Interfacility Transport of Children with Traumatic Pneumothorax: Does Elevation Make a Difference?

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality in pediatric trauma patients. Management with tube thoracostomy is routinely dictated by symptoms, use of positive pressure ventilation, or plan for air transport. Many patients transferred to our pediatric trauma center (PTC) require transport at considerable elevation. We sought to characterize the effect of transport at elevation in this population to inform management recommendations. METHODS: The trauma registry was queried for pediatric patients transferred to our tertiary referral center with traumatic PTX from 2010 to 2022, yielding 412 charts for analysis. Data abstracted included mechanism of injury, mode of transport, size of pneumothorax, chest tube placement, endotracheal intubation, and estimated elevation change during transport. RESULTS: There were 412 patients included for analysis. Most patients had small pneumothoraces that resolved without chest tube placement (388 patients, 94.1%). No patients experienced acute respiratory decompensation in transport. There were four (0.9%) patients with increased PTX on arrival, however, none experienced acute decompensation as a result. Average elevation gain was 2337 feet. There was no association between elevation change and requirement of post-transport chest tube placement. No patients experienced PTX-related complications after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In this large patient series, no patient experienced a meaningful increase in the size of their traumatic PTX during or immediately following transport at elevation to our institution. These findings suggest it is safe to transfer a pediatric trauma patient with a small, hemodynamically insignificant PTX without tube thoracostomy despite considerable changes in elevation during transport. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: II-III, Retrospective Study.

A Single Institution's Recent Experience With Pediatric Hand Burns.

Children are at risk for sustaining hand burns due to their innate curiosity, slow withdrawal reflexes, and thin palmar epidermis. We sought to summarize our recent experience managing pediatric hand burns, focusing on injuries that required surgical management. This was a retrospective review of children with burn-injured hands managed at a quaternary referral children's hospital between 2016 and 2020. Demographics and mechanisms of injury were collected for all patients. Initial management of all wounds included pain control, deflation of blisters, and mechanical debridement. Wounds were then dressed, and a plaster-backed soft cast was applied for positioning if the swelling was controlled. Wounds were reassessed in 4-7 days, at which time a nonadherent dressing with antifungal ointment or a bismuth dressing was applied to partial-thickness wounds, vs an active silver dressing for deep partial-thickness burns. For patients who underwent split-thickness or full-thickness skin grafting, additional wound care, operative, and short-term outcomes data were collected. A total of 3715 children were seen for burn injuries during the study period, of which 2100 (56.5%) were seen for hand burns. In total, 123 (5.8%) required a skin graft an average of 11.7 days from the date of their burn injury. Surgical complications were minimal with 5 (4.1%) incomplete graft takes, though none required reoperation, and 1 (0.8%) experiencing a postoperative wound infection. Pediatric hand burns are common. A multidisciplinary treatment approach, including standardized wound care and adept therapeutic interventions, will lead to spontaneous healing in approximately 95% of patients.