Robust vascular invasion concurrent with intense EGFR immunostaining can predict recurrence in patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of most patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer is good without postoperative chemotherapy; however, about 10% suffer recurrence and inevitably die. We conducted this study to establish the optimal indications for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients at risk of recurrence. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 124 patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer, who underwent gastrectomy at the Kitasato University East Hospital, between 2001 and 2010. We reviewed EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients, 47 (38%) showed intense EGFR IHC (2+ or 3+), with significantly less frequency than in stage II/III advanced gastric cancer (p < 0.001). According to univariate analysis, intense EGFR IHC was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.023) and associated with overall survival (OS) (p = 0.045) as well as vascular invasion (p = 0.031). On the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, intense EGFR IHC(p = 0.016) was an independent prognostic predictor for RFS, and both vascular invasion (p = 0.033) and intense EGFR IHC (p = 0.031) were independent prognostic predictors for OS. The combination of both factors increased the risk of recurrence (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In stage IB node-negative gastric cancer, vascular invasion and intense EGFR IHC increase the likelihood of recurrence. We recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for such patients because of the high risk of metachronous recurrence.

DNA diagnosis of peritoneal fluid cytology test by CDO1 promoter DNA hypermethylation in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease of the peritoneum is challenging for early cancer detection in gastric cancer (GC). Utility of PCR amplification of cancer-derived DNA has been considered feasible due to its molecular stability, however such markers have never been available in GC clinics. We recently discovered cancer-specific methylation of CDO1 gene in GC, and investigated the clinical potential to detect the minimal residual disease. METHODS: One hundred and two GC patients were investigated for peritoneal fluid cytology test (CY), and detection level of the promoter DNA methylation of CDO1 gene was assessed by quantitative methylation specific PCR (Q-MSP) in the sediments (DNA CY). RESULTS: (1) CY1 was pathologically confirmed in 8 cases, while DNA CY1 was detected in 18 cases. All 8 CY1 were DNA CY1. (2) DNA CY1 was recognized in 14.3, 25.0, 20.0, and 42.9%, in macroscopic Type II, small type III, large type III, and type IV, respectively, while it was not recognized in Type 0/I/V. (3) DNA CY1 was prognostic relevance in gastric cancer (p = 0.0004), and its significance was robust among Type III/IV gastric cancer (p = 0.006 for overall survival and p = 0.0006 for peritoneal recurrence free survival). (4) The peritoneal recurrence was hardly seen in GC patients with potent perioperative chemotherapy among those with DNA CY1. CONCLUSIONS: DNA CY1 detected by Q-MSP for CDO1 gene promoter DNA methylation has a great potential to detect minimal residual disease of the peritoneum in GC clinics as a novel DNA marker.

Promoter DNA methylation of CDO1 gene and its clinical significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

We have demonstrated that CDO1 methylation is frequently found in various cancers, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but its clinical relevance has remained elusive. CDO1 methylation was investigated in 169 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1996 and 2007. CDO1 methylation was assessed by Q-MSP (quantitative methylation specific PCR), and its clinical significance, including its relationship to prognosis, was analyzed. (i) The median TaqMeth value of CDO1 methylation was 9.4, ranging from 0 to 279.5. CDO1 methylation was significantly different between cStage I and cStage II/III (P = 0.02). (ii) On the log-rank plot, the optimal cut-off value was determined to be 8.9; ESCC patients with high CDO1 methylation showed a significantly worse prognosis than those with low CDO1 methylation (P = 0.02). (iii) A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified only CDO1 hypermethylation as an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.00, CI 1.09-3.78, P = 0.03). (iv) CDO1 hypermethylation stratified ESCC patients' prognosis in cStage II/III for both neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (NAC)-positive and NAC-negative cases. Moreover, the CDO1 methylation level was significantly lower in cases with Grade 2/3 than in those with Grade 0/1 (P = 0.02) among cStage II/III ESCC patients with NAC. Promoter DNA hypermethylation of CDO1 could be an independent prognostic factor in ESCC; it may also reflect NAC eradication of tumor cells in the primary tumors.

Potential benefits of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy for cT1 upper-third gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Few reports have compared laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) with laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) in patients with cT1N0 gastric cancer. This study assessed the safety and feasibility of LAPG with esophagogastrostomy in these patients and compared postgastrectomy disturbances and nutritional status following LAPG and LATG. METHODS: This study compared 40 patients who underwent LAPG with esophagogastrostomy and 59 who underwent LATG with esophagojejunostomy, both with OrVil™. Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, nutritional status at 1 and 2 years, and relapse-free survival were compared in these two groups. RESULTS: Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAPG group than in the LATG group (280 min vs. 365 min, P < 0.001). Although the rate of surgical complications was similar in the two groups, the rate of anastomotic stricture was significantly higher in the LAPG group than in the LATG group (28 vs. 8.4 %; P = 0.012). Rates of reflux esophagitis graded A or higher in the Los Angeles classification were 10 and 5.1 %, respectively. Hemoglobin levels 2 years after surgery, relative to baseline levels, were significantly higher in the LAPG group than in the LATG group (98.6 vs. 92.9 %, P = 0.020). Body weight, albumin and total protein concentrations, and total lymphocyte count 1 and 2 years after surgery were slightly, but not significantly, higher in the LAPG group. Relapse-free survival rates were similar, as were 5-year overall survival rates (86 vs. 79 %, P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: LAPG with esophagogastrostomy using OrVil™ was safe and feasible for patients with cT1N0 gastric cancer. LAPG may have nutritional advantages over LATG, but the rate of anastomotic stricture was significantly higher for LAPG than for LATG.

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in Japan: long-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: We report the long-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with open DG (ODG). METHODS: Between 2005 and 2008, 63 patients with clinical T1 (cT1) gastric cancer were randomly assigned to undergo either LADG or ODG. Long-term clinical outcomes included prospective questionnaire-based symptoms and survival. RESULTS: Based on the responses to the prospective questionnaires, patients who underwent LADG reported greater satisfaction and were more likely to favor the procedure than those who underwent ODG. The most notable difference in symptoms was related to wound pain and diarrhea. After ODG, wound pain reduced in intensity but persisted throughout the follow-up. Surprisingly, diarrhea was more frequent after LADG than after ODG, possibly due to overeating, because symptoms elicited by overeating, such as vomiting after a meal or heartburn, were also more frequent after LADG. In terms of long-term survival, there were no cases of recurrence in either group. CONCLUSIONS: LADG was associated with less wound pain during long-term follow-up after surgery, whereas symptoms related to overeating were common. Based on our findings and the patients' reported satisfaction, we recommend LADG for cT1 gastric cancer as an effective procedure with excellent long-term survival.

Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in additional gastrectomy after endoscopic resection of cT1aN0 gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic therapy for clinical T1aN0 (cT1aN0) gastric cancer is an excellent therapeutic strategy; however, pathological lymph node metastasis (LNM) occasionally occurs. Patients who have a potential for LNM are subject to additional gastrectomy. Our aim was to identify predictors of LNM in additional gastrectomy. METHODS: One hundred and twelve cT1aN0 gastric cancer patients undergoing additional gastrectomy after endoscopic resection were identified between 1997 and 2013. Predictors for LNM were initially selected by a univariate analysis and applied to a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: (1) Twelve patients (10.7 %) had LNM following additional gastrectomy. (2) Clinicopathological factors significantly associated with LNM were the depth of invasion (SM2 or deeper, designated as SM2) (p = 0.0018) and rigorous lymphatic invasion (ly2,3) (p < 0.001). (3) The univariate predictors for LNM were applied to the multivariate logistic regression model, and SM2 (p = 0.0027) and ly2,3 (p = 0.0028) remained significant predictors. (4) When classified into 2 × 2 subgroups, the predictability for LNM was as follows: SM2 plus ly2,3 (46.7 %), SM2 plus ly0,1 (10.0 %), M,SM1 plus ly2,3 (0 %), and M,SM1 plus ly0,1 (0 %). CONCLUSIONS: In cT1aN0 gastric cancer patients, both SM2 and ly2,3 are significant predictors for LNM that may be important as references for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic resection.

Prognostic impact of venous invasion in stage IB node-negative gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about risk factors for recurrence in stage IB gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis. The aims of this study were to determine prognostic factors associated with long-term survival and to clarify patterns of recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 130 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at Kitasato University East Hospital from 2001 through 2010 and analyzed clinicopathological characteristics associated with survival and patterns of recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 130 patients, 12 (9.2%) had recurrence, among whom 10 (83%) patients died. Four patients (3.1%) died of other diseases. The 5-year overall survival rate was 89%. Of the 12 patients with recurrence, 7 (58%) had liver metastasis, 3 (25%) had distant lymph-node metastasis, 2 (17%) had peritoneal dissemination, and 1 (8.3%) had locoregional recurrence. Patients with tumors more than 5 cm in diameter tended to have recurrence within 1 year. Patients who had recurrence more than 2 years after surgery tended to survive for longer than 5 years after recurrence. Moderate or marked venous invasion (v2 or v3) and age >65 years were significantly associated with relapse-free and overall survival on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the only independent prognostic factor for relapse-free and overall survival was venous invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate or marked venous invasion (v2 or v3) is an independent predictor of relapse-free and overall survival in stage IB node-negative gastric cancer. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, currently not given to this subgroup of patients, may improve the outcomes of patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer, particularly when accompanied by venous invasion.

A Risk Model for Surgical Site Infection in the Gastric Cancer Surgery Using Data of 790 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Understanding risk factors of surgical site infections (SSIs) in gastrectomy is important to provide the best treatment for the patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using the medical records of 790 patients with gastrectomy from 2005 through 2009. SSIs were classified into incisional SSIs (iSSIs) and organ/space SSIs (o/sSSIs). RESULTS: iSSIs and o/sSSIs were detected in 41 (5.2%) patients and 68 (8.6%) patients, respectively. Open surgery was the only independent risk factor (p = 0.028) for iSSIs, while open surgery (p = 0.004), concurrent splenectomy (p < 0.001), operative time ≥220 min (p = 0.009), preoperative body mass index ≥20.8 kg/m2 (p = 0.004) and male gender (p = 0.028) were the independent risk factors for o/sSSIs. We created a risk model for o/sSSIs using these independent risk factors. The C-index model discrimination was 0.84 (p < 0.001), and the calibration of the models demonstrated a linear correlation between the predicted and observed probability. CONCLUSION: We reported the risk factors of SSIs for gastrectomy. The risk model developed in this study for o/sSSIs pertaining to gastric cancer surgery would contribute to provide guidance for the development of best practices.

A preliminary study on pre-operative tumor volumetry measured by three-dimensional computer tomography in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of tumor volumetry measured by three-dimensional (3-D) multidetector row computed tomography (MD-CT). METHODOLOGY: A total of 50 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone pre-operative tumor volumetry using 3D-MD-CT followed by subsequent laparotomy (11 women, 39 men; mean age 63.9 years) were examined. Tumor volume and conventional clinicopathological factors were studied and then analyzed with respect to survival. RESULTS: Tumor volume was distributed widely and ranged from 0.16 cm3 to 363.5 cm3 with a mean of 43.6 cm3 (<10 cm3, 21 tumors; ≥10 cm3, 29 tu- mors). Significant differences in survival were found for volume (<10.0 cm3 vs. ≥10.0 cm3; p=0.0414), and depth of invasion (T1-2 vs. T3-4; p=0.0475), but not for diameter (<50 mm vs. ≥50 mm; p=0.2142), location (proximal third vs. middle or distal third; p=0.3254), macroscopic type (localized vs. invasive; p=0.3619), or microscopic type (differentiated vs. undifferentiated; p=0.1230). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that tumor volume measured by pre-operative 3D-MD-CT offers an alternative indicator for determining the prognosis in gastric cancer.

Preoperative tumor size is a critical prognostic factor for patients with Borrmann type III gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to clarify whether preoperative tumor size is an independent prognostic factor (IPF) for patients with Borrmann type III gastric cancer. METHODS: The study group comprised 350 patients with Borrmann type III gastric cancer. We performed a log-rank plot analysis to establish the threshold value of preoperative tumor size for the prediction of overall survival (OS). Factors with P < 0.10 on univariate prognostic analyses for OS were put into a Cox's proportional hazards model to identify the IPFs. RESULTS: Peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) was the strongest IPF for patients with Borrmann type III gastric cancer (P < 0.0001). We were able to measure the tumor size preoperatively in 135 patients with negative CY results (CY0). The cutoff tumor size for the prediction of OS was 5.3 cm. A Cox's proportional hazards model showed that pathological lymph-node metastasis (P = 0.007) and preoperative tumor size (P = 0.018) were significant IPFs in the CY0 patients. Patients with a preoperative tumor size of <5.3 cm had satisfactory outcomes, with a 5-year OS rate of >80 %. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative tumor size is an IPF for patients with Borrmann type III gastric cancer and CY0. Thus, preoperative tumor size may be a useful factor for deciding on whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy is indicated.

Immunohistochemical analysis of RTKs expression identified HER3 as a prognostic indicator of gastric cancer.

Standard treatment in Japan for the 13th Japanese Gastric Cancer Association stage II/III advanced gastric cancer is postoperative adjuvant S-1 administration after curative surgery. High expression of receptor type tyrosine kinases (RTKs) has repeatedly represented poor prognosis for cancers. However it has not been demonstrated whether RTKs have prognostic relevance for stage II/III gastric cancer with standard treatment. Tumor tissues were obtained from 167 stage II/III advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery and received postoperative S-1 chemotherapy from 2000 to 2010. Expression of the RTKs including EGFR, HER2, HER3, IGF-1R, and EphA2 was analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Analysis using a multivariate proportional hazard model identified the most significant RTKs that represented independent prognostic relevance. When tumor HER3 expression was classified into IHC 1+/2+ (n = 98) and IHC 0 (n = 69), the cumulative 5-year Relapse Free Survival (5y-RFS) was 56.5 and 82.9%, respectively (P = 0.0034). Significant prognostic relevance was similarly confirmed for IGF-1R (P = 0.014), and EGFR (P = 0.030), but not for EphA2 or HER2 expression. Intriguingly, HER3 expression was closely correlated with IGF-1R (P < 0.0001, R = 0.41), and EphA2 (P < 0.0001, R = 0.34) expression. Multivariate proportional hazard model analysis identified HER3 (IHC 1+/2+) (HR; 1.53, 95% CI, 1.11-2.16, P = 0.0078) as the sole RTK that was a poor prognostic factor independent of stage. Of the 53 patients who recurred, 40 patients (75.5%) were HER3-positive. Thus, of the RTKs studied, HER3 was the only RTK identified as an independent prognostic indicator of stage II/III advanced gastric cancer with standard treatment.

Lymph node ratio is a critical prognostic predictor in gastric cancer treated with S-1 chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: S-1 is an oral anticancer drug widely used in postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients in Japan with stage II/III gastric cancer. Candidates for more intense adjuvant treatments need to be identified, particularly among patients with stage III cancer. METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who underwent surgery and received S-1 postoperatively between 2000 and 2010. RESULTS: Factors indicating poor prognosis identified by univariate analysis include male sex (P = 0.022), age ≥67 years (P = 0.021), intestinal-type histology (P = 0.049), lymph node ratio ≥16.7 % (P < 0.0001), open surgery (P = 0.039), as well as the 13th JGCA stage (P < 0.0001) and the 14th JGCA/7th International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node ratio ≥16.7 % and intestinal-type histology were significant as predictors of prognosis, independent from the pathological stages. Based on these and other findings, stage IIIC cancer on the 14th JGCA/7th UICC stage system in combination with the lymph node ratio could identify patients with extremely high risk for recurrence CONCLUSIONS: Our current findings suggest that lymph node ratio ≥16.7 % in combination with the new staging system could be a useful prognostic indicator in advanced gastric cancer. Because these high-risk patients cannot be identified preoperatively by any diagnostic tool, further improvement in postoperative adjuvant therapy is warranted.

Simple prognostic indicators using macroscopic features and age in advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Macroscopic features and age may be important prognostic factors that discriminate survival among clinical conditions requiring different therapeutic strategies of advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and this study aimed to identify their clinical relevance. METHODOLOGY: A total of 232 AGC patients who had Surgical T2b or beyond was enrolled to identify clinical indicators, including macroscopic features in combination with age. RESULTS: Macroscopic features were divided into 3 categories (types I/II/V, III, and IV), which included stage IV in 24%, 53%, and 72% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Macroscopic features (P < 0.0001), histological features (P = 0.025), and pathological infiltration type (P = 0.0003) were all univariate prognostic factors, as well as stage (P < 0.0001) and age (P = 0.009). However, the multivariate proportional hazards model found that macroscopic features (P = 0.0013) and age (P = 0.0091) were the only factors independent of stage (P <0.0001). Both factors clearly classified the patients into 4 groups (young type 1/II/V (group 1), elderly type I/II/V (group 2), type III and young type IV (group 3), and elderly type IV (group 4) with different prognoses. CONCLUSIONS: Macroscopic features and age were simple indicators of prognosis in AGC. Both factors may have great potential to develop prognostic categories that effectively classify AGC into categories requiring different therapeutic strategies.

Preoperative dual-phase 3D CT angiography assessment of the right hepatic artery before gastrectomy.

PURPOSES: In the current study, we evaluated the efficacy of dual-phase three-dimensional (3D) CT angiography (CTA) in the assessment of the vascular anatomy, especially the right hepatic artery (RHA), before gastrectomy. METHODS: The study initially included 714 consecutive patients being treated for gastric cancer. A dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan using 32-multi detector-row CT was performed for all patients. RESULTS: Among the 714 patients, 3D CTA clearly identified anomalies with the RHA arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in 49 cases (6.9 %). In Michels' classification type IX, the common hepatic artery (CHA) originates only from the SMA. Such cases exhibit defective anatomy for the CHA in conjunction with the celiac-splenic artery system, resulting in direct exposure of the portal vein beneath the #8a lymph node station, which was retrospectively confirmed by video in laparoscopic gastrectomy cases. Fused images of both 3D angiography and venography were obtained, and could have predicted the risk preoperatively, and the surgical finding confirmed its usefulness. CONCLUSION: Preoperative evaluations using 3D CTA can provide more accurate information about the vessel anatomy. The fused images from 3D CTA have the potential to reduce the intraoperative risks for injuries to critical vessel, such as the portal vein, during gastrectomy.

Comparison of the Heller-Toupet procedure with the Heller-Dor procedure in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for achalasia.

PURPOSE: We compared the outcomes of Toupet fundoplication with those of Dor fundoplication in patients with achalasia who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with achalasia and dysphagia underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication performed by a single surgeon. Heller-Toupet fundoplication (HT) was performed in 30 patients, and Heller-Dor fundoplication (HD) was done in 42. The symptoms and esophageal function were retrospectively assessed in both groups. RESULTS: The dysphagia scores significantly decreased after both the HT and HD procedures, and did not differ significantly between them. The incidence of reflux symptoms was significantly higher after HT (26.7%) than after HD (7.1%). The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure significantly decreased after both HT and HD. Upon endoscopic examination, the incidence of reflux esophagitis was significantly higher after HT (38.5%) than after HD (8.8%). During esophageal pH monitoring, the fraction time at pH <4 was similar in the patients who underwent HT and HD. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy provided significant improvements in the dysphagia symptoms of achalasia patients, regardless of the type of fundoplication. The incidences of reflux symptoms and reflux esophagitis were higher after HT than after HD. However, the results of pH monitoring did not differ between the procedures.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery improves esophageal body motility in patients with severe reflux esophagitis.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to clarify whether laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) improves the esophageal body motility (EBM) in patients with reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) scheduled to undergo LARS were divided into a mild esophagitis group (ME; n = 18, Grade O:A:B = 7:10:1) and a severe esophagitis group (SE; n = 17, Grade C:D = 13:4), according to the Los Angeles classification of reflux esophagitis. The types of fundoplication (Nissen/Toupet) were 6/12 in the ME group and 4/13 in the SE group. Esophageal pH monitoring and manometry were performed before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The fraction time of a pH below 4 significantly decreased after surgery in both groups. The LES pressures did not change significantly after surgery in the ME group, but significantly increased in the SE group. The peristaltic amplitudes 18 and 13 cm above the LES did not change significantly after surgery in either group. The peristaltic amplitudes 8 and 3 cm above the LES did not change significantly after surgery in the ME group, but significantly increased after surgery in the SE group. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative EBM was not improved by LARS in patients with GERD and mild mucosal breaks in the esophagus, but the preoperative middle to distal EBM was improved by LARS in patients with GERD and severe mucosal breaks.

Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open DG (ODG) have been investigated in previous clinical trials, but operative techniques and concomitant treatments have evolved, and up-to-date evidence produced by expert surgeons is required to provide an accurate image of the relative efficacies of the treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic versus ODG with respect to specific primary and secondary short-term outcomes. METHODS: From October 2005 to February 2008, a total of 64 patients with early gastric cancer were randomly assigned to the LADG or the ODG group. One patient was excluded due to concurrent illness unrelated to the intervention, so the data from 63 patients were analyzed. The primary short-term outcome was the 4-day postoperative use of analgesics. Secondary short-term outcomes were postoperative residual pain, complications, days hospitalized, blood data, days with fever, and days to first flatus. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in favor of LADG for postoperative use of analgesics (P = 0.022). Unexpectedly, there was no significant difference in degree of pain in the immediate postoperative period, putatively due to the optimal use of analgesics. Of the secondary outcomes, residual pain at postoperative day 7 (P = 0.003) and days to first flatus (P = 0.001) were significantly better with LADG. Postoperative complications, number of days hospitalized, and number of days with fever were also better with LADG, but the differences were not significant. Blood data representing inflammation (WBC and CRP) showed marked differences, especially on postoperative day 7 (P = 0.0016 and P = 0.0061, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LADG performed by expert surgeons results in less postoperative pain accompanied by decreased surgical invasiveness and is associated with fewer postoperative inconveniences. No preliminary suggestions of changes in long-term curability were observed. LADG for early gastric cancer is a feasible and safe procedure with short-term clinical results superior to those of ODG.

Survival outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for clinical early (cT1) gastric cancer.

PURPOSES: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for clinical early (cT1) gastric cancer (EGC) is superior to open gastrectomy in terms of the short-term outcome; however, long-term survival outcome remains elusive. METHODS: Four hundred and ninety-one cT1 EGC patients who underwent LAG between 1998 and 2010 were registered to evaluate the survival outcome, including 237 patients who were observed for at least 5 years (long-term, L group), while 221 patients who were observed for at least 2-5 years (intermediate term, I group). RESULTS: There were 17 deaths, including 7 patients who developed recurrence (5 in pT1 and 2 in pT4a). Two fatal cases with pStage IIB were uniquely T1N3b. Six out of the 7 recurrences occurred within 2 years after surgery. The 237 patients in the L group included 6 of the recurrent deaths (2.5 %), while the 221 patients in the I group included 1 recurrent death (0.9 %). Recurrent sites of pathological T1 cases were the liver (n = 2), lung (n = 1), ovary (n = 1), and bone (n = 1), and no peritoneal or local recurrence was found. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, the survival outcome of EGC by LAG was excellent and LAG was acceptable as a therapeutic procedure for EGC.

Therapeutic potential of PRL-3 targeting and clinical significance of PRL-3 genomic amplification in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 (PRL-3) has deserved attention as a crucial molecule in the multiple steps of metastasis. In the present study, we examined the mechanisms regulating PRL-3 expression, and assessed the clinical potential of PRL-3-targeted therapy in gastric cancer. METHODS: PRL-3 genomic amplification was analyzed using quantitative-polymerase chain reaction and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization in 77 primary gastric tumors. The anticancer activity of PRL-3 inhibitor (1-4-bromo-2-benzylidene rhodanine) treatment was evaluated against cancer cells with different genetic and expression status. RESULTS: PRL-3 genomic amplification was closely concordant with high level of its protein expression in cell lines, and was found in 20% (8/40) among human primary tumors with its expression, which were all stage III/IV disease (40%, 8/20), but in none (0/37) among those without expression. Additionally, PRL-3 genomic amplification was associated with metastatic lymph node status, leading to advanced stage and thereby poor outcomes in patients with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.021). PRL-3 small interfering RNA robustly repressed metastatic properties, including cell proliferation, invasion, and anchorage-independent colony formation. Although neither PRL-3 genomic amplification nor expression level was responsible for the sensitivity to PRL-3 inhibitor treatment, the inhibitor showed dose-dependent anticancer efficacy, and remarkably induced apoptosis on all the tested cell lines with PRL-3 expression. CONCLUSIONS: We have for the first time, demonstrated that PRL-3 genomic amplification is one of the predominant mechanisms inducing its expression, especially in more advanced stage, and that PRL-3-targeted therapy may have a great potential against gastric cancer with its expression.

Lymphatic tumor emboli detected by D2-40 immunostaining can more accurately predict lymph-node metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Resected specimens of superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SSCCE) underwent D2-40 immunostaining to accurately assess lymphatic tumor emboli (LY) and to analyze correlations between LY and lymph node metastasis (N). This present study was designed to determine the accuracy of LY grade for predicting the risk of N. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 75 patients with SSCCE who underwent surgical resection of their tumors. Resected specimens were sliced into continuous sections at 5 mm intervals. Intramucosal cancers are classified into three groups (m1, m2, m3), and submucosal cancers are also divided into three groups (sm1, sm2, sm3). The numbers of LY present in lymphatic ducts on D2-40 immunostaining, venous tumor emboli (V) on CD34 immunostaining, and lymphatic tumor emboli (ly) and V on hematoxylin-eosin staining (HE) and elastica van Gieson staining (EVG) were counted for each case. The presence of lymphatic tumor emboli was graded according to the total number of LY per case as follows: 0, LY0; 1 to 2, LY1; 3 to 9, LY2; and 10 or more, LY3. RESULTS: All m1 and m2 cases were LY- and N- Lymphatic tumor emboli were present in 54% of m3 cases, 70% of sm1 cases, 54% of sm2 cases, and 75% of sm3 cases. Determination of N was positive in 18% of m3 cases, 47% of sm1 cases, 36% of sm2 cases, and 62% of sm3 cases. The frequency of LY significantly correlated with the number of N (p < 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis showed that only LY and V significantly correlated with N. When the detection rate of N was compared between LY and ly, LY was superior to ly in terms of specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and false positive rate. As for LY grade, N was positive in 39.1% of LY1 cases, 81.8% of LY2 cases, and 100% of LY3 cases. Even in LY-, N was positive in one sm1 case and in two sm2 cases. In the sm1 case, the depth of invasion was 350 µm from the lower margin of the muscularis mucosae. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of lymphatic invasion on the basis of LY is more accurate for the prediction of N than conventional techniques, and LY grade strongly correlates with N. In patients with SSCCE, mucosal cancers (m1, m2, and m3) and submucosal cancers with a depth of invasion of ≤ 200 µm from the lower margin of the muscularis mucosae on endoscopic mucosal resection have a low risk of N if the number of LY is 0. Endoscopic mucosal resection alone can provide good treatment outcomes in such patients.