Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for the maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies.

BACKGROUND: Lifelong HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) has prompted an interest in two-drug regimens to minimise cumulative drug exposure and toxicities. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of dolutegravir and rilpivirine suggest potential compatibility and effectiveness as a two-drug regimen. We aimed to investigate this two-drug regimen in a phase 3 study. METHODS: We identically designed SWORD-1 and SWORD-2, which were open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority studies in 12 countries evaluating efficacy and safety of once-daily dolutegravir 50 mg plus rilpivirine 25 mg versus current ART regimen (CAR). We included participants aged 18 years or older who were on first or second ART with stable plasma HIV-1 RNA (viral load <50 copies per mL) for 6 months or longer at screening. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) with stratification by third-agent class, age, and planned participation in a bone mineral density substudy. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with viral load lower than 50 copies per mL at week 48 among those individuals who received one or more doses of study medication. Investigators monitored adverse events to assess safety. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02429791 (SWORD-1) and NCT02422797 (SWORD-2). FINDINGS: We screened for participants from April 14, 2015, to Oct 15, 2015, for SWORD-1 and from April 21, 2015, to Sept 25, 2015, for SWORD-2. We randomly assigned 516 participants to dolutegravir-rilpivirine and 512 to continue with CAR. At week 48 (last patient visit was Nov 22, 2016), in the pooled analysis of the intention-to-treat population, 95% of participants had viral loads lower than 50 copies per mL in each group (486 of 513 in the dolutegravir-rilpivirine group vs 485 of 511 in the CAR group), with an adjusted treatment difference of -0·2% (95% CI -3·0 to 2·5) and showed non-inferiority with a predefined margin of -8%. 395 (77%) of 513 participants in the dolutegravir-rilpivirine group and 364 (71%) of 511 participants in the CAR group reported adverse events. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (49 [10%] for dolutegravir-rilpivirine vs 50 [10%] for CAR) and headache (41 [8%] vs 23 [5%]). More participants taking dolutegravir-rilpivirine (17 [3%]) reported adverse events leading to withdrawal than did participants taking CAR (three [<1%]). INTERPRETATION: Dolutegravir-rilpivirine was non-inferior to CAR over 48 weeks in participants with HIV suppression and showed a safety profile consistent with its components. Results support the use of this two-drug regimen to maintain HIV suppression. FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV.

Brief Report: Evaluation of Inflammation and Atherogenesis Biomarkers Through 148 Weeks Postswitch to Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine in SWORD-1/SWORD-2.

BACKGROUND: Switching to the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir + rilpivirine demonstrated noninferiority vs continuing a 3-drug or 4-drug current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) at week 48 and maintained high levels of virologic suppression to week 148 in the SWORD studies. We report inflammation and atherogenesis biomarkers postswitch to dolutegravir + rilpivirine. SETTING: SWORD-1: 65 centers, 13 countries; SWORD-2: 60 centers, 11 countries. METHODS: Virologically suppressed adults were randomized to switch to dolutegravir + rilpivirine (early-switch group; n = 513) or continue CAR (n = 511). Participants continuing CAR switched to dolutegravir + rilpivirine at week 52 (late-switch group; n = 477). Biomarkers were evaluated from Baseline to week 48 for dolutegravir + rilpivirine and CAR and noncomparatively for dolutegravir + rilpivirine postswitch through 148 weeks (early-switch) and 96 weeks (late-switch). RESULTS: Through week 48, changes in biomarkers did not significantly differ between dolutegravir + rilpivirine and CAR groups, except for increases in soluble CD14 and decreases in fatty acid-binding protein-2, which favored dolutegravir + rilpivirine. For inflammation biomarkers through week 148, there was no marked change in C-reactive protein, inconsistent changes in soluble CD14 and interleukin-6, and increases in soluble CD163. For atherogenesis biomarkers through week 148, fatty acid-binding protein-2 and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 showed sustained reductions; D-dimer showed inconsistent increases between early-switch vs late-switch groups. CONCLUSIONS: No consistent pattern of change in biomarkers postswitch to dolutegravir + rilpivirine was observed through weeks 48 and 148 in SWORD-1/SWORD-2, suggesting no association of increased inflammation or atherogenesis with the 2-drug regimen while maintaining virologic suppression.

Brief Report: Durable Suppression and Low Rate of Virologic Failure 3 Years After Switch to Dolutegravir + Rilpivirine 2-Drug Regimen: 148-Week Results From the SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: The SWORD trials showed that in participants who achieved virologic suppression taking 3-drug or 4-drug regimens, switching to the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir plus rilpivirine was noninferior in maintaining HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at the week 48 primary endpoint. We present pooled week 148 analysis results from both studies. SETTING: SWORD-1: 65 centers, 13 countries; SWORD-2: 60 centers, 11 countries. METHODS: SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 are identical, open-label, phase III studies. Participants with screening HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for ≥6 months; no prior virologic failure; and no documented resistance-associated major protease inhibitor, integrase inhibitor, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), or non-NRTI mutations or integrase resistance-associated substitution R263K were randomly assigned 1:1 to switch to once-daily dolutegravir 50 mg plus rilpivirine 25 mg on day 1 (early-switch group) or to continue their current antiretroviral regimen and, if virologically suppressed at week 48, switch to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine at week 52 (late-switch group) until week 148. RESULTS: Using snapshot algorithm at week 148, 432 of 513 (84%) early-switch participants (148 weeks of exposure) and 428 of 477 (90%) late-switch participants (96 weeks of exposure) maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Eleven participants (1%) on dolutegravir plus rilpivirine met the confirmed virologic withdrawal criterion through week 148 (early-switch group, n = 8; late-switch group, n = 3) with no integrase resistance identified. Non-NRTI resistance-associated mutations were identified in 6 participants (<1%). Drug-related adverse events (grades 2-4) were observed in 31 (6%) early-switch and 16 (3%) late-switch participants. Significant improvements in bone biomarkers were observed. Significant improvements were observed in renal biomarkers in participants taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate pre-switch. CONCLUSION: Switching to the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir plus rilpivirine maintained virologic suppression for a high proportion of participants through 3 years, with low rates of virologic failure and a well-tolerated safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: 100-week data from the randomised, open-label, phase 3 SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies.

BACKGROUND: Primary analyses of the SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 trials at 48 weeks showed that switching to a two-drug regimen of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine was non-inferior to continuing a standard three-drug or four-drug antiretroviral regimen for maintenance of virological suppression in people with HIV-1. Here, we present efficacy and safety data from the 100-week analysis of the trials. METHODS: SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 are identically designed, randomised, open-label phase 3 studies at 65 centres in 13 countries and 60 centres in 11 countries, respectively. Adults aged 18 years or older who were on a standard three-drug or four-drug antiretroviral therapy (ART) and had had fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL of plasma for at least 6 months were randomly assigned (1:1) to 50 mg dolutegravir plus 25 mg rilpivirine orally once daily (early-switch group) or to continue their standard regimen for 52 weeks before switching to the dolutegravir plus rilpivirine combination (ie, the late-switch group). In this analysis of week 100 data, the efficacy endpoint of interest was the proportion of participants with fewer than 50 copies of HIV-1 RNA per mL of plasma (per the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm). This outcome was assessed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Data were analysed after the last participant completed week 100 (Sept 15, 2017) and verified through the data cutoff (Nov 21, 2017). SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02429791 and NCT02422797, respectively. FINDINGS: 513 participants were randomly assigned to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine (ie, the early-switch group) and 511 to continue their standard ART regimen, 477 of whom then switched to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine at week 52 (ie, the late-switch group). At week 100, 456 (89% [95% CI 86-92]) of 513 participants in the early-switch group and 444 (93% [91-95]) of 477 in the late-switch group had fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 103 (20%) participants in the early-switch group and 58 (12%) in the late-switch group. The most common drug-related adverse events were headache (11 participants in the early-switch group [2%] vs eight [2%] in the late-switch group) and nausea (eight [2%] vs five [1%]). INTERPRETATION: The combination of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine sustained virological suppression of HIV-1, was associated with a low frequency of virological failure, and had a favourable safety profile, which support its use as a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing and protease inhibitor-sparing alternative to three-drug regimens that reduces overall exposure to ART. FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Pharmaceutica.

Switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate combination to dolutegravir with rilpivirine improves parameters of bone health.

OBJECTIVE: Bone mineral density (BMD) loss, a risk factor for osteoporosis, has been attributed to HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART), including regimens containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. DESIGN: Study 202094 is an open-label, parallel-group, sub-study of the phase III SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02478632). METHODS: HIV-1-infected adults with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml who received ART containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for at least 6 months were randomized to receive dolutegravir with rilpivirine or continue current ART regimen. Total hip and lumbar spine BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in total hip BMD. RESULTS: DXA scans were evaluable for 81 participants at baseline and Week 48. Percentage increase in total hip BMD was significantly greater in participants who switched to dolutegravir with rilpivirine (1.34%) compared with participants who continued current ART (0.05%; treatment difference, +1.29%; 95% CI 0.27-2.31; P = 0.014). Lumbar spine BMD significantly increased in the dolutegravir with rilpivirine group by 1.46% (95% CI 0.65-2.28) compared with 0.15% (95% CI -0.79 to 1.09) in the current ART group (treatment difference, 1.32; 95% CI 0.07-2.57; P = 0.039). Participants in the dolutegravir with rilpivirine group experienced significantly greater reductions in bone formation and resorption biomarkers compared with the current ART group. CONCLUSION: Switch to dolutegravir with rilpivirine was associated with significant improvement in BMD and bone turnover markers compared with tenofovir-based three-drug regimens, providing a robust option for preserving bone health while continuing suppressive ART.

Patient and caregiver perspective on pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis and newly developed symptom questionnaires*.

OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE), a rare chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus, is predominantly observed in children and is primarily manifested with feeding difficulties. To our knowledge, no self- or caregiver-reported questionnaires are available to assess pediatric EE symptoms and their impact as reported directly by children or their parents/caregivers. The objectives of this study were to characterize the symptoms and impact of EE among children as reported by patients and parents/caregivers and to assess the content validity of two newly developed pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis symptom questionnaires, one parent/caregiver-reported questionnaire for ages 2-7 years and one child-reported questionnaire for ages 8-17 years. The questionnaires were developed based on a review of the literature and clinical expert consultation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study involving one-on-one interviews with patients and caregivers was conducted at an American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders conference. Parents of patients aged 2-7 years (n = 12) and patients aged 8-17 years (n = 16) were first asked about symptoms and their impact on everyday life, using open-ended questions. Participants then completed the appropriate symptom questionnaire and were asked to provide feedback on the relevance, comprehensiveness, and clarity of each item and other questionnaire issues (time to complete, length, format, etc.). All reported symptoms were enumerated, and the feedback on the symptom questionnaires was analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: The majority of study participants were white (82%) and male (86%). The most frequently reported symptoms of 2-7-year olds were vomiting (92%), "reflux" (50%), dysphagia (25%), abdominal pain (25%), and trouble sleeping (25%). The 8-17-year group reported abdominal pain (56%), vomiting (31%), throat pain (25%), diarrhea (25%), and food getting stuck (25%). Symptoms and treatment were reported to have a major impact on daily life, particularly on school, after-school activities and social events, feeling frustrated regarding symptoms and treatment, and feeling "different". Overall, participants thought that the questionnaires were clear, relevant, and appropriate for symptom assessment. LIMITATION: This study was based on a small and convenient sample of participants attending an EE conference and hence may not be representative of the general EE patient population. CONCLUSIONS: EE is associated with a range of symptoms that vary in terms of the type, frequency and severity across and within patients. The results provide adequate support for the content validity of the self- and caregiver-reported versions of the symptom-specific questionnaires. Minor modifications were made based on the feedback obtained. A psychometric evaluation of the revised questionnaires is needed next to assess the construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the measures.