Screw versus suture button in treatment of syndesmosis instability: Comparison using weightbearing CT scan.

BACKGROUND: The superiority of screw or suture button fixation for syndesmotic instability remains debatable. Our aim is to compare radiographic outcomes of screw and suture button fixation of syndesmotic instability using weight bearing CT scan (WBCT). METHODS: Twenty patients with fixation of unilateral syndesmotic instability were recruited and divided among two groups (screw = 10, suture button = 10). All patients had WBCT of both ankles ≥12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In suture button group, injured side measurements were significantly different from normal side for syndesmotic area (P = 0.003), fibular rotation (P = 0.004), anterior difference (P = 0.025) and direct anterior difference (P = 0.035). In screw group, syndesmotic area was the only significantly different measurement (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: While both screw and suture button didn't completely restore the syndesmotic area as compared to the contralateral uninjured ankle, external malrotation of the fibula was uniquely associated with suture button fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective Cohort Study.

The arthroscopic syndesmotic assessment tool can differentiate between stable and unstable ankle syndesmoses.

PURPOSE: Patients with stable isolated injuries of the ankle syndesmosis can be treated conservatively, while unstable injuries require surgical stabilisation. Although evaluating syndesmotic injuries using ankle arthroscopy is becoming more popular, differentiating between stable and unstable syndesmoses remains a topic of on-going debate in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to quantify the degree of displacement of the ankle syndesmosis using arthroscopic measurements. The hypothesis was that ankle arthroscopy by measuring multiplanar fibular motion can determine syndesmotic instability. METHODS: Arthroscopic assessment of the ankle syndesmosis was performed on 22 fresh above knee cadaveric specimens, first with all syndesmotic and ankle ligaments intact and subsequently with sequential sectioning of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, the interosseous ligament, the posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, and deltoid ligaments. In all scenarios, four loading conditions were considered under 100N of direct force: (1) unstressed, (2) a lateral hook test, (3) anterior to posterior (AP) translation test, and (4) posterior to anterior (PA) translation test. Anterior and posterior coronal plane tibiofibular translation, as well as AP and PA sagittal plane translation, were arthroscopically measured. RESULTS: As additional ligaments of the syndesmosis were transected, all arthroscopic multiplanar translation measurements increased (p values ranging from p < 0.001 to p = 0.007). The following equation of multiplanar fibular motion relative to the tibia measured in millimeters: 0.76*AP sagittal translation + 0.82*PA sagittal translation + 1.17*anterior third coronal plane translation-0.20*posterior third coronal plane translation, referred to as the Arthroscopic Syndesmotic Assessment tool, was generated from our data. According to our results, an Arthroscopic Syndesmotic Assessment value equal or greater than 3.1 mm indicated an unstable syndesmosis. CONCLUSIONS: This tool provides a more reliable opportunity in determining the presence of syndesmotic instability and can help providers decide whether syndesmosis injuries should be treated conservatively or operatively stabilized. The long-term usefulness of the tool will rest on whether an unstable syndesmosis correlates with acute or chronic clinical symptoms.

Hallux saltans due to stenosing tenosynovitis of flexor hallucis longus: dynamic sonography and arthroscopic findings.

Triggering of the toes is rare, with isolated cases reported in the literature involving predominantly the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon, a condition known as "hallux saltans" (HS). We report the dynamic sonographic findings of a 42-year-old female with a 2-month history of ankle pain and triggering of right hallux, consistent with HS. Sonography demonstrated tenosynovitis and focal thickening of FHL at the level of hindfoot, with a fibrous band adjacent to the tendon. Dynamic ultrasound showed triggering and snapping of FHL tendon during hallux flexion and extension, respectively. We present comprehensive documentation of this rare entity, including sonographic still images and cine clips, as well as correlation with arthroscopic surgical findings.

The added value of cross-sectional imaging in the detection of additional radiographically occult fractures in the setting of a Chopart fracture.

PURPOSE: Radiography has a low sensitivity for the detection of fractures related to the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid articulations, also known as Chopart fractures. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of radiographs for detecting additional foot and ankle fractures related to Chopart fracture using CT or MRI as the reference standard. METHOD: We performed an IRB-approved, retrospective review of radiology reports between 2010 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were (1) diagnosis of a Chopart fracture and (2) at least one radiograph and subsequent cross-sectional imaging (CT or MR). CT or MRI was considered the diagnostic reference standard. Results were stratified by the energy of trauma and by type of radiograph performed (weight-bearing (WB) versus non-WB). RESULTS: One hundred eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The calcaneocuboid articulation was the most commonly involved type of Chopart fracture, seen in 75% of cases (81/108). Chopart fractures were detected on the initial radiographs in 67.6% of cases (73/108). Additional fractures of the ankle and midfoot were diagnosed in 34.2% of cases (37/108), with 56.7% (21/37) of these cases having at least one additional fracture seen on CT or MRI that was not seen on the initial radiographs, with fractures of the midfoot most often missed. In 56.7% (17/30) patients whose radiographs detected Chopart fractures, at least one additional fracture was missed; 30% of them demonstrated intra-articular extension and 56.7% were considered displaced. High-energy trauma was related to higher incidence of additional fractures. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of radiographs to detect additional fractures between high versus low-energy trauma (p = 0.3) and WB versus non-WB radiographs (p = 0.5). Most patients were treated nonoperatively (56.5%, 61/108), with surgical intervention more frequent in patients with a high energy of trauma (51.7% versus 33.3%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the setting of a Chopart fracture, CT or MRI can add significant value in the detection of additional ankle or midfoot fractures, irrespective of the energy of trauma. Since additional fractures can have important management implications, CT or MRI should be considered as part of the standard workup for all midfoot fractures.

Fusion Versus Joint-Sparing Reconstruction for Patients With Flexible Flatfoot.

AIMS: Passively correctible, adult-acquired flatfoot deformities (AAFD) are treated with joint-sparing procedures. Questions remain as to the efficacy of such procedures when clinical deformities are severe. In severe deformities, a primary fusion may lead to predictable outcomes, but risks nonunion. We evaluated pre- and postsurgical flexible AAFD patients undergoing joint-sparing or fusion procedures, comparing reoperation and complication rates. METHODS: We identified patients with flexible AAFD between January 1, 2001 and 2016. Exclusion criteria were incomplete medical record, rigid AAFD, and prior flatfoot surgery. Patient demographics, pre- and postsurgical radiographic measurements, surgery performed, and postoperative complications were evaluated by bivariate analysis, comparing joint-sparing versus fusion procedures. RESULTS: Of 239 patients (255 feet) (mean follow-up 62 ± 50 months), 209 (87%) underwent joint-sparing reconstructions, 30 (12.6%) underwent fusions. Fifty-four (24.1%) feet underwent joint-sparing reconstruction with reoperation versus 11 (35.5%) in fusion patients (P = .17). Radiographic improvement in talonavicular angle, talar first-metatarsal (anteroposterior view), and Meary's angle was higher in fusion patients (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .003, respectively). DISCUSSION: More nonunion reoperations among fusion patients were offset by reoperations in joint-sparing patients. Fusion uniquely corrected Meary's angle. Nonunion is of less concern for joint-sparing versus fusion for patients with severe flexible AAFD. Degree of deformity versus advantage of joint motion should improve decision making. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Retrospective case series.

Isolated Intermetatarsal Ligament Release as Primary Operative Management for Morton's Neuroma: Short-term Results.

BACKGROUND: Although the precise pathoetiology of Morton's neuroma remains unclear, chronic nerve entrapment from the overlying intermetatarsal ligament (IML) may play a role. Traditional operative management entails neuroma excision but risks unpredictable formation of stump neuroma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records were examined for adult patients who failed at least 3 months of conservative treatment for symptomatic and recalcitrant Morton's neuroma and who then underwent isolated IML decompression without neuroma resection. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients underwent isolated IML decompression for Morton's neuroma with an average follow-up of 13.5 months. Visual Analog Pain Scale averaged 6.4 ± 1.8 (4-9) preoperatively and decreased to an average of 2 ± 2.1 (0-7) at final follow-up (P = .002). All patients reported significant improvement. CONCLUSION: Isolated IML release of chronically symptomatic Morton's neuroma shows promising short-term results regarding pain relief, with no demonstrated risk of recurrent neuroma formation, permanent numbness, or postoperative symptom exacerbation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Case series.

Minimally Invasive Chevron-Akin for Correction of Moderate and Severe Hallux Valgus Deformities: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive chevron-Akin (MICA) technique has already demonstrated efficacy compared with other known surgical treatments for mild to moderate hallux valgus (HV). MICA combines percutaneous osteotomies with the benefits of modern, rigid internal fixation. The aim of study was to evaluate the radiographic parameters, clinical improvement, and potential complications in moderate to severe HV cases, operated using the MICA technique. METHODS: Retrospective study including 70 feet with HV operated using the MICA technique. The AOFAS hallux MTP-IP score and radiographics for HV evaluation were applied preoperatively, and after 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of follow-up. The following radiographic parameters were measured: metatarsophalangeal hallux valgus angle (HVA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), interphalangeal angle (IPA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA). RESULTS: The average preoperative VAS pain score was 8.2 ± 1.5, which improved to 1.2 ± 2.2 at 24 months. The mean preoperative IMA was 14.8 ± 3.6 degrees compared with a mean of 7.5 ± 2.1 degrees (P < .01) at 24 months. The preoperative HVA value averaged 30.4 ± 9.8 degrees and at 6 months postoperatively 11.1 ± 6.8 degrees (P < .01), which remained stable until measured at 24 months. The mean preoperative DMAA was 16.3 ± 8.6 degrees and at the 6-month follow-up was 7.8 ± 5.4 degrees (P < .01). The mean preoperative IPA was 7.63 ± 4.4 degrees compared with a mean of 6.28 ± 3.5 degrees (P > .05) at 24 months. Complications included painful hardware (14.28%), neuropathic pain (2.85%), and loss of correction (4.28%). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective review from a single center, we found the MICA technique to be an effective procedure for correcting moderate to severe HV, with a low rate of recurrence and an acceptable rate of complications. Patients undergoing the surgical procedure in our series showed a significant reduction in radiographic parameters and a significant improvement in clinical scores, maintaining these results over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.

Nonoperative treatment of an os peroneum fracture in a high-level athlete: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The os peroneum is a sesamoid bone in the peroneus longus tendon. Fractures of the os peroneum are rare. Some authors recommend surgery for active patients. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 41-year-old male professional tennis coach sustained a minimally displaced fracture of the os peroneum. He was treated with restricted weightbearing for 2 weeks, followed by physical therapy and gradual return to activities. He returned to tennis 8 weeks after injury. Followup 7 years after the injury showed he had full strength, full motion, and a radiographically healed os peroneum. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score was 100 and Ankle Activity Score and Tegner Activity Level Scale were unchanged from those before injury. LITERATURE REVIEW: Fracture of the os peroneum is a rare injury and treatment recommendations are based largely on very small series and case reports. Proposed treatment strategies for fracture of the os peroneum include nonoperative treatment, fixation of the fracture, excision of the bone with direct repair of the tendon, and tenodesis of the peroneus longus to the peroneus brevis. PURPOSES AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although some surgeons suggest fracture of the os peroneum should be treated operatively in active patients, this case shows nonoperative treatment allowed pain-free return to activities in a high-level athlete with a minimally-displaced fracture.

Arthroscopic characterization of syndesmotic instability in the coronal plane: Exactly what measurement matters?

BACKGROUND: Although ankle arthroscopy is increasingly used to diagnose syndesmotic instability, precisely where in the incisura one should measure potential changes in tibiofibular space or how much tibiofibular space is indicative of instability, however, remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine where within the incisura one should assess coronal plane syndesmotic instability and what degree of tibiofibular space correlates with instability in purely ligamentous syndesmotic injuries under condition of lateral hook stress test (LHT) assessment. METHODS: Ankle arthroscopy was performed on 22 cadaveric specimens, first with intact ankle ligaments and then after sequential sectioning of the syndesmotic and deltoid ligaments. At each step, a 100N lateral hook test was applied through a lateral incision 5 cm proximal to the ankle joint and the coronal plane tibiofibular space in the stressed and unstressed states were measured at both anterior and posterior third of the distal tibiofibular joint, using calibrated probes ranging from 0.1 to 6.0 mm, in 0.1 mm of increments. The anterior and posterior points of measurements were defined as the junction between the anterior and middle third, and junction between posterior and middle third of the incisura, respectively. RESULTS: Anterior third tibiofibular space measurements did not correlate significantly with the degree of syndesmotic instability after transection of the ligaments, neither before nor after applying LHT at all the three groups of different sequences of ligament transection (P range 0.085-0.237). In contrast, posterior third tibiofibular space measurements correlated significantly with the degree of syndesmotic instability after transection of the ligaments, both with and without applying stress in all the groups of different ligament transection (P range <0.001-0.015). Stressed tibiofibular space measurements of the posterior third showed higher sensitivity and specificity when compared to the stressed anterior third measurements. Using 2.7 mm as a cut off for posterior third stressed measurements has both sensitivity and specificity about 70 %. CONCLUSION: Syndesmotic ligament injury results in coronal plane instability of the distal tibiofibular articulation that is readily identified arthroscopically with LHT when measured in the posterior third of the incisura. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When applying LHT, tibiofibular space measurement for coronal plane instability along the anterior third of the incisura is less sensitive for identifying syndesmotic instability and may miss this diagnosis especially when subtle.

Factors associated with adverse events after distal tibiofibular syndesmosis fixation.

PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS: Factors associated with adverse outcomes following surgery for syndesmotic instability with associated closed fibula fracture are incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the pathoetiology and incidence of adverse events after stabilization of syndesmotic instability. In addition, we aimed to identify any patient or surgeon related factors that might be associated with unanticipated outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2000 and May 2015, a total of 849 adult patients who were surgically treated with either screw or suture button fixation for syndesmotic instability with associated fibula fracture without open wound were identified and retrospectively evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with any postoperative complication or unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: Within one year after surgery, 10.7% (91 patients) suffered an infectious complication and 22.0% (187 patients) underwent unplanned reoperation. Factors associated with infectious complications were increased duration of hospital admission (OR: 1.08, p = .014), use of an external fixator device before ORIF (OR: 5.19 p < .001), peripheral vascular disease (OR: 4.33, p = .008), and osteoporosis (OR: 2.71, p = .022). For unplanned hardware removal specifically, patients' BMI below 30 was an associated risk factor. (OR: 1.50, p = .010). CONCLUSION: Certain patient groups have an increased risk of adverse events following the use of current surgical fixation methods for stabilizing the syndesmosis. Patients undergoing surgery for syndesmotic instability with associated fibula fracture without open wound should be counseled that up to 1 in 10 suffer an infectious complication and that 1 in 5 require unplanned hardware removal.

Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding Adverse Events in Lower Leg, Ankle, and Foot Orthopaedic Surgery with and without Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is insufficient knowledge about the benefits of anticoagulant use for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its inherent risk of bleeding adverse events in patients undergoing surgery distal to the knee. METHODS: The study included patients who had undergone an orthopaedic procedure distal to the tibial articular surface when they were 18 years of age or older. Using retrospective information from a tertiary care referral center, we compared patient demographics, clinical findings, diagnostic reports, procedures performed, and the rate of symptomatic VTE and bleeding adverse events between patients who had and those who had not received anticoagulant prophylaxis. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias due to prophylactic treatment allocation. RESULTS: A total of 5,286 patients who had received anticoagulant prophylaxis for below-the-knee surgery were successfully matched with 5,286 patients who had not received anticoagulant prophylaxis for such surgery. After propensity score matching, the standardized difference between the groups was <0.1 for all baseline characteristics, indicating a negligible difference between the groups. Patients who received anticoagulant prophylaxis had a significantly lower risk of developing a VTE compared with patients who did not (39 patients [0.7%] versus 99 patients [1.9%]), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.56; p < 0.001). In contradistinction, patients who received anticoagulant prophylaxis had a significantly higher risk of developing a bleeding adverse event than those who did not (115 [2.2%] versus 55 [1.0%]; OR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.55 to 3.09]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant prophylaxis reduced the risk of VTE after surgery distal to the tibial articular surface by 3-fold but resulted in a concomitant 2-fold increase in the risk of a bleeding adverse event. Large-scale, prospective studies are necessary to better understand the true incidence of such events, associated patient-specific risk factors, efficacy of various thromboprophylactic regimens, and patient-reported implications of such events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Opioid Consumption Rate Following Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The rapid increase in the consumption of prescription opioids has become one of the leading medical, economic, and sociological burdens in North America. In the United States, orthopedic surgery is the fourth leading specialty in the number of opioids prescribed, and the largest among all operative specialties. There is insufficient evidence to guide surgeons about appropriate opioid prescription amounts after orthopedic foot and ankle (F&A) procedures. The aim of this study was to determine the opioid consumption rate after foot and ankle procedures and identify risk factors associated with higher use. METHODS: A total of 535 patients who underwent foot and/or ankle surgery between August 2016 and March 2018 were included in the study. Each patient received a preoperative discussion about postoperative pain and expectations alongside a standardized handout. At the 2-week postoperative visit, the patients self-reported the amount of consumed opioids. Prescription details, number of opioid pills consumed, refill requests, pain-issue-related telephone calls, and additional physician/emergency department visits were documented. Patient demographics, comorbidities, use of regional anesthesia, hospitalization, surgery type/severity, and preoperative opioid use were collected. A total of 244 patients had a sufficiently complete data set for inclusion in the final cohort. Subjects had a mean age of 50 years (±16.3) and a body mass index (BMI) of 29 (±6.1). Sixty-six (27%) patients underwent a soft tissue procedure alone and 178 (73%) underwent a bony procedure. RESULTS: On average, patients consumed 46.6% of the prescribed pills following a bony procedure and 42.4% after a soft tissue procedure, which resulted in a total of 4496 leftover pills. BMI, procedure type (bony vs soft tissue)/severity, and number of opioids prescribed were positively correlated with elevated consumption rates (P = .008, P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: BMI, procedure type, and higher initial pill dispensation correlated with a larger number of consumed pills during the postoperative period. On average, patients took 42.4% of the prescribed opioid after soft tissue procedures and 46.6% after bony procedures, resulting in a significant number of unused pills. Future guidelines are necessary to improve postoperative pain management to prevent narcotic overprescription and minimize the downstream potential for unprescribed community opioid access. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case series, analytic.