RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have shown an increased risk for colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary, hematologic, and skin cancers, but updated long-term data is needed. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cancer in patients with UC compared to the general Norwegian population, in a population-based cohort (the IBSEN study), 30 years after diagnosis; and to identify possible risk factors associated with cancer. METHODS: The IBSEN cohort prospectively included all incident patients between 1990 and 1993. Cancer incidence data were obtained from the Cancer Registry of Norway. The overall and cancer-specific hazard ratios (HR) were modelled using Cox regression. Standardized incidence ratios were estimated compared to the general population. RESULTS: In total, the cohort included 519 patients, and 83 cases were diagnosed with cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall cancer risk (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: [0.79-1.29]) and colorectal cancer risk (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: [0.75-2.47]) between patients and controls. The incidence of biliary tract cancer was higher than expected (SIR = 9.84, 95%CI: [3.19-20.15]), especially when UC patients suffered from primary sclerosing cholangitis. Male UC patients were also more at risk of being diagnosed with hematologic malignancies (HR = 3.48, 95% CI: [1.55-7.82]). Being prescribed thiopurines was associated with a higher risk of cancer (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: [1.02-4.01]). CONCLUSIONS: At 30 years after diagnosis, the risk of all cancer in patients with UC was not significantly increased compared with the general population. However, the risks of biliary tract cancer and hematologic cancers were increased, particularly in male patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar , Colite Ulcerativa , Neoplasias Colorretais , Humanos , Masculino , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Incidência , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease report multiple symptoms, but the relationships among co-occurring symptoms are poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of symptoms and explore symptom clusters and possible associations between symptom clusters and socio-demographic and clinical variables in patients newly diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: The IBSEN III study is a prospective population-based inception cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This study used patient data from the three largest hospitals in the study catchment area. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was used to assess the prevalence of symptoms. Symptom clusters were identified using principal component analysis. Possible associations between socio-demographic and clinical variables and symptom cluster membership were estimated using regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 573 patients (age, ≥18 years) diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease, 350 (61.1%) completed the questionnaire (responders). Eleven symptoms were reported by >50% of the responders. The three most prevalent symptoms were bloating (84%), drowsiness (81%), and lack of energy (81%). Three symptom clusters were identified: psychological (56% of the patients), impaired energy (28%), and physical (16%) clusters. Multinomial regression analysis revealed that vitamin D deficiency was significantly associated with the impaired energy cluster (odds ratio=2.49, 95% confidence interval [1.00-6.2], p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found high symptom prevalence in patients newly diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. Three distinct symptom clusters were identified, and the psychological cluster includes >50% of the patients. Vitamin D deficiency is the only factor associated with cluster membership, namely the impaired energy cluster.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Humanos , Adolescente , Síndrome , Estudos Prospectivos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Colite Ulcerativa/complicaçõesRESUMO
PURPOSE: This unselected, population-based cohort study aimed to determine the level of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) at the time of diagnosis compared with a reference population and identify the demographic factors, psychosocial measures, and disease activity markers associated with HRQoL. METHODS: Adult patients newly diagnosed with CD or UC were prospectively enrolled. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Norwegian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaires. Clinical significance was assessed using Cohen's d effect size and further compared with a Norwegian reference population. Associations between HRQoL and symptom scores, demographic factors, psychosocial measures, and disease activity markers were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the Norwegian reference population, patients with CD and UC reported significantly lower scores in all SF-36 dimensions, except for physical functioning. Cohen's d effect sizes for men and women in all SF-36 dimensions were at least moderate, except for bodily pain and emotional role for men with UC and physical functioning for both sexes and diagnoses. In the multivariate regression analysis, depression subscale scores ≥ 8 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, substantial fatigue, and high symptom scores were associated with reduced HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Patients newly diagnosed with CD and UC reported statistically and clinically significantly lower scores in seven of the eight SF-36 dimensions than the reference population. Symptoms of depression, fatigue, and elevated symptom scores were associated with poorer HRQoL.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Seguimentos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fadiga , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term efficacy and side effects of antitumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), the need for surgery and the clinical outcome after discontinuing anti-TNF therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-TNF register at Østfold Hospital Trust. Clinical and sociodemographic data were recorded for patients initiating anti-TNF therapy from January 2000 until December 2011. Follow-up was conducted until December 2017. RESULTS: Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 40/154 (26%) patients at the last follow-up (median follow-up time 10 years). A total of 40 (26%) patients had to discontinue treatment due to serious side effects, and malignancy was recorded in 10 (6.5%) patients. Surgical resection was performed in 55 (36%) patients during follow-up. Patients with Montreal phenotype B2 before anti-TNF therapy were estimated to have a 2.54-fold greater risk of surgery than patients with phenotype B1 (p = .001). Of those with phenotype B1 before anti-TNF therapy, 19 (24%) of them developed stenosis in need of surgical resection ('phenotype migration'). In patients followed up after discontinuing anti-TNF therapy (n = 89, median observational time six years), CR was achieved in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term complete remission was achieved in only one in four patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, and one in four patients had to discontinue therapy due to side effects. Despite anti-TNF therapy, one in four patients with a baseline luminal disease phenotype needed subsequent surgical resection.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Humanos , Infliximab/efeitos adversos , Necrose , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Participants were recruited from nine hospitals in the southeastern and western parts of Norway. Clinical and sociodemographic data were collected, and participants completed the MFI-20, as well as the Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ). In addition to a confirmatory factor analysis, validity, reliability, test-retest and responsiveness were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 410 patients were included. The Norwegian MFI-20 had an acceptable model fit when compared to the original five-dimensional structure. A positive correlation was observed between the dimensions of MFI-20 and the FQ. MFI-20 scores increased according to subjective disease activity, but no differences were observed when using a calprotectin cut-off < or > =250 µg/g mg/kg. All MFI-20 dimensions except 'reduced motivation' in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) patients had alpha Cronbach alpha values ≥70, and test-retest reliability revealed good to excellent values. Merely one dimension (Reduced activity) in UC patients reporting improvement did not reach the threshold for acceptable responsiveness according to Guyatt statistics. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of MFI-20 is valid, reliable and responsive. The instrument can safely be used in studies using fatigue as an endpoint.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), consisting of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic disorder with a considerable negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). During the past decade, IBD nurse specialists have been increasingly involved in follow-up care of IBD outpatients, in a consultative and coordinating role, closely cooperating with gastroenterologists. Whether patients' HRQoL differs between nurses' follow-up care (NF) and conventional follow-up care (CF) has not been widely researched and the aim of this study was to compare two different follow-up regimes with respect to patients' HRQoL. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multicenter study involved seven centers; five organized as CF, two as NF. RESULTS: A total of 304 patients aged 18-80 years, 174 females and 130 males, were included, of whom 140 received care under the NF model and 164 under the CF model. Participants in the NF group had a statistically significant higher median total score on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) (p-value < .001). This pattern could also be seen in the sub-scores of the different IBDQ domains. Despite a trend of higher IBDQ score in all domains in the NF model, the overall result in our study did not reach the limit of 16 points, defined as clinically significant. A higher proportion of NF patients had IBDQ scores defined as remission, as well as a statistically significant higher frequency of outpatient check-ups during a two-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led models are not inferior to conventional models with regards to patient reported HRQoL except in the social domain where the model showed to be clinically significant better. Further studies are needed to advance efforts to implement these models and increase access to IBD care.
Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Qualidade de Vida , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Assistência ao Convalescente , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limited access to supervision, feedback and quality learning experiences pose challenges to learning in the clinical setting for first-year nursing students who are beginning their clinical experiences. Prior studies have indicated that simulation training, as a partial replacement of clinical practice hours, may improve learning. However, there has been little research on simulation training integrated as a partial replacement during first-year students' clinical practice in nursing homes. The primary aim of this study was to examine first-year nursing students' knowledge acquisition and self-efficacy in integrating a partial replacement of clinical hours in nursing homes with simulation training. Its secondary aim was to examine perceptions of how learning needs were met in the simulated environment compared with the clinical environment. DESIGN: The primary aim was addressed using an experimental design that included pre- and post-tests. The secondary aim was investigated using a descriptive survey-based comparison. METHODS: First-year students at a Norwegian university college (n = 116) were asked to participate. Those who agreed (n = 103) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 52) or the control group (n = 51). A knowledge test, the General Self-efficacy Scale and the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey were used to measure students' outcomes and perceptions. The data were analysed using independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests and paired samples t-tests. RESULTS: Knowledge scores from pre- to post-tests were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group with a medium to large effect size (p < 0.01, Hedges' g = 0.6). No significant differences in self-efficacy were identified. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the simulated and the clinical environment with regard to meeting learning needs; effect sizes ranged from small and medium to large (Cohen's d from 0.3 to 1.0). CONCLUSION: Integrating the partial replacement of clinical hours in nursing homes with simulation training for first-year nursing students was positively associated with knowledge acquisition and meeting learning needs. These findings are promising with regard to simulation as a viable partial replacement for traditional clinical practice in nursing homes to improve learning.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is an inflammatory biomarker that is sensitive for bacterial infections and a promising clinical decision aid in antimicrobial stewardship programs. However, there are few studies of physicians' experiences concerning the use of PCT. The objective of this study was to investigate whether hospital physicians' experience with procalcitonin after 18 months of use can inform the PCT implementation in antimicrobial stewardship programs. MATERIALS/METHODS: We deployed a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with 14 hospital physicians who had experience with procalcitonin in clinical practice. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Physicians reported a knowledge gap, which made them uncertain about the appropriate procalcitonin use, interpretation, and trustworthiness. Simultaneously, the physicians experienced procalcitonin as a useful clinical decision aid but emphasised that their clinical evaluation of the patient was the most important factor when deciding on antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin was regarded a helpful clinical tool, but the physicians called for more knowledge about its appropriate uses. Active implementation of unambiguous procalcitonin algorithms and physician education may enhance the utility of the test as an antimicrobial stewardship adjunct.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/organização & administração , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/normas , Infecções Bacterianas/sangue , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Bioensaio/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/epidemiologia , Médicos/normas , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Pró-Calcitonina/análise , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore self-esteem and associations between self-esteem and sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a disease of chronic relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. IBD symptoms, including pain, fatigue, and diarrhea, as well as potential life-long medical treatment and surgery, may be demanding, cause significant challenges, and influence self-esteem. METHODS: In this cross-sectional multicenter study, participants were recruited from nine hospitals in the southeastern and western regions of Norway from March 2013 to April 2014. Data were collected using self-report questionnaires. Self-esteem was assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, fatigue was assessed by the Fatigue Questionnaire, self-efficacy was assessed by the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and disease activity was assessed by the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Harvey Bradshaw Index for Crohn's disease (CD). Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to examine associations between self-esteem and sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors. RESULTS: In total, 411 of 452 (91%) patients had evaluable data and were included in this study. The mean scores on self-esteem, self-efficacy, total fatigue, anxiety, and depression were similar between UC patients and CD patients. Male gender, being employed, and higher self-efficacy were independently associated with higher self-esteem, whereas anxiety and depression were independently associated with lower self-esteem. Neither disease activity nor fatigue were associated with self-esteem in the final multiple regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Patient-centered interventions that improve self-esteem and reduce anxiety and depression seem to be important to optimize IBD management.
Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Autoimagem , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Fatigue is a major concern for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), but evidence from population-based studies regarding fatigue in long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is scarce. Our aims were to assess fatigue scores and the prevalence of chronic fatigue in IBD patients 20 years after diagnosis and to identify variables associated with fatigue in this cohort. METHODS: Twenty years after diagnosis, patients from a cohort with incident IBD were invited to a follow-up visit that included a structured interview, a clinical examination, laboratory tests and the Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ). Fatigue scores were obtained, and factors associated with fatigue were assessed via linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 599 invited patients, 440 (73.5%) completed the FQ. Among those with active disease, we found significantly higher fatigue scores than among those with quiescent disease (fatigue scores: UC 17.1 versus 12.4, p < .001, and CD 17.5 versus 13.3, p < .001). The fatigue scores of those with quiescent disease were comparable with those of the reference population. Chronic fatigue was more frequent among IBD patients than in the reference population. Factors associated with fatigue included self-perceived disease activity, poor sleep quality, anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: At 20 years after IBD diagnosis, fatigue scores were higher and chronic fatigue was more frequent among IBD patients with active disease than in the reference population and among those with quiescent IBD. Subjectively perceived disease activity, sleep quality, anxiety and depression were associated with fatigue in IBD patients.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/classificação , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/epidemiologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Vitamin D deficiency is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aims of the present study were to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and to identify clinical and epidemiological variables associated with vitamin D deficiency in an outpatient population with IBD. METHODS: Participants were recruited from nine hospitals in the southeastern and western regions of Norway as part of an observational, multicentre study from March 2013 to April 2014. Clinical and epidemiological data were collected by interview and from medical records. All analyses of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) were performed in the same laboratory. RESULTS: In total, 49% (200/408) of the patients had a 25-OH-D concentration <50 nmol/L, including 53% (122/230) of the Crohn's disease (CD) patients and 44% (78/178) of the ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. In CD patients, disease activity, measured as the HBI, was inversely associated with vitamin D deficiency. No such association was observed with the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) scores in UC, but in UC patients, vitamin D deficiency was associated with elevated faecal calprotectin >100 mg/kg. In patients with CD, there were significantly more relapses during the previous year in patients with vitamin D deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency was common, especially in CD, and was associated with increased disease activity, a relapsing disease course and higher inflammatory activity.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/sangue , Doença de Crohn/sangue , Deficiência de Vitamina D/epidemiologia , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Noruega/epidemiologia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Vitamina D/sangue , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Decentralised acute care services have, through the establishment of municipality acute wards (MAWs), been launched in Norway. The aim is to provide treatment for patients who otherwise would need hospitalisation. Currently there is a lack of studies investigating patient experiences in such services. The aims of this study were therefore to a) translate and validate the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire (PPE-15) in Norwegian, and b) assess patient experiences in decentralised acute care, and potential factors associated with these experiences. METHODS: Patients were recruited from five municipal acute wards in southeastern Norway during the period from June 2014 to June 2015. Data on socio-demographics, length of stay and comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)) were collected. Patients completed the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire (PPE-15) and the EuroQOL 5-dimension, 3-level version. Convergent validity of the PPE-15 was assessed by correlation of items in PPE-15 and the Nordic Patient Experience Questionnaire (NORPEQ). A retest of the PPE-15 was performed in a subgroup of patients approximately 3 weeks after baseline assessment. Test-retest agreement was assessed with Cohens' unweighted Kappa. RESULTS: A total of 479 patients responded, median age 78.0 years and 41.8% men. A total of 68 patients participated in the retest. Testing of convergent validity revealed an overall weak to moderate correlation. Kappa statistics showed from fair to good test-retest agreement. Most problems were related to continuity and transition, while fewest problems were related to respect for patient preferences. A higher Charlson comorbidity score was the only variable that was negatively associated with patient experience. CONCLUSION: Patients reported problems in several items of the PPE-15 after discharge from decentralised acute wards. The findings from the current study may be helpful for planning ways to improve quality of care, e.g., by providing feedback to healthcare personnel or by using patient experience as a quality indicator.
Assuntos
Hospitais , Alta do Paciente/normas , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Comorbidade , Cuidado Periódico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Avaliação Geriátrica , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate older peoples' experiences with acute hospital treatment and care, and variables that may influence these experiences. BACKGROUND: In the Nordic countries, research on older peoples' experiences with hospital care is sparse. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an acute geriatric ward in a hospital in Norway during a 1-year period (n = 189). Patient experience was assessed using the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire, self-rated health by Euro-QoL 5-dimension, three-level version and comorbidity by Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS: Responders' median age was 79 years, 48.7% male. Most of the problems were related to continuity and transition, while fewest problems were related to respect for patient preferences. Charlson comorbidity index score and the variables "still working," "in a relationship" and "living alone" negatively influenced patient experience. CONCLUSIONS: A high amount of problems were identified among patients hospitalised in an acute geriatric ward. Findings from this study may provide important information about issues that need focus to increase the care experiences of older people. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Results from this study adds to existing knowledge, and emphasize the need for increased focus on discharge and continuity of care processes.
Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Avaliação Geriátrica , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Aguda/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Preferência do Paciente , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quality of care (QoC) has gained increased attention in IBD. A better QoC has, historically, been linked to improved treatment outcomes. Even so, factors of equal importance to patients may be quality of life (QoL), patient-physician communication and access to care. Recent surveys suggest that IBD care in Europe is suboptimal. METHODS: Patients were recruited from nine hospitals in the south-eastern and western part of Norway as a part of an observational, multicenter study In addition to clinical and socio-demographic factors; a purposely designed 26 item questionnaire was used to quantify aspects related to IBD care, including QoC. Moreover, the Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ) was used to investigate fatigue. RESULTS: In total, 411 patients were included. Of these, 231 were diagnosed with CD and 180 with UC. Furthermore, 86.1% (354/411) were satisfied with the quality of IBD follow-up and only 4.1% (17/411) were dissatisfied. Most dissatisfaction was related to: lack of focus on personal relations (18.2%), HRQoL (15.1%), general practitioner knowledge of IBD (13.9%), ability to talk about important topics (7.8%), and hospital discharge communication (9.4%). Higher age and longer disease duration was associated with improved QoC scores in both UC and CD. Fatigue was associated with decreased QoC scores in both diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are satisfied with quality of care in IBD. However, communication seems to be an important area of improvement - not only related to patient-physician communication, but also to transitional communication between different health-care levels.
Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Faecal (f-) calprotectin is a widely used marker for intestinal inflammation. However, extraction procedure is time consuming and cumbersome. The main aim of this study was to evaluate patient-performed extraction of f-calprotectin compared to extraction performed in the laboratory. METHODS: A total of 81 adult patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease provided two samples from the same bowel movement, one conventional faeces sample and one sample with a patient administered extraction device. A laboratory technician extracted the conventional faeces sample with the same extraction device. RESULTS: F-calprotectin results from the laboratory-performed extraction and the patient-performed extraction correlated significantly, with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.92. Method comparison showed a slope of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.08-1.36) with intercept of -0.30 (95% confidence interval -9.00 to 4.62). This demonstrates a small proportional difference between the results from the home extracted samples and the results from the laboratory extracted samples, where the home extracted samples are slightly higher. However, six of the 81 patients had made obvious mistakes in the extraction process and their samples were excluded from the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patient administered extraction of f-calprotectin can be a realistic alternative for selected patients. However, instructions must be very precise to avoid mistakes.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Fezes/química , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário/isolamento & purificação , Autocuidado/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário/química , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Municipality acute wards (MAWs) have recently been introduced in Norway. Their mandate is to provide treatment for patients who otherwise would have been hospitalized. Even though GPs are key stakeholders, little is known about how they perceive referring patients to these wards. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' perspectives on factors relevant for their decision-making when referring patients to MAWs. METHODS: We used a qualitative approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with 23 GPs from five different MAW catchment areas in the southeastern part of Norway. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The GPs experienced challenges in deciding which patients were suitable for treatment at a MAW, including whether patients could be regarded as medically clarified, and whether these services were sufficient and safe. GPs were also under pressure from several other stakeholders when deciding where to refer their patients. Moreover, the MAWs were viewed not merely as an alternative to hospitals, but also as a service in addition to hospitals. CONCLUSION: This study improves our understanding of how GPs experience decentralized acute health care services, by identifying factors that influence and challenge their referral decisions. For these services to be used as intended in the collaboration reform, integrating the perspectives of GPs in the development and implementation of these services may be beneficial.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos , Clínicos Gerais/psicologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto , Idoso , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Segurança do Paciente , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Municipality acute wards (MAWs) have recently been launched in Norway as an alternative to hospitalizations, and are aimed at providing treatment for patients who otherwise would have been hospitalized. The objective of this study was to explore how patients normally admitted to hospitals perceived the quality and safety of treatment in MAWs. DESIGN: The study had a qualitative design. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. SETTING: The study was conducted in a county in south-eastern Norway and included five different MAWs. PATIENTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 participants who had required acute health care and who had been discharged from the five MAWs. RESULTS: Three subthemes were identified that related to the overarching theme of hospital-like standards ("almost a hospital, but "), namely (a) treatment and competence, (b) location and physical environment, and (c) adequate time for care. Participants reported the treatment to be comparable to hospital care, but they also experienced limitations. Participants spoke positively about MAW personnel and the advantages of having a single patient room, a calm environment, and proximity to home. CONCLUSIONS: Participants felt safe when treated at MAWs, even though they realized that the diagnostic services were not similar to that in hospitals. Geographical proximity, treatment facilities and time for care positively distinguished MAWs from hospitals, while the lack of diagnostic resources was stressed as a limitation. Key points Municipality acute wards (MAWs) have been implemented across Norway. Research on patient perspectives on the decentralization of acute healthcare in MAWs is lacking. ⢠Patients perceive decentralized acute healthcare and treatment as being comparable to the quality they would have expected in hospitals. ⢠Geographical proximity, a home-like atmosphere and time for care were aspects stressed as positive features of the decentralized services. ⢠Lack of diagnostic resources was seen as a limitation.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Satisfação do Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à SaúdeRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to translate and test the psychometrical properties of the disease-specific pulmonary embolism quality-of-life questionnaire (PEmb-QoL). METHODS: Patients with a prior history of pulmonary embolism (PE) were identified from the thrombosis registry at Østfold Hospital Trust, Fredrikstad, Norway. All eligible patients were asked to complete the generic EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) QoL questionnaire as well as the disease-specific PEmb-QoL at baseline and after 2 weeks. Construct validity was tested using principal component factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho) between EQ-5D and PEmb-QoL. Internal consistency reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, while test-retest reliability was calculated using the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 213 participants had complete datasets and were included in further analyses. Factor analysis with varimax rotation yielded six factors explaining 71% of the cumulative variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.94, indicating a very good intercorrelation of items. Of the 213 participants, 145 (68%) completed the questionnaire a second time. The ICC ranged from 0.75 to 0.86, indicating good test-retest reliability. All factors were found significant with p values <0.001. The criterion validity of the PEmb-QoL was confirmed through good correlation with other similar health-related quality-of-life constructs in the EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of the current study indicate that Norwegian version of the PEmb-QoL is both valid and reliable, thus representing an important supplement in subjective outcomes measurement among patients sustaining PE.
Assuntos
Comparação Transcultural , Nível de Saúde , Psicometria , Embolia Pulmonar/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Embolia Pulmonar/reabilitação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Faecal (f-) calprotectin is a widely used surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation. F-calprotectin analysis is labour demanding partly due to a time consuming extraction step. The aim of this project was to validate a new extraction method for f-calprotectin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre study included 135 patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. The patients submitted a faeces sample, which was extracted with both the conventional method at the participating laboratory and the new extraction device. The extracts were analyzed by an automated ELISA instrument. RESULTS: Method comparison of the traditional method and the new device showed a slope of 1.01 (0.93-1.07) with intercept of - 2.2 (- 4.9-0.6). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The new extraction device is a reliable and time saving alternative to the conventional extraction method.