Earlier and more aggressive treatment with biologics may prevent relapses and further new organ involvement in Behçet's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Immunosuppressives (IS) are the choice of treatment for major organ involvement in Behçet's disease (BD). In this study, we aimed to investigate the relapse rate and new major organ development in BD under ISs during long-term follow-up. METHODS: The files of 1114 BD patients followed in Marmara University Behçet's Clinic were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with a follow-up less than 6 months were excluded. Conventional IS and biologic treatment courses were compared. 'Events under IS' were defined as a relapse of the same organ and/or new major organ development in patients receiving ISs. RESULTS: Among 806 patients included in the final analysis (male: 56%, age at diagnosis: 29 (23-35) years, median follow-up time: 68 (33-106) months). Major organ involvement was present in 232 (50.5%) patients at diagnosis, and 227 (49.5%) developed new major organ involvement during follow-up. Major organ involvement developed earlier in males (p = 0.012) and in patients with a first-degree relative history of BD (p = 0.066). ISs were given mostly for major organ involvement (86.8%, n = 440). Overall, 36% of the patients had a relapse or new major organ involvement under ISs (relapse: 30.9%, new major organ involvement: 11.6%.) 'Events under IS' (35.5% vs 20.8%, p = 0.004), and relapses (29.3% vs 13.9%, p = 0.001) were more common with conventional ISs compared to biologics. CONCLUSION: Any major event under ISs was less common with biologics compared to conventional ISs in patients with BD. These results suggest that earlier and more aggressive treatment may be an option in BD patients who had the highest risk for severe disease course.

Risk of tuberculosis is increased in Behçet's disease compared to other rheumatological disorders after anti-TNFα treatments: a case series and review of the literature

Background/aim: Tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-a) antagonists are extensively utilized in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases and also shown to be effective in Behçet's disease (BD) patients with major organ involvement. In this study, we aimed to re- evaluate the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) infection after anti-TNFa treatments and to reveal the risk of TB in BD. Methods: Data of patients who received anti-TNFa treatment between 2005 and 2018 were assessed retrospectively. Demographic features, TNF-a antagonist type/treatment time, tuberculosis skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON results, isoniazid prophylaxis status, and concomitant corticosteroid (CS) treatments were collected. Results: A total of 1277 (male/female = 597/680; median age = 49 years) patients were treated with TNF-a antagonist for a median of 33 months (Q1:12, Q3:62). Thirteen (1%) patients developed TB during the follow-up period. Within 13 TB-positive patients, 7 of them had pulmonary, and 7 had extrapulmonary TB. Although, the median time of (month) TNF-a antagonist treatment was higher in TB-positive patients than negative ones, the difference was not statistically significant (48 and 33 months, respectively, p = 0.47). Similarly, TB-positive patients were treated with CSs more than TB-negative patients (80% vs. 60%). Time from the initiation of TNF-a antagonist treatment to the diagnosis of TB had a median of 40 months (Q1-Q3: 22-56). There was a statistically significant increase of TB development in BD patients than non-BD patients after TNF-a antagonists (7.5% vs. 0.8%, respectively, p = 0.007). When we combined our patients with the other series from Turkey, among 12928 patients who received TNF-a antagonists, TB was positive in 12 (3.9%) of 305 BD patients compared to 112 (0.9%) of 12623 non-BD patients (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Our results suggest a higher frequency of TB infections in BD patients with TNF-a antagonists. As biologic agents are increasingly used for major organ involvement in current practice for BD, screening mechanisms should be carefully implemented.