Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Exp Bot ; 70(14): 3679-3691, 2019 07 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31301134

RESUMO

Bending and torsional properties of young roots and stems were measured in nine woody angiosperms. The variation in mechanical parameters was correlated to wood anatomical traits and analysed with respect to the other two competing functions of xylem (namely storage and hydraulics). Compared with stems, roots exhibited five times greater flexibility in bending and two times greater flexibility in torsion. Lower values of structural bending and structural torsional moduli (Estr and Gstr, respectively) of roots compared with stems were associated with the presence of thicker bark and a greater size of xylem cells. Across species, Estr and Gstr were correlated with wood density, which was mainly driven by the wall thickness to lumen area ratio of fibres. Higher fractions of parenchyma did not translate directly into a lower wood density and reduced mechanical stiffness in spite of parenchyma cells having thinner, and in some cases less lignified, cell walls than fibres. The presence of wide, partially non-lignified rays contributed to low values of Estr and Gstr in Clematis vitalba. Overall, our results demonstrate that higher demands for mechanical stability in self-supporting stems put a major constraint on xylem structure, whereas root xylem can be designed with a greater emphasis on both storage and hydraulic functions.


Assuntos
Magnoliopsida/química , Raízes de Plantas/química , Caules de Planta/química , Xilema/química , Magnoliopsida/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Raízes de Plantas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Caules de Planta/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Madeira/química , Madeira/crescimento & desenvolvimento
2.
Am J Sports Med ; 47(3): 688-694, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640513

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bone loss at the anterior glenoid rim is a main reason for failure of soft-tissue based surgical stabilization procedures in patients with anterior shoulder instability. PURPOSE: To evaluate the capability of conventional glenoid bone loss measurement techniques to provide an adequate estimation of the actual biomechanical effect of glenoid defects. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with unilateral anterior shoulder instability and varying degrees of glenoid defect were included. Patient-specific computer tomography-based 3-dimensional shoulder models of the affected and unaffected sides were created. The bony shoulder stability ratio (SR) was determined in various potential dislocation directions with finite element analysis. Values obtained from conventional glenoid defect size measurement techniques (Pico and Sugaya) were correlated with the finite element analysis results. Additionally, a mathematical model was developed to theoretically analyze the correlation between glenoid defect size measurements and the SR. RESULTS: The authors found substantial interindividual differences of the SR of the unaffected shoulders in all directions of measurement. Bone loss at the anterior glenoid rim significantly reduced the SR in the 2-o'clock ( P = .011), 3-o'clock ( P < .001), and 4-o'clock ( P < .001) directions referring to a right shoulder. The correlation between the defect size measurements and the SR for the 2-o'clock (rho = -0.522 and -0.580), 3-o'clock (rho = -0.597 and -0.580), and 4-o'clock (rho = -0.527 and -0.522) directions was statistically significant. However, it showed only moderate strength and was nonlinear as well as dependent on the inherent shape of the concavity. As shown by the mathematical model, bone loss has the most considerable effect at the edge of the glenoid rim, and an increasingly concave-shaped glenoid leads to an increase in loss of SR provoked by the same extent of bone loss. CONCLUSION: Current glenoid bone loss measurements are unable to provide an adequate estimation on the actual biomechanical effect of glenoid defects because (1) the relation between the glenoid defect size and its biomechanical effect is nonlinear and (2) patients with shoulder instability have constitutional biomechanically relevant glenoid concavity shape differences. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings challenge the current concept of setting a general threshold for critical glenoid bone loss, which requires bony reconstruction surgery.


Assuntos
Instabilidade Articular/diagnóstico por imagem , Escápula/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa