Real-world survival of Danish patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to investigate the treatment flow of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) across treatment lines and adherence to guidelines (defined as trastuzumab, pertuzumab and chemotherapy first line, where 85% received vinorelbine as backbone and T-DM1 second line). Furthermore, we identified clinical markers to predict the risk of developing brain metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive mBC, diagnosed between 01.01.2014-31.12.2019, registered in the database of the Danish Breast Cancer Group were included in this real-word study. Clinical follow-up was assessed until 01.10.2020 and complete follow-up for overall survival until 01.10.2021. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with guidelines adherence analyzed as a time-varying covariate, and the risk of CNS metastasis was estimated by the cumulative incidence function. RESULTS: 631 patients were included. 329 (52%) patients followed the guidelines. The median OS for all patients was 42.3 months (95% Cl, 38.2-48.4), and significantly higher for the patients who followed guidelines; NA (95% CI, 78.2-NA). The median PFS for all patients was 13.4 months (95% Cl, 12.1-14.8), 6.6 (95% Cl, 5.8-7.6) and 5.8 (95% Cl, 4.9-6.9) for first, second and third line of treatment, respectively. Patients with ER-negative mBC had a higher risk of developing brain metastases and patients with high tumor burden had a higher risk of developing brain metastases with an adjusted HR of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.49-0.98), p = 0.047 and 2.69 (95% CI, 1.45-5.00), p = 0.002, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found that only half of the patients with HER2-positive mBC, received first and second-line treatment according to national guidelines. Patients receiving treatment according to guidelines had a significantly higher median OS compared to patients who did not. We also found that patients with ER-negative disease or high tumor burden had a significantly higher risk of developing brain metastases.

The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer.

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2 dual blockade including biosimilar trastuzumab (SB3) for HER2-positive early breast cancer: Population based real world data from the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG).

BACKGROUND: Dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been increasingly used for HER2-positive tumours >2 cm and/or with positive axillary lymph nodes in order to evaluate pathologic response and obtain better surgical management. SB3 is a registered biosimilar trastuzumab approved following a phase III trial demonstrating similar efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting as trastuzumab. However, the study was done without pertuzumab. METHOD: The database of the Danish Breast Cancer Group was used to extract data on all patients who started NACT with SB3 and pertuzumab between September 1, 2018 and August 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: In total 215 patients received NACT and dual blockade. The median age was 55 (24-81). NACT used was cyclophosphamide and epirubicin followed by weekly paclitaxel (62% on six cycles, 35% on eight cycles) or other chemotherapy followed by weekly paclitaxel (3%). Overall, 56% of patients achieved pCR. 60 of 88 node-positive patients pre-NACT achieved ypN0(i-) after neoadjuvant treatment. pCR rate was significantly associated with estrogen receptor status and malignancy grade. An association with CEP17/HER2-ratio was assessed. CONCLUSION: Real world data on dual blockade with SB3 and pertuzumab in combination with NACT in a nationwide population-based study show a pCR rate comparable to that seen in previous clinical studies.

Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide and Docetaxel With or Without Epirubicin for Early TOP2A-Normal Breast Cancer: DBCG 07-READ, an Open-Label, Phase III, Randomized Trial.

Purpose Administration of anthracycline and taxane therapy in the adjuvant setting is considered a standard for breast cancer. We evaluated a non-anthracycline-based regimen in TOP2A-normal patients. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, open-label, phase III trial, 2,012 women with early TOP2A-normal breast cancer and at least one high-risk factor were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (DC) or three cycles of epirubicin (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) followed by three cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2; EC-D). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) after a median of 5 years of follow-up. Secondary end points were patient-reported toxicity, overall survival (OS), and distant disease-free survival. Results At a median estimated potential follow-up of 69 months, 5-year DFS was 87.9% (95% CI, 85.6% to 89.8%) in the EC-D arm and 88.3% (95% CI, 86.1% to 90.1%) in the DC arm. There was no significant difference in the risk of DFS events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.28; P = 1.00), distant disease-free survival (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.47; P = .40), or mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.59; P = .41) in the intent-to-treat analysis. A significant interaction between menopausal status and treatment group was observed for DFS ( P = .04) but not for OS ( P = .07). Patients with grade 3 tumors derived most benefit from DC, and patients with grade 1 to 2 tumors derived most benefit from EC-D (DFS: interaction P = .02; and OS: interaction P = .03). Patients receiving EC-D reported significantly more stomatitis, myalgia or arthralgia, vomiting, nausea, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy, whereas edema was more frequent after DC. Conclusion This study provides evidence to support no overall outcome benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in patients with early TOP2A-normal breast cancer.