Fulfillment and Validity of the Kidney Health Evaluation Measure for People with Diabetes.

Objective: To evaluate the fulfillment and validity of the kidney health evaluation for people with diabetes (KED) Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS) measure. Patients and Methods: Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was used to identify the nationally distributed US population aged 18 years and older, with diabetes, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. The OLDW includes deidentified medical, pharmacy, laboratory, and electronic health record (EHR) data. The KED fulfillment was defined in 2017 as both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing within the measurement year. The KED validity was assessed using bivariate analyses of KED fulfillment with diabetes care measures in 2017 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018. Results: Among eligible 5,635,619 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 736,875 Medicare advantage (MA) beneficiaries, and 660,987 commercial patients, KED fulfillment was 32.2%, 38.7%, and 37.7%, respectively. Albuminuria testing limited KED fulfillment with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing (<40%) and eGFR testing (>90%). The KED fulfillment was positively associated with receipt of diabetes care in 2017, CKD diagnosis in 2018, and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018. The KED fulfillment trended lower for Black race, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status, low neighborhood income, and low education status. Conclusion: Less than 40% of adults with diabetes received guideline-recommended testing for CKD in 2017. Routine KED was associated with diabetes care and evidence-based CKD interventions. Increasing guideline-recommended testing for CKD among people with diabetes should lead to timely and equitable CKD detection and treatment.

A Factorial Analysis of Drug and Bleeding Effects in Toxicokinetic Studies.

The ICH revised the S3A guidance allowing blood to be microsampled for toxicokinetic analysis from the main study cohorts of rats in general toxicology studies. The resulting changes in the hemogram have been examined in healthy animals but the ability to read through the data when there are toxicological changes has not been thoroughly examined in the literature. To address this, a toxicology study in Sprague Dawley rats was conducted where animals received repeated doses of saline or valproic acid by IP injection daily for 7 days. Animals in both treatment groups were unbled, serially bled (6 bleeds/animal at 0.1 ml/bleed) or compositely bled (2 bleeds/animal at 0.6 ml/bleed) on days 1 and 7 for TK analysis. No statistically significant changes in the clinical pathology were observed for either the serial bleed or composite bleed animals when compared with their respective unbled control; however, a 4%-7% decrease in erythrocyte counts following serial bleeding and a 5%-19% decrease following composite bleeding was observed. When all the clinical pathology and organ weight data were equivalence tested, both the serial bleed and composite bleed results were equivalent to their unbled controls except for the erythroid parameters in the composite bleed group. Toxicokinetic analysis of the blood samples resulted in comparable concentration-time curves, regardless of the method of blood collection. Under these study conditions, the results show blood microsamples can be collected from the core or recovery cohort of animals in a toxicology study without impacting the toxicological interpretation in rats.