Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 73(5): e51-e65, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31029297

RESUMO

The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) organized a multidisciplinary effort to create a clinical practice guideline specific to unscheduled, time-sensitive procedural sedation, which differs in important ways from scheduled, elective procedural sedation. The purpose of this guideline is to serve as a resource for practitioners who perform unscheduled procedural sedation regardless of location or patient age. This document outlines the underlying background and rationale, and issues relating to staffing, practice, and quality improvement.


Assuntos
Sedação Consciente/normas , Consenso , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sociedades Médicas
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(6): 864-865, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28935280
4.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(6): 862-863, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28935283

Assuntos
Médicos , Humanos
5.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 29(1): 53, 2021 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33781299

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Traditional, instructor led, in-person training of CPR skills has become more challenging due to COVID-19 pandemic. We compared the learning outcomes of standard in-person CPR training (ST) with alternative methods of training such as hybrid or online-only training (AT) on CPR performance, quality, and knowledge among laypersons with no previous CPR training. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for relevant articles from January 1995 to May 2020. Covidence was used to review articles by two independent researchers. Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool was used to assess quality of the manuscripts. RESULTS: Of the 978 articles screened, twenty met the final inclusion criteria. All included studies had an experimental design and moderate to strong global quality rating. The trainees in ST group performed better on calling 911, time to initiate chest compressions, hand placement and chest compression depth. Trainees in AT group performed better in assessing scene safety, calling for help, response time including initiating first rescue breathing, adequate ventilation volume, compression rates, shorter hands-off time, confidence, willingness to perform CPR, ability to follow CPR algorithm, and equivalent or better knowledge retention than standard teaching methodology. CONCLUSION: AT methods of CPR training provide an effective alternative to the standard in-person CPR for large scale public training.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/educação , Educação Médica/normas , Guias como Assunto , Aprendizagem , Pandemias , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa