Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy that results from granulomatous inflammation of the myocardium and may present with high-grade conduction disease, ventricular arrhythmias, and right or left ventricular dysfunction. Over the past several decades, the prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis has increased. Definitive histological confirmation is often not possible, so clinicians frequently face uncertainty about the accuracy of diagnosis. Hence, the likelihood of cardiac sarcoidosis should be thought of as a continuum (definite, highly probable, probable, possible, low probability, unlikely) rather than in a binary fashion. Treatment should be initiated in individuals with clinical manifestations and active inflammation in a tiered approach, with corticosteroids as first-line treatment. The lack of randomized clinical trials in cardiac sarcoidosis has led to treatment decisions based on cohort studies and consensus opinions, with substantial variation observed across centers. This scientific statement is intended to guide clinical practice and to facilitate management conformity by providing a framework for the diagnosis and management of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Sarcoidosis.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of major concern to patients with sarcoidosis. HRQoL impairment is the most common reason to treat the disease. Advances in patient-reported outcome (PRO) methodology offer the promise to use these instruments to follow quality of life in individual patients with sarcoidosis over time. Several HRQoL issues will be highlighted including their clinical importance, common causes in patients with sarcoidosis, the construction and use of PROs in clinical sarcoidosis trials, methods to adapt PROs to monitor HRQoL in individual patients with sarcoidosis, and the approach to improving HRQoL in this disease.

Clinical Pharmacology in Sarcoidosis: How to Use and Monitor Sarcoidosis Medications.

When sarcoidosis needs treatment, pharmacotherapy is usually required. Although glucocorticoids work reliably and relatively quickly for sarcoidosis, these drugs are associated with numerous significant side effects. Such side effects are common in sarcoidosis patients, as the disease frequently has a chronic course and glucocorticoid treatment courses are often prolonged. For these reasons, corticosteroid-sparing and corticosteroid-replacing therapies are often required for sarcoidosis. Unfortunately, many healthcare providers who care for sarcoidosis patients are not familiar with the use of these agents. In this manuscript, we provide a review of the pharmacotherapy of sarcoidosis. We discuss the mechanism of action, dosing, side-effect profile, approach to monitoring and patient counselling concerning glucocorticoids, and the common alternative drugs recommended for use in the recent European Respiratory Society (Lausanne, Switzerland) Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines. We also discuss the use of these agents in special situations including hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, pregnancy, breastfeeding, vaccination, and drug-drug interactions. It is hoped that this manuscript will provide valuable practical guidance to clinicians who care for sarcoidosis patients.

A Multichannel CT and Radiomics-Guided CNN-ViT (RadCT-CNNViT) Ensemble Network for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis.

Pulmonary sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a variable presentation and prognosis. The early accurate detection of pulmonary sarcoidosis may prevent progression to pulmonary fibrosis, a serious and potentially life-threatening form of the disease. However, the lack of a gold-standard diagnostic test and specific radiographic findings poses challenges in diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis. Chest computed tomography (CT) imaging is commonly used but requires expert, chest-trained radiologists to differentiate pulmonary sarcoidosis from lung malignancies, infections, and other ILDs. In this work, we develop a multichannel, CT and radiomics-guided ensemble network (RadCT-CNNViT) with visual explainability for pulmonary sarcoidosis vs. lung cancer (LCa) classification using chest CT images. We leverage CT and hand-crafted radiomics features as input channels, and a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) and vision transformer (ViT) ensemble network for feature extraction and fusion before a classification head. The 3D CNN sub-network captures the localized spatial information of lesions, while the ViT sub-network captures long-range, global dependencies between features. Through multichannel input and feature fusion, our model achieves the highest performance with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and combined AUC of 0.93 ± 0.04, 0.94 ± 0.04, 0.93 ± 0.08, 0.95 ± 0.05, 0.94 ± 0.04, and 0.97, respectively, in a five-fold cross-validation study with pulmonary sarcoidosis (n = 126) and LCa (n = 93) cases. A detailed ablation study showing the impact of CNN + ViT compared to CNN or ViT alone, and CT + radiomics input, compared to CT or radiomics alone, is also presented in this work. Overall, the AI model developed in this work offers promising potential for triaging the pulmonary sarcoidosis patients for timely diagnosis and treatment from chest CT.

Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Score (SDS) system: Impact of race, sex, organ involvement and duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Score (SDS) system has been established for sarcoidosis patients based on the WASOG organ involvement criteria. We evaluated modifications of the SDS system to determine if they improved its the diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Biopsy-confirmed patients with sarcoidosis seen during a 7-month period at 9 sarcoidosis centers across the world. Patients with non-sarcoidosis seen at the same sites were served as control patients. Comparing the SDS-biopsy and SDS-clinical values of five groups: duration of symptoms prior to evaluation (≤1 years vs.>1 years, ≤2 years vs.>2 years), organ involvement (lung, eye, or cardiac), race, and sex. RESULTS: A total of 990 patients with sarcoidosis and 1011 controls were included in this study. The SDS-clinical was significantly more discriminating for those undergoing assessment with symptoms for more than one year (z-statistic=2.570, p = 0.0102) or two years (z-statistic=2.546, p = 0.0109). However, the addition of two points for both >1 years and >2 years since onset of symptoms did not increase sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis with the SDS system. The SDS-clinical cut-off for patients with ocular or cardiac disease was two points higher than that for lung disease. There was no difference in SDS-clinical or biopsy AUC values based on gender or race. CONCLUSIONS: The longer the duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis, the more likely the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was correct. For patients presenting with ocular or cardiac symptoms, evidence of multi-organ involved can improve the diagnostic accuracy of the SDS-clinical.

Tratamiento de la sarcoidosis / Sarcoidosis treatment

OBJETIVOS: 1. Reconocer las indicaciones de tratamiento de la sarcoidosis pulmonar 2. Describir el manejo farmacológico de la sarcoidosis pulmonar. 3. Identificar las indicaciones de tratamiento para la sarcoidosis extra pulmonar 4. Describir medicamentos diferentes a los cortico esteroides disponibles para el manejo de la sarcoidosis. 5. Identificar el momento en que medicamentos diferentes a los esteroides, deben ser considerados para el manejo de la sarcoidosis.