A study of diverse clinical decision support rule authoring environments and requirements for integration.

BACKGROUND: Efficient rule authoring tools are critical to allow clinical Knowledge Engineers (KEs), Software Engineers (SEs), and Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to convert medical knowledge into machine executable clinical decision support rules. The goal of this analysis was to identify the critical success factors and challenges of a fully functioning Rule Authoring Environment (RAE) in order to define requirements for a scalable, comprehensive tool to manage enterprise level rules. METHODS: The authors evaluated RAEs in active use across Partners Healthcare, including enterprise wide, ambulatory only, and system specific tools, with a focus on rule editors for reminder and medication rules. We conducted meetings with users of these RAEs to discuss their general experience and perceived advantages and limitations of these tools. RESULTS: While the overall rule authoring process is similar across the 10 separate RAEs, the system capabilities and architecture vary widely. Most current RAEs limit the ability of the clinical decision support (CDS) interventions to be standardized, sharable, interoperable, and extensible. No existing system meets all requirements defined by knowledge management users. CONCLUSIONS: A successful, scalable, integrated rule authoring environment will need to support a number of key requirements and functions in the areas of knowledge representation, metadata, terminology, authoring collaboration, user interface, integration with electronic health record (EHR) systems, testing, and reporting.

Extending i2b2 into a framework for semantic abstraction of EHR to facilitate rapid development and portability of Health IT applications.

The wide gap between a care provider's conceptualization of electronic health record (EHR) and the structures for electronic health record (EHR) data storage and transmission, presents a multitude of obstacles for development of innovative Health IT applications. While developers model the EHR view of the clinicians at one end, they work with a different data view to construct health IT applications. Although there has been considerable progress to bridge this gap by evolution of developer friendly standards and tools for terminology mapping and data warehousing, there is a need for a simplified framework to facilitate development of interoperable applications. To this end, we propose a framework for creating a layer of semantic abstraction on the EHR and describe preliminary work on the implementation of this framework for management of hyperlipidemia and hypertension. Our goal is to facilitate the rapid development and portability of Health IT applications.

Using Medical Text Extraction, Reasoning and Mapping System (MTERMS) to process medication information in outpatient clinical notes.

Clinical information is often coded using different terminologies, and therefore is not interoperable. Our goal is to develop a general natural language processing (NLP) system, called Medical Text Extraction, Reasoning and Mapping System (MTERMS), which encodes clinical text using different terminologies and simultaneously establishes dynamic mappings between them. MTERMS applies a modular, pipeline approach flowing from a preprocessor, semantic tagger, terminology mapper, context analyzer, and parser to structure inputted clinical notes. Evaluators manually reviewed 30 free-text and 10 structured outpatient clinical notes compared to MTERMS output. MTERMS achieved an overall F-measure of 90.6 and 94.0 for free-text and structured notes respectively for medication and temporal information. The local medication terminology had 83.0% coverage compared to RxNorm's 98.0% coverage for free-text notes. 61.6% of mappings between the terminologies are exact match. Capture of duration was significantly improved (91.7% vs. 52.5%) from systems in the third i2b2 challenge.