuous medications for OUD did not significantly change from the 2014-2015 to 2017-2018 periods (-0.01 prevalence difference, 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.02) with state variability in trend (90% prediction interval, -0.08 to 0.06). Non-Hispanic Black enrollees had lower OUD medication use than White enrollees (prevalence ratio [PR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81; P < .001; 90% prediction interval, 0.52 to 1.00). Pregnant women had higher use of OUD medications (PR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25; P < .001; 90% prediction interval, 1.01-1.38) and medication continuity (PR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10-1.17, P < .001; 90% prediction interval, 1.06-1.22) than did other eligibility groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among US Medicaid enrollees in 11 states, the prevalence of medication use for treatment of opioid use disorder increased from 2014 through 2018. The pattern in other states requires further research.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/tendências , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naltrexona/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(8): 2451-2458, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31792860

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The association between pharmaceutical industry promotion and physician opioid prescribing is poorly understood. Whether the influence of industry gifts on prescribing varies by specialty is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between opioid-related gifts to physicians and opioid prescribing in the subsequent year across 7 physician specialties. DESIGN: Panel study using data from 2014 to 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 236,103 unique Medicare Part D physicians (389,622 physician-years) who received any gifts from pharmaceutical companies measured using Open Payments and prescribed opioids in the subsequent year. MAIN MEASURES: Amounts paid by pharmaceutical companies for opioid-related gifts including meals and lodging; quartile of opioid prescribing as a percent of total prescribing compared with other same-specialty physicians. KEY RESULTS: In 2014-2015, 14.1% of physician received opioid-related gifts from the industry with 2.6% receiving > $100. Gifts varied by specialty and were concentrated among two pharmaceutical companies responsible for 60% of the value of opioid-related gifts. Receiving opioid-related gifts was associated with greater prescribing of opioids compared with same-specialty physicians in the next year. Primary care physicians are nearly 3.5 times as likely to be in the highest quartile of prescribing versus the lower quartiles if they were paid ≥ $100. Psychiatrists and neurologists were 7 to 13 times as likely to be in a higher quartile of opioid prescribing compared with colleagues who were paid $0 in the preceding year. CONCLUSIONS: The value of opioid-related gifts given to physicians varies substantially by provider specialty, as does the relationship between payment amounts and prescriber behavior in the following year.


Assuntos
Preparações Farmacêuticas , Médicos , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides , Indústria Farmacêutica , Doações , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estados Unidos
6.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(6): 1743-1750, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32060717

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior research on the restaurant environment and obesity risk is limited by cross-sectional data and a focus on specific geographic areas. OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of changes in chain restaurant calories over time on body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: We used a first-difference model to examine whether changes from 2012 to 2015 in chain restaurant calories per capita were associated with percent changes in BMI. We also examined differences by race and county income, restaurant type, and initial body weight categories. SETTING: USA (207 counties across 39 states). PARTICIPANTS: 447,873 adult patients who visited an athenahealth medical provider in 2012 and 2015 where BMI was measured. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: Percent change in objectively measured BMI from 2012 to 2015. RESULTS: Across all patients, changes in chain restaurant calories per capita were not associated with percent changes in BMI. For Black or Hispanic adults, a 10% increase in exposure to chain restaurant calories per capita was associated with a 0.16 percentage-point increase in BMI (95% CI 0.03, 0.30). This translates into a predicted weight increase of 0.89 pounds (or a 0.53% BMI increase) for an average weight woman at the 90th percentile of increases in the restaurant environment from 2012 to 2015 versus an increase 0.39 pounds (or 0.23% BMI increase) at the 10th percentile. Greater increases in exposure to chain restaurant calories also significantly increased BMI for Black or Hispanic adults receiving healthcare services in lower-income counties (0.26, 95% CI 0.04, 0.49) and with overweight/obesity (0.16, 95% CI 0.04, 0.29). LIMITATIONS: Generalizability to non-chain restaurants is unknown and the sample of athenahealth patients is relatively homogenous. CONCLUSIONS: Increased exposure to chain restaurant calories per capita was associated with increased weight gain among Black or Hispanic adults.


Assuntos
Obesidade , Restaurantes , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Ingestão de Energia , Feminino , Humanos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Sobrepeso
7.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(1): 80-89, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192041

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Little is known about the longitudinal patterns of buprenorphine adherence among pregnant women with opioid use disorder, especially when late initiation, nonadherence, or early discontinuation of buprenorphine during pregnancy may increase the risk of adverse outcomes. We aimed to identify distinct trajectories of buprenorphine use during pregnancy, and factors associated with these trajectories in Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included 2361 Pennsylvania Medicaid enrollees aged 15 to 46 having buprenorphine therapy during pregnancy and a live birth between 2008 and 2015. We used group-based trajectory models to identify buprenorphine use patterns in the 40 weeks prior to delivery and 12 weeks postdelivery. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with specific trajectories. RESULTS: Six distinct trajectories were identified. Four groups initiated buprenorphine during the first trimester of the pregnancy (early initiators): 31.6% with persistently high adherence, 15.1% with moderate-to-high adherence, 10.5% with declining adherence, and 16.7% with early discontinuation. Two groups did not initiate buprenorphine until midsecond or third trimester (late initiators): 13.5% had moderate-to-high adherence and 12.6% had low-to-moderate adherence. Factors significantly associated with late initiation and discontinuation were younger age, non-white race, residents of rural counties, fewer outpatient visits, more frequent emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and lower buprenorphine daily dose. CONCLUSIONS: Six buprenorphine treatment trajectories during pregnancy were identified in this population-based Medicaid cohort, with 25% of women initiating buprenorphine late during pregnancy. Understanding trajectories of buprenorphine use and factors associated with discontinuation/nonadherence may guide integration of behavioral treatment with obstetrical/gynecological care to improve buprenorphine treatment during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/reabilitação , Complicações na Gravidez/reabilitação , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Prev Med ; 100: 112-116, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28389331

RESUMO

No prior studies examining changes in the calorie content of chain restaurants have included national data before and after passage of federal menu labeling legislation, required by the 2010 Affordable Care Act. This paper describes trends in calories available in large U.S. chain restaurants in 2008 and 2012 to 2015 using data were obtained from the MenuStat project (2012 to 2015) and from the Center for Science in the Public Interest (2008). This analysis included 44 of the 100 largest U.S. restaurants which are available in all years of the data (2008 and 2012-2015) (N=19,391 items). Generalized linear models were used to examine 1) per-item calorie changes from 2008 to 2015 among items on the menu in all years and 2) mean calories in new items in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 compared to items on the menu in 2008 only. We found that Among items common to the menu in all years, overall calories declined from 327kcal in 2008 to 318kcal in 2015 (p-value for trend=0.03). No differences in mean calories among menu items newly introduced in 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 relative to items only on the menu in 2008 were found. These results suggest that the federal menu labeling mandate (to be implemented in May 2017) appears to be influencing restaurant behavior towards lower average calories for menu items.


Assuntos
Ingestão de Energia , Rotulagem de Alimentos/métodos , Valor Nutritivo , Restaurantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Planejamento de Cardápio , Estados Unidos
10.
Med Care ; 52(1): 10-9, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24316870

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The "Unborn Child" (UC) option provides state Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) programs with a new strategy to extend prenatal coverage to low-income women who would otherwise have difficulty enrolling in or would be ineligible for Medicaid. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of the UC option with the probability of enrollment in Medicaid/CHIP during pregnancy and probability of receiving adequate prenatal care. RESEARCH DESIGN: We use pooled cross-sectional data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 32 states between 2004 and 2010 (n = 81,983). Multivariable regression is employed to examine the association of the UC option with Medicaid/CHIP enrollment during pregnancy among eligible women who were uninsured preconception (n = 45,082) and those who had insurance (but not Medicaid) preconception (n = 36,901). Multivariable regression is also employed to assess the association between the UC option and receipt of adequate prenatal care, measured by the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. RESULTS: Residing in a state with the UC option is associated with a greater probability of Medicaid enrollment during pregnancy relative to residing in a state without the policy both among women uninsured preconception (88% vs. 77%, P < 0.01) and among women insured (but not in Medicaid) preconception (40% vs. 31%, P < 0.01). Residing in a state with the UC option is not significantly associated with receiving adequate prenatal care, among both women with and without insurance preconception. CONCLUSIONS: The UC option provides states a key way to expand or simplify prenatal insurance coverage, but further policy efforts are needed to ensure that coverage improves access to high-quality prenatal care.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
Prev Med ; 69: 146-50, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25284261

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of breastfeeding on maternal weight loss in the 12months postpartum among U.S. women. METHODS: Using data from a national cohort of U.S. women conducted in 2005-2007 (N=2102), we employed propensity scores to match women who breastfed exclusively and non-exclusive for at least three months to comparison women who had not breastfed or breastfed for less than three months. Outcomes included postpartum weight loss at 3, 6, 9, and 12months postpartum; and the probability of returning to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) category and the probability of returning to pre-pregnancy weight. RESULTS: Compared to women who did not breastfeed or breastfed non-exclusively, exclusive breastfeeding for at least 3months resulted in 3.2 pound (95% CI: 1.4,4.7) greater weight loss at 12months postpartum, a 6.0-percentage-point increase (95% CI: 2.3,9.7) in the probability of returning to the same or lower BMI category postpartum; and a 6.1-percentage-point increase (95% CI: 1.0,11.3) in the probability of returning to pre-pregnancy weight or lower postpartum. Non-exclusive breastfeeding did not significantly affect any outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that exclusive breastfeeding for at least three months has a small effect on postpartum weight loss among U.S. women.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Redução de Peso/fisiologia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Saúde da Mulher , Adulto Jovem
14.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(1): 98-107, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190592

RESUMO

Medicare is the primary source of health insurance coverage for reproductive-age people with Social Security Disability Insurance. However, Medicare does not require contraceptive coverage for pregnancy prevention, and little is known about contraceptive use in traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. We analyzed Medicare and Optum data to assess variations in contraceptive use and methods used by traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage enrollees, as well as among enrollees with and without noncontraceptive clinical indications. Clinically indicated contraceptives are used for reasons other than pregnancy prevention, including menstrual regulation or to treat acne, menorrhagia, and endometriosis. Contraceptive use was higher among Medicare Advantage enrollees than traditional Medicare enrollees, but use in both populations was low compared with contraceptive use among Medicaid enrollees. We found significant variation by Medicare type with respect to contraceptive methods used. Relative to traditional Medicare, the probability of long-acting reversible contraception was more than three times higher in Medicare Advantage, and the probability of tubal sterilization was more than ten times higher. Overall, Medicare enrollees with noncontraceptive clinical indications had twice the probability of contraceptive use as those without them. Medicare coverage of all contraceptive methods without cost sharing would help address financial barriers to contraceptives and support the reproductive autonomy of disabled enrollees.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais , Medicare Part C , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Anticoncepção , Medicaid , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro
15.
J Gen Intern Med ; 28(11): 1447-53, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23674077

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force changed its recommendation regarding screening mammography in average-risk women aged 40-49 years. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the 2009 recommendation on reported mammogram use in a population-based survey. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of data collected in the 2006, 2008, and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. PARTICIPANTS: Women ages 40-74 years in the 50 states and Washington, DC who were not pregnant at time of survey and reported data on mammogram use during the 2006, 2008, or 2010 survey. MAIN MEASURES: Mammogram use was compared between women ages 40-49 and women ages 50-74 before and after the recommendation. We performed a difference-in-difference estimation adjusted for access to care, education, race, and health status, and stratified analyses by whether women reported having a routine checkup in the prior year. KEY RESULTS: Reported prevalence of mammogram use in the past year among women ages 40-49 and 50-74 was 53.2 % and 65.2 %, respectively in 2008, and 51.7 % and 62.4 % in 2010. In 2010, mammography use did not significantly decline from 2006-2008 in women ages 40-49 relative to women ages 50-74. CONCLUSION: There was no reduction in mammography use among younger women in 2010 compared to older women and previous years. Patients and providers may have been hesitant to comply with the 2009 recommendation.


Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Diretrizes para o Planejamento em Saúde , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos/normas , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Am J Public Health ; 103(6): e92-8, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23597354

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We examined news coverage of public debates about large taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to illuminate how the news media frames the debate and to inform future efforts to promote obesity-related public policy. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative content analysis in which we assessed how frequently 30 arguments supporting or opposing SSB taxes appeared in national news media and in news outlets serving jurisdictions where SSB taxes were proposed between January 2009 and June 2011. RESULTS: News coverage included more discrete protax than antitax arguments on average. Supportive arguments about the health consequences and financial benefits of SSB taxes appeared most often. The most frequent opposing arguments focused on how SSB taxes would hurt the economy and how they constituted inappropriate governmental intrusion. CONCLUSIONS: News outlets that covered the debate on SSB taxes in their jurisdictions framed the issue in largely favorable ways. However, because these proposals have not gained passage, it is critical for SSB tax advocates to reach audiences not yet persuaded about the merits of this obesity prevention policy.


Assuntos
Bebidas/economia , Meios de Comunicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/estatística & dados numéricos , Dissidências e Disputas , Edulcorantes/economia , Impostos/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Política
17.
Prev Med ; 57(2): 120-4, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23743418

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to evaluate whether physician body mass index (BMI) impacts their patients' trust or perceptions of weight-related stigma. METHODS: We used a national cross-sectional survey of 600 non-pregnant overweight and obese patients conducted between April 5 and April 13, 2012. The outcome variables were patient trust (overall and by type of advice) and patient perceptions of weight-related stigma. The independent variable of interest was primary care physician (PCP) BMI. We conducted multivariate regression analyses to determine whether trust or perceived stigma differed by physician BMI, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Patients reported high levels of trust in their PCPs, regardless of the PCPs body weight (normal BMI=8.6; overweight=8.3; obese=8.2; where 10 is the highest). Trust in diet advice was significantly higher among patients seeing overweight PCPs as compared to normal BMI PCPs (87% vs. 77%, p=0.04). Reports of feeling judged by their PCP were significantly higher among patients seeing obese PCPs (32%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 23-41) as compared to patients seeing normal BMI PCPs (14%; 95% CI: 7-20). CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese patients generally trust their PCP, but they more strongly trust diet advice from overweight PCPs as compared to normal BMI PCPs.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Obesidade/terapia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Estereotipagem , Confiança/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Sobrepeso/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
18.
Addict Behav Rep ; 17: 100492, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37214425

RESUMO

Introduction: Risk factors and treatment rates for substance use disorders (SUDs) differ by sex. Females often have greater childcare and household responsibilities than males, which may inhibit SUD treatment. We examined how SUD, medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) receipt, and overdose rates differ by sex among parents with young children (<5 years). Methods: Using deidentified national administrative healthcare data from Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database version 8.1 (2007-2021), we identified parents aged 26-64 continuously enrolled in commercial insurance for ≥ 30 days and linked to ≥ 1 dependent child < 5 years from January 1, 2016-February 29, 2020. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the average predicted prevalence of SUD diagnosis, MOUD receipt after opioid use disorder (OUD) diagnosis, and overdose by parent sex in any month, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, state of residence, enrollment month, and mental health conditions. Results: From 2016 to 2020, there were 2,241,795 parents with a dependent child < 5 years, including 1,155,252 (51.5%) females and 1,086,543 (48.5%) males. Male parents had a higher average predicted prevalence of an SUD diagnosis (11.1% [11, 11.16]) than female parents (5.5% [5.48, 5.58]). Among parents with OUD, the average predicted prevalence of receiving MOUD was 27.4% [26.1, 28.63] among male and 19.7% [18.34, 21.04] among female parents, with no difference in overdose rates by sex. Conclusion: Female parents are less likely to be diagnosed with an SUD or receive MOUD than male parents. Removing policies that criminalize parental SUD and addressing childcare-related barriers may improve SUD identification and treatment.

19.
Cancer Med ; 12(14): 15455-15467, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37329270

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. Despite increased CRC screening rates, they remain low among low-income non-older adults, including Medicaid enrollees who are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages. OBJECTIVES: Given limited evidence regarding CRC screening service use among Medicaid enrollees, we examined multilevel factors associated with CRC testing among Medicaid enrollees in Pennsylvania after Medicaid expansion in 2015. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using the 2014-2019 Medicaid administrative data, we performed multivariable logistic regression models to assess factors associated with CRC testing, adjusting for enrollment length and primary care services use. SUBJECTS: We identified 15,439 adults aged 50-64 years newly enrolled through Medicaid expansion. MEASURES: Outcome measures include receiving any CRC testing and by modality. RESULTS: About 32% of our study population received any CRC testing. Significant predictors for any CRC testing include being male, being Hispanic, having any chronic conditions, using primary care services ≤4 times annually, and having a higher county-level median household income. Being 60-64 years at enrollment, using primary care services >4 times annually, and having higher county-level unemployment rates were significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving any CRC tests. CONCLUSIONS: CRC testing rates were low among adults newly enrolled in Medicaid under the Medicaid expansion in Pennsylvania relative to adults with high income. We observed different sets of significant factors associated with CRC testing by modality. Our findings underscore the urgency to tailor strategies by patients' racial, geographic, and clinical conditions for CRC screening.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Medicaid , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Pobreza , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Cobertura do Seguro
20.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 33: 7-40, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22224876

RESUMO

Health inequalities, which have been well documented for decades, have more recently become policy targets in developed countries. This review describes time trends in health inequalities (by sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status), commitments to reduce health inequalities, and progress made to eliminate health inequalities in the United States, United Kingdom, and other OECD countries. Time-trend data in the United States indicate a narrowing of the gap between the best- and worst-off groups in some health indicators, such as life expectancy, but a widening of the gap in others, such as diabetes prevalence. Similarly, time-trend data in the United Kingdom indicate a narrowing of the gap between the best- and worst-off groups in some indicators, such as hypertension prevalence, whereas the gap between social classes has increased for life expectancy. More research and better methods are needed to measure precisely the relationships between stated policy goals and observed trends in health inequalities.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Saúde Pública/tendências , Política Pública , Classe Social , Comparação Transcultural , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa