Spatial characterization of the tachycardia circuit of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

AIMS: The exact circuit of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) remains elusive. To assess the location and dimensions of the AVNRT circuit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Both typical and atypical AVNRT were induced at electrophysiology study of 14 patients. We calculated the activation time of the fast and slow pathways, and consequently, the length of the slow pathway, by assuming an average conduction velocity of 0.04 mm/ms in the nodal area. The distance between the compact atrioventricular node and the slow pathway ablating electrode was measured on three-dimensionally reconstructed fluoroscopic images obtained in diastole and systole. We also measured the length of the histologically discrete right inferior nodal extension in 31 human hearts. The length of the slow pathway was calculated to be 10.8 ± 1.3 mm (range 8.2-12.8 mm). The distance from the node to the ablating electrode was measured in five patients 17.0 ± 1.6 mm (range 14.9-19.2 mm) and was consistently longer than the estimated length of the slow pathway (P < 0.001). The length of the right nodal inferior extension in histologic specimens was 8.1 ± 2.3 mm (range 5.3-13.7 mm). There were no statistically significant differences between these values and the calculated slow pathway lengths. CONCLUSION: Successful ablation affects the tachycardia circuit without necessarily abolishing slow conduction, probably by interrupting the circuit at the septal isthmus.

A unified theory for the circuit of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common regular tachycardia in the human, but its exact circuit remains elusive. In this article, recent evidence about the electrophysiological characteristics of AVNRT and new data on the anatomy of the atrioventricular node, are discussed. Based on this information, a novel, unified theory for the nature of the circuit of the tachycardia is presented.

Electrophysiology testing for risk stratification of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a call for action.

Current guidelines recommendations, based on the results of primary sudden cardiac death prevention trials, use the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a sole criterion for the indication of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for primary prevention purposes. In this article, we review the sensitivity and specificity of LVEF for predicting arrhythmic vs. non-arrhythmic cardiac death and examine existing evidence on the use of electrophysiology testing for risk stratification of ischaemic patients with reduced left ventricular function.

Catheter Ablation of Atypical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Because of its low prevalence, data on atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are scarce, and the optimal ablation method has not been established. Our study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of conventional slow pathway ablation, as applied for typical cases, in atypical AVNRT. METHODS: We studied 2079 patients with AVNRT subjected to slow pathway ablation. In 113 patients, mean age 48.5±18.1 years, 68 female, atypical AVNRT or coexistent atypical and typical AVNRT without other concomitant arrhythmia was diagnosed. Ablation data and outcomes were compared with a group of age- and sex-matched control patients with typical AVNRT. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy and radiofrequency current delivery times were not different in the atypical and typical groups, 20.3±12.2 versus 20.8±12.9 minutes (P=0.730) and 5.9±5.0 versus 5.5±4.5 minutes (P=0.650), respectively. Slow pathway ablation was accomplished from the right septum in 110 patients, and from the left septum in 3 patients, in the atypical group. There was no need for additional ablation lesions at other anatomic sites, and no cases of atrioventricular block were encountered. Recurrence rates of the arrhythmia were 5.6% in the atypical (6/108 patients) and 1.8% in the typical (2/111 patients) groups in the next 3 months following ablation (P=0.167). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional ablation at the anatomic area of the slow pathway is the therapy of choice for symptomatic AVNRT, regardless of whether the typical or atypical form is present.

Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a randomized, controlled trial.

AIMS: To conduct a randomized trial in order to guide the optimum therapy of symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with at least one symptomatic episode of tachycardia per month and an electrophysiologic diagnosis of AVNRT were randomly assigned to catheter ablation or chronic antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy with bisoprolol (5 mg od) and/or diltiazem (120-300 mg od). All patients were properly educated to treat subsequent tachycardia episodes with autonomic manoeuvres or a 'pill in the pocket' approach. The primary endpoint of the study was hospital admission for persistent tachycardia cardioversion, during a follow-up period of 5 years. Sixty-one patients were included in the study. In the ablation group, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 29 were free of arrhythmia or conduction disturbances at a 5-year follow-up. In the AAD group, three patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remainder, 10 patients (35.7%) continued with initial therapy, 11 patients (39.2%) remained on diltiazem alone, and 7 patients (25%) interrupted their therapy within the first 3 months following randomization, and subsequently developed an episode requiring cardioversion. During a follow-up of 5 years, 21 patients in the AAD group required hospital admission for cardioversion. Survival free from the study endpoint was significantly higher in the ablation group compared with the AAD group (log-rank test, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation is the therapy of choice for symptomatic AVNRT. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is ineffective and not well tolerated.

Apical vs. non-apical right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. The optimal site of right ventricular (RV) stimulation in CRT has not been established. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials and observational studies comparing the mid- and long-term effects of RV apical (RVA) and non-apical (RVNA) pacing on CRT outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched the Cochrane library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for studies evaluating RVA vs. RVNA pacing in CRT with regards to left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction, functional status improvement (defined as ≥1 New York Heart Association class improvement), and the clinical outcome of mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization. Effect estimates [standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] were pooled using random-effect models. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 2670 patients (1655 with an apical and 1015 with a non-apical RV lead position) were included. In meta-analyses, LVESV reduction and functional status improvement were similar in patients with RVA and RVNA pacing (SMD 0.13, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.50, P = 0.48; OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.45, P = 0.60, respectively). Data regarding mortality and hospitalizations could not be pooled due to a small number of relevant studies with significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that in CRT patients the effects of RVA or RVNA pacing on LV remodelling and functional status are similar. Mortality and morbidity outcomes with different RV lead positions should be further assessed in randomized clinical trials.

Atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: prevalence, electrophysiologic characteristics, and tachycardia circuit.

AIMS: This study aimed at assessing the prevalence, electrophysiologic characteristics, and mechanism of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 925 consecutive patients with AVNRT. Atrial-His (AH) and His-atrial (HA) intervals were measured during atypical AVNRT (HA > 70 ms), and compared with measurements in 34 patients with typical (slow-fast) AVNRT. Assuming that conduction velocity over the fast pathway is similar in the anterograde and retrograde directions, the AH interval during the fast-slow form should be smaller than the HA during slow-fast. Atypical AVNRT was diagnosed in 59 patients (6.4%), median age 50 years (range 19-79 years), and 37 (59.7%) of them female. Fast-slow AVNRT was diagnosed in 44 patients (74.5%), and slow-slow AVNRT in 9 patients (15.2%). The remaining six patients (10.2%) could not be reliably classified due to inconsistent AH, and HA/AH patterns or variable intervals. Tachycardia induction with anterograde conduction jumps was seen in two patients with the fast-slow, and in three patients with slow-slow or intermediate forms. Atrial-His in the fast-slow group was significantly longer than HA in the slow-fast group, 99.7 ± 40.5 ms vs. 45.8 ± 7.7 ms, P < 0.001. Tachycardia cycle length was longer in fast-slow compared with slow-fast, 379.1 ± 68.5 ms vs. 317.1 ± 42.8 ms, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Of AVNRT cases, 6.4% are atypical and may display patterns that do not necessarily correspond to the fast-slow or slow-slow conventional types. Atypical fast-slow and typical AVNRT do not appear to utilize the same limb for fast conduction.

High-resolution mapping of the circuit of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Recent anatomic and electrophysiologic evidence has provided new insight into the anatomic substrate. Previous reports on electroanatomic mapping (EAM) of the circuit of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have been limited by mapping only the triangle of Koch on the right side of the septum and by the use of conventional mapping tools. The objectives are to obtain comprehensive high-resolution mapping of typical AVNRT and to investigate the role of the atrioventricular ring tissues in the circuit. METHODS: We employed EAM with the use of novel modules and algorithms for studying typical AVNRT from the right and the left sides of the septum. RESULTS: We performed extensive mapping of both the atrial septum and the septal vestibule of the tricuspid valve during typical AVNRT in 9 (6 females) patients, aged 49.6 ± 12.1 years. In two of these, left septal mapping was also obtained through the aorta. The earliest initial activation was variable, emanating from the superior or medial septum. The impulse consistently appeared below the orifice of the coronary sinus, at the site where its inferoanterior margin merged with the septal vestibule of the tricuspid valve at its entrance to the right atrium. It then returned to the initial activation site, presumably through the septal vestibular myocardium. The left septal activation area corresponded to that recorded on the right side. CONCLUSIONS: Typical AVNRT uses a circuit confined within the pyramid of Koch from the AV node to the septal isthmus, involving the myocardial walls of the pyramidal space.

Classification of electrophysiological types of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a reappraisal.

Sequence of retrograde atrial activation is not a reliable criterion for the classification of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) into typical and atypical types. The conventional concept of a lower common pathway is not supported by current evidence and does not represent a reliable or reproducible criterion. The distinction between 'fast-slow' and 'slow-slow' forms is not unanimously defined, and probably of no practical significance. We suggest that AVNRT should be classified as typical or atypical according to the His-atrial interval or, when a His bundle electrogram is not reliably recorded, the ventriculo-atrial interval measured on the His bundle recording electrode.

Sudden cardiac death and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: two modern epidemics?

Critical analysis of the existing evidence indicates that: In patients with documented sustained ventricular arrhythmias and/or cardiac arrest, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) confer a survival benefit. In several clinical settings this is rather transient, and might be lost when modern medical therapy including ß-blockers is implemented. In patients without sustained ventricular arrhythmias or cardiac arrest, ICDs confer a significant survival benefit only in high-risk patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 35% due to a remote myocardial infarction. Left ventricular ejection fraction alone is rather unlikely to be sufficient for effective sudden cardiac death risk prediction, due to low sensitivity and specificity. The benefits of ICDs in the elderly as well as in women are not established. With current prices, ICDs are probably cost-effective only when used in high-risk patients without associated comorbidities that limit the life expectancy to <10 years. Recommendations by current guidelines may result in unnecessary overuse of ICD.

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.

This paper reviews the history of surgical procedures developed for eradication of atrial fibrillation (AF) during cardiac surgery for structural heart disease, and in patients with AF without other indication for cardiac surgery. Current evidence indicates that, despite their proven efficacy, the Cox-Maze procedure and its modifications require cardiopulmonary bypass and cannot be easily justified in the case of AF without other indication for cardiac surgery. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery for mitral valve disease, concomitant ablation techniques using modifications of the Maze and alternative energy sources appear to be safe and effective in treating AF, especially in non-rheumatic disease. Minimally invasive epicardial ablation has been recently developed and can be performed on a beating heart through small access incision ports. Various techniques combining pulmonary vein isolation, ganglionated plexi ablation, and left atrial lines have been tried. Initial results are promising but further clinical experience is required to establish ideal lesion sets, appropriate energy sources, and the benefit-risk ratio of such an approach in patients without other indication for cardiac surgery. The role of surgical ablation in the current management of AF is under investigation.

Ganglionated plexi ablation directed by high-frequency stimulation and complex fractionated atrial electrograms for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is ambiguous. Some researchers had already suggested that additional identification of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) around the areas with a positive reaction to high-frequency stimulation (HFS) might improve the accuracy of GP's boundaries location, then enhancing the success rate of ablation. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of GP ablation directed by HFS and CFAE in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with PAF (age 57±8 years) underwent GP ablation. Ablation targets were the sites where vagal reflexes were evoked by HFS and additional extended ablation CFAE area around the areas where vagal reflexes were evoked. At 12 months, 71% of patients were free of symptomatic AF. At 3 months after ablation the root mean square successive differences and HF were significantly lower in patients without AF recurrence (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.004). The LF/HF ratio was significantly higher in patients without AF recurrence (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Enhanced GP ablation directed by HFS and CFAE can be safely performed and enables maintenance of sinus rhythm in the majority of patients with PAF for a 12-month period. Denervation of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system may be the preferable target of catheter ablation of AF.