RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent long-term complication after abdominal surgery, with a prevalence greater than 30% in high-risk groups. The aim of the PRIMA trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of mesh reinforcement in high-risk patients, to prevent incisional hernia. METHODS: We did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial at 11 hospitals in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands. We included patients aged 18 years or older who were undergoing elective midline laparotomy and had either an abdominal aortic aneurysm or a body-mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2 or higher. We randomly assigned participants using a computer-generated randomisation sequence to one of three treatment groups: primary suture; onlay mesh reinforcement; or sublay mesh reinforcement. The primary endpoint was incidence of incisional hernia during 2 years of follow-up, analysed by intention to treat. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00761475. FINDINGS: Between March, 2009, and December, 2012, 498 patients were enrolled to the study, of whom 18 were excluded before randomisation. Therefore, we included 480 patients in the primary analysis: 107 were assigned primary suture only, 188 were allocated onlay mesh reinforcement, and 185 were assigned sublay mesh reinforcement. 92 patients were identified with an incisional hernia, 33 (30%) who were allocated primary suture only, 25 (13%) who were assigned onlay mesh reinforcement, and 34 (18%) who were assigned sublay mesh reinforcement (onlay mesh reinforcement vs primary suture, OR 0·37, 95% CI 0·20-0·69; p=0·0016; sublay mesh reinforcement vs primary suture, 0·55, 0·30-1·00; p=0·05). Seromas were more frequent in patients allocated onlay mesh reinforcement (34 of 188) than in those assigned primary suture (five of 107; p=0·002) or sublay mesh reinforcement (13 of 185; p=0·002). The incidence of wound infection did not differ between treatment groups (14 of 107 primary suture; 25 of 188 onlay mesh reinforcement; and 19 of 185 sublay mesh reinforcement). INTERPRETATION: A significant reduction in incidence of incisional hernia was achieved with onlay mesh reinforcement compared with sublay mesh reinforcement and primary suture only. Onlay mesh reinforcement has the potential to become the standard treatment for high-risk patients undergoing midline laparotomy. FUNDING: Baxter; B Braun Surgical SA.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/instrumentação , Hérnia Incisional/prevenção & controle , Telas Cirúrgicas , Técnicas de Sutura , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Hérnia Incisional/epidemiologia , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , SuturasRESUMO
PURPOSE: With current diagnostic methods, the majority of patients with symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage(CAL) is identified approximately 1 week after operation.The aim of this study is to determine whether real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis on drain fluid can serve as a screening test for CAL in the early postoperative phase. METHODS: All patients included in this multicenter prospective observational study underwent left-sided colorectal resection for both malignant and benign diseases with construction of an anastomosis. In all patients, an intra-abdominal drain was placed during operation. During the first five postoperative days, drain fluid was processed for RT-PCR. The quantitative results of the RT-PCR on days 2 to 5 were compared to the results of day 1 in order to detect concentration changes. RESULTS: In total, 243 patients, with both benign and malignant diseases, were included of whom 19 (7.8 %) developed symptomatic CAL. An increase in E. coli concentration was found insignificantly more patients with CAL on day 4 and 5 [p =0.0004; diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 7.9]. For E. faecalis, this result was found for days 2, 3, and 4 (p <0.003) with highest DOR on day 3 (31.6). Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 92.9 and 98.7 %, respectively, virtually ruling out CAL in case of negative test results on the third postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Quantitative PCR for E. faecalis performed on drain fluid may be an objective, affordable and fast screening tool for symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fístula Anastomótica/microbiologia , Drenagem , Enterococcus faecalis/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Enterococcus faecalis/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Escherichia coli/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PrognósticoRESUMO
Background: Integrating music into pain treatment demonstrates significant benefits, effectively reducing subjective pain levels and perioperative opioid requirements. Currently, the relationship between the impact of specific types of music and listeners' socio-cultural background is still unclear. This is especially relevant given that sociological research indicates that these factors can have a notable influence on music preference and perception. Current evidence suggests that individuals who choose their own music may experience greater benefits. However, additional research is needed to comprehensively grasp whether the effect of (preferred) music on pain endurance remains consistent across different socio-cultural backgrounds. Methods: In this study, a collaborative effort between medical and sociological researchers aims to investigate music-induced analgesia differentiated by socio-cultural background in healthy volunteers. Participants (n = 84) will listen to self-, and researcher-chosen music and a podcast as a control condition in a cross-over study design. The primary outcome of this study is pain endurance measured by electric stimuli of increasing intensity. Detailed sociological validated questionnaires will be utilized. Considering the notable influence of educational level on music taste formation found in previous research and its crucial role as a source of socio-cultural differentiation, participants will be stratified based on their level of education. Discussion: This experimental study represents one of the first efforts to gain a socio-culturally differentiated understanding of the therapeutic potential of music. Consequently, this could pave the way to purposefully and inclusively implement personalized music in healthcare settings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. METHODS: This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. RESULTS: A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Laparoscopia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Abdome , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Emergências , Laparoscopia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Laparotomy incisions provide easy and rapid access to the peritoneal cavity in case of emergency surgery. Incisional hernia (IH) is a late manifestation of the failure of abdominal wall closure and represents frequent complication of any abdominal incision: IHs can cause pain and discomfort to the patients but also clinical serious sequelae like bowel obstruction, incarceration, strangulation, and necessity of reoperation. Previous guidelines and indications in the literature consider elective settings and evidence about laparotomy closure in emergency settings is lacking. This paper aims to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) project called ECLAPTE (Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency): the final manuscript includes guidelines on the closure of emergency laparotomy.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais , Hérnia Incisional , Humanos , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Reoperação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Perioperative blood transfusions may adversely affect survival in patients with colorectal malignancy, although definite proof of a causal relationship has never been reported. BACKGROUND: We report the long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial performed between 1986 and 1991 to compare the effects of allogeneic blood transfusions and an autologous blood transfusion program in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: All 475 randomized patients operated upon for colorectal cancer were tracked via a national computerized record-linkage system to investigate survival and cause of death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to study 20 years' overall survival. Colorectal cancer-specific survival was analyzed over the 10-year time period after surgery. RESULTS: The overall survival percentage at 20 years after surgery was worse in the autologous group (21%) compared to the allogeneic group (28%) (P = 0.041; log-rank test). Cox regression, allowing for tumor stage, age, and sex, resulted in a hazard ratio (autologous vs allogeneic group) for overall mortality of 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.54; P = 0.051). Colorectal cancer-specific survival at 10 years for the whole study group was 48% and 60% for the autologous and allogeneic group, respectively (P = 0.020; log-rank test). The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.39 (95 confidence interval 1.05-1.83; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up colorectal cancer patients did not benefit from autologous transfusion compared with standard allogeneic transfusion. On the contrary, the overall and colorectal cancer-specific survival rates were worse in the patients in the autologous transfusion group.
Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transfusão de Sangue Autóloga , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a group of diseases characterized by an interruption of the blood supply to varying portions of the intestine, leading to ischemia and secondary inflammatory changes. If untreated, this process may progress to life-threatening intestinal necrosis. The incidence is low, estimated at 0.09-0.2% of all acute surgical admissions, but increases with age. Although the entity is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain, diligence is required because if untreated, mortality remains in the range of 50%. Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention are the cornerstones of modern treatment to reduce the high mortality associated with this entity. The advent of endovascular approaches in parallel with modern imaging techniques is evolving and provides new treatment options. Lastly, a focused multidisciplinary approach based on early diagnosis and individualized treatment is essential. Thus, we believe that updated guidelines from World Society of Emergency Surgery are warranted, in order to provide the most recent and practical recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of AMI.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/cirurgia , Isquemia/etiologia , IntestinosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic mesh reinforcement has proven to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia (IH). Fear of infectious complications may withhold the widespread implementation of prophylactic mesh reinforcement, particularly in the onlay position. STUDY DESIGN: Patients scheduled for elective midline surgery were randomly assigned to a suture closure group, onlay mesh group, or sublay mesh group. The incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with infectious complications were assessed through examining the adverse event forms. Data were collected prospectively for 2 years after the index procedure. RESULTS: Overall, infectious complications occurred in 14/107 (13.3%) patients in the suture group and in 52/373 (13.9%) patients with prophylactic mesh reinforcement (p = 0.821). Infectious complications occurred in 17.6% of the onlay group and 10.3% of the sublay group (p = 0.042). Excluding anastomotic leakage as a cause, these incidences were 16% (onlay) and 9.7% (sublay), p = 0.073. The mesh could remain in-situ in 40/52 (77%) patients with an infectious complication. The 2-year IH incidence after onlay mesh reinforcement was 10 in 33 (30.3%) with infectious complications and 15 in 140 (9.7%) without infectious complications (p = 0.003). This difference was not statistically significant for the sublay group. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic mesh placement was not associated with increased incidence, severity, or need for invasive treatment of infectious complications compared with suture closure. Patients with onlay mesh reinforcement and an infectious complication had a significantly higher risk of developing an incisional hernia, compared with those in the sublay group.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Incisional/prevenção & controle , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/instrumentação , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/instrumentação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is the major complication after colorectal surgery. To date, animal experiments concerning colorectal anastomosis focus on anastomotic healing instead of anastomotic leakage. This study aims to develop a new experimental model for colorectal anastomotic leakage. METHODS: A control group, receiving an anastomosis with 12 interrupted sutures, was compared to a group receiving an anastomosis with 6 interrupted sutures. When the leakage rate was observed to be too low, the number of sutures was decreased stepwise, to 5 or less. Each group contained 9 "C57Bl6-mice". After 7 d the Anastomotic Bursting Pressure (ABP) was determined. RESULTS: In the first experiment, one mouse (11.1%) in the case group and none in the control group developed leakage. Average ABP was 152.2 mmHg in the control group and 138,8 mmHg in the case group (P=0.111). In the second experiment, case group receiving an anastomosis with 5 sutures, 4 mice (44.4%) in the case group developed leakage. This experiment was repeated twice resulting in leakage rates of 33.3% and 44.4%. The average overall ABP in the case group was 142.7 mmHg vs. 179.9 mmHg (P=0.022) in the control group. The mice without leakage showed a stabilization of average weight loss around day 2 and 3 and a decrease afterwards. The mice with leakage showed a decrease only after day 5. The difference in wellness-scores between the groups with- and without leakage was 2 points, increasing during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The model of anastomotic leakage caused by creating an anastomosis with 5 interrupted sutures is feasible. Weight loss and wellness-scores are good predictors of leakage.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Camundongos , Animais , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Técnicas de SuturaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aims to increase knowledge of colorectal anastomotic leakage by performing an incidence study and risk factor analysis with new potential risk factors in a Dutch tertiary referral center. METHODS: All patients whom received a primary colorectal anastomosis between 1997 and 2007 were selected by means of operation codes. Patient records were studied for population description and risk factor analysis. RESULTS: In total 739 patients were included. Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in 64 (8.7%) patients of whom nine (14.1%) died. Median interval between operation and diagnosis was 8 days. The risk for AL was higher as the anastomoses were constructed more distally (p = 0.019). Univariate analysis showed duration of surgery (p = 0.038), BMI (p = 0.001), time of surgery (p = 0.029), prophylactic drainage (p = 0.006) and time under anesthesia (p = 0.012) to be associated to AL. Multivariate analysis showed BMI greater than 30 kg/m(2) (p = 0.006; OR 2.6 CI 1.3-5.2) and "after hours" construction of an anastomosis (p = 0.030; OR 2.2 CI 1.1-4.5) to be independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: BMI greater than 30 kg/m(2) and "after hours" construction of an anastomosis were independent risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage.
Assuntos
Plantão Médico , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Colorretal/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Peroperative peritoneal trauma activates a cascade of peritoneal defense mechanisms responsible for postoperative adhesion formation. The same cascade seems to play a role in the process of intra-abdominal tumor recurrence. Icodextrin is a glucose polymer solution that is absorbed slowly from the peritoneal cavity, allowing prolonged "hydroflotation" of the viscera, thereby decreasing adhesion formation. This study evaluated the adhesion-preventing properties of icodextrin and its effect on peritoneal metastasis. METHODS: Reproducible rat models of peritoneal trauma were used, allowing semiquantitative scoring of adhesion formation or tumor load. In one experiment, peritoneal trauma was inflicted; one group was treated by peroperative intra-abdominal instillation of 7.5% icodextrin, one by instillation of RPMI (placebo), and one had no instillate (controls). In another experiment involving a different model of peritoneal trauma, the coloncarcinoma cell line CC531 was injected intraperitoneally to induce tumor load, again using these three groups. RESULTS: Treatment of peritoneally traumatized rats with icodextrin caused a 51% reduction in postoperative adhesion formation ( P < .001). However, peroperative intra-abdominal treatment with icodextrin did not affect intraperitoneal tumor cell adhesion and growth of free intra-abdominal tumor cells in rats with this model of severe peritoneal trauma. CONCLUSION: A 7.5% icodextrin solution is effective in reducing postoperative adhesions without promoting tumor recurrence and therefore may prove useful and safe in oncologic surgery.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Glucanos/farmacologia , Glucose/farmacologia , Peritônio/patologia , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Animais , Adesão Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Divisão Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Icodextrina , Transplante de Neoplasias , Peritônio/efeitos dos fármacos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos , Organismos Livres de Patógenos Específicos , Aderências Teciduais/patologiaRESUMO
Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain is subject for criticism. In this prospective study, we analyze factors that encourage or discourage the indication for therapeutic laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with chronic abdominal pain underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and in case of adhesions, they underwent adhesiolysis. Pain relief was assessed, and the individual impact of variables on pain relief was determined. Laparoscopy was performed in 224 patients. Two hundred patients had only adhesions and underwent primary laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Three months after adhesiolysis, 74% of patients were pain-free or had less pain. The remaining 26% of the patients felt no change (22%) or had more pain (4%). Gender, age, and bowel perforation leading to a laparotomy appear to be individual factors significantly influencing pain relief. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis can be done (almost) completely in 92% of patients with adhesions. After laparoscopic adhesiolysis, 74% of patients had good results and 4% had more pain. The complication rate is high.
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Criança , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Aderências Teciduais/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The first international summit on anastomotic leak was held in Chicago in October, 2012 to assess current knowledge in the field and develop novel lines of inquiry. The following report is a summary of the proceedings with commentaries and future prospects for clinical trials and laboratory investigations. BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage remains a devastating problem for the patient, and a continuing challenge to the surgeon operating on high-risk areas of the gastrointestinal tract such as the esophagus and rectum. Despite the traditional wisdom that anastomotic leak is because of technique, evidence to support this is weak-to-non-existent. Outcome data continue to demonstrate that expert high-volume surgeons working in high-volume centers continue to experience anastomotic leaks and that surgeons cannot predict reliably which patients will leak. METHODS: A one and one-half day summit was held and a small working group assembled to review current practices, opinions, scientific evidence, and potential paths forward to understand and decrease the incidence of anastomotic leak. RESULTS: RESULTS of a survey of the opinions of the group demonstrated that the majority of participants believe that anastomotic leak is a complicated biologic problem whose pathogenesis remains ill-defined. The group opined that anastomotic leak is underreported clinically, it is not because of technique except when there is gross inattention to it, and that results from animal models are mostly irrelevant to the human condition. CONCLUSIONS: A fresh and unbiased examination of the causes and strategies for prevention of anastomotic leak needs to be addressed by a continuous working group of surgeons, basic scientists, and clinical trialists to realize a real and significant reduction in its incidence and morbidity. Such a path forward is discussed.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) is a challenging matter in terms of obstruction release as well of oncological issues. Several options are available and no guidelines are established. The paper aims to generate evidenced based recommendations on management of OLCC. METHODS: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were queried for publications focusing on OLCC published prior to April 2010. A extensive retrieval, analyses, and grading of the literature was undertaken. The findings of the research were presented and largely discussed among panellist and audience at the Consensus Conference of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and Peritoneum and Surgery (PnS) Society held in Bologna July 2010. Comparisons of techniques are presented and final committee recommendation are enounced. RESULTS: Hartmann's procedure should be preferred to loop colostomy (Grade 2B). Hartmann's procedure offers no survival benefit compared to segmental colonic resection with primary anastomosis (Grade 2C+); Hartmann's procedure should be considered in patients with high surgical risk (Grade 2C). Total colectomy and segmental colectomy with intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity, however total colectomy is associated with higher rates impaired bowel function (Grade 1A). Segmental resection and primary anastomosis either with manual decompression or intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity rate (Grade 1A). In palliation stent placement is associated with similar mortality/morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay (Grade 2B). Stents as a bridge to surgery seems associated with lower mortality rate, shorter hospital stay, and a lower colostomy formation rate (Grade 1B). CONCLUSIONS: Loop colostomy and staged procedure should be adopted in case of dramatic scenario, when neoadjuvant therapy could be expected. Hartmann's procedure should be performed in case of high risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Subtotal and total colectomy should be attempted when cecal perforation or in case of synchronous colonic neoplasm. Primary resection and anastomosis with manual decompression seems the procedure of choice. Colonic stents represent the best option when skills are available. The literature power is relatively poor and the existing RCT are often not sufficiently robust in design thus, among 6 possible treatment modalities, only 2 reached the Grade A.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no conclusive evidence which size of suture stitches and suture distance should be used to prevent burst abdomen and incisional hernia. METHODS: Thirty-eight porcine abdominal walls were removed immediately after death and divided into 2 groups: A and B (N = 19 each). Two suturing methods using double-loop polydioxanone were tested in 14-cm midline incisions: group A consisted of large stitches (1 cm) with a large suture distance (1 cm), and group B consisted of small stitches (.5 cm) with a small suture distance (.5 cm). RESULTS: The geometric mean tensile force in group B was significantly higher than in group A (787 N vs 534 N; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Small stitches with small suture distances achieve higher tensile forces than large stitches with large suture distances. Therefore, small stitches may be useful to prevent the development of a burst abdomen or an incisional hernia after midline incisions.
Assuntos
Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Hérnia/prevenção & controle , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Sutura , Animais , Polidioxanona , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Suínos , Resistência à TraçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of resection margins and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer by meta-analysis of individual data from randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Structured MEDLINE search for published studies. STUDY SELECTION: A meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials and individual data. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual data were obtained from 4 recently published trials (875 patients: 278 [32%] with R1 and 591 [68%] with R0 resections). DATA SYNTHESIS: Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were compared using log-rank analyses. Pooled hazard ratios of the effects of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments on the risk of death were calculated separately and across groups according to resection margins status. Six hundred ninety-eight patients (80%) had died, with a median follow-up of 44 months in the surviving patients. Resection margin involvement was not a significant factor for survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.29; log-rank chi(2) = 1.4; P = .24). The 2- and 5-year survival rates, respectively, were 33% and 16% for R0 patients and 29% and 15% for R1 patients. Chemoradiotherapy in R1 patients resulted in a 28% reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.47-1.10) compared with a 19% increased risk in R0 patients (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.95-1.49). Chemotherapy in R1 patients had a 4% increased risk of death (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.78-1.40) compared with a 35% reduction in risk in the R0 subgroup (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy but not chemoradiotherapy should be the standard of care for patients with either R0 or R1 resections for pancreatic cancer.
Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Neoplasia Residual/patologia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Postoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis is a significant clinical problem after "curative" resection of pancreatic carcinoma. Preoperative surgical trauma activates a cascade of peritoneal defense mechanisms responsible for postoperative intra-abdominal tumor recurrence. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a pivotal role in this postoperative inflammatory reaction. This study explores the influence of ROS on adhesion of human pancreatic carcinoma cells to human mesothelial cells. Furthermore this study explores the influence of ROS on the presentation of adhesion molecules on Panc-1 and mesothelial cells. ROS were produced using the enzymatic reaction of xanthine with xanthine oxidase (X/XO). A reproducible in vitro assay to study adhesion of human Panc-1 carcinoma tumor cells to a mesothelial cell monolayer of primary human mesothelial cells was used. Mesothelial monolayers were incubated with ROS produced prior to adhesion of the tumor cells. Incubation of the mesothelial cells with X/XO resulted in a significant increase (69.5%) in adhesion of Panc-1 in all patients. SOD/catalase, anti-oxidants, could reduce this increase by 56.7%. ROS significantly influenced the expression of the adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and CD44h on mesothelial cells, but did not influence adhesion molecule expression on Panc-1. The ROS released during the post-operative inflammatory reaction may play an important role in the adhesion of pancreatic tumor cells to the mesothelium-possibly by influencing adhesion molecule expression on mesothelial cells. Therefore ROS can partly be responsible for the enhanced post-operative intra-abdominal tumor recurrence.