Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Skeletal Radiol ; 2024 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413401

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the correlation between intradiscal gas and infection in patients percutaneously biopsied for suspected discitis-osteomyelitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all CT-guided discitis-osteomyelitis biopsies performed between 2002 and 2022. Two independent trained musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated for presence of gas on CT and/or MRI within 1 week of the biopsy. Disagreements were resolved by a third musculoskeletal radiologist. CT was considered the gold standard for the detection of intradiscal gas. Pathology, microbiology, and imaging and clinical follow-up were used as the gold standard for presence of infection. Interrater agreement on CT and MRI, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were calculated, using the presence of gas as an indicator (test positive) for "no infection." RESULTS: There were 284 biopsies in 275 subjects (mean age 58 ± 1.0 (range 4-99) years; 101 (37%) females and 174 (63%) males). Of the biopsies, 12 (4%) were cervical, 80 (28%) were thoracic, 192 (68%) were lumbar, and 200 (70%) were considered true discitis-osteomyelitis based on pathology, imaging, and clinical follow-up. Interrater agreement was excellent for CT (kappa = 0.83) and poor for MRI (kappa = - 0.021). The presence of gas had a 94% specificity and 76% negative predictive value for the absence of infection. CONCLUSION: CT is the preferred method for detecting intradiscal gas. The presence of gas means that discitis-osteomyelitis is unlikely. If intradiscal gas is present in the setting of discitis-osteomyelitis, the gas bubbles tend to be smaller and fewer in number.

2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 220(4): 499-511, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222488

RESUMO

BACKGROUND. The reported sensitivity and yield of image-guided biopsies for diskitis-osteomyelitis vary widely. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of pooled sensitivity data to elucidate strategies for optimal image-guided biopsies among patients suspected to have diskitis-osteomyelitis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. A comprehensive literature search was performed for studies of patient populations with proven or suspected diskitis-osteomyelitis that included percutaneous image-guided biopsy as part of the workup algorithm. Type of pathogens, imaging modality used for biopsy guidance, tissue targeted, antibiotic administration at the time of biopsy, true microbiology positives, true microbiology negatives, false microbiology positives, false microbiology negatives, disease (i.e., diskitis-osteomyelitis) positives as determined by reference standard, true infection positives (i.e., positive microbiology or pathology results), and total number of biopsies performed were extracted from the studies. Microbiology sensitivity, microbiology biopsy yield, and infection sensitivity were calculated from the pooled data. These terms and the data required to calculate them were also defined in detail. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Thirty-six articles satisfied inclusion criteria and were used for analysis. The pooled microbiology sensitivity, infection sensitivity, and microbiology biopsy yields were 46.6%, 70.0%, and 26.7%, respectively. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-only microbiology sensitivity was significantly higher than both pyogenic bacteria and mixed-organism microbiology sensitivity (p < .001). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative organism (28.6%). Pooled microbiology sensitivity was not significantly different for CT guidance and fluoroscopy guidance (p = .16). There was a statistically significant difference between pooled microbiology sensitivity of bone/end plate (45.5%) and disk/paravertebral soft-tissue (64.8%) image-guided biopsies (p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in pooled microbiology sensitivities for patients who received antibiotics before the procedure (46.2%) and those who did not (44.6%) (p = .70). CONCLUSION. Image guidance by CT or fluoroscopy does not affect microbiology yield, disk and paravertebral soft-tissue biopsies should be considered over bone and end plate biopsies, and preprocedural antibiotic administration does not appear to impact biopsy results. CLINICAL IMPACT. Understanding and correctly applying reported statistics contribute to appropriate interpretation of the abundant literature on this topic and optimization of care for patients with diskitis-osteomyelitis.


Assuntos
Discite , Osteomielite , Humanos , Discite/tratamento farmacológico , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Biópsia , Osteomielite/microbiologia , Osso e Ossos/patologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa