Phase 1 study of narnatumab, an anti-RON receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Purpose Macrophage-stimulating 1-receptor (RON) is expressed on macrophages, epithelial cells, and a variety of tumors. Narnatumab (IMC-RON8; LY3012219) is a neutralizing monoclonal antibody that blocks RON binding to its ligand, macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP). This study assessed safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of narnatumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods Narnatumab was administered intravenously weekly at 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg or every 2 weeks at 15, 20, 30, or 40 mg/kg in 4-week cycles. Results Thirty-nine patients were treated, and 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 hyponatremia, 5 mg/kg) was reported. The most common narnatumab-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (20.5%) and decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting (10.3% each). Except for 2 treatment-related grade 3 AEs (hyponatremia, hypokalemia), all treatment-related AEs were grade 1 or 2. Narnatumab had a short half-life (<7 days). After Cycle 2, no patients had concentrations above 140 µg/mL (concentration that demonstrated antitumor activity in animal models), except for 1 patient receiving 30 mg/kg biweekly. Eleven patients had a best response of stable disease, ranging from 6 weeks to 11 months. Despite only 1 DLT, due to suboptimal drug exposure, the dose was not escalated beyond 40 mg/kg biweekly. This decision was based on published data reporting that mRNA splice variants of RON are highly prevalent in tumors, accumulate in cytoplasm, and are not accessible by large-molecule monoclonal antibodies. Conclusions Narnatumab was well tolerated and showed limited antitumor activity with this dosing regimen.

Pharmacokinetics of Enarodustat in Non-Japanese and Japanese Healthy Subjects and in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis.

The pharmacokinetics of enarodustat were elucidated in healthy subjects and in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis in phase 1 studies conducted in the United States and Japan. In healthy non-Japanese and Japanese subjects, following single oral administration up to 400 mg, enarodustat was rapidly absorbed. Maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to infinity were dose-dependent, renal excretion of unchanged enarodustat was substantial (on average ≈45% of dose), and mean t1/2 of <10 hours indicated negligible accumulation with once-daily dosing. In general, with daily dosing (25, 50 mg), accumulation at steady-state was ≈1.5-fold (t1/2(eff) ≈15 hours), presumably due to a decrease in renal drug excretion which is not clinically relevant in patients with ESRD. In the single- and multiple-dose studies, plasma clearance (CL/F) was lower in healthy Japanese subjects. In non-Japanese patients with ESRD on hemodialysis, following once-daily dosing (2-15 mg), enarodustat was rapidly absorbed, steady-state maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the dosing interval were dose-dependent, and interindividual variability in the exposure parameters was low-to-moderate (coefficient of variation, 27%-39%). Steady-state CL/F was similar across doses, renal drug excretion was not significant (<10% of dose), mean t1/2 and t1/2(eff) were similar (overall, 8.97-11.6 hours), and accumulation was minimal (≈20%), demonstrating predictable pharmacokinetics. Japanese patients with ESRD on hemodialysis (15 mg, single dose) exhibited similar pharmacokinetics with mean t1/2 of 11.3 hours and low interindividual variability in the exposure parameters, albeit with lower CL/F versus non-Japanese patients. Body weight-adjusted clearance values were generally similar in non-Japanese and Japanese healthy subjects and also in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis.

Development and Application of a Mechanistic Population Modeling Approach to Describe Abemaciclib Pharmacokinetics.

Abemaciclib is an oral anticancer drug that inhibits cyclin dependent kinases 4 and 6 and is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A in the intestines and liver to active metabolites. The objectives were (1) to develop a mechanistic model to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the active moieties and investigate the effect of patient factors and (2) apply the model to dat from two phase III breast cancer trials of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy. To develop the model, data from seven phase I studies and two phase II studies including 421 patients with cancer and 65 healthy individuals were pooled for nonlinear mixed effects modeling. The PK was similar between patients and healthy subjects, and the effects of diarrhea, formulation, race, and patient covariates on exposure were negligible. Application of the model confirmed its predictive performance and that abemaciclib PK did not change when coadministered with endocrine therapy.

Abemaciclib in Combination with Single-Agent Options in Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase Ib Study.

Purpose: Abemaciclib, a dual inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, has demonstrated preclinical activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label phase Ib study was conducted to test safety, MTD, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of abemaciclib in combination with other therapies for treatment in patients with metastatic NSCLC.Patients and Methods: An initial dose escalation phase was used to determine the MTD of twice-daily oral abemaciclib (150, 200 mg) plus pemetrexed, gemcitabine, or ramucirumab, followed by an expansion phase for each drug combination. Pemetrexed and gemcitabine were administered according to label. The abemaciclib plus ramucirumab study examined two dosing schedules.Results: The three study parts enrolled 86 patients; all received ≥1 dose of combination therapy. Across arms, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue, diarrhea, neutropenia, decreased appetite, and nausea. The trial did not identify an abemaciclib MTD for the combination with pemetrexed or gemcitabine but did so for the combination of abemaciclib with days 1 and 8 ramucirumab (8 mg/kg). Plasma sample analysis showed that abemaciclib did not influence the pharmacokinetics of the combination agents and the combination agents did not affect abemaciclib exposure. The disease control rate was 57% for patients treated with abemaciclib-pemetrexed, 25% for abemaciclib-gemcitabine, and 54% for abemaciclib-ramucirumab. Median progression-free survival was 5.55, 1.58, and 4.83 months, respectively.Conclusions: Abemaciclib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when dosed on a continuous twice-daily schedule in combination with pemetrexed, gemcitabine, or ramucirumab. Abemaciclib exposures remained consistent with those observed in single-agent studies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5543-51. ©2018 AACR.

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Pemetrexed With or Without Cixutumumab (IMC-A12) as a First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor is deregulated in solid tumors. Cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the activity of type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor, was investigated in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin in the frontline setting. METHODS: In this open-label, phase II study, patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC and a performance status of 0 to 1 were randomized (1:1) to receive 20 mg/kg cixutumumab, 500 mg/m2 pemetrexed, and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin (cixutumumab [n = 87]) or pemetrexed and cisplatin (control [n = 85]). Eligible patients received pemetrexed-based maintenance therapy with cixutumumab (cixutumumab arm) or without it (control arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points assessed overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Exploratory correlative analyses were also performed. RESULTS: The mean age of the intent-to-treat population (n = 172) was 59 years (range 32-83). Median progression-free survival was 5.45 months with cixutumumab versus 5.22 months in the control (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.61; p = 0.44). Median overall survival was 11.33 months with cixutumumab versus 10.38 months in the control (hazard ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.36). Objective response rate did not differ between treatments (p = 0.338). Grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia occurred at a higher rate with cixutumumab than in the control (9.4% versus 1.2%). One death possibly related to cixutumumab occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy was not improved in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC when cixutumumab was added to pemetrexed/cisplatin. Combination therapy was well tolerated and no new safety concerns were reported.

The effect of AST-120 on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of losartan and losartan acid (E-3174) in healthy subjects.

AST-120 is an orally administered adsorbent used to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This was a randomized, open-label, 5-way crossover study to assess the effect of AST-120 on the pharmacokinetics of losartan and its active metabolite (E-3174) in healthy subjects. Losartan (100 mg) was administered alone under fasting (A) and fed (B) conditions, and results were compared when AST-120 (3 g thrice daily for 2 days) was administered 60 minutes after (C), 30 minutes prior to (D), and 30 minutes after (E) losartan. Plasma concentrations of losartan and E-3174 were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry detection. Under fed conditions, treatment C had no significant effect on the AUC(0-t) and Cmax of losartan and E-3174. Treatments D and E resulted in a marked decrease in Cmax of losartan and E-3174. Therefore, administration of AST-120 60 minutes after losartan under fed conditions may be preferred over other dosing regimens for CKD patients.

Phase 1 study of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 monoclonal antibody LY3022856/IMC-3C5 in patients with advanced and refractory solid tumors and advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Metastasis of solid tumors to regional lymph nodes is facilitated by tumor lymphangiogenesis, which is primarily mediated by the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR-3). We conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation (part A) study of the VEGFR-3 human immunoglobulin G subclass 1 monoclonal antibody LY3022856 in advanced solid tumors, followed by a colorectal cancer (CRC) expansion (part B). METHODS: Part A evaluated the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LY3022856 in patients treated intravenously at doses of 5-30 mg/kg weekly (qwk). Part B further evaluated tolerability in CRC patients treated with 30 mg/kg. Secondary objectives were pharmacokinetics, anti-tumor activity, and pharmacodynamics (exploratory). RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (23 in part A; 21 in part B) were treated; only one dose-limiting toxicity was observed at the lowest dose level. The MTD was not reached. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade included in ≥15 % of all patients were: nausea (41 %), fatigue (32 %), vomiting (30 %), decreased appetite (27 %), pyrexia (25 %), peripheral edema (23 %), and urinary tract infection (UTI, 20 %). The most common grade 3/4 TEAEs included UTI and small intestinal obstruction (7 % each). No radiographic responses were noted. Median progression-free survival in part B was 6.3 weeks (95 % confidence interval: 5.1, 14.4), and a best overall response of stable disease was observed in 4 CRC patients (19.0 %). CONCLUSIONS: LY3022856 was well tolerated up to a dose of 30 mg/kg qwk, but with minimal anti-tumor activity in CRC. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01288989.

An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase I Study of Anti-TYRP1 Monoclonal Antibody IMC-20D7S for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TYRP1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is specifically expressed in melanocytes and melanoma cells. Preclinical data suggest that mAbs targeting TYRP1 confer antimelanoma activity. IMC-20D7S is a recombinant human IgG1 mAb targeting TYRP1. Here, we report the first-in-human phase I/Ib trial of IMC-20D7S. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The primary objective of this study was to establish the safety profile and the MTD of IMC-20D7S. Patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after or during at least one line of treatment or for whom standard therapy was not indicated enrolled in this standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation, open-label study. IMC-20D7S was administered intravenously every 2 or 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. The most common adverse events were fatigue and constipation experienced by nine (33%) and eight (30%) patients, respectively. There were no serious adverse events related to treatment, no discontinuations of treatment due to adverse events, and no treatment-related deaths. Given the absence of dose-limiting toxicities, an MTD was not defined, but a provisional MTD was established at the 20 mg/kg every 2-week dose based on serum concentration and safety data. One patient experienced a complete response. A disease control rate, defined as stable disease or better, of 41% was observed. CONCLUSION: IMC-20D7S is well tolerated among patients with advanced melanoma with evidence of antitumor activity. Further investigation of this agent as monotherapy in selected patients or as part of combination regimens is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5204-10. ©2016 AACR.

Effect of repeated oral administrations of the oral adsorbent AST-120 on serum creatinine and other markers of renal function. A randomized controlled study in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: AST-120 is an orally administered adsorbent used in Japan for prolonging time to initiation of hemodialysis and improving uremic symptoms in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As AST-120 is suspected to reduce the progression of CKD by adsorbing renal toxins in the gastrointestinal tract, the objective of the current study was to determine whether binding of AST-120 to creatinine in the intestines could acutely alter creatinine balance, thereby limiting the utility of serum creatinine (sCr) as a measure of progression of renal function. Such information may be critical for the design of future studies to assess the efficacy of AST-120 in CKD patients. METHODS: Patients with CKD (n = 20) received oral doses of AST-120(3 g t.i.d.) and placebo in a two-way crossover study. Blood and urine were collected for determination of sCr, 24-hour urinary creatinine (UcrV), creatinine clearance (Ccr), and urea nitrogen clearance (URCL). Differences between treatments were assessed using an ANCOVA model. RESULTS: Following AST-120 and placebo treatments, mean sCr (1.73 and 1.79 mg/dl, respectively) and UcrV (1,264.73 and 1,286.05 mg) values were not significantly different. No significant differences were observed for Ccr and URCL. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that AST-120 has no acute impact on creatinine balance in patients with CKD. Consequently, sCr and other markers of renal function are acceptable measures for assessing changes in renal function following AST-120 treatment.