Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have compared Impella use to intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS undergoing PCI who received Impella (percutaneous left ventricular assist device) without vasopressors, IABP without vasopressors, and vasopressors without mechanical circulatory support (MCS). METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using ICD-10 codes (2015-2018) to identify patients with AMI-CS undergoing PCI. We created three propensity-matched cohorts to examine clinical outcomes in patients receiving Impella versus IABP, Impella versus vasopressors without MCS, and IABP versus vasopressors without MCS. RESULTS: Among 17,762 patients, Impella use was associated with significantly higher in-hospital major bleeding (31.4% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.001) and hospital charges (p < 0.001) compared to IABP use, with no benefit in mortality (34.1% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.06). Impella use was associated with significantly higher mortality (42.3% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.02), major bleeding (33.9% vs. 22.7%; p = 0.001), and hospital charges (p < 0.001), when compared to the use of vasopressors without MCS. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between IABP use and the use of vasopressor without MCS. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of retrospective data of patients with AMI-CS undergoing PCI, Impella use was associated with higher mortality, major bleeding, and in-hospital charges when compared to vasopressor therapy without MCS. When compared to IABP use, Impella was associated with no mortality benefit, along with higher major bleeding events and in-hospital charges. A vasopressor-only strategy suggested no difference in clinical outcomes when compared to IABP. This study uses the NIS for the first time to highlight outcomes in AMI-CS patients undergoing PCI when treated with vasopressor support without MCS, compared to Impella and IABP use.

Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist device in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Many advanced heart failure patients have both a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study examines incidence, clinical impact, and management of LVAD-related EMI. METHODS: We performed a three-center retrospective analysis of transvenous ICD implanted patients with LVAD implanted between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was EMI after LVAD implantation, categorized as LVAD-related noise or telemetry interference. RESULTS: The rate of LVAD-related EMI among the 737 patients (mean age 58.6 ± 12.8 years) studied was 5.0%. Telemetry interference (1.5%) compromised ICD interrogation in all patients. This was resolved successfully with use of a metal shield, encased wand, radiofrequency tower, different ICD programmer or by increasing distance between ICD programmer and LVAD (n = 6). ICD replacement was required to reestablish successful communication in three patients. LVAD-related noise (3.5%) led to oversensing (n = 4), inappropriate mode switches (n = 4), noise reversion (n = 3), inhibition of pacing (n = 2), inappropriate detection as atrial fibrillation (AF) (n = 2) and inappropriate detection as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (n = 2). This noise interference persisted (n = 3), resolved spontaneously (n = 16), resolved with programming change (n = 6) or required lead revision (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: EMI from LVAD impacts ICD function, although, the incidence rate is low. Physicians implanting both, LVAD in patients with ICD (more common) or ICD in patients with LVAD, should be aware of possible interferences. Telemetry failure not resolved by metal shielding was overcome by ICD generator replacement to a different manufacturer. In most cases, LVAD-related noise resolves spontaneously.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation In Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of trans-septal transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TS-TMVI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2015 to 2018) for patients undergoing TS-TMVI. We identified patients with CKD (Stage III or higher). We conducted propensity score matching analysis to compare the outcomes in patients with CKD versus patients without CKD. The main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day nonelective readmissions. From 2015 to 2018, there were 2,017 admissions for patients receiving TS-TMVI, of whom 733 (36.34%) had CKD. In the CKD group, 76 (10.4%) required chronic dialysis. During the study years, the number of TS-TMVI procedures increased in patients with CKD (ptrend <0.001). Patients with CKD were older and less likely to be women. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality in those with versus without CKD in the matched cohorts (7.8% vs 7.3%; odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 1.80). Subgroup analysis showed no interaction between chronic dialysis status and in-hospital mortality after TS-TMVI. In the matched cohort, TS-TMVI in those with CKD was associated with higher rates of cardiogenic shock (12.3% vs 7.6%, p = 0.03), acute kidney injury (35.7% vs 16.7%, p <0.001), hemodialysis (5.4% vs 1.5%, p = 0.01) and longer median length of stay, (7 [12] vs 5 [8] days, p <0.001). Patients with CKD were more likely to have 30-day nonelective readmission (25.8% vs 16.5%, p = 0.01), driven by more readmissions for bleeding/anemia. In conclusion, TS-TMVI in patients with CKD is associated with increased risk for cardiogenic shock, worsening renal function requiring hemodialysis, without increased risk of mortality when compared with patients without CKD. Also, there was a higher length of stay and 30-day readmission rate in patients with CKD versus patients without CKD.

Stress cardiomyopathy in hospitalized patients with cancer: machine learning analysis by primary malignancy type.

AIMS: Previous studies have shown that patients with stress (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy (SC) and cancer have higher in-hospital mortality than patients with SC alone. No studies have examined outcomes in patients with active cancer and SC compared to patients with active cancer without SC. We aimed to assess the potential association between primary malignancy type and SC and their shared interaction with inpatient mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed SC by primary malignancy type with propensity score adjusted multivariable regression and machine learning analysis using the 2016 United States National Inpatient Sample. Of 30 195 722 adult hospitalized patients, 4 719 591 had active cancer, of whom 568 239 had SC. The mean age of patients with cancer and SC was 69.1, of which 74.7% were women. Among patients with cancer, those with SC were more likely to be female and have white race, Medicare insurance, hypertension, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, obesity, cerebrovascular disease, anaemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < 0.003 for all). In machine learning-augmented, propensity score multivariable regression adjusted for age, race, and income, only lung cancer [OR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.08-1.46; P = 0.003] and breast cancer [OR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.62-2.02; P < 0.001] were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of SC. Neither SC alone nor having both SC and cancer was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. The presence of concomitant SC and breast cancer was significantly associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.25-0.94; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that primary malignancy type influences the likelihood of developing SC. Further studies will be necessary to delineate characteristics in patients with lung cancer and breast cancer which contribute to development of SC. Additional investigation should confirm lower mortality in patients with SC and breast cancer and determine possible explanations and protective factors.