A pediatric randomized, controlled trial of German cockroach subcutaneous immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cockroach allergy contributes to morbidity among urban children with asthma. Few trials address the effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with cockroach allergen among these at-risk children. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether nasal allergen challenge (NAC) responses to cockroach allergen would improve following 1 year of SCIT. METHODS: Urban children with asthma, who were cockroach-sensitized and reactive on NAC, participated in a year-long randomized double-blind placebo-controlled SCIT trial using German cockroach extract. The primary endpoint was the change in mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) during NAC after 12 months of SCIT. Changes in nasal transcriptomic responses during NAC, skin prick test wheal size, serum allergen-specific antibody production, and T-cell responses to cockroach allergen were assessed. RESULTS: Changes in mean NAC TNSS did not differ between SCIT-assigned (n = 28) versus placebo-assigned (n = 29) participants (P = .63). Nasal transcriptomic responses correlated with TNSS, but a treatment effect was not observed. Cockroach serum-specific IgE decreased to a similar extent in both groups, while decreased cockroach skin prick test wheal size was greater among SCIT participants (P = .04). A 200-fold increase in cockroach serum-specific IgG4 was observed among subjects receiving SCIT (P < .001) but was unchanged in the placebo group. T-cell IL-4 responses following cockroach allergen stimulation decreased to a greater extent among SCIT versus placebo (P = .002), while no effect was observed for IL-10 or IFN-γ. CONCLUSIONS: A year of SCIT failed to alter NAC TNSS and nasal transcriptome responses to cockroach allergen challenge despite systemic effects on allergen-specific skin tests, induction of serum-specific IgG4 serum production and down-modulation of allergen-stimulated T-cell responses.

Performance of the Pediatric Asthma Risk Score across Diverse Populations.

BACKGROUND: Methods to determine whether a toddler is likely to develop asthma are of value to parents and clinical trialists testing primary prevention strategies. The Pediatric Asthma Risk Score (PARS) is a 14-point score of six factors designed to predict asthma in early life. PARS was developed and validated in relatively homogenous populations, so its generalizability is unknown. METHODS: We computed PARS using the six factors of self-declared race (parent-reported as "Black" or "not Black"), parental asthma, eczema, any wheezing, wheezing without a cold, and polysensitization in 5634 children from birth to 3 years of age. The primary outcome of our analysis was the ability of PARS to predict asthma development at 5 to 10 years of age using the area under the receiver operating curve in each cohort and across all cohorts with varying ethnicity, sex, cohort type, birth decades, missing PARS factors, and polysensitization definition. We also performed a meta-analysis across all the cohorts. Finally, we compared PARS predictive ability with the binary Asthma Predictive Index (API). RESULTS: Across 10 cohorts, the area under the receiver operating curve for PARS was 0.76. PARS performance did not differ by ethnicity, sex, cohort type, enrollment decade, missing PARS factors, or polysensitization definition (all P>0.05). The weights of each factor in the meta-analysis were similar to the original PARS weights. PARS and API equally identified children at high risk for developing asthma or not; API missed 31% of children at moderate asthma risk. CONCLUSIONS: PARS provided robust estimates of asthma risk in children from a wide range of ethnicities, backgrounds, and susceptibility. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others.)